Jump to content

Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989
C169
ILO Convention
Date of adoptionJune 27, 1989
Date in forceSeptember 5, 1991
ClassificationIndigenous and Tribal Peoples
SubjectIndigenous and Tribal Peoples
PreviousEmployment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 1988
NextChemicals Convention, 1990

TheIndigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989is anInternational Labour OrganizationConvention,also known asILO Convention 169,orC169.It is the majorbindinginternational conventionconcerningindigenous peoplesandtribal peoples,and a forerunner of theDeclaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

It was established in1989,with the preamble stating:[1]

Noting the international standards contained in theIndigenous and Tribal Populations Conventionand Recommendation, 1957, and

Recalling the terms of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights,theInternational Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,theInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,and the manyinternational instrumentson the prevention ofdiscrimination,and

Considering that the developments which have taken place in international law since 1957, as well as developments in the situation ofindigenousandtribal peoplesin all regions of the world, have made it appropriate to adopt new international standards on the subject with a view to removing theassimilationistorientation of the earlier standards, and

Recognising the aspirations of these peoples to exercise control over their own institutions, ways of life and economic development and to maintain and develop their identities, languages and religions, within the framework of the States in which they live, and

Noting that in many parts of the world these peoples are unable to enjoy their fundamentalhuman rightsto the same degree as the rest of the population of the States within which they live, and that their laws, values, customs and perspectives have often been eroded, and...

Provisions[edit]

The convention is made of a Preamble, followed by forty-four articles, divided in ten parts. These are:[2]

  • Part I. General Policy
  • Part II. Land
  • Part III. Recruitment And Conditions Of Employment
  • Part IV. Vocational Training, Handicrafts And Rural Industries
  • Part V. Social Security And Health
  • Part VI. Education And Means Of Communication
  • Part VII. Contacts And Co-operation Across Borders
  • Part VIII. Administration
  • Part IX. General Provisions
  • Part X. Final Provisions

Modification[edit]

This Convention revised Convention C107, theIndigenous and Tribal Populations Convention, 1957.Some of the nations ratifying the 1989 Convention "denounced"the 1957 Convention.[3]

Purpose and history[edit]

The ILO 169 convention is the most important operative international law guaranteeing the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples. Its strength, however, is dependent on a high number ofratificationsamong nations.[4][5][6]

The revision to the Convention 107 forbade governments from pursuing approaches deemed integrationist andassimilationist.[7]It asserts the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples to choose to integrate or to maintain their cultural and political independence. Articles 8–10 recognize the cultures, traditions, and special circumstances of indigenous tribal peoples.

In November 2009, a court decision inChile,considered to be a landmark inindigenous rightsconcerns, made use of the ILO convention law. The court ruled unanimously in favor of granting a water flow of 9 liters per second toChusmizaandUsmagamacommunities. The legal dispute had dragged for 14 years, and centers on communitywater rightsin one of the driest deserts on the planet. The Supreme Court decision onAymarawater rights upholds rulings by both thePozo Almontetribunal and theIquiqueCourt of Appeals, and marks the first judicial application of ILO Convention 169 in Chile.[8]Prior to this decision, some protests had escalated over the failure to respect the Convention 169 inChile.Mapucheleaders filed an injunction againstMichelle Bacheletand minister of the presidencyJosé Antonio Viera Gallo,who is also coordinator of indigenous affairs, with the argument that the government had failed to fully comply with the Convention 169 clause on the right to "prior consultation", which must be carried out "in good faith and in a form appropriate to the circumstances, with the objective of achieving agreement or consent to the proposed measures," such aslogging,agribusinessorminingprojects inindigenousterritories. There were already several examples of the successful use of the ILO Convention in Chile, like the case of aMachiwoman who brought legal action to protect a plot of land with herbs used for medicinal purposes, which was threatened by theforest industry.Some concerns were however raised at the time over the political framework of the government being brought in line with the convention, and not the other way around.[9]

Ratifications[edit]

Countries that ratified the convention
Ratifications of Convention 169:[10]
Country Date Notes
ArgentinaArgentina 3 July 2000 ratified
BoliviaBolivia 11 December 1991 ratified
BrazilBrazil 25 July 2002 ratified
Central African RepublicCentral African Republic 30 August 2010 ratified
ChileChile 15 September 2008 ratified
ColombiaColombia 7 August 1991 ratified
Costa RicaCosta Rica 2 April 1993 ratified
DenmarkDenmark 22 February 1996 ratified
DominicaDominica 25 June 2002 ratified
EcuadorEcuador 15 May 1998 ratified
FijiFiji 3 March 1998 ratified
GermanyGermany 15 April 2021 ratified
GuatemalaGuatemala 5 June 1996 ratified
HondurasHonduras 28 March 1995 ratified
LuxembourgLuxembourg 5 June 2018 ratified
MexicoMexico 5 September 1990 ratified
NepalNepal 14 September 2007 ratified
NetherlandsNetherlands 2 February 1998 ratified
NicaraguaNicaragua 25 August 2010 ratified
NorwayNorway 19 June 1990 ratified
ParaguayParaguay 10 August 1993 ratified
PeruPeru 2 February 1994 ratified
SpainSpain 15 February 2007 ratified
VenezuelaVenezuela 22 May 2002 ratified

References[edit]

  1. ^ILOConvention C169
  2. ^"C169 - Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)".www.ilo.org.Retrieved11 October2022.
  3. ^"C169 - Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)".www.ilo.org.Part X. Final Provisions.Retrieved11 October2022.
  4. ^Nettheim, Garth (2002).Indigenous Peoples and Governance Structures: A Comparative Analysis of Land and Resource Management Rights.Aboriginal Studies Press.ISBN0-85575-379-X.
  5. ^N. Zillman, Donald (2002).Human Rights in Natural Resource Development: Public Participation in the Sustainable Development of Mining and Energy Resources.Oxford University Press.ISBN0-19-925378-1.
  6. ^Survival International website – ILO 169ArchivedOctober 18, 2016, at theWayback Machine
  7. ^Bunn-Livingstone, Sandra (2002).Juricultural Pluralism Vis-a-Vis Treaty Law:State Practice and Attitudes.Springer.ISBN90-411-1801-2.
  8. ^"Chile's Supreme Court Upholds Indigenous Water Use Rights".The Santiago Times. 2009-11-30.Retrieved2010-03-02.
  9. ^"Chile: Indigenous Protests on Several Fronts".IPS. 2009-10-07. Archived fromthe originalon 2009-10-27.Retrieved2010-03-02.
  10. ^ILO (April 1, 2020)."Convention No. C169".ilo.org.RetrievedApril 1,2020.

External links[edit]