Jump to content

Inner Asia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Map of Inner Asia, showing the extent of the area studied by the Sinor Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, located atIndiana Universityin the USA
Map of Inner Asia, showing the extent of the area studied by the CIAS at theUniversity of Toronto.

Inner Asiarefers to the northern andlandlockedregions spanningNorth,CentralandEast Asia.It includes parts ofwesternandnortheast China,as well as southernSiberia.The area overlaps with some definitions of "Central Asia", mostly the historical ones, but certain regions that are often included in Inner Asia, such asManchuria,are not a part of Central Asia by any of its definitions. Inner Asia may be regarded as the western and northern "frontier" ofChina properand as being bounded by East Asia proper, which consists of China proper, Japan and Korea.[1]

The extent of Inner Asia has been understood differently in different periods. "Inner Asia" is sometimes contrasted to "China proper", that is, the territories originally unified under theQin dynastywith majorityHanpopulations. In 1800, Chinese Inner Asia consisted of four main areas, namelyManchuria(modernNortheast ChinaandOuter Manchuria), theMongolian Plateau(Inner MongoliaandOuter Mongolia),Xinjiang(Chinese TurkestanorEast Turkestan), andTibet.Many of these areas had been only recently conquered by theQing dynastyof China and, during most of the Qing period, they were governed through administrative structures different from those of the older Chinese provinces.[2]A Qing government agency, theLifan Yuan,supervisedthe empire's Inner Asian regions,also known asChinese Tartary.

Definition and usage

[edit]
Alternative conception of Inner Asia showing the Mongolian (or Mongolian-related) areas of Inner Asia that are represented in the Mongolian Digital Ethnography Archive

"Inner Asia" today has a range of definitions and usages.[3]Denis Sinor,for example, used "Inner Asia" in contrast toagriculturalcivilizations, noting its changing borders, such as when a Roman province was taken by the Huns, areas ofNorth Chinawere occupied by theMongols,orAnatoliacame underTurkish influence,eradicatingHellenisticculture.[4]

Scholars or historians of theQing dynasty,such as those who compiled theNew Qing History,often use the term "Inner Asia" when studying Qing interests or reigns outsideChina proper,[5]although previousChinese dynastieslike theHan dynasty,Tang dynastyandMing dynastyalso expanded their realms and influences into Inner Asia.

According toMorris Rossabi,Inner Asia is composed not only of the fiveCentral Asiancountries, which includesTurkmenistan,Uzbekistan,Tajikistan,Kyrgyzstan,andKazakhstan,but also includesAfghanistan,Xinjiang,Mongolia,Manchuria,and parts ofIran.[6]

In other languages

[edit]

InFrench,"Asie centrale"can mean either" Central Asia "or" Inner Asia ", while Mongolia and Tibet are grouped as"Haute-Asie"(Upper Asia).[7]

The terms meaning "Inner Asia" in the languages of Inner Asia itself are all modern translations of terms in European languages, mostly Russian.[citation needed]

[edit]

Central Asia

[edit]

"Central Asia"normally denotes the western part of Inner Asia; that is,Kazakhstan,Kyrgyzstan,Tajikistan,Turkmenistan,andUzbekistan,withAfghanistansometimes also included as part of Central Asia. However,The Library of Congresssubject classification system treats "Central Asia" and Inner Asia as synonymous.[7]

Central Eurasia

[edit]

According toMorris Rossabi,the term "Inner Asia" is the well-established term for the area in the literature. However, because of its deficiencies, including the implication of an "Outer Asia" that does not exist,Denis Sinorhas proposed the neologism "Central Eurasia", which emphasizes the role of the area in intercontinental exchange.[8]According to Sinor:[9]

The definition that can be given of Central Eurasia in space is negative. It is that part of the continent of Eurasia that lies beyond the borders of the great sedentary civilizations.... Although the area of Central Eurasia is subject to fluctuations, the general trend is that of diminution. With the territorial growth of the sedentary civilizations, their borderline extends and offers a larger surface on which new layers of barbarians will be deposited.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Bulag, Uradyn E. (October 2005)."Where is East Asia?: Central Asian and Inner Asian Perspectives on Regionalism".Japan Focus. Archived fromthe originalon 2015-04-02.Retrieved2012-12-09.
  2. ^The Cambridge History of China: Volume 10, Part 1, by John K. Fairbank, p37
  3. ^Book Abstract: "Inner Asia: Making a Long-Term U.S. Commitment."Archived2011-06-04 at theWayback MachineAuthors: Carol D. Clair; Army War Coll Carlisle Barracks Pa. Retrieved: 22 August 2009.
  4. ^The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Volume 1 By Denis Sinor.Retrieved: 22 August 2009.
  5. ^New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde,ed. Ruth W. Dunnell,Mark C. Elliott,Philippe Foret and James A. Millward
  6. ^Rossabi, Morris. "Central Asia: A Historical Overview".Asia Society.
  7. ^abResearch Institute for Inner Asian Studies (RIFIAS). Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana.Retrieved: 22 August 2009.
  8. ^Rossabi, Morris (1975).China and Inner Asia: from 1368 to the present day.Pica Press. p. 10.
  9. ^Sinor, Denis(1997).Inner Asia: History, civilization, languages: a syllabus.p. 4.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]