Jump to content

Boeing KC-46 Pegasus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromKC-46A Pegasus)

KC-46 Pegasus
AU.S. Air ForceKC-46A with refueling boom lowered
Role Tanker/transport
National origin United States
Manufacturer Boeing Defense, Space & Security
First flight 25 September 2015
Introduction 2019
Status In service[1][2]
Primary users United States Air Force
Japan Air Self-Defense Force
Produced 2013–present
Number built 93 as of October 2024[3]
Developed from Boeing KC-767

TheBoeing KC-46 Pegasusis an American militaryaerial refuelingand strategicmilitary transport aircraftdeveloped byBoeingfrom its767jet airliner.In February 2011, the tanker was selected by theUnited States Air Force(USAF) as the winner in theKC-X tanker competitionto replace olderBoeing KC-135 Stratotankers.The first aircraft was delivered to the USAF in January 2019.[4]The USAF intends to procure 179 tankers by 2027.

Development

[edit]

Background

[edit]
Main article:Boeing KC-767

In 2001, the U.S. Air Force began a procurement program to replace around 100 of its oldest KC-135E Stratotankers, and selectedBoeing'sKC-767.The Boeing tanker received theKC-767Adesignation from theUnited States Department of Defensein 2002 and appeared in the 2004 edition of DoD model designation report.[5]The USAF decided to lease 100 KC-767 tankers from Boeing.[6]

U.S. SenatorJohn McCainand others criticized the draft leasing agreement as being wasteful and problematic. In response to protests, the USAF struck a compromise in November 2003, whereby it would purchase 80 KC-767s and lease 20 more.[7][8]In December 2003, the Pentagon announced a freeze on the program over an investigation into alleged corruption that led to the jailing ofone of its former procurement executiveswho applied to work for Boeing.[9]The KC-767A contract was canceled by the DoD in January 2006.[10]

USAF KC-X program

[edit]
Main article:KC-X

In 2006, the USAF released arequest for proposal(RFP) for a new tanker program, KC-X, to be selected by 2007. Boeing announced it may enter a higher capability tanker based on theBoeing 777,named theKC-777Strategic Tanker.Airbuspartnered withNorthrop Grummanto offer theAirbus A330 MRTT,the tanker version of theA330,which was marketed to the USAF under the designationKC-30.[11]In January 2007, the USAF issued the KC-X Aerial Refueling Aircraft RFP, calling for 179 tankers, four system development and demonstration and 175 production, in a contract worth an estimated US$40 billion (~$56.6 billion in 2023).[12]Northrop and EADS expressed dissatisfaction at how the RFP was structured and threatened to withdraw, leaving only Boeing in the running.[13]

Gray jet aircraft facing left on apron against a cloudless, pale blue sky. In the foreground are green grass; the foreground is a wet tarmac.
An Italian Air Force KC-767 on the apron at McConnell AFB/Boeing Factory inWichita, Kansas,in 2010

In February 2007, Boeing announced it was offering the KC-767 Advanced Tanker for the KC-X,[14]stating that the KC-767 was a better fit than the KC-777 for the requirements.[15]In April 2007, Boeing submitted its KC-767 tanker proposal to USAF.[16]The KC-767 offered for this KC-X round was based on the in-development 767-200LRF (Long Range Freighter), rather than the -200ER on which Italian and Japanese KC-767 aircraft are based,[17]differing by combining the -200ER fuselage, -300F wing, gear, cargo door and floor, -400ER digital flightdeck and flaps, uprated engines, and "sixth-generation"fly-by-wirefuel delivery boom.[18]

Boeing submitted its final proposal in January 2008.[19]In February 2008, the DoD chose the KC-30 over the KC-767, the USAF subsequently designated itKC-45A.[20]Boeing submitted a protest to the United StatesGovernment Accountability Office(GAO) in March 2008 and waged a public relations campaign in support of their protest.[21]In June, after USAF admissions on bidding process flaws, the GAO upheld Boeing's protest and recommended the contract be rebid.[21]In July 2008,Defense SecretaryRobert Gatesannounced that the USAF would reopen bidding,[22]and put the contract into an "expedited recompetition" with Defense UndersecretaryJohn Youngin charge of the selection process, not the USAF.[23]A draft of the revised RFP was provided to contractors in August 2008 for comments.[24]However, in September 2008, the DoD canceled the KC-X solicitation.[25]

In September 2009, the USAF began a new round of bids with a clearer set of criteria, including reducing the number of requirements from 800 to 373 in an attempt to simplify the process and allow a more objective decision to be made.[26]In March 2010, Boeing announced it would bid the KC-767 for the new KC-X round.[27]EADS stated in April 2010 it would submit a bid without Northrop Grumman as a U.S. partner.[28][29]Boeing submitted its KC-767 "NewGen Tanker" bid, based on the 767-200 with an improved version of theKC-10'srefueling boom,and cockpit displays from the 787, in July 2010.[30][31][32]Boeing submitted a revised bid in February 2011.[33]

In addition to the KC-X, observers speculate that a modified KC-46 will be used as the basis of theKC-Ytanker program, the second step of the USAF's three-step tanker renewal plan, as replacing it with something entirely new is likely too big a risk.[34]In September 2016,Air Mobility Commandstated that the follow-onKC-Yacquisition program to replace the remaining KC-135s had been abandoned in favor of further KC-46s with upgrades.[35]

Selection and early development

[edit]

In February 2011, the USAF announced the selection of Boeing's KC-767 bid, which was designatedKC-46A.[36][37]Boeing was awarded a development contract, which called for the delivery of 18 initial operational KC-46s by 2017. The USAF sought a total of 179 new tankers.[38]In June 2011, development costs were reportedly projected to overrun by about $300 million (~$401 million in 2023). Boeing would be responsible for this amount, which exceeds the contract cost cap of $4.9 billion.[39][40]In July 2011, revised projections indicated a reduced cost overrun.[41]In 2013, the USAF added additional crews and flight hours to their future plans in response to a review that showed that the best of current plans did not take full advantage of the KC-46's cargo and aeromedical evacuation advantages over the KC-135.[42]

In August 2013, Boeing and the USAF completed acritical design review(CDR) for the KC-46. With the CDR complete, the design was set and production and testing could proceed. Wing assembly for the first aircraft began in June 2013. Flight testing of the 767-2C airframe, which would be reconfigured into the KC-46, was scheduled to begin in mid-2014. The first fully equipped KC-46 was projected to fly in early 2015. The contract called for Boeing to build four test aircraft and deliver 18 combat-ready tankers by August 2017. The USAF intended to buy 179 KC-46s, with all delivered by 2028.[43][44]

In December 2013, Boeing joined the wings and fuselage for the first 767-2C to be adapted into a KC-46A.[45]The first of four 767-2C provision freighters were to complete assembly by the end of January 2014. Once assembled, it would go through ground vibration and instrumentation testing and have body fuel tanks added. The first test flight would occur during summer 2014 and include measuring its rate of climb and descent. The Engineering Manufacturing and Design (EMD) model was to be integrated with the needed systems and technologies to become a military-standard KC-46A by January 2015. Seven low-rate production KC-46s were to be delivered in 2015, 12 in 2016, and 15 delivered annually from 2017 to 2027.[46]The last of four test aircraft began assembly in January 2014.[47]

In April 2014, the GAO found that the KC-46 program was projected to underrun its projected cost estimate of $51.7 billion by $300 million. The program acquisition unit cost per jet will be $287 million, $1.8 million less than estimated. The GAO noted that delays in training air crew and maintainers could cause testing to slip 6–12 months, but stated that the program had not missed any major milestones and that the development of about 15.8 million lines of software code was progressing as planned.[48]In May 2014, the USAF estimated the development program's cost, including the first four aircraft, could rise from $4.4–4.9 billion to $5.85 billion.[49]

In July 2014, Boeing recorded a $272 million pre-tax charge to cover the tanker's wiring redesign.[50][51]The wiring issue arose when it was found that 5-10% of the wiring bundles did not have sufficient separation distance or were not properly shielded to meet a USAF requirement for double or triple-redundant wiring for some mission systems. In September 2014, it was confirmed that the wiring redesign would delay the first 767-2C flight from June 2014 to November 2014.[52][53]In March 2015, the program cost to develop and procure 179 tankers was projected to total US$43.16 billion (~$54.2 billion in 2023).[54]

Flight tests and delays

[edit]
A KC-46A refuels anA-10 Thunderbolt II.

The 767-2C's first flight took place on 28 December 2014. It flew fromPaine Fieldand landed atBoeing Field.[55][56]In March 2015, a refueling test with aC-17transport was stopped because of a higher-than-expected boom axial load while delivering fuel. The problem was caused by the turbulent "bow wave effect" generated by two large aircraft flying in line.[57][58][59]In January 2016, the KC-46 successfully refueled anF-16for the first time during a five hour 36 minute sortie. Test refueling of several other military aircraft followed, including a C-17,F/A-18,A-10,andAV-8B.[60]In February 2016, a KC-46 refueled an F/A-18, using its probe-and-drogue system for the first time.[61]

In July 2015, Boeing announced a further $835 million (~$1.05 billion in 2023) pretax charge for the faulty integrated fuel system's redesign and retrofit.[62]Wiring and fuel system flaws could delay contracts worth $3 billion for up to eight months. Following schedule revisions agreed by the USAF and Boeing, the first flight of a fully equipped KC-46 was delayed to as late as September 2015.[63]The Bank of America/Merrill Lynch noted in July 2015 "We fail to understand how Boeing could take a $1.26 billion (~$1.58 billion in 2023) pre-tax charge (since it won the contract over Airbus) on the Boeing KC-46A program since the program is based on the 767 airframe that has been in production for over 30 years."[64]

In March 2016, theDefense Contract Management Agencyreportedly had low confidence in the August 2017 deadline, predicting the first 18 tankers' delivery to run about seven months late based on past performance and current risks, such as production delays, a new joint USAF-Boeing schedule review, and flight test uncertainties. The Pentagon's test office was to start combat testing in April 2017.[65]

An April 2016 GAO report projected an additional four months beyond the August 2017 target to deliver 18 KC-46s, and that operational testing will not begin until May 2017 and will not be completed until two months after delivery of the first 18 aircraft, risking late discoveries of problems. The GAO noted that Boeing had not obtainedFederal Aviation Administration's approval for two key aerial refueling systems—the centerline drogue system and the wing aerial refueling pods, which were built without following FAA processes—Boeing projected readiness for FAA certification by July 2017, over three years late.[66]The 18 KC-46s were to include the four EMD aircraft raised to operational standards, plus the first 14 low-rate production tankers. Instead, 16 of the 18 were off the production line. Boeing was liable for all late design fixes on tankers delivered before testing ended.[67]

In April 2016, the fourth test aircraft, 767-2C EMD-3, first flew. EMD-3 focused on environmental control systems, including temperature and smoke penetration testing.[68]Two days later, Boeing took another pre-tax charge of $243 million for cost overruns, bringing the total amount paid for tanker cost overruns to $1.5 billion. Boeing president and chief executiveDennis Muilenburgstated that 80% of the test points required for a positive Milestone C decision had been completed.[69]Flight testing helped determine whether a refueling fault could be resolved by either software or hardware changes, which Boeing worked on in parallel.[70]

In May 2016, a further delay of at least six months due to technical and supply chain issues was reported, potentially requiring program re-structuring and cuts. At the time, only 20% of the flight tests were completed.[71]In June 2016, USAF spokesman Maj. Rob Leese confirmed that, while the contract with Boeing lacked predefined delay penalties, not delivering the 18 certified KC-46s by August 2017 is a contract schedule breach, and that the USAF would receive considerations from Boeing in the schedule re-baseline after the RRA delay.[72][73]In July 2016, US Defense Acquisitions Chief Frank Kendall confirmed that the tanker program office was studying the delay's cost to the USAF, and that it was entitled to consideration for losses from operating the KC-135 for longer than planned.[74]

On 8 June 2016, Boeing's defense unit CEO,Leanne Caret,reported that a modified boom would be flown shortly.[75]On 10 July 2016, Caret reported positive results from early flight tests with the revised boom.[74]On 21 July 2016, Boeing took a further $393 million charge on the program, bringing the total value of penalties to almost $1.9 billion. The charge reflected higher costs associated with the schedule and technical challenges, such as the boom axial load issue, delays in thecertification processand concurrency between testing and initial production.[76]The initial 18 KC-46s were equipped with the boom and centerline drogue, but not the wing-mounted wing-aerial refueling pods (WARP) needed for full contractual Required Assets Available, they were delivered separately later.[77]

On 5 July 2016, USAF spokesman Daryl Mayer stated that, despite the testing delays, Milestone C approval was expected in the following month, and that Boeing would add a fifth EMD aircraft to accelerate testing. EMD-1 and EMD-3 primarily conducted flight tests towards FAA airworthiness certificates, while EMD-2 and EMD-4 focused on USAF aerial refueling and mission system testing.[78]An F-16 was successfully refueled on 8 July, and a C-17 on 12 July 2016. Once the hardware fix is verified, a KC-46 with the updated boom underwent regression testing on the F-16, followed by refueling demonstrations with the C-17 and A-10 for the final test for Milestone C approval.[79][80]On 15 July 2016, the KC-46 successfully refueled an A-10, offloading 1,500 pounds of fuel at 15,000 feet. At the time, more than 900 flight test hours have been completed by the five EMD aircraft.[81]On 12 August 2016, the program received Milestone C approval, indicating production readiness. The issuing of contracts for two lots covering 19 aircraft was expected within 30 days.[82]

A KC-46A connects with an F-35A Lightning II over California, Jan. 2019.

In January 2018, Air Mobility Command stated that tests for final FAA certification were roughly 94 percent complete.[83]Boeing announced its FAA certification in September 2018, with military certification outstanding. Aircraft refueled during testing include the F-16, F/A-18, AV-8B, C-17, A-10,KC-10,KC-135and the KC-46 itself.[84]In January 2019, a KC-46 from the418th Flight Test SquadronatEdwards AFBmade connection with anF-35A,the occasion being the first time that the KC-46 connected with afifth-generation jet fighter.[85]Completion of refueling certification of the F-35 by the KC-46 was announced by the412th Test Wingin June 2019.[86]

In March 2020, the USAF announced that chronic leaks in the fuel system had been upgraded to a Category I deficiency. The USAF identified the issue in June 2019, but had not originally believed it to be serious. Crews became aware of the issue when they discovered fuel between the primary and secondary fuel protection barriers. There was no known root cause at the time of the announcement.[87]By January 2021, Boeing's losses on the program were estimated at $5 billion (~$5.55 billion in 2023).[88]At the time, it was expected that the KC-46 would not be combat ready until at least late 2023.[89]

Design

[edit]
Cockpit of a KC-46A Pegasus
Seats fitted in the interior of a KC-46A

The KC-46 Pegasus is a variant of theBoeing 767and is a widebody, low-wingcantilever monoplanewith a conventionalempennagefeaturing a single fin and rudder. It has a retractabletricycle landing gearand a hydraulic flight control system. The Pegasus is powered by twoPratt & Whitney PW4062engines, one mounted under each wing. It has been described as combining "the 767-200ER's fuselage, with the 767-300F's wing, gear, cargo door and floor, with the 767-400ER digital flightdeck and flaps".[90](The displays actually look like those of the 787). The KC-46 uses a similarManeuvering Characteristics Augmentation System(MCAS) to that implicated intwo 737 MAX crashes;in March 2019, the USAF began reviewing KC-46 training due to this feature. Unlike the 737, the KC-46's MCAS takes input from dual redundant angle of attack sensors and disengages with stick input by the pilot.[91]

The flightdeck has room for a crew of four with a forward crew compartment with seats for 15 crew members and in the rear fuselage either palletized passenger seating for 58, or 18 pallets in cargo configuration. The rear compartment can also be used in an aero-medical configuration for 54 patients (24 on litters).[92]Quick ingress from the ground is available via a ladder that can be pulled down near the front landing gear.[93]The KC-46A can carry 212,299 lb (96,297 kg) of fuel,[94]10 percent more than the KC-135, and 65,000 lb (29,000 kg) of cargo. Survivability is improved withinfrared countermeasuresand the aircraft has limitedelectronic warfarecapabilities.[46]It usesmanual flight controls,allowing unrestricted maneuverability to avoid threats anywhere in theflight envelope.[95]

Aerial Refueling Operator Station

At the rear of the KC-46 is a fly-by-wire refueling boom supplemented by wing air refueling pods at each wingtip and a centerline drogue system under the rear fuselage so it can handle both types of refueling in one mission.[92]The boom includes a hydraulic relief valve system, similar to those on the KC-10 and KC-767 tankers, to relieve axial pressure in the event of excessive loads building up on the boom.[75]In order to address the stiff boom issue, which keeps a KC-46 from refueling lightweight, thrust-limited receivers like the A-10, Boeing is replacing the current actuator with one using a pressure-flow PQ valve in the 2023 time frame.[96]

Rather than using a single boom operator seated or prone at the tail looking out a window, the Aerial Refueling Operator Station (AROS) seats two operators at the front of the tanker. AROS includes three main displays for each operator to display images from multiple multi-spectral cameras distributed around the aircraft. The central 2D/3D display provides a rear-facing view for boom refueling operations. Boom operators can execute their mission in total darkness with both aircraft blacked out.[97]The hybrid 2D-3D system requires stereoscopic glasses to be fully effective.[97]

The Remote Vision System (RVS) that feeds video to the AROS has been problematic, motion viewed in the RVS versus which can create a depth compression and curvature effect.[97]Blackouts and washouts on the displays during refueling, caused by shadows or direct sunlight are a problem that will be fixed by the RVS 2.0 upgrade along with depth perception issues via the use of new cameras and a full-color high-definition screen. Experienced boom operators of older tankers still prefer the KC-46, even with its current drawbacks.[98]

Operational history

[edit]

United States

[edit]
The first delivered KC-46A (15-46009) lands atMcConnell AFBin January 2019.

In April 2014, the USAF announced that the KC-46 will be based atMcConnell Air Force BaseinWichita, Kansas,with an optimistic expectation of receiving the first of 36 tankers in 2016.[99][100]McConnell AFB was chosen because it had low construction costs and it is in a location with a high demand for air refueling, having KC-135s based there. In addition to McConnell AFB serving as the home base, up to 10 operating bases will be used by the KC-46. Crews will be trained atAltus Air Force Base,Oklahoma, which was also chosen for its limited construction needs and for its existing experience with training programs for theC-17 Globemasterand the KC-135.[101]

In October 2015, the USAF announced thatSeymour Johnson Air Force Base,North Carolina, was chosen as the preferred alternative for the first Reserve-led KC-46A main operating base, with an anticipated arrival of the KC-46As at Seymour Johnson in fiscal year 2019.Tinker Air Force Base,Oklahoma;Westover Air Reserve Base,Massachusetts; andGrissom Air Reserve Base,Indiana, were named as the reasonable alternatives. The October 2015 announcement also stated that the USAF intended to initiate an Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP), which the USAF would use to make its final basing decisions.[102]

On 10 January 2019, the USAF took delivery of the first KC-46, well past the original 2016 delivery date, albeit with two issues outstanding and funds withheld.[103]The two outstanding issues were inadequate boom pressure when refueling the A-10 and glare induced distortion under certain conditions in the remote vision system (RVS). The USAF acknowledged that they failed to give Boeing adequate specifications for the A-10.[104]At milestone C, Boeing gave the USAF a boom design that used the international standard of 1400 lbs of thrust resistance, which they accepted, but the A-10 is only able to generate 650 lbs.[105]

On 25 January 2019, the22d Air Refueling Wingat McConnell AFB received its first two KC-46As (15-46009and17-46031).[106]In February 2019, the97th Air Mobility Wingat Altus AFB received its first KC-46.[107]

A KC-46 preparing to refuel the NavyBlue Angelsover South Dakota, July 2020

In April 2019, it was confirmed that the USAF halted all deliveries on 23 March and until further notification, as loose material and debris were found in planes already delivered.[108]

In August 2019, the157th Air Refueling WingatPease Air National Guard Basereceived its first KC-46A.[109]

In September 2019, the USAF restricted the KC-46 from carrying cargo and passengers due to an issue with the floor cargo locks unlocking mid-flight.[110]A fix was approved by the USAF in November 2019 and were retrofitted upon delivered aircraft.[111]By 20 December 2019, four KC-46As had received new cargo locks and the USAF had closed the Category 1 deficiency and cleared retrofitted aircraft for cargo and passenger operations.[112]

In June 2020, the916th Air Refueling Wingat Seymour Johnson Air Force Base received its first KC-46A.[113]By January 2021, Boeing had delivered 42 KC-46As to the USAF and was on contract for 94 tankers.[114]

In early 2021, the USAF cleared the KC-46 for limited operational use. The type can conduct U.S.-based refueling only, requiring other tankers for deployments to combat areas. At the time, the KC-46 could refuel the B-52, F-15, F-16, and F/A-18, but it was not approved to service the A-10, F-22, F-35, B-1, or B-2. It was expected to be fully combat-ready by 2023.[115][116][117]

During September 2022, the USAF approved the KC-46 for general operational use, closing out a 15-month evaluation period.[118]

Japan

[edit]
A Japanese KC-46 in 2023

TheJapan Air Self-Defense Force(JASDF) operates four of the earlier Boeing KC-767 tankers that were delivered from 2008 to 2010.[119]In October 2015, Japan selected the KC-46, with a contract for three tankers expected in 2016.[120]The decision allows for common operations and training with the USAF. Japan was reportedly attracted to its capability to refuelMV-22 Ospreytiltrotors,which the JASDF is to receive. Airbus declined to bid its A330 MRTT as they viewed Japan's request for proposals as intended for the KC-46.[121][122]

The three tankers are to be fielded around 2020 at a cost of more than ¥20.8 billion, about US$173 million (~$201 million in 2023) per aircraft.[121][122]An order for a third and fourth KC-46 was placed in October 2020.[123]Japan ordered two additional KC-46s in December 2022, bringing Japan's order total to six.[124]In February 2021, the JASDF conducted its first KC-46 flight.[125]Training of Japanese KC-46 pilots began in June 2021 and Japan received its first KC-46 in November 2021.[126]

Export bids

[edit]

Indonesia

[edit]

In January 2018,Indonesian Air Forceofficials were reported as saying they were studying both the Airbus A330 MRTT and KC-46 tankers for a future modernization program, expected to take place after the currentAirbus A400M Atlasprogram completes. The Indonesian Air Force is said to compare the tankers on compatibility with the force's current aircraft, life-cycle costs, interoperability with current and future assets, and potential funding and technology transfer options with state-owned aircraft manufacturerIndonesian Aerospace.[127]

Israel

[edit]

In March 2020, theState Departmentapproved theForeign Military SaletoIsraelof eight KC-46s and related equipment for a cost of $2.4 billion (~$2.78 billion in 2023).[128]In February 2022, the United States and Israel signed an agreement to supply KC-46s to replace the aging fleet of Israeli tankers.[129]In September 2022, Boeing announced Israel has purchased four KC-46s for delivery in 2025.[130]The contract includes provisions to enable Israel to potentially purchase a further four KC-46s.[131]

Italy

[edit]

In November 2022, it was reported that Italy was negotiating the purchase of six KC-46s, to be designatedKC-767Blocally, after deciding to forgo modernization work on the current fleet of four KC-767As. The purchase could have include logistics support for the KC-46A fleet for a period of five years. The total cost of the contract would have been approximately €1.12 billion. Italy's four KC-767As would be sold to Boeing.[132][133]

In July 2024, Italy "halted" the acquisition of the KC-46 due to "changed and unforeseen needs" and started the procedure to procure a new tanker, possibly from another vendor.[134][135][136]

Failed bids

[edit]

Canada

[edit]

In February 2017, Boeing stated it would bid the KC-46A for theRoyal Canadian Air Force's Strategic Tanker Transport Capability competition, which is to replace Canada's fleet ofCC-150 Polaristankers. The contract is valued at C$1.5+ billion.[137]In April 2021,Airbus Defence and Spaceand their submission of the A330 MRTT was deemed to be the only qualified bidder to replace the CC-150.[138]

India

[edit]

In January 2018, theIndian Air Forcere-launched its air-to-air refueling procurement program, and sent out arequest for informationfor six refueling aircraft to Airbus, Boeing andIlyushin,to which Boeing could respond with an offer for the KC-46 Pegasus.[139]Airbus and Boeing responded to the request for information, while Ilyushin was disqualified as the official requirement is for an aircraft with twoturbofanengines.[140]

In April 2022, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) announced that it had entered into anMoUagreement with Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) to convert passenger aircraft into multi-mission tanker transport (MMTT) aircraft in India.[141]

Korea

[edit]

In June 2014, Boeing submitted the KC-46 for theRepublic of Korea Air Force's requirement for four aerial tankers. The KC-46 competed with the Airbus A330 MRTT.[142]South Korea selected the Airbus A330 MRTT in June 2015.[143]

Poland

[edit]

Boeing pitched the KC-46 to thePolish Air Forcefor its tanker requirement.[144]In December 2014, Airbus was awarded a contract for four A330 MRTTs from a consortium of Poland, the Netherlands, and Norway.[145][146]

United Arab Emirates

[edit]

In May 2019, according to Boeing, theUnited Arab Emiratesmade a formal request to procure three KC-46As.[147][148]In November 2021 the United Arab Emirates ordered two more Airbus A330 MRTTs for a total of five.[149]

Operators

[edit]
Israel
Japan
United States

Specifications

[edit]

Data fromUSAF KC-46A,[94]Boeing KC-767,[155]Boeing 767-200ER[156]

General characteristics

  • Crew:3 (2 pilots, 1boom operator) basic crew; 15 permanent seats for additional/optional air crew members, including aeromedical evacuation crew members
  • Capacity:seating for up to 114 people, 18463L pallets,or 58 patients (24 litters, 34 ambulatory) and 65,000 lb (29,500 kg) payload
  • Length:165 ft 6 in (50.5 m)
  • Wingspan:157 ft 8 in (48.1 m)
  • Height:52 ft 1 in (15.9 m)
  • Empty weight:181,610 lb (82,377 kg)
  • Max takeoff weight:415,000 lb (188,240 kg)
  • Fuel Capacity:212,299 lb (96,297 kg)
    Fuel Capacity (vol):31,220 US gal (118,200 L)
    Maximum Transfer Fuel Load:207,672 lb (94,198 kg)
  • Powerplant:2 ×Pratt & Whitney PW4062turbofan,62,000[155]lbf (280 kN) thrust each

Performance

  • Maximum speed:570 mph (914 km/h, 500 kn)
  • Cruise speed:530 mph (851 km/h, 460 kn)
  • Range:7,350 mi (11,830 km, 6,385 nmi); global with in flight refueling[155]
  • Service ceiling:40,100 ft (12,200 m)

See also

[edit]

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

References

[edit]
  1. ^"KC-46A cleared for worldwide deployments following first combat refuel".20 September 2022.
  2. ^"Air Mobility Command approves KC-46A Pegasus for worldwide deployments following first combat refuel".22 September 2022.
  3. ^"Orders & Deliveries".Boeing.Retrieved1 October2024.
  4. ^"U.S. Air Force Accepts First Boeing KC-46A Pegasus Tanker Aircraft"(Press release). Boeing. 10 January 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 10 January 2019.Retrieved10 January2019.
  5. ^"Model Designation of Military Aerospace Vehicles"(PDF).Executive Services Directorate.12 May 2004.Archived(PDF)from the original on 15 November 2023.
  6. ^Tirpak, John A. (1 August 2003)."100 Tankers".Air & Space Forces Magazine.Archivedfrom the original on 28 May 2023.
  7. ^Tirpak, John A. (1 February 2004)."Tanker Twilight Zone".Air & Space Forces Magazine.Archivedfrom the original on 21 April 2023.
  8. ^Lunsford, J. Lynn; Jaffe, Greg (7 November 2003)."Pentagon Sets Compromise On Boeing Tanker-Lease Deal".The Wall Street Journal.Archived fromthe originalon 10 January 2024.Retrieved10 January2004.
  9. ^Cahlink, George (1 October 2004)."Ex-Pentagon procurement executive gets jail time".Govexec.com.Archivedfrom the original on 8 November 2022.Retrieved21 December2006.
  10. ^Majumdar, Dave (24 February 2011)."Boeing wins KC-X tanker battle".Air Force Times.Archived fromthe originalon 21 July 2012.
  11. ^"Northrop Grumman KC-30 marketing web site".Archived fromthe originalon 30 January 2009.
  12. ^Air Force Posts KC-X Request for ProposalsArchived15 February 2007 at theWayback Machine.USAF, 30 January 2007.
  13. ^Evens, Ben and Daly, Matthew (AP), "Northrop-EADS threatens to withdraw bid for US Air Force contract leaving only Boeing".Aerotech News and Review,2 February 2007.
  14. ^Borak, D."Boeing Unveils Air Force Tanker in $40 Billion Contract Competition"Archived24 May 2011 at theWayback Machine.Associated Press.12 February 2007.
  15. ^"Why the 767?"Archived29 April 2011 at theWayback MachineAir Force magazine, 13 February 2007.
  16. ^"Boeing Submits KC-767 Advanced Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force"Archived21 May 2007 at theWayback Machine.Boeing, 11 April 2007.
  17. ^"Boeing Offers KC-767 Advanced Tanker to U.S. Air Force"Archived14 February 2007 at theWayback Machine.Boeing, 12 February 2007.
  18. ^"Size matters in US Air Force KC-X contest".Flightglobal. 21 January 2008.Archivedfrom the original on 4 November 2012.
  19. ^"Boeing Submits Final KC-767 Advanced Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force"Archived28 June 2011 at theWayback Machine.Boeing, 3 January 2008.
  20. ^Butler, Amy, Fulghum, Davis A and Wall, Robert."Northrop/EADS Clinches U.S. Refueler Deal".Aviation Week,29 February 2008.
  21. ^ab"GAO backs Boeing tanker protest".King-TV. 18 June 2008. Archived fromthe originalon 29 December 2008.
  22. ^"Air Force to Reopen Bidding on Tanker Contract"Archived1 February 2016 at theWayback Machine.New York Times, 10 July 2008.
  23. ^Kruzel, John J."Pentagon Reopens Bidding on Tanker Contract"Archived15 August 2008 at theWayback Machine.US DoD, 9 July 2008.
  24. ^"Pentagon Issues New Tanker Bid Parameters".Aviation Week,6 August 2008.
  25. ^"DoD Announces Termination of KC-X Tanker Solicitation"Archived13 September 2008 at theWayback Machine.US DoD, 10 September 2008.
  26. ^Cole, August; Sanders, Peter (25 September 2009)."Air Force Resumes Tanker Contest".Wall Street Journal.Archivedfrom the original on 23 January 2016.
  27. ^"Boeing to Offer NewGen Tanker to US Air Force"Archived14 July 2011 at theWayback Machine.Boeing, 4 March 2010.
  28. ^"EADS Re-Enters Tanker Bidding"Archived26 March 2018 at theWayback Machine.Wall Street Journal, 21 April 2010.
  29. ^Butler, Amy."Northrop Grumman Officially Out of KC-X"[dead link].Aviation Week,9 March 2010.
  30. ^Trimble, Stephen (9 July 2010)."USAF receives three proposals for KC-X, but Antonov team admits concerns".Flightglobal. Archived fromthe originalon 13 July 2010.
  31. ^Warwick, Graham."Boeing Wins Restaged U.S. Air Force KC-X Tanker"[dead link].Aviation Week,25 February 2011.
  32. ^Trimble, Stephen (29 September 2010)."Boeing source reveals specifications for KC-767 NewGen Tanker".Flight International.Flightglobal. Archived fromthe originalon 2 October 2010.
  33. ^Gates, Dominic."Boeing, EADS Submit Final Bids For Air Force Tanker Contract"Archived17 March 2011 at theWayback Machine.Seattle Times,11 February 2011.
  34. ^"What's Next: USAF Lays Groundwork To Replace Fighter, Tanker Fleets".Defense news, 14 September 2014
  35. ^On to the Stealthy KC-ZArchived12 October 2016 at theWayback Machine- Airforcemag.com, 21 September 2016.
  36. ^Trimble, Stephen (24 February 2011)."USAF selects Boeing for KC-X contract".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 5 November 2012.Retrieved24 February2011.
  37. ^"Boeing Wins $35B Air Force Tanker Deal"Archived30 October 2014 at theWayback Machine.Bloomberg, 24 February 2011.
  38. ^"Boeing Receives US Air Force Contract to Build Next-Generation Refueling Tanker"(press release). Boeing. 24 February 2011.Archivedfrom the original on 28 February 2011.
  39. ^Cappacio, Tony."Boeing projected to face $300 million overrun on tanker contract".The Seattle Times.NW source.Archivedfrom the original on 2 July 2011.Retrieved29 June2011.
  40. ^Butler, Amy (29 June 2011)."Boeing Liable For KC-46 Overage".Aviation Week.Retrieved29 July2011.[dead link]
  41. ^Weisgerber, Marcus."Boeing Lowers KC-46 Cost Estimate".Defense News,27 July 2011.
  42. ^"Air Force increases projected KC-46 flying hours, crew ratio".Global security.5 February 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 1 February 2014.Retrieved6 February2013.
  43. ^Majumdar, Dave (4 September 2013)."USAF and Boeing complete KC-46 critical design review".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2013.Retrieved5 September2013.
  44. ^"US Air Force, Boeing Finalize KC-46A Tanker Aircraft Design."Archived8 September 2013 at theWayback MachineBoeing news release, 4 September 2013.
  45. ^"Boeing Joins First KC-46A Airframe".Aviation Week.12 December 2013.[permanent dead link]
  46. ^ab"First KC-46A Baseline Test Aircraft Due This Month"Archived15 January 2014 at theWayback Machine.DoDBuzz.com, 12 January 2014
  47. ^Hemmerdinger, Jon (16 January 2014)."Boeing assembles final KC-46A test aircraft".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 20 January 2014.
  48. ^"KC-46 on the Money".Air Force mag.11 April 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 13 April 2014.
  49. ^Cameron, Doug."Boeing takes hit for tanker troubles"[dead link].Wall Street Journal, 24 July 2014, p. B2.
  50. ^"Boeing Reports Second-Quarter Results and Raises 2014 EPS Guidance"Archived30 July 2014 at theWayback Machine.Boeing, 23 July 2014.
  51. ^Trimble, Stephen (23 July 2014)."Boeing reports KC-46A loss, rejects wider concerns".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 31 October 2014.
  52. ^Everstine, Brian (16 September 2014)."First Flight for KC-46 Tanker Platform Slips Further".Aviation Week.Penton.Archivedfrom the original on 31 October 2014.Retrieved12 September2014.
  53. ^Everstine, Brian (16 September 2014)."First flight delayed for KC-46A test aircraft".airforcetimes.com.Gannett. Archived fromthe originalon 16 September 2014.
  54. ^"GAO-15-342SP DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs"(PDF).US Government Accountability Office. March 2015. p. 103.Archived(PDF)from the original on 24 September 2015.
  55. ^Norris, Guy (29 December 2014)."Boeing 767-2C First Flight Begins Tanker Test Campaign".Aviation Week.Archivedfrom the original on 10 June 2015.
  56. ^Daryl Mayer (28 December 2014)."Boeing completes successful first flight in KC-46 program".88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs.Archivedfrom the original on 1 February 2016.
  57. ^Drew, James (4 April 2016)."Boeing's KC-46 test run complicated by C-17 refuelling issue".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 15 April 2016.
  58. ^"Air Force: Boeing Tanker Issue Could Delay Production Decision".Defense News. 1 April 2016.
  59. ^Shalal, Andrea (1 April 2016)."Boeing tanker issue may delay U.S. production decision".St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
  60. ^"Boeing, U.S. Air Force Aircrews Make History with First KC-46A Tanker Refueling Flight".Boeing Press Release.24 January 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 31 January 2016.
  61. ^Thulowiet, Kenji (16 February 2016)."KC-46 refuels fighter jet with hose, drogue system for first time".USAF, 412th Test Wing Public Affairs.Archivedfrom the original on 2 March 2016.
  62. ^"Supplier Quality Control, Fuel System Integration Haunt KC-46".Aviation Week.24 July 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 24 July 2015.
  63. ^"Boeing Faces Eight-Month Delay on $3 Billion Tanker Contracts".Bloomberg Business.21 July 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 24 July 2015.
  64. ^"Opinion: For Boeing, Big Losses And Missed Opportunities In The Tanker Market: KC-46 Falls Flat In International Market".Aviation Week.22 July 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 24 July 2015.
  65. ^"Boeing Likely to Miss Delivery Date for Tankers, Pentagon Says".Bloomberg.com.Bloomberg. 22 March 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 25 March 2016.
  66. ^"Watchdog: Challenges Ahead For Boeing's KC-46 Tanker".Defense News. 11 April 2016.
  67. ^Drew, James (12 April 2016)."Boeing's 'optimistic' KC-46 plan delivers 18 tankers in six months".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 25 April 2016.
  68. ^"Fourth KC-46 test aircraft completes initial flight".IHS Jane's Defence Weekly. 27 April 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 27 April 2016.
  69. ^Drew, James (27 April 2016)."Boeing records $243 million KC-46 charge as it seeks LRIP contract".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 28 April 2016.
  70. ^Drew, James (5 May 2016)."KC-46 team working fixes to complete C-17 demo in 'late May'".Washington DC: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 6 May 2016.
  71. ^"KC-46A Tanker Program Braces For Another Delay".Aviation Week. 26 May 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 28 May 2016.
  72. ^"Boeing's Penalty For Latest KC-46 Delay Still Unclear".Defense News. 2 June 2016.[dead link]
  73. ^Drew, James (14 June 2016)."USAF Considering Penalty For Boeing Over KC-46 Delays".Aviation Week.Archivedfrom the original on 16 June 2016.
  74. ^abMehta, Aaron (12 July 2016)."Pentagon Seeks 'Consideration' for KC-46 Tanker Delay".Defense News.
  75. ^abWeisgerber, Marcus (8 June 2016)."Here's How Boeing Aims To Fix Its Broken Tanker".Defense One.Atlantic Media.Archivedfrom the original on 12 June 2016.
  76. ^Insinna, Valerie (21 July 2016)."Boeing Racks Up Another $393M In Cost Overruns On KC-46 Program".Defense News.
  77. ^"Boeing's KC-46 Tanker Will Miss Major Deadline".Defense News. 27 May 2016.
  78. ^Seligman, Lara (5 July 2016)."Boeing KC-46 Tests Moving 'Slower Than Planned'".Aviation Week.Archivedfrom the original on 7 July 2016.
  79. ^Mehta, Aaron (13 July 2016)."Reworked KC-46 Boom Refuels F-16, C-17".Defense News. Archived fromthe originalon 13 July 2016.
  80. ^Seligman, Lara (13 July 2016)."KC-46 Successfully Refuels C-17".Aviation Week.Archivedfrom the original on 15 July 2016.
  81. ^Erwin, Sandra (18 July 2016)."Boeing's KC-46 Tanker to Receive Production Green Light".National Defense.[permanent dead link]
  82. ^"KC-46a approved for production".U.S. Air Force.Archivedfrom the original on 12 October 2016.
  83. ^Panzino, Charlsy (26 January 2018)."The Air Force's KC-46 tanker is almost ready for prime time".Defense News.Archivedfrom the original on 27 January 2018.
  84. ^"Boeing KC-46 Tanker Program Completes FAA Certification"(Press release). Boeing. 4 September 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 5 September 2018.
  85. ^Thuloweit, Kenji (14 February 2019)."KC-46 Pegasus connects with fifth-generation fighter".Edwards AFB.Archivedfrom the original on 15 February 2019.Retrieved15 February2019.
  86. ^Casem, Giancarlo (4 June 2019)."KC-46, F-35 completes receiver certification testing".412th Test Wing.Archivedfrom the original on 5 June 2019.Retrieved5 June2019.
  87. ^Trevithick, Joseph (30 March 2020)."The Air Force's Troubled KC-46 Tankers Leak Fuel Excessively".thedrive.com.The Drive.Retrieved31 March2020.
  88. ^Reim, Garrett."Boeing delivers 14 KC-46A tankers in 2020, receives contract for a dozen more".Flight Global,13 January 2021.
  89. ^Weisgerber, Marcus (1 February 2021)."Air Force Hunts for Ways to Use Not-Quite-Ready Tankers".Defence One.
  90. ^Rogoway, Tyler (24 April 2015)."Broken Booms: Why Is It So Hard To Develop & Procure A New USAF Tanker?".Foxtrot Alpha.Jalopnik.Retrieved23 January2020.
  91. ^"USAF Reviewing Training After MAX 8 Crashes; KC-46 Uses Similar MCAS".airforcemag.com.March 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 23 March 2019.
  92. ^ab"KC-46 Pegasus".Boeing.Archivedfrom the original on 6 January 2019.Retrieved6 January2019.
  93. ^McMenemy, Jeff (15 September 2019)."A look inside the KC-46A".Fosters.com.Archivedfrom the original on 16 September 2019.Retrieved16 September2019.There's also a compartment on the belly of the plane, which can be opened so crew can pull down a ladder, climb up, and quickly board the plane. "If you need to get inside faster you can climb up this ladder, step on a platform, climb up another ladder and end up in the floor of the plane," Zubricki said.
  94. ^abKC-46A Tanker FactsheetArchived19 March 2016 at theWayback Machine.U.S. Air Force, February 2016.
  95. ^"Boeing to Offer NewGen Tanker to US Air Force"Archived11 July 2011 at theWayback Machine.finchannel.com, 5 March 2010.
  96. ^Hadley, Greg.(4 Jan 2022) "Boeing Works to Solve KC-46 Deficiencies, One by One".airandspaceforces.com
  97. ^abc"This Is What The Boom Operator's Station On The New KC-46 Tanker Actually Looks Like We finally are getting a good look at the KC-46's most controversial feature".The Drive. 2 April 2019.Retrieved11 September2022.
  98. ^"KC-46 Boom Operators Learn to Live With RVS Pending 2.0 Upgrade".Air Force Magazine. 9 August 2022.Retrieved11 September2022.
  99. ^"USAF: McConnell to house next generation tankers"Archived24 April 2014 at theWayback Machine.KWCH, 22 April 2014.
  100. ^"McConnell gets final OK for refueling tankers, prepares to spend $219 million for construction".Archived24 April 2014 at theWayback MachineThe Wichita Eagle, 22 April 2014.
  101. ^"Altus selected for KC-46A training"Archived24 April 2014 at theWayback Machine.Militarytimes.com, 23 April 2014.
  102. ^Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs (29 October 2015)."Seymour-Johnson chosen for first Reserve-led KC-46A basing".Air Force Reserve Command.Archived fromthe originalon 26 January 2016.
  103. ^"The Air Force finally takes ownership of its first Boeing tanker — with serious misgivings".The Seattle Times.10 January 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 11 January 2019.
  104. ^Thompson, Loren (11 January 2019)."Five Reasons The Air Force Has Begun Taking Delivery Of Boeing's KC-46A Pegasus Tanker".Forbes.Archived fromthe originalon 11 January 2019.
  105. ^Insinna, Valerie (10 January 2019)."Boeing delivers first KC-46, but fixes to technical problems still years away".Defense News.
  106. ^Slanchik, Michaela R. (25 January 2019)."McConnell AFB welcomes first KC-46A Pegasus".McConnell Air Force Base.Archivedfrom the original on 4 February 2019.Retrieved3 February2019.
  107. ^Scarle, Kenny (8 February 2019)."Pegasus Wings its Way to 97 AMW".97 AMW Public Affairs.Archivedfrom the original on 9 February 2019.Retrieved9 February2019.
  108. ^Pawlyk, Oriana."Air Force Again Halts KC-46 Tanker Deliveries".Military.com. Archived fromthe originalon 2 April 2019.Retrieved2 April2019.
  109. ^McMenemy, Jeff (8 August 2019)."First KC-46A tanker arrives at Pease".seacoastonline.com.Retrieved8 August2019.
  110. ^"US Air Force restricts KC-46 from carrying cargo and passengers".11 September 2019.
  111. ^"Cargo lock fix for KC-46 tanker approved by U.S. Air Force".UPI.Retrieved13 November2019.
  112. ^Insinna, Valerie (20 December 2019)."The KC-46 is back to carrying cargo and passengers".Defense News.
  113. ^"916th Air Refueling Wing Welcomes KC-46A Pegasus".Dobbins Air Reserve Base.12 June 2020.Retrieved14 June2020.
  114. ^Reim, Garrett:Boeing wins $2.1bn for 15 more KC-46A tankers, points to battle communications role,Flight Global,22 January 2021.
  115. ^Despite growing pains, KC-46 tanker will begin 'limited operations'.Defense News.25 February 2021.
  116. ^Air Mobility Command to Start Integrating KC-46 Into Limited Operations.Air Force Magazine.24 February 2021.
  117. ^Air Force clears KC-46A for limited, non-combat refueling.United Press International.25 February 2021.
  118. ^Air Mobility Command Public Affairs (19 September 2022)."KC-46A cleared for worldwide deployments following first combat refuel".Air Mobility Command, United States Air Force.Retrieved21 September2022.
  119. ^"Boeing Delivers 4th KC-767 Tanker to Japan Ministry of Defense"(Press release).Boeing.12 January 2010.
  120. ^Tân たな không trung cấp du ・ thâu tống cơ の cơ chủng quyết định について[Decision on the model of new aerial refueling and transport aircraft].Ministry of Defense (Japan)(in Japanese). 23 October 2015. Archived fromthe originalon 22 March 2017.
  121. ^abDrew, James (23 October 2015)."Japan chooses Boeing KC-46, halting Airbus tanker winning streak".Flightglobal.Washington DC.Archivedfrom the original on 25 October 2015.
  122. ^abYeo, Mike (4 September 2019)."Japan seeks improved aerial refueling, military transport capabilities in KC-46 funding request".Defense News.Melbourne, Australia.
  123. ^"Japan orders two more KC-46A tanker planes".UPI.Retrieved30 October2020.
  124. ^Insight, Global Defense (30 November 2022)."Japan Orders Two More Boeing KC-46A Tankers".Global Defense Insight.Retrieved4 December2022.
  125. ^"First Japan Air Self-Defense Force Boeing KC-46 tanker takes flight".Air Recognition.10 February 2021.
  126. ^"Program Profile Boeing KC-46".Aviation Week.Retrieved7 October2022.
  127. ^Rahmat, Ridzwan (18 January 2018)."Indonesia puts KC-46A Pegasus, Airbus A330 in frame for aerial tanker requirement".IHS Jane's 360.Singapore. Archived fromthe originalon 19 January 2018.Retrieved19 January2018.
  128. ^"Israel – KC-46A Aerial Refueling Aircraft".Defense Security Cooperation Agency (dsca.mil).Retrieved4 March2020.
  129. ^"A Look Back At Tankers"(PDF).U.S Department of Defense.Retrieved25 April2024.
  130. ^Williams, Dan (1 September 2022)."Eye on Iran, Israel to buy four Boeing air force tankers for $927 million".Reuters.Retrieved1 September2022.
  131. ^Frantzman, Seth (1 September 2022)."Israel, Boeing agree to $927M deal for four KC-46A tankers".Defense News.Retrieved6 August2023.
  132. ^Dubois, Gastón (3 November 2022)."Italy is negotiating the purchase of six Boeing KC-46A tankers".Aviacionline.com(in Spanish).Retrieved1 January2023.
  133. ^Cenciotti, David (3 November 2022)."Italy Will Buy Six KC-46 Tankers To Replace Its KC-767As".The Aviationist.Retrieved1 January2023.
  134. ^Cenciotti, David; D'Urso, Stefano (5 July 2024)."Italian Air Force Suspends 1.2 Billion Euro KC-46 Program".The Aviationist.Retrieved1 September2024.
  135. ^Kington, Tom (12 July 2024)."Italy Air Force eyes new tanker competition after dropping Boeing buy".Defense News.Retrieved1 September2024.
  136. ^D'Urso, Stefano (23 July 2024)."Italian Air Force Seeks New Replacement For KC-767 Tankers".The Aviationist.Retrieved1 September2024.
  137. ^"Boeing to bid KC-46 on future RCAF tanker program - Skies Mag".Archivedfrom the original on 3 February 2017.Retrieved3 February2017.
  138. ^Pugliese, David (1 April 2021)."Airbus deemed only qualified supplier for new RCAF refueling and VIP aircraft".Ottawa Citizen.Retrieved9 April2021.
  139. ^Raghuvanshi, Vivek (26 January 2018)."Third time's the charm? India again attempts to buy midair refuelers".Defense News.New Delhi.Archivedfrom the original on 27 January 2018.Retrieved27 January2018.
  140. ^Joshi, Saurabh (15 February 2018)."Boeing KC-46, Airbus A330 MRTT in IAF tanker contest".StratPost.New Delhi.Archivedfrom the original on 17 February 2018.Retrieved17 February2018.
  141. ^Shukla, Ajai (7 April 2022)."HAL, Israel Aerospace tie up to turn civil aircraft into mid-air refuellers".Business Standard India.
  142. ^Hoyle, Craig (30 June 2014)."Boeing offers KC-46 for South Korea tanker requirement".London: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 13 July 2014.Retrieved30 June2014.
  143. ^"South Korea Selects Airbus for $1.33B Tanker Contract".Defense News.30 June 2015. Archived fromthe originalon 8 July 2015.Retrieved30 June2015.
  144. ^Perry, Dominic (3 September 2014)."Boeing eyes Poland as first KC-46A export buyer".Warsaw: Flightglobal.Archivedfrom the original on 4 September 2014.Retrieved3 September2014.
  145. ^"Airbus leaps ahead of Boeing in race for airborne tanker exports".Puget Sound Business Journal.24 December 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 26 December 2014.Retrieved24 December2014.
  146. ^"European Partners Opt for Airbus Military Tanker".The Wall Street Journal.19 December 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 20 December 2014.Retrieved19 December2014.
  147. ^Yeo, Mike (31 May 2019)."UAE issues formal request to buy KC-46A tanker, says Boeing".Defense News.Singapore.Archivedfrom the original on 31 May 2019.Retrieved31 May2019.
  148. ^McGinley, Shane (2 June 2019)."UAE submits request to buy three Boeing tanker aircraft".Arabian Business.Retrieved6 September2019.
  149. ^"United Arab Emirates orders two additional Airbus A330 MRTT".airbus.com.14 November 2021.Retrieved15 March2023.
  150. ^Gross, Judah Ari."Ministers sign off on pricey purchase of F-35s, refuelers and bombs".www.timesofisrael.com.Retrieved16 February2021.
  151. ^"In first, US to sell new aerial re-fuelling planes to Israel".19 June 2019.
  152. ^"Japan orders two more Boeing KC-46 Pegasus tankers - AeroTime".2 December 2022.Retrieved13 April2024.
  153. ^"Japan to acquire two additional KC-46 tankers".Janes.com.December 2022.Retrieved13 April2024.
  154. ^Boeing Defense [@BoeingDefense] (10 September 2024)."Last week's tanker takeoff marks the 8th #KC46 Pegasus aircraft delivered to @Travis60AMW and the 88th KC-46 in the U.S. Air Force fleet. #TankerTuesday"(Tweet).Archivedfrom the original on 10 September 2024.Retrieved1 October2024– viaTwitter.
  155. ^abcKC-767 Advanced Tanker product card (archive copy),KC-767 International Tanker backgrounderArchived12 August 2011 at theWayback Machine.Boeing.
  156. ^767-200ER specificationsArchived16 February 2013 at theWayback Machine.Boeing.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toBoeing KC-46 Pegasus.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_KC-46_Pegasus&oldid=1249328032"