Jump to content

Kiev Missal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kiev Missal
Pages with Glagolitic writing (Kiev Missal). Copy. Kiev History Museum
Created10th century
Discovered19th century
Present locationKyiv

TheKiev Missal(orKiev FragmentsorKiev Folios;scholarly abbreviationKi) is a seven-folioGlagoliticOld Church Slavoniccanonmanuscriptcontaining parts of theRoman-riteliturgy. It is usually held to be the oldest and the most archaic Old Church Slavonic manuscript,[1]and is dated at no later than the latter half of the 10th century.[2]Sevenparchmentfolios have been preserved in small format (c.14.5 cm × 10.5 cm) of easily portable book to be of use tomissionarieson the move.

Folio 7r.
The third folio of Kiev Missal

Discovery and publishing

[edit]

Kiev Folios were found in the 19th century in Jerusalem by the Archimandrite Andrej Kapustin (Antonin Kapustin), who donated them to theKiev Theological Academy.[3]After the 1917 Russian Revolution, the folios were transferred to thelibrary of the Ukrainian Academy of SciencesinKyivwhere they are being kept today.

Izmail Sreznevskymade the manuscript known to the public, editing the first edition of Kiev Folios in 1874. They have been republished many times since, though not always successfully. Notable editions are byVatroslav Jagićin 1890 (Glagolitica. 2. Würdigung neuentdeckter Fragmente, Mit 10 Taf.,Wien 1890, Denkschrift. Kaiserl. Akad., Bd. 38), by Sievers in 1924 (Die altslavischen Verstexte von Kiew und Freising,Leipzig 1924, Akad. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl., Bd. 76/2) and by Mohlberg in 1928 (Il messale di Kiew/sec IX./ed il suo prototipo Romano del VI-VII).

Special attention to the Kiev folios has been paid byVáclav Vondrákin a paperO původu Kijevských listů a Pražských zlomků a o bohemismech v starších církevněslovanských památkách vůbec(Praha, 1904). The newestfacsimileedition has been published in 1983 in Kiev to honor the ninthInternational Congress of Slavistswhich was held there (V. V. Nimčuk,Kijivs′ki hlaholični lystky,AN USSR). That edition contains extensive overview of the existing bibliography of the Kiev Folios.

Dating and origin

[edit]

The first page of the first folio was written later than other pages, probably at the boundary of the 11th and 12th centuries.[3]Linguistic, paleographic and graphic features indicate South Croatia as its place of origin.[3]This page contains parts of Paul's epistles (13, 11-14 and 14, 1-4). That part of the Kiev Folios and the problems associated with it has been thoroughly analyzed by the Croatian Slavist Marija Pantelić,[4]who finally situated it somewhere in theDubrovnikarea.

The rest of the folios, containing part of theRoman Missal,is dated at no later than the second half of the 10th century.[3]

Content

[edit]

By content it is aRoman Missal,i.e., a book collecting all the text used at theholy massservice. Missal texts are accompanied by instructions on how to perform rites throughout the liturgical year, calledrubrics,which is a term originating fromLatinwordrubricadesignating red soil used for painting.

The text of the Kiev Missal folios has been for the most part written in black (the text meant to be pronounced), and for the lesser part in red (the instructions for gestures that the priest must perform and other instructions for the ceremony). Since the Kiev Missal has only 13 pages preserved, it's obvious that only a part of the missal has been preserved, from thesacramentarycontaining crucial and unchangeable parts spoken by the priest.

Linguistic features

[edit]

The Kiev Folios are generally held by Slavists as the oldest among the OCS canon manuscripts, even though they exhibit several West Slavic features that place them at the beginning of the Czech-Moravian recension of OCS.[5]These are:

  • Instead of OCSšt,ždwe find West Slavic reflexes ofProto-Slavic*/tj/ (also from earlier *kt) and */dj/, i.e. instead ofpomoštь,prosęšte,priemljǫšte,daždь,tuždimъ,tъždewe findpomocь,prosęce,priemljǫce,dazь,tuzimъ,tъzeetc.[5]
  • At the place of Proto-Slavic *stj and *skj we would expect a reflex of OCSšt,but we findšč:očiščeniě,zaščiti(imperative),zaščititь.
  • As an ending of instrumental singular of masculine o-stems we would expect-omь.But instead,-ъmьis used, so instead of expectedoplatomь,obrazomь,vъsǫdomьwe findoplatъmь,obrazъmь,vъsǫdъmь.
  • Genitive of first-person pronounazъismenein OCS. In Kiev Folios we findmneby the elision ofweak yer.

As features that connect Kiev Folios to the canonic manuscripts of other important Slavic area, namelyBulgarian,one has to note:

  • consistent distinguishing between yersъandь,and only twiceъis found whereьis expected
  • Kiev folios preserve nasal vowels (/ę/ and /ǫ/) and don't mix them

Controversies

[edit]

Croatian SlavistJosip Hammstirred a fierce debate in his bookDas Glagolitische Missale von Kiew(Wien, 1979). In it, and in his other papers and lectures he maintained the view that the Kiev Folios are a 19th-century fake by Czech patriots in order to prove the antiquity of Czech literary culture. However, in general Slavists do not hold this view.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Lunt (2001:9) "The seven glagolitic folia known as the Kiev Folia (KF) are generally considered as most archaic from both the paleographic and the linguistic points of view..."
  2. ^Damjanović (2003:15)
  3. ^abcdDamjanović (2003:16)
  4. ^Pantelić (1985)
  5. ^abDamjanović (2003:17)

References

[edit]
  • Damjanović, Stjepan(2004),Slovo iskona(in Croatian), Zagreb:Matica hrvatska,ISBN953-150-567-5
  • Schenker, Alexander M.(1995),The Dawn of Slavic: An Introduction to Slavic Philology,New Haven: Yale University Press,ISBN0-300-05846-2
  • Pantelić, Marija (September 1985),"On Kiev and Sinai folia"(PDF),Slovo(in Croatian),35,Old Church Slavonic Institute:5–56
  • Zagiba, Franz (September 1964),"Die historische Umkreis der Kiever Sakramentarfragmente"(PDF),Slovo(in German),14,Old Church Slavonic Institute:59–77
  • Koschmieder, Erwin (September 1955),"Die vermeintlichen Akzentzeichen der Kiever Blätter"(PDF),Slovo(in German),4–5,Old Church Slavonic Institute:5–23
  • Nedeljković, Olga (September 1964),"Akcenti ili neume u Kijevskim listićima"(PDF),Slovo(in Croatian),14,Old Church Slavonic Institute:25–51
  • Damjanović, Stjepan(2003),Staroslavenski jezik(4th revised and extended ed.), Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada,ISBN953-169-095-2
  • Lunt, Horace G.(2001),Old Church Slavonic Grammar(7h revised ed.), New York: Mouton de Gruyter,ISBN3-11-016284-9
[edit]