Jump to content

Lesser of two evils principle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromLesser evil)

Thelesser of two evils principle,also referred to as thelesser evil principleandlesser-evilism,is the principle that when faced with selecting from two immoral options, the least immoral one should be chosen. The principle is most often invoked in reference to binary political choices under systems that make it impossible to express asincere preference for one's favorite.

Origin

[edit]

The maxim existed already in Platonic philosophy.[1]InNicomachean Ethics,Aristotlewrites: "For the lesser evil can be seen in comparison with the greater evil as a good, since this lesser evil is preferable to the greater one, and whatever preferable is good". The modern formulation was popularized byThomas à Kempis'devotional bookThe Imitation of Christwritten in early 15th century.

In part IV of hisEthics,Spinozastates the following maxim:[2]

Proposition 65: "According to the guidance of reason, of two things which are good, we shall follow the greater good, and of two evils, follow the less."

In modern elections

[edit]

The concept of "lesser evil" voting (LEV) can be seen as a form of theminimaxstrategy where voters, when faced with two or more candidates, choose the one they perceive as the least harmful or the "lesser evil." To do so, "voting should not be viewed as a form of personal self-expression or moral judgement directed in retaliation towards major party candidates who fail to reflect our values, or of a corrupt system designed to limit choices to those acceptable to corporate elites" rather as an opportunity to reduce harm or loss.[3]

In 2012,Huffington Postcolumnist Sanford Jay Rosen stated that the idea became common practice for left-leaning voters in theUnited Statesdue to their overwhelming disapproval of the United States government's support for theVietnam War.[4]Rosen stated: "Beginning with the1968 presidential election,I often have heard from liberals that they could not vote for the lesser of two evils. Some said they would not vote; some said they would vote for a third-party candidate. That mantra delivered us to Richard Nixon in1972until Watergate did him in. And it delivered us toGeorge W. BushandDick Cheneyin2000until they were termed out in 2009 ".[4]

In the2016 United States presidential election,both major candidates of the major parties —Hillary Clinton(D) andDonald Trump(R) — had disapproval ratings close to 60% by August 2016.[5]Green Party candidateJill Steininvoked this idea in her campaign stating, "Don't vote for the lesser evil, fight for the greater good".[6]Green Party votes hurt Democratic chances in 2000 and 2016.[7][8][9]This sentiment was repeated for the next two election cycles, both of which were between Democratic candidate (and current president)Joe Bidenand Republican candidate (and former president) Donald Trump.[10][11]Accordingly, the lesser evil principle should be applied to two front-runners among many choices, after eliminating from consideration "minor party candidates (who) can be spoilers in elections by taking away enough votes from a major party candidate to influence the outcome without winning."[12]

In elections between only two candidates where one is mildly unpopular and the other immensely unpopular, opponents of both candidates frequently advocate a vote for the mildly unpopular candidate. For example, in the second round of the2002 French presidential electiongraffiti in Paris told people to "vote for the crook, not the fascist". The "crook" in those scribbled public messages wasJacques ChiracofRally for the Republicand the "fascist" wasJean-Marie Le Penof theNational Front.Chirac eventually won the second round having garnered 82% of the vote.[13]

Mythology

[edit]

"Between Scylla and Charybdis"is an idiom derived fromHomer'sOdyssey.In the story,Odysseuschose to go nearScyllaas the lesser of two evils. He lost six of his companions, but if he had gone nearCharybdisall would be doomed. Because of such stories, having to navigate between the two hazards eventually entered idiomatic use. Another equivalent English seafaring phrase is "Between a rock and a hard place".[14]The Latin lineincidit in scyllam cupiens vitare charybdim( "he runs into Scylla, wishing to avoid Charybdis" ) had earlier become proverbial, with a meaning much the same asjumping from the frying pan into the fire.Erasmusrecorded it as an ancient proverb in hisAdagia,although the earliest known instance is in theAlexandreis,a 12th-century Latinepic poembyWalter of Châtillon.[15]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Dougherty, M. V. (14 April 2011).Moral Dilemmas in Medieval Thought: From Gratian to Aquinas.Cambridge University Press.ISBN9781139501439.
  2. ^de Spinoza, Benedict(2017) [1677]. "Of Human Bondage or of the Strength of the Affects".Ethics.Translated by White, W.H. New York:Penguin Classics.p. 424.ASINB00DO8NRDC.
  3. ^Noam Chomskyand John Halle, "An Eight Point Brief for LEV (Lesser Evil Voting),"New Politics,June 15, 2016.
  4. ^abStanford Jay Rosen (2012-09-25)."Don't Get Fooled Again: Why Liberals and Progressives Should Vote Enthusiastically for President Obama".Huffington Post.Retrieved2013-03-23.
  5. ^Aaron Blake (2016-08-31)."A record number of Americans now dislike Hillary Clinton".Washington Post.Retrieved2016-08-31.
  6. ^"Meet Jill Stein, the Other Anti-Establishment Progressive Running for President".26 May 2016.
  7. ^"Did Ralph Nader Spoil Al Gore's Presidential Bid? A Ballot-Level Study of Green and Reform Party Voters in the 2000 Presidential Election".Retrieved30 March2023.
  8. ^"Jill Stein cost Hillary dearly in 2016. Democrats are still writing off her successor".Politico.
  9. ^"Green Party candidate Jill Stein got more votes than Trump's victory margin in 3 key states".December 2016.
  10. ^"2020 could be another 'lesser of two evils' election".CNN.24 July 2019.
  11. ^"The 'lesser of two evils' voters who could decide 2024".NBC News.28 June 2023.
  12. ^"10.6 Minor Parties,"American Government and Politics in the Information Age,University of Minnesota,2011.
  13. ^"Chirac's new challenge".The Economist. 2002-05-06.Retrieved2011-04-15.
  14. ^Definition from theLongman Dictionary of Contemporary Englishavailable online
  15. ^Noted byEdward Charles HaringtoninNotes and Queries5th Series,8(7 July 1877:14).