Lotus 101
 Satoru Nakajimademonstrating the 101 before the2011 Japanese Grand Prix | |||||||||||
| Category | Formula One | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructor | Lotus | ||||||||||
| Designer(s) | Frank Dernie(Technical Director) Mike Coughlan(Chief Designer) Tim Feast (Chief Engineer) | ||||||||||
| Predecessor | 100T | ||||||||||
| Successor | 102 | ||||||||||
| Technical specifications[1] | |||||||||||
| Chassis | Carbon fibreandKevlarmonocoque | ||||||||||
| Suspension (front) | Double wishbones, pull-rod dampers | ||||||||||
| Suspension (rear) | Double wishbones, push-rod dampers | ||||||||||
| Axle track | Front: 1,800 mm (71 in) Rear: 1,650 mm (65 in) | ||||||||||
| Wheelbase | 2,900 mm (110 in) | ||||||||||
| Engine | Judd CV3,496 cc (213.3 cu in) 90°V8NAmid-engine,longitudinally-mounted | ||||||||||
| Transmission | Lotus6 speedmanual | ||||||||||
| Power | 600–610 hp (447.4–454.9 kW) @ 11,200 rpm[2] | ||||||||||
| Weight | 500 kg (1,100 lb) | ||||||||||
| Fuel | Elf | ||||||||||
| Tyres | Goodyear | ||||||||||
| Competition history | |||||||||||
| Notable entrants | CamelTeam Lotus | ||||||||||
| Notable drivers | 11. Nelson Piquet12.  Satoru Nakajima | ||||||||||
| Debut | 1989 Brazilian Grand Prix | ||||||||||
| Last event | 1989 Australian Grand Prix | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Constructors' Championships | 0 | ||||||||||
| Drivers' Championships | 0 | ||||||||||
 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification.(June 2018) |
TheLotus 101was the car with which theLotusteam competed in the1989 Formula One World Championship.It was powered by aJuddV8engine and driven by triple World ChampionNelson PiquetandSatoru Nakajima,in their second and third seasons with the team respectively.
Overview
[edit]Gérard Ducarouge's departure during 1988 had necessitated the formerWilliamsaerodynamicistFrank Dernieto be appointed as Technical Director in November 1988. Despite his appointment the majority of the work for the 101 had been conducted by chief designerMike Coughlan.The 101 was to be a rushed design built within weeks and to a series of constraints.
Ducarouge's departure coincided with end of the 1,500 cc turbocharged era. Lotus, along with other competitors, now had to incorporate 3,500 cc normally aspirated engines into their cars.Juddwere therefore enlisted to supply their CV 32 valve V8 engine, but as Lotus were only a "customer" (Judd's principal contracts were the supply of their latest EV V8 engines to theBrabhamandMarchteams) solutions were sought to make up the power deficiency by appointingTickfordto research and develop a version of the Judd engine with a five-valve-per-cylinder head. The use of the Judd engine did permit Dernie and Coughlan to design a smaller and lighter car than before; indeed the narrowness of the cockpit requiredMomoto build a special steering wheel to allow the drivers to fit their hands between the wheel and bodywork of the car.[3]
The initial optimism and favourable reception by management and driver alike shortly evaporated, as the 101 proved to be a disaster. Not only were the customer Judd engines rated at around 610 bhp (455 kW) (about 80 bhp (60 kW) less than the dominantHondaV10 engineused byMcLaren), but it was apparent that theGoodyeartyres that the team were using had been designed principally for use by the McLaren andFerrariteams, who, in addition to having heavier and more powerful engines (which allowed the tyres to heat up faster) were able to test and tune their chassis to work better with the compounds.[4]
The 101 failed to collect significant results as the season progressed, culminating in the events following theBritish Grand PrixwhereNelson Piquethad driven to a fighting fourth-placed finish. The Chapman family, who were still the shareholders in Team Lotus International, persuadedPeter Warrand ChairmanFred Bushell(who was about to face charges arising from theDeLoreanaffair) to leave.Tony Rudd,who was at the time working forGroup Lotus,was appointed executive chairman. Also the Tickford head was abandoned.[5]
The renewed optimism briefly helped to improve results; however, atSpaboth Lotuses failed to qualify for a Grand Prix for the first time since 1958. The season ended with two fourth-place finishes forNelson PiquetandSatoru NakajimainJapanandAustraliarespectively. Nakajima also snatched the fastest lap in the torrential rain of Adelaide.
Given the dreadful start to the season (Lotus only scored points in one of the first seven races), the total points tally of 15 points was almost a positive Lotus could take out of the 1989 season. Indeed, it would prove to be the highest number of points Lotus were to score in a season during the normally aspirated engine era until the team's collapse at the end of the 1994 season.[6]
Complete Formula One results
[edit](key) (Results initalicsindicate fastest lap)
| Year | Entrant | Engine | Tyres | Drivers | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Pts. | WCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | CamelTeam Lotus | Judd CV V8 |
G | BRA | SMR | MON | MEX | USA | CAN | FRA | GBR | GER | HUN | BEL | ITA | POR | ESP | JPN | AUS | 15 | 6th | |
| Nelson Piquet | Ret | Ret | Ret | 11 | Ret | 4 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | DNQ | Ret | Ret | 8 | 4 | Ret | ||||||
| Satoru Nakajima | 8 | NC | DNQ | Ret | Ret | DNQ | Ret | 8 | Ret | Ret | DNQ | 10 | 7 | Ret | Ret | 4 |
References
[edit]- ^"Lotus 101".www.statsf1.com.Retrieved4 November2018.
- ^"Engine Judd • STATS F1".
- ^"The 1989 Lotus 101 And The Relevance Of Formula 1 Duds".11 October 2017.Retrieved16 December2019.
- ^"Gravel Trap: Lotus loving in the land of rum".17 May 2014.Retrieved16 December2019.
- ^"Lunch with... Peter Warr".Motor Sport Magazine.7 July 2014.Retrieved16 December2019.
- ^"1989 Lotus 101 Judd - Images, Specifications and Information".Ultimatecarpage.com.Retrieved16 December2019.
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
