Jump to content

Mabila

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Battle of Mávilla
Part ofSpanish colonization of the Americas
DateOctober 18, 1540
Location
Mavila, Alabama
Belligerents
Habsburg Spain Chiefdom of Tuskalusa
Commanders and leaders
Hernando de Soto Tuskaloosa
Strength
around 600 Spaniards over 3,000
Casualties and losses
200 2,500-3,000?

Mabila[1](also spelledMavila,Mavilla,Maubila,orMauvilla,as influenced by Spanish or French transliterations)[2]was a small fortress town known to the paramount chiefTuskaloosain 1540, in a region of present-day centralAlabama.[1]The exact location has been debated for centuries, but southwest of present-daySelma, Alabama,is one possibility. In late 2021, archaeologists announced the excavation of Spanish artifacts at several Native American settlement sites inMarengo Countythat indicate that they have found the historical province of Mabila, although not the town itself. They theorize that the town site is within a few miles of their excavations.[3]

In 1540 Chief Tuskaloosa arranged for more than 2,500 native warriors to be concealed at Mabila, prepared to attack a large party of foreign invaders in theMississippian cultureterritory: Spanish explorerHernando de Sotoand his expedition.[1]

DeSoto's route in what is nowGeorgia,South Carolina,North Carolina,Tennessee,Alabama,MississippiandArkansas;Mabila is in the green circle at lower left.

WhenHernando de Sotofirst metTuskaloosaat his home village and asked him for supplies, Tuskaloosa advised them to travel to another of his towns, known asMabila,where supplies would be waiting. A native messenger was sent ahead to Mabila. When Tuskaloosa arrived with the first group of Spaniards, he asked the Spanish people to leave the settlement and territory. A fight broke out between a soldier and a native, and many warriors emerged from hiding in houses and began shooting arrows at the Spaniards.[1]The Spaniards fled, leaving their possessions inside the fortress. The conflict that resulted is called the Battle of Mabila. Armed with guns, the Spaniards eventually burned down the village and killed most of the warriors.[1][4]

Fortress town[edit]

The walled compound of Mabila, one of many encountered by the Spaniards in their exploration,[1]was enclosed in a thickstuccoedwall, 16.5-ft (5-m) high. It was made from wide tree trunks tied with cross-beams and covered with mud/strawstucco,to appear as a solid wall.[1]The fortress was defended by Muskogee warriors, who shot arrows or threw stones.

Based on the earlier sources,Garcilaso de la Vegadescribed the town of Mabila as: [1][2]

Artist's impression of Mabila: note walls appear solid (stuccoed tree trunks).

...on a very fine plain and had an enclosure threeestados(about 16.5 feet or 5-m) high, which was made of logs as thick as oxen. They were driven into the ground so close together that they touched one another. Other beams, longer and not so thick, were placed crosswise on the outside and inside and attached with split canes and strong cords. On top they were daubed with a great deal of mud packed down with long straw, which mixture filled all the cracks and open spaces between the logs and their fastenings in such a manner that it really looked like a wall finished with a mason's trowel. At intervals of fifty paces around this enclosure, were towers capable of holding seven or eight men who could fight in them. The lower part of the enclosure, to 'the height of an estado' (5.55 feet), was full of loopholes for shooting arrows at those on the outside. Thepueblohad only two gates, one on the east and the other on the west. In the middle of the pueblo, was a spacious plaza around which were the largest and most important houses.[1]

Battle of Mabila[edit]

The Spaniards suffered their greatest losses of the De Soto Expedition during the battle at Mabila, but the Mississippians suffered even more grievous losses.[1]De Soto had demanded supplies, bearers, and women from the powerfulChief Tuskaloosa,when they met him at his main town. He said they needed to go to another settlement, and took them to Mabila.

On October 18, 1540, de Soto and the expedition arrived at Mabila, a heavily fortified village situated on a plain. It had a wooden palisade encircling it, with bastions placed so that archers could shoot theirlongbowsto cover the approaches. Upon arriving at Mabila, the Spaniards knew something was amiss. The population of the town was almost exclusively male- young warriors and men of status. There were several women, but no children. The Spaniards also noticed the palisade had been recently strengthened, and that all trees, bushes, and weeds, had been cleared from outside the settlement for the length of a crossbow shot. Outside the palisade, they saw an older warrior in a field, who was seen exhorting younger warriors, and leading them in mock skirmishes and military exercises.[5]

When the Spaniards reached the town of Mabila, ruled by one of Tuskaloosa's vassals, the Chief asked de Soto to allow him to remain there. When de Soto refused, Tuskaloosa warned him to leave the town, then withdrew to another room, and refused to talk further.[1]A lesser chief was asked to intercede, but he would not. One of the Spaniards, according toElvas,"seized him by the cloak of marten-skins that he had on, drew it off over his head, and left it in his hands; whereupon, the Indians all beginning to rise, he gave him a stroke with a cutlass, that laid open his back, when they, with loud yells, came out of the houses, discharging their bows."[1]

The Spaniards barely escaped from the well-fortified town. The Indians closed the gates and "beating their drums, they raised flags, with great shouting." De Soto determined to attack the town, and in the battle that followed, Elvas records: "The Indians fought with so great spirit that they, many times, drove our people back out of the town. The struggle lasted so long that many Catholics, weary and very thirsty, went to drink at a pond nearby, tinged with the blood of the killed, and returned to the combat."

De Soto had his men set fire to the town, then by Elvas's account,

breaking in upon the Indians and beating them down, they fled out of the place, the cavalry and infantry driving them back through the gates, where losing the hope of escape, they fought valiantly; and the Catholics getting among them with cutlasses, they found themselves met on all sides by their strokes, when many, dashing headlong into the flaming houses, were smothered, and, heaped one upon another, burned to death. They who perished there were in all two thousand five hundred, a few more or less: of the Catholics there fell two hundred... Of the living, one hundred and fifty (150) Catholics had received seven hundred wounds...

Elvas noted later that four hundred hogs, and twelve horses died in the conflagration. But other contempary authors Ranjel-Oviedoand Garcilaso say seven and forty-five horses died in the battle, respectively.[6]The exact count of Indian dead is not known, but Spanish accounts at the time estimated that between 2,500 and 3,000 Indians had been killed by the raging fires within the city's walls. Spanish killed in action were either 22, 18, 25, 20, or 82 based upon the contemporary chroniclers of the time Ranjel-Oviedo, Elvas,Cañete,Biedma, and Garcilaso, respectively; with another 48 or more Spaniards dying from their wounds within days following the battle.[7]According to Garcilaso, "Most of the dead were women" who had followed their husbands, sweethearts, and others, to witness their glorious victory over the Castilians.[8]As for the Indian leader Tascalusa, neither he nor his body was ever found, and if he did perish in the burning city, his body would have been "burned beyond recognition."[9]In the "five centuries" of warfare between the Red man and the White man, the battle of Mabila was the first of the bloodiest battles ever fought on the North American continent.[10][11]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^abcdefghijklSylvia Flowers, "DeSoto's Expedition", U.S.National Park Service,2007, webpage:NPS-DeSoto.
  2. ^abRelated spellings:Mavila,Mavilla,Mauvilla.
  3. ^"Mystery solved? Alabama researchers close in on pivotal battle site".14 November 2021.
  4. ^The single primary source about DeSoto's expedition was written byHernández de Biedma.Another account, usually described as that of DeSoto's aideRodrigo Ranjel,survives only partially in a summary history written byGonzalo Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés.That secondary source had a strong influence on the formation of the text generally known as theRelaçamof the "Gentleman of Elvas"and, in turn, on the writing ofGarcilaso de la Vega'sFlorida del Inca.(see review ofThe Hernando de Soto Expedition:History, Historiography, and Discovery in the SoutheastinJournal of Interdisciplinary History30.3, Winter 1999, webpage:SIU-GArchived2009-03-17 at theWayback Machine).
  5. ^Charles Hudson (1998).Knights of Spain, Warriors of the Sun: Hernando de Soto and the South's Ancient Chiefdoms.University of Georgia Press. pp. 234–238.ISBN978-0-8203-2062-5.RetrievedMarch 3,2012.
  6. ^Duncan p. 519
  7. ^Duncan p. 382, 390, 518
  8. ^Duncan p. 387
  9. ^Duncan p. 388
  10. ^Duncan p. 384
  11. ^Tony Horwitz (April 27, 2009).A Voyage Long and Strange: On the Trail of Vikings, Conquistadors, Lost Colonists, and Other Adventurers in Early America.Macmillan. p. 239.ISBN978-0-312-42832-7.RetrievedMarch 3,2012.

References[edit]

  • Duncan, David E.Hernando De Soto, A Savage Quest in the Americas.(1996) University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
  • Sylvia Flowers, "DeSoto's Expedition", U.S.National Park Service,2007, webpage:NPS-DeSoto.