Jump to content

Micrometeoroid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Micrometeorite, collected from the Antarctic snow, was a micrometeoroid before it entered the Earth's atmosphere

Amicrometeoroidis a tinymeteoroid:a small particle of rock in space, usually weighing less than agram.Amicrometeoriteis such a particle that survives passage throughEarth's atmosphereand reaches Earth's surface.

The term "micrometeoroid" was officially deprecated by theIAUin 2017, as redundant to meteoroid.[1]

Origins and orbits[edit]

Micrometeoroids are very small pieces of rock or metal broken off from larger chunks of rock and debris often dating back to the birth of theSolar System.Micrometeoroids are extremely common in space. Tiny particles are a major contributor tospace weatheringprocesses. When they hit the surface of theMoon,or any airless body (Mercury,theasteroids,etc.), the resulting melting and vaporization causes darkening and other optical changes in theregolith.

Micrometeoroids have less stableorbitsthan meteoroids, due to their greatersurface areatomassratio. Micrometeoroids that fall to Earth can provide information on millimeter scale heating events in thesolar nebula.Meteoritesandmicrometeorites(as they are known upon arrival at the Earth's surface) can only be collected in areas where there is no terrestrialsedimentation,typically polar regions. Ice is collected and then melted and filtered so the micrometeorites can be extracted under a microscope.

Sufficiently small micrometeoroids avoid significant heating on entry intoEarth's atmosphere.[2]Collection of such particles by high-flying aircraft began in the 1970s,[3]since which time these samples of stratosphere-collectedinterplanetary dust(calledBrownlee particlesbefore their extraterrestrial origin was confirmed) have become an important component of theextraterrestrial materialsavailable for study in laboratories on Earth.

Historical studies[edit]

In 1946 during theGiacobinidmeteor shower,Helmut Landsbergcollected several small magnetic particles that were apparently associated with the shower.[4]Fred Whipplewas intrigued by this and wrote a paper that demonstrated that particles of this size were too small to maintain their velocity when they encountered theupper atmosphere.Instead, they quickly decelerated and then fell to Earth unmelted. In order to classify these sorts of objects, he coined the term "micro-meteorite".[5]

Velocities[edit]

Whipple, in collaboration withFletcher Watsonof theHarvard Observatory,led an effort to build an observatory to directly measure the velocity of the meteors that could be seen. At the time the source of the micro-meteorites was not known. Direct measurements at the new observatory were used to locate the source of the meteors, demonstrating that the bulk of material was left over fromcomettails, and that none of it could be shown to have an extra-solar origin.[6]Today it is understood that meteoroids of all sorts are leftover material from the formation of the Solar System, consisting of particles from theinterplanetary dust cloudor other objects made up from this material, like comets.[7]

Flux[edit]

Lunar sample 61195 fromApollo 16textured with "zap pits" from micrometeorite impacts

The early studies were based exclusively on optical measurements. In 1957,Hans Petterssonconducted one of the first direct measurements of the fall of space dust on Earth, estimating it to be 14,300,000 tons per year.[8]This suggested that the meteoroid flux in space was much higher than the number based on telescope observations. Such a high flux presented a very serious risk to the high-orbitingApollocapsules and for missions to the Moon. To determine whether the direct measurement was accurate, a number of additional studies followed, including thePegasus satellite program,Lunar Orbiter 1,Luna 3,Mars 1andPioneer 5.These showed that the rate of meteors passing into the atmosphere, or flux, was in line with the optical measurements, at around 10,000 to 20,000 tons per year.[9]TheSurveyor Programdetermined that the surface of the Moon is relatively rocky.[10]Most lunar samples returned during theApollo Programhave micrometeorite impacts marks, typically called "zap pits", on their upper surfaces.[11]

Effect on spacecraft operations[edit]

Electron micrograph image of an orbital debris hole made in the panel of theSolar Maxsatellite

Micrometeoroids pose a significant threat tospace exploration.The average velocity of micrometeoroids relative to aspacecraftin orbit is 10 kilometers per second (22,500 mph). Resistance to micrometeoroid impact is a significant design challenge for spacecraft andspace suitdesigners (SeeThermal Micrometeoroid Garment). While the tiny sizes of most micrometeoroids limits the damage incurred, the high velocity impacts will constantly degrade the outer casing of spacecraft in a manner analogous tosandblasting.Long term exposure can threaten the functionality of spacecraft systems.[12]

Impacts by small objects with extremely high velocity (10 kilometers per second) are a current area of research interminal ballistics(although accelerating objects up to such velocities is difficult; current techniques includelinear motorsandshaped charges). The risk is especially high for objects in space for long periods of time, such assatellites.[12]They also pose major engineering challenges in theoretical low-cost lift systems such asrotovators,space elevators,and orbital airships.[13][14]

Spacecraft micrometeoroid shielding[edit]

The "energy flash" of ahypervelocityimpact during a simulation of what happens when a piece of orbital debris hits a spacecraft in orbit

Whipple's work pre-dated theSpace Raceand it proved useful when space exploration started only a few years later. His studies had demonstrated that the chance of being hit by a meteoroid large enough to destroy a spacecraft was extremely remote. However, a spacecraft would be almost constantly struck by micrometeorites, about the size of dust grains.[6]

Whipple had already developed a solution to this problem in 1946. Originally known as a "meteor bumper" and now termed theWhipple shield,this consists of a thin foil film held a short distance away from the spacecraft's body. When a micrometeoroid strikes the foil, it vaporizes into a plasma that quickly spreads. By the time this plasma crosses the gap between the shield and the spacecraft, it is so diffused that it is unable to penetrate the structural material below.[15]The shield allows a spacecraft body to be built to just the thickness needed for structural integrity, while the foil adds little additional weight. Such a spacecraft is lighter than one with panels designed to stop the meteoroids directly.

For spacecraft that spend the majority of their time in orbit, some variety of the Whipple shield has been almost universal for decades.[16][17]Later research showed thatceramic fibrewoven shields offer better protection to hypervelocity (~7 km/s) particles thanaluminiumshields of equal weight.[18]Another modern design usesmulti-layer flexible fabric,as inNASA's design for its never-flownTransHabexpandable space habitation module,[19]and theBigelow Expandable Activity Module,which was launched in April 2016 and attached to theISSfor two years of orbital testing.[20][21]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^IAU Commission F1 (April 30, 2017)."Definition of terms in meteor astronomy"(PDF).International Astronomical Union.Retrieved25 Jul2020.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. ^P. Fraundorf (1980) The distribution of temperature maxima for micrometeorites decelerated in the Earth's atmosphere without meltingGeophys. Res. Lett.10:765-768.
  3. ^D. E. Brownlee, D. A. Tomandl and E. Olszewski (1977) Interplanetary dust: A new source of extraterrestrial material for laboratory studies,Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf.8th:149-160.
  4. ^Fred Whipple,"The Theory of Micro-Meteorites, Part I: In an Isothermal Atmosphere"Archived24 September 2015 at theWayback Machine,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,Volume 36 Number 12 (15 December 1950), pp. 667 – 695.
  5. ^Fred Whipple,"The Theory of Micrometeorites."Archived17 October 2015 at theWayback Machine,Popular Astronomy,Volume 57, 1949, p. 517.
  6. ^abWhipple, Fred (1951)."A Comet Model. II. Physical Relations for Comets and Meteors".Astrophysical Journal.113:464–474.Bibcode:1951ApJ...113..464W.doi:10.1086/145416.
  7. ^Brownlee, D. E.; Tomandl, D. A.; Olszewski, E. (1977). "1977LPI.....8..145B Interplanetary dust: A new source of extraterrestrial material for laboratory studies".Proceedings of the 8th Lunar Scientific Conference.1977:149–160.Bibcode:1977LPI.....8..145B.
  8. ^Hans Pettersson, "Cosmic Spherules and Meteoritic Dust."Scientific American,Volume 202 Issue 2 (February 1960), pp. 123–132.
  9. ^Andrew Snelling and David Rush,"Moon Dust and the Age of the Solar System"Archived12 May 2011 at theWayback MachineCreation Ex-Nihilo Technical Journal,Volume 7 Number 1 (1993), p. 2–42.
  10. ^Snelling, Andrew and David Rush."Moon Dust and the Age of the Solar System."Archived2012-03-09 at theWayback MachineCreation Ex-Nihilo Technical Journal,Volume 7, Number 1, 1993, p. 2–42.
  11. ^Wilhelms, Don E. (1993),To a Rocky Moon: A Geologist's History of Lunar Exploration,University of Arizona Press,p.97,ISBN978-0816510658
  12. ^abRodriguez, Karen (April 26, 2010)."Micrometeoroids and Orbital Debris (MMOD)".www.nasa.gov.Archived fromthe originalon October 28, 2009.Retrieved2018-06-18.
  13. ^Swan, Raitt, Swan, Penny, Knapman, Peter A., David I., Cathy W., Robert E., John M. (2013).Space Elevators: An Assessment of the Technological Feasibility and the Way Forward.Virginia, USA: International Academy of Astronautics. pp. 10–11, 207–208.ISBN9782917761311.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^Swan, P., Penny, R. Swan, C. Space Elevator Survivability, Space Debris Mitigation, Lulu.com Publishers, 2011
  15. ^Brian Marsden,"Professor Fred Whipple: Astronomer who developed the idea that comets are 'dirty snowballs'."Archived11 February 2018 at theWayback MachineThe Independent,13 November 2004.
  16. ^Fred Whipple,"Of Comets and Meteors"Archived29 June 2008 at theWayback MachineScience,Volume 289 Number 5480 (4 August 2000), p. 728.
  17. ^Judith Reustle (curator),"Shield Development: Basic Concepts"Archived27 September 2011 at theWayback Machine,NASA HVIT. Retrieved 20 July 2011.
  18. ^Ceramic Fabric Offers Space Age ProtectionArchived9 March 2012 at theWayback Machine,1994 Hypervelocity Impact Symposium
  19. ^Kim Dismukes (curator),"TransHab Concept"Archived1 June 2007 at theWayback Machine,NASA, 27 June 2003. Retrieved 10 June 2007.
  20. ^Howell, Elizabeth (2014-10-06)."Private Inflatable Room Launching to Space Station Next Year".Space.com.Archivedfrom the original on 4 December 2014.Retrieved2014-12-06.
  21. ^"ISS welcomes CRS-8 Dragon after flawless launch".9 April 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 23 April 2016.Retrieved14 May2016.

See also[edit]

External links[edit]