Militia Ordinance
 | |
| Long title | An Ordinance of the Lords and Commons in Parliament for the safety and defence of the Kingdom of England and Dominion of Wales |
|---|---|
| Citation | [L.J., iv., 625.] |
| Introduced by | Sir Arthur Haselrige |
| Territorial extent | Kingdom of England |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | Withheld |
| Commencement | 15 March 1642 |
Status: Not passed | |
TheMilitia Ordinancewas passed by theParliament of Englandon 15 March 1642. By claiming the right to appoint military commanders without the king's approval, it was a significant step in events leading to the outbreak of theFirst English Civil Warin August.[1]
The1641 Irish Rebellionmeant there was widespread support in England for raising military forces to suppress it.[2]However, as relations betweenCharles Iand Parliament deteriorated, neither side trusted the other, fearing such an army might be used against them.[3]
The only permanent military force available were thetrained bands,orcountymilitia, controlled bylord lieutenants,who in turn were appointed by the king. In December 1641,Sir Arthur Haselrigeintroduced a militia bill giving Parliament the right to nominate its commanders, not Charles, which was passed by theHouse of Commons.
After failing to arrest theFive Memberson 5 January, Charles left London, and headed north toYork;over the next few weeks, many Royalist members of theCommonsandHouse of Lordsjoined him. The result was a Parliamentary majority in the Lords, who approved the bill on 5 March 1642, while confirming doing so was not a violation of the Oath of Allegiance.[4]
The bill was returned to the Commons for approval the same day, then passed to Charles for hisroyal assent,required for it to become a legally binding Act of Parliament.[3]When he refused, Parliament declared on 15 March 1642 "the People are bound by the Ordinance for the Militia, though it has not received the Royal Assent".[5]
Charles responded to this unprecedented assertion of parliamentary sovereignty by issuingCommissions of Array,although these were statements of intent, with little practical impact on the raising of armies. Parliament continued to pass and enforce Ordinances throughout the 1640s, most of which were declared void after the1660 Restoration;an exception was the 1643 excise duty.[6]
References
[edit]- ^Hibbert 1993,p. 38.
- ^Hutton 2003,p. 4.
- ^abFirth & Rait 1911,pp. 1–4.
- ^5 March 1642: Ordinance of Parliament for the Safety and Defence of the Kingdom & 1767-1830,pp. 624–625.
- ^"15 March 1642: That the People are bound by the Ordinance for the Militia, though it has not received the Royal Assent".House of Lords Journal, 1629–42.Vol. 4. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office. 1830. pp. 645–646 – via British History Online.
- ^Wheeler 1999,p. 148.
Sources
[edit]- Firth, C. H.; Rait, R. S., eds. (1911).Acts & Ordinances of the Interregnum 1642-1660; Volume I.HMSO.
- Hibbert, Christopher (1993).Cavaliers and Roundheads: The English at War 1642-1649.HarperCollins.ISBN978-0246136329.
- Hutton, Ronald (2003).The Royalist War Effort 1642-1646.Routledge.ISBN9780415305402.
- Journal of the House of Lords; Volume 4 5 March 1642.HMSO. 1767–1830.
- Wheeler, J. S. (1999).The Making of a World Power: War and the Military Revolution in Seventeenth Century England.Stroud: Sutton.ISBN0-7509-2025-4.
External links
[edit]- Gardiner, Samuel Rawson,ed. (1906)."50. The Militia Ordinance".The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625-1660(3rd Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 245–246 – via Constitution.org.