Queen of Rhodesia
Queen ofRhodesia | |
---|---|
Details | |
Style | Her Majesty |
Formation | 11 November 1965 |
Abolition | 2 March 1970 |
Queen of Rhodesiawas the title asserted forElizabeth IIasRhodesia's constitutional head of state following the country'sUnilateral Declaration of Independencefrom theUnited Kingdom.However, the position only existed under the Rhodesian constitution of 1965 and remained unrecognised elsewhere in the world. The British government, along with theUnited Nationsand almost all governments, regarded the declaration of independence as an illegal act and nowhere else was the existence of the British monarch havingseparate statusin Rhodesia accepted. With Rhodesia becoming a republic in 1970, the status or existence of the office ceased to be contestable.
History
[edit]Southern Rhodesiahad been acrown colonywithresponsible governmentsince 1923 and the transfer from rule under theBritish South Africa Company.The monarch of the United Kingdom was automatically recognised as monarch in the colonies. Following the UK refusing to grant Southern Rhodesiaindependence under minority rule,on 11 November 1965, they unilaterally declared independence and declaredElizabeth IIas the queen of Rhodesia.[1]The independence declaration clarified that they were only breaking from the British government and affirmed loyalty to Elizabeth, viewing her as the separate Rhodesian monarch as part of a "loyal rebellion".[2]All Rhodesian oaths continued to be taken to her and the declaration of independence ended with "God Save The Queen".[3]
In response, theBritish Parliamentpassed theSouthern Rhodesia Act 1965whichde jureaffirmed British control of the colony and granted Queen Elizabeth II the power to act in the colony. She then issued an order in council to suspend the constitution and sacked theRhodesian Frontgovernment.[4]These were ignored in Rhodesia and Prime MinisterIan Smithclaimed it was the act of the British government and not of the Queen. The Rhodesian theory believed in the divisibility ofthe Crownto show their political autonomy.[5]The Rhodesians also ceased to recognise thegovernor of Southern Rhodesia,Sir Humphrey Gibbs,as the representative of the Queen and asked him to move out ofGovernment House, Salisbury(which Gibbs refused to do). Smith then asked Queen Elizabeth II to appoint a governor-general of Rhodesia to act on her behalf, but she refused as she did not recognise the title and treated the request as if it had come from an ordinary citizen as Smith was no longer recognised as prime minister.[4]Elizabeth issued a response via Gibbs that said: "Her Majesty is not able to entertain purported advice of this kind and has therefore been pleased to direct that no action should be taken upon it".[4]
Accordingly Smith appointedClifford DupontasOfficer Administering the Governmentin place of any royal appointment. It was initially suggested by Rhodesian officials that, due to hisStuartancestry, they would appoint theDuke of Montroseasregentuntil Queen Elizabeth II recognised the title. The suggestion was rejected as a violation of theRegency Act 1953.[6]On the British side, the diplomatMichael Pallisersuggested that Queen Elizabeth II appoint her husbandPrince Philipas governor-general and have him arrive with a detachment ofColdstream Guardsto legally sack Smith and the Rhodesian Front.[7]However the plan was not feasible due to bringing the royal family into politics and the risk that Philip would have been in.[7]
Power
[edit]The monarch's powers were the same as prior to theUnilateral Declaration of Independence.However they werede factoexercised by the Officer Administering the Government (Clifford Dupont) rather than by the governor of Southern Rhodesia (SirHumphrey Gibbs) as Queen Elizabeth II'sde jurerepresentative. Every Rhodesian Bill presented to the Officer Administering the Government, had the followingwords of enactment:[8]
Be it enacted by His Excellency the Officer Administering the Government as representative of the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Parliament of Rhodesia
In 1968, shecommuted the sentenceof three African men sentenced to death.[9]Her pardon was ignored as theHigh Court of Rhodesiaruled that, as Rhodesian officials had not been consulted, the pardon came from the orders of the British government rather than from the Queen of Rhodesia, and the men were executed.[10][11][12]
Symbols
[edit]The Queen's portrait featured on Rhodesian banknotes and coins, as well as on postage stamps.[13]
-
Ten shillings
-
One pound
-
Five pounds
Abolition
[edit]There had been calls for Rhodesia to become a republic as early as 1966.[14]The Whaley Commission had been set up by the Rhodesian government in 1967 to review the constitution and recommendations for alterations.[15]After Queen Elizabeth II's pardon was ignored, the Rhodesian government announced that theQueen's Official Birthdaywould no longer be a public holiday and they would only fire a 21-gun salute on her actual birthday.[16]
The Rhodesian Front published the Whaley Report's proposals for a referendum to abolish the monarchy and establish a republic with a new constitution a month after the executions.[15][17]Smith argued for it on the grounds that the British government "had denied us the Queen of Rhodesia".[18]In the1969 Rhodesian constitutional referendum,the Rhodesian electorate voted in favour of the establishment of a republic. The move was opposed by theRoman Catholic Churchover fears it would lead to further marginalisation of blacks in Rhodesia.[19]Gibbs also resigned as Governor at this time.[20]The internationally unrecognised republic was declared on 2 March 1970. In response, Queen Elizabeth II formally revoked the royal titles of theRoyal Rhodesian Air ForceandRoyal Rhodesia Regiment.[21]Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother's honorary commissionership of theBritish South Africa Policewas also suspended.[22]Dupont replaced Elizabeth II as head of state in Rhodesia as the newpresident.[23]
Contrary to Smith's hope that such a move would bring international legitimacy, it had the opposite effect. All countries that had relations with Rhodesia, exceptPortugalandSouth Africa,withdrew their diplomatic missions from the country. This was because originally they maintained relations because of the pre-existing royal accreditation but because a republic had been declared, that rationale was no longer valid.[24]
Rhodesia remained an unrecognised republic untilZimbabwe Rhodesiaagreed to return to colonial status in 1979. Queen Elizabeth II resumed monarchical duties over the colony through her role as Queen of the United Kingdom and appointedLord Soamesas her representative as Governor of Southern Rhodesia until its independence asZimbabweon 18 April 1980.[25]
References
[edit]- ^"As The Crown returns, watch out for these milestones".The Guardian.18 August 2019.Retrieved5 July2021.
- ^Kenrick, David (29 October 2018). "Settler Soul-Searching and Sovereign Independence: The Monarchy in Rhodesia, 1965–1970".Journal of Southern African Studies.44(6). Informa UK Limited: 1077–1093.doi:10.1080/03057070.2018.1516355.ISSN0305-7070.S2CID149475345.
- ^Lowry, Donal (2020), Kumarasingham, H. (ed.),"The Queen of Rhodesia Versus the Queen of the United Kingdom: Conflicts of Allegiance in Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence",Viceregalism,Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 203–230,doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46283-3_8,ISBN978-3-030-46282-6,S2CID226736902,retrieved6 July2021
- ^abcTwomey, Anne(2018).The Veiled Sceptre.Cambridge University Press. pp. 79–80.ISBN978-1107056787.
- ^Kenrick, David (2019).Decolonisation, Identity and Nation in Rhodesia, 1964–1979.Springer International Publishing. p. 135.ISBN978-3030326982.
- ^"Stuart Duke proposed as Regent of Rhodesia".The Guardian.14 October 1965.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^ab"Lancaster House 1979: Part II, The Witnesses by FCDO Historians".Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 20 December 2019. p. 118.Retrieved5 July2021– via Issuu.
- ^Rhodesia, Southern (1966),Act to Ratify and Confirm the Constitution of Rhodesia,p. 22
- ^"Rhodesia (Royal Prerogative of Mercy) (Hansard, 4 March 1968)".Hansard. 4 March 1968.Retrieved5 July2021.
- ^"Retaliation threats made to Rhodesia".El Paso Times.7 March 1968.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^""In hanging the three Africans, the Smith regime has been true to its basic nature.""(PDF).American Committee on Africa.Retrieved5 July2021.
- ^"Rhodesia Defies Queen's Reprieve; Hanging Ordered for Three Africans Long Doomed".The New York Times.6 March 1968.Retrieved5 July2021.
- ^Marr, Andrew (2011),The Diamond Queen: Elizabeth II and Her People,Pan Macmillan,ISBN9780230760943
- ^"White Rhodesians salute Independence anniversary".Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph(Press release). 11 November 1966.Retrieved5 July2021– via Google News.
- ^abHarris, P. B. (1969)."The Failure of a 'Constitution': The Whaley Report, Rhodesia, 1968".International Affairs.45(2). Wiley, Royal Institute of International Affairs: 234–245.doi:10.2307/2613004.ISSN1468-2346.JSTOR2613004.Retrieved11 August2021.
- ^"Queen".The Age.20 April 1968.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^"Rhodesia proposes to become a republic".The Vancouver Sun.17 July 1968.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^"Rhodesia ready to become a Republic".Red Deer Advocate.18 July 1968.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^"Challenge By the Church in Rhodesia".The New York Times.3 May 1970.Retrieved5 July2021.
- ^Kandiah, Michael (2001)."Rhodesia UDI"(PDF).Institute of Contemporary British History.Retrieved11 August2021.
- ^"That'll show them".Times Colonist.16 March 1970.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^Murphy, Phillip (2013).Monarchy and the End of Empire: The House of Windsor, the British Government, and the Postwar Commonwealth.Oxford University Press. pp. 105–106.ISBN978-0199214235.
- ^"Rhodesia becomes independent; seen as" just another dull occurrence "".Ames Daily Tribune.2 March 1970.Retrieved5 July2021– via Newspapers.com.
- ^Strack, Harry R. (1978).Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia(1st ed.). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. pp. 51–52.ISBN978-0-8156-2161-4.
- ^"Rhodesia Restored To Colonial Status".The New York Times.13 December 1979.Retrieved5 July2021.
- Elizabeth II
- National symbols of Rhodesia
- Politics of Rhodesia
- 1965 establishments in Rhodesia
- 1970 disestablishments in Rhodesia
- History of Rhodesia
- Former Commonwealth monarchies
- Former monarchies of Africa
- History of the British Empire
- History of the Commonwealth of Nations
- Zimbabwe and the Commonwealth of Nations