Jump to content

Morgan Russell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Morgan Russell
self-portrait c. 1907
Born(1886-01-25)January 25, 1886
DiedMay 29, 1953(1953-05-29)(aged 67)
NationalityAmerican
Known forPainting
MovementSynchromism

Morgan Russell(January 25, 1886 – May 29, 1953) was a modern American artist. WithStanton Macdonald-Wright,he was the founder ofSynchromism,a provocative style of abstract painting that dates from 1912 to the 1920s. Russell's "synchromies," which analogized color to music, were an early American contribution to the rise ofModernism.

Biography

[edit]
Cosmic Synchromy(1913–14). Oil on canvas, 41.28 cm x 33.34 cm. In the collection of theMunson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute
Morgan Russell, 1913–14,Synchromy in Orange, To Form,oil on canvas
Handwritten letter from Morgan Russell to Jean Gabriel Lemoine, 1923[1]

Russell was born and raised in New York City. He initially studied architecture and, after 1903, became friendly with the sculptorArthur Lee,for whom he posed as a model and with whom he lived for a time. From 1903 to 1905, he studied sculpture at theArt Students Leaguewith Lee andJames Earle Fraser;he also posed as a model for the sculpture class. With financial help fromGertrude Vanderbilt Whitney,whom he met at the League in January 1906, he traveled to Europe to study art in Paris and Rome. Mrs. Whitney was one of the earliest and staunchest believers in Russell's talent and provided him with a monthly stipend for several years. In 1907, after returning to New York City, Russell studied painting at the New York School of Art with the notedAshcan painterRobert Henri,among others. Returning to Paris in 1909, he studied atMatisse’s art school, frequented Gertrude Stein's salon, and metPicassoandRodin.[2]

In Paris, Russell metStanton Macdonald-Wright,a fellow expatriate, in 1911, and soon after the two began developing theories about color and its primacy in the creation of a meaningful work of art. Like other young adventurous artists of the time, they had come to view academic realism as a dead-end and were pondering the possibilities of an art form that might minimize or even abandon representational content. They were particularly interested in the theories of their teacher, Canadian painter Percyval Tudor-Hart, who believed that colors could be orchestrated in the same harmonious way that a composer arranges notes in a symphony. Inspired by their experience ofDelacroix,thePost-Impressionists,and theFauves,Russell and Macdonald-Wright co-founded Synchromism in 1912. In June of the same year, they held their first Synchromist exhibition at Der Neue Kunstsalon inMunich,followed four months later by another exhibition at GalerieBernheim-Jeunein Paris. Like other young modernists eager to make a name for themselves, they issued a manifesto broadcasting their goals, plastered the kiosks of Paris with notices of their show, and hoped to create a sensation. Russell also began exhibiting at theSalon des Indépendantsin 1913.

Synchromismwas an early innovation in pureabstraction,which was developed primarily by Russell with contributions from Stanton Macdonald-Wright. Other American painters in Paris experimenting with Synchromism at the time includedThomas Hart Benton,Andrew Dasburg,andPatrick Henry Bruce,all of whom were friends with Russell and Macdonald-Wright. Bruce was also friendly withSoniaandRobert Delaunay,proponents ofOrphism(a term coined in 1912 by the poetGuillaume Apollinaire). Similarities between Synchromism and Orphism led to later charges of plagiarism, which both Russell and Macdonald-Wright vehemently denied.[3]

Russell and Macdonald-Wright had high hopes for acclaim and financial success when they introduced Synchromism to the New York art world. Though Russell exhibited in the famousArmory Showin New York in 1913 and in the prestigiousForum Exhibition of Modern American Paintersin 1916, those hopes were never met. Art collectors, critics, and curators prior to World War I were reluctant to embrace color abstraction and, on the rare occasions when they were open to radical new styles of art, preferred the European modernism attached to names with greater cachet.

The first sympathetic, extended treatment of Synchromism appeared in the bookModern Painting: Its Tendency and Meaning,published in 1915 by Macdonald-Wright's brother,Willard Huntington Wright,a prestigious literary editor and art critic. (Stanton secretly co-authored the book, a fact that the Wright brothers were at pains to conceal.)[4]Modern Painting: Its Tendency and Meaningsurveyed the major modern art movements from Manet to Cubism, praised the work ofCézanneand Matisse, denigrated "lesser Moderns" such asKandinskyand the Orphists, and predicted a coming age in which abstraction would supplant representational art. Synchromism, the subject of a long, adulatory chapter, is presented in the book as the culminating point in the evolutionary process of Modernism. At no time did Wright acknowledge that he was writing about his own brother and his friend, Morgan Russell. Also, by overstating his case, Wright did little long-range good for the cause he was promoting, but his well-reviewed book did bring some informed attention to the two painters. For a time, their names appeared more frequently in the art press, and evenH.L. Menckenbought a Synchromist painting, which he later donated to theBaltimore Museum of Art.

By 1920, Russell and Macdonald-Wright had gone their separate ways, though Macdonald-Wright continued to make efforts at selling his friend's work throughout the 1920s.[5]Macdonald-Wright moved back to his native California and established a successful niche for himself as a charismatic figure in the Los Angeles art world. Russell, who was a cross-dresser (though married twice), never ceased painting, either, but he experienced financial difficulties and lapsed into relative obscurity. Synchromism was seldom discussed in art-history textbooks and was not the subject of any major exhibitions before the late 1950s. Gallery exhibitions of Russell's work were infrequent. After spending almost four decades in France between 1909 and 1946, Russell retired to the United States after the war and converted to Catholicism in 1947. His painting in his later years, often of nudes, was largely figurative and displayed none of the color effects he had pioneered with Synchromism. After suffering two incapacitating strokes, he died aged 67 in a nursing home in a suburb of Philadelphia in 1953.

Gradually, during the last three decades of the twentieth century, long-overdue scholarly and public attention was paid to Synchromism. TheWhitney Museum of American Artlaunched a six-museum traveling exhibition in 1978 devoted to color abstraction that brought Russell's name before the public again, and the purchase of his papers by collector Henry Reed, and the subsequent donation to and controversial retrieval of those papers from the Whitney Museum, brought his name into the news. Morgan Russell's first museum retrospective was held at theMontclair Art Museumin New Jersey in 1990. His work is represented today in the collection of theMuseum of Modern Art,theBrooklyn Museum,theWalker Art Centerin Minneapolis, theColumbus Museum of Art,and theSan Diego Museum of Art,among others. His monumentalSynchromy in Orange: To Form(1914), in the collection of theAlbright-Knox Art Galleryin Buffalo, was one of the centerpieces of the 2013 exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, "Inventing Abstraction, 1910–1925."

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Jean Gabriel Lemoine papers relating to Morgan Russell, 1921-1923".Archives of American Art,Smithsonian Institution.Retrieved24 July2022.
  2. ^Biographical information for this entry is taken from Marilyn Kushner,Morgan Russell(New York: Hudson Hills Press, 1990).
  3. ^South, Will (2001).Color, Myth, and Music: Stanton Macdonald-Wright and Synchromism.Raleigh, North Carolina:North Carolina Museum of Art.p. 43.
  4. ^For Willard Huntington Wright's campaign on behalf of his brother and Morgan Russell, see John Loughery,Alias S.S. Van Dine(New York:Scribners,1992), pp. 86–104.
  5. ^Kushner, pp. 191–192.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]