Natural logarithm of 2
The decimal value of thenatural logarithmof2(sequenceA002162in theOEIS) is approximately
The logarithm of 2 in other bases is obtained with theformula
Thecommon logarithmin particular is (OEIS:A007524)
The inverse of this number is thebinary logarithmof 10:
By theLindemann–Weierstrass theorem,the natural logarithm of anynatural numberother than 0 and 1 (more generally, of any positivealgebraic numberother than 1) is atranscendental number.
Series representations[edit]
Rising alternate factorial[edit]
- This is the well-known "alternating harmonic series".
Binary rising constant factorial[edit]
Other series representations[edit]
- using
- (sums of the reciprocals ofdecagonal numbers)
Involving the Riemann Zeta function[edit]
(γis theEuler–Mascheroni constantandζRiemann's zeta function.)
BBP-type representations[edit]
(See more aboutBailey–Borwein–Plouffe (BBP)-type representations.)
Applying the three general series for natural logarithm to 2 directly gives:
Applying them togives:
Applying them togives:
Applying them togives:
Representation as integrals[edit]
The natural logarithm of 2 occurs frequently as the result of integration. Some explicit formulas for it include:
Other representations[edit]
The Pierce expansion isOEIS:A091846
TheEngel expansionisOEIS:A059180
The cotangent expansion isOEIS:A081785
The simplecontinued fractionexpansion isOEIS:A016730
- ,
which yields rational approximations, the first few of which are 0, 1, 2/3, 7/10, 9/13 and 61/88.
Thisgeneralized continued fraction:
- ,[1]
- also expressible as
Bootstrapping other logarithms[edit]
Given a value ofln 2,a scheme of computing the logarithms of otherintegersis to tabulate the logarithms of theprime numbersand in the next layer the logarithms of thecompositenumberscbased on theirfactorizations
This employs
prime | approximate natural logarithm | OEIS |
---|---|---|
2 | 0.693147180559945309417232121458 | A002162 |
3 | 1.09861228866810969139524523692 | A002391 |
5 | 1.60943791243410037460075933323 | A016628 |
7 | 1.94591014905531330510535274344 | A016630 |
11 | 2.39789527279837054406194357797 | A016634 |
13 | 2.56494935746153673605348744157 | A016636 |
17 | 2.83321334405621608024953461787 | A016640 |
19 | 2.94443897916644046000902743189 | A016642 |
23 | 3.13549421592914969080675283181 | A016646 |
29 | 3.36729582998647402718327203236 | A016652 |
31 | 3.43398720448514624592916432454 | A016654 |
37 | 3.61091791264422444436809567103 | A016660 |
41 | 3.71357206670430780386676337304 | A016664 |
43 | 3.76120011569356242347284251335 | A016666 |
47 | 3.85014760171005858682095066977 | A016670 |
53 | 3.97029191355212183414446913903 | A016676 |
59 | 4.07753744390571945061605037372 | A016682 |
61 | 4.11087386417331124875138910343 | A016684 |
67 | 4.20469261939096605967007199636 | A016690 |
71 | 4.26267987704131542132945453251 | A016694 |
73 | 4.29045944114839112909210885744 | A016696 |
79 | 4.36944785246702149417294554148 | A016702 |
83 | 4.41884060779659792347547222329 | A016706 |
89 | 4.48863636973213983831781554067 | A016712 |
97 | 4.57471097850338282211672162170 | A016720 |
In a third layer, the logarithms of rational numbersr=a/bare computed withln(r) = ln(a) − ln(b),and logarithms of roots vialnn√c=1/nln(c).
The logarithm of 2 is useful in the sense that the powers of 2 are rather densely distributed; finding powers2iclose to powersbjof other numbersbis comparatively easy, and series representations ofln(b)are found by coupling 2 tobwithlogarithmic conversions.
Example[edit]
Ifps=qt+dwith some smalld,thenps/qt= 1 +d/qtand therefore
Selectingq= 2representslnpbyln 2and a series of a parameterd/qtthat one wishes to keep small for quick convergence. Taking32= 23+ 1,for example, generates
This is actually the third line in the following table of expansions of this type:
s | p | t | q | d/qt |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1/2=0.50000000… |
1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | −1/4= −0.25000000… |
2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1/8=0.12500000… |
5 | 3 | 8 | 2 | −13/256= −0.05078125… |
12 | 3 | 19 | 2 | 7153/524288=0.01364326… |
1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1/4=0.25000000… |
3 | 5 | 7 | 2 | −3/128= −0.02343750… |
1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3/4=0.75000000… |
1 | 7 | 3 | 2 | −1/8= −0.12500000… |
5 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 423/16384=0.02581787… |
1 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 3/8=0.37500000… |
2 | 11 | 7 | 2 | −7/128= −0.05468750… |
11 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 10433763667/274877906944=0.03795781… |
1 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 5/8=0.62500000… |
1 | 13 | 4 | 2 | −3/16= −0.18750000… |
3 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 149/2048=0.07275391… |
7 | 13 | 26 | 2 | −4360347/67108864= −0.06497423… |
10 | 13 | 37 | 2 | 419538377/137438953472=0.00305254… |
1 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1/16=0.06250000… |
1 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 3/16=0.18750000… |
4 | 19 | 17 | 2 | −751/131072= −0.00572968… |
1 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 7/16=0.43750000… |
1 | 23 | 5 | 2 | −9/32= −0.28125000… |
2 | 23 | 9 | 2 | 17/512=0.03320312… |
1 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 13/16=0.81250000… |
1 | 29 | 5 | 2 | −3/32= −0.09375000… |
7 | 29 | 34 | 2 | 70007125/17179869184=0.00407495… |
1 | 31 | 5 | 2 | −1/32= −0.03125000… |
1 | 37 | 5 | 2 | 5/32=0.15625000… |
4 | 37 | 21 | 2 | −222991/2097152= −0.10633039… |
5 | 37 | 26 | 2 | 2235093/67108864=0.03330548… |
1 | 41 | 5 | 2 | 9/32=0.28125000… |
2 | 41 | 11 | 2 | −367/2048= −0.17919922… |
3 | 41 | 16 | 2 | 3385/65536=0.05165100… |
1 | 43 | 5 | 2 | 11/32=0.34375000… |
2 | 43 | 11 | 2 | −199/2048= −0.09716797… |
5 | 43 | 27 | 2 | 12790715/134217728=0.09529825… |
7 | 43 | 38 | 2 | −3059295837/274877906944= −0.01112965… |
Starting from the natural logarithm ofq= 10one might use these parameters:
s | p | t | q | d/qt |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 3/125=0.02400000… |
21 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 460353203/10000000000=0.04603532… |
3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 1/4=0.25000000… |
10 | 5 | 7 | 10 | −3/128= −0.02343750… |
6 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 17649/100000=0.17649000… |
13 | 7 | 11 | 10 | −3110989593/100000000000= −0.03110990… |
1 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 1/10=0.10000000… |
1 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 3/10=0.30000000… |
8 | 13 | 9 | 10 | −184269279/1000000000= −0.18426928… |
9 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 604499373/10000000000=0.06044994… |
1 | 17 | 1 | 10 | 7/10=0.70000000… |
4 | 17 | 5 | 10 | −16479/100000= −0.16479000… |
9 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 18587876497/100000000000=0.18587876… |
3 | 19 | 4 | 10 | −3141/10000= −0.31410000… |
4 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 30321/100000=0.30321000… |
7 | 19 | 9 | 10 | −106128261/1000000000= −0.10612826… |
2 | 23 | 3 | 10 | −471/1000= −0.47100000… |
3 | 23 | 4 | 10 | 2167/10000=0.21670000… |
2 | 29 | 3 | 10 | −159/1000= −0.15900000… |
2 | 31 | 3 | 10 | −39/1000= −0.03900000… |
Known digits[edit]
This is a table of recent records in calculating digits ofln 2.As of December 2018, it has been calculated to more digits than any other natural logarithm[2][3]of a natural number, except that of 1.
Date | Name | Number of digits |
---|---|---|
January 7, 2009 | A.Yee & R.Chan | 15,500,000,000 |
February 4, 2009 | A.Yee & R.Chan | 31,026,000,000 |
February 21, 2011 | Alexander Yee | 50,000,000,050 |
May 14, 2011 | Shigeru Kondo | 100,000,000,000 |
February 28, 2014 | Shigeru Kondo | 200,000,000,050 |
July 12, 2015 | Ron Watkins | 250,000,000,000 |
January 30, 2016 | Ron Watkins | 350,000,000,000 |
April 18, 2016 | Ron Watkins | 500,000,000,000 |
December 10, 2018 | Michael Kwok | 600,000,000,000 |
April 26, 2019 | Jacob Riffee | 1,000,000,000,000 |
August 19, 2020 | Seungmin Kim[4][5] | 1,200,000,000,100 |
September 9, 2021 | William Echols[6][7] | 1,500,000,000,000 |
See also[edit]
- Rule of 72#Continuous compounding,in whichln 2figures prominently
- Half-life#Formulas for half-life in exponential decay,in whichln 2figures prominently
- Erdős–Moser equation:all solutions must come from aconvergentofln 2.
References[edit]
- Brent, Richard P. (1976)."Fast multiple-precision evaluation of elementary functions".J. ACM.23(2): 242–251.doi:10.1145/321941.321944.MR0395314.S2CID6761843.
- Uhler, Horace S. (1940)."Recalculation and extension of the modulus and of the logarithms of 2, 3, 5, 7 and 17".Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.26(3): 205–212.Bibcode:1940PNAS...26..205U.doi:10.1073/pnas.26.3.205.MR0001523.PMC1078033.PMID16588339.
- Sweeney, Dura W. (1963)."On the computation of Euler's constant".Mathematics of Computation.17(82): 170–178.doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1963-0160308-X.MR0160308.
- Chamberland, Marc (2003)."Binary BBP-formulae for logarithms and generalized Gaussian–Mersenne primes"(PDF).Journal of Integer Sequences.6:03.3.7.Bibcode:2003JIntS...6...37C.MR2046407.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2011-06-06.Retrieved2010-04-29.
- Gourévitch, Boris; Guillera Goyanes, Jesús (2007)."Construction of binomial sums forπand polylogarithmic constants inspired by BBP formulas "(PDF).Applied Math. E-Notes.7:237–246.MR2346048.
- Wu, Qiang (2003)."On the linear independence measure of logarithms of rational numbers".Mathematics of Computation.72(242): 901–911.doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-02-01442-4.
- ^Borwein, J.; Crandall, R.; Free, G. (2004)."On the Ramanujan AGM Fraction, I: The Real-Parameter Case"(PDF).Exper. Math.13(3): 278–280.doi:10.1080/10586458.2004.10504540.S2CID17758274.
- ^"y-cruncher".numberworld.org.Retrieved10 December2018.
- ^"Natural log of 2".numberworld.org.Retrieved10 December2018.
- ^"Records set by y-cruncher".Archived fromthe originalon 2020-09-15.RetrievedSeptember 15,2020.
- ^"Natural logarithm of 2 (Log(2)) world record by Seungmin Kim".19 August 2020.RetrievedSeptember 15,2020.
- ^"Records set by y-cruncher".RetrievedOctober 26,2021.
- ^"Natural Log of 2 - William Echols".RetrievedOctober 26,2021.
External links[edit]
- Weisstein, Eric W."Natural logarithm of 2".MathWorld.
- Gourdon, Xavier; Sebah, Pascal."The logarithm constant:log 2".