Old European hydronymy

Old European hydronymic map for the root*al-,*alm-

Old European(‹See Tfd›German:Alteuropäisch) is the term used byHans Krahe(1964) for the language of the oldest reconstructed stratum of Europeanhydronymy(river names) inCentralandWestern Europe.

Geography

Krahe writes in A1, chapter III, "Introducing preface" Number 2that the old European hydronomy extended from Scandinavia to South Italy, from Western Europe including the British Isles to the Baltic countries. Of the three Mediterranean peninsulas, Italy was most completely included, whilst the Balkan Peninsula was only scarcely covered. He writes that what he presents for hydronomy also applies to mountains and ranges of mountains, and continues with "Karpaten" and "Karawanken", certainly within the Slavic settlement area, omitting the Bavarian/Austrian "Karwendel" though.This area is associated with the spread of the later "Western" Indo-European dialects, theCeltic,Italic,Germanic,Baltic,andIllyrianbranches.Notably exempt isGreece.

Krahe located the geographical nucleus of this area as stretching from theBalticacrossWestern PolandandGermanyto theSwiss plateauand the upperDanubenorth of theAlps,while he considered the Old European river names of southern France, Italy and Spain to be later imports, replacing "Aegean-Pelasgian"andIberiansubstrates,corresponding toItalic,CelticandIllyrian"invasions" from about 1300 BC.

Origins of names

Old European hydronymic map for the root*Sal-,*Salm-

Krahe continues in III A 5, "Geographic Area and age of the paleoeuropean hydronomy", that the overwhelming majority of river and stream names originate from words that in the historical single languages cannot be found or cannot be found anymore.He uses mainly Indo-European roots to allow the river names in question to speak (rule 1), of which more than ten thousand are listed.

In III A 2, "Etymology and Semasiology of the paleoeuropean river names", Krahe states that the oldest strata are composed by prerequisites of nature and that the river names especially refer to the water itself (rule 2),and that words referring to humans and culture are newer. Both rules are important arguments for considering the old European hydronomy of southern France and the north of the Iberian Peninsula as a result of secondary implementation (A 1, number 3) due to a postulated immigration about 1300 BC.

In "Morphology of Paleoeuropean river names" (III A 1, number 3), Krahe concentrates on suffixes (simples and multiples) and distinguishes eleven different ones in a table.He attributes geographical (Central European vs. South European or Eastern), functional (for example affluent) or temporal (before or after a change of consonants or vowels) functions to the suffixes of the river names (rule 3). For the temporal function he claims the existence of a system ofphonetic changes(Lautverschiebung), however he does not include prefixes in his considerations.

Krahe's concentration on Indo-European roots and the omission of prefixes had serious negative consequences, because later those more than ten thousand roots were emphasized, or sometimes those ofOld Irish,but scarcely ofGaulishand other Celtic languages or theBaltic languagesand completely omittingBasque.Delamarre later included, for example, under Gaulishdubrononly rivers with "B" (or similar) omitting other names, which Krahe would have termedSchwundstufe;i.e., "zero grade",the form of a root characterized by the loss of a letter (basically a vowel), sometimes combined with the inversion of letters.

Krahe ignored the effect of the Moorish occupation in Spain, which resulted in frequent combinations of Arab "prefixes" (always at the beginning) on Celtic "suffixes" as seen inGuadiana(guadi"river" +anas"bayous, muddy", as it appears inPtolemy).The tables "Comparison of old European hydronyms" show that, in contradiction to Krahe's opinion, hydronyms (and toponyms) can in some cases very well be explained even by modern Irish, Welsh, or French and certainly by Gaulish.

Krahe's influence on other scholars

Krahe has influenced archaeologists, linguists and particularly experts in Celtic languages:

Marija Gimbutas(Lithuanian: Marija Gimbutienė) studied inTübingen,and received her doctorate of archeology in 1946 in the same department where Krahe lectured. Gimbutas developed theKurgantheory.

Jürgen Untermann,a disciple of Krahe, whose dissertation was written in 1954 in Tübingen was professor forcomparative linguisticsat theUniversity of Cologne.He was anepigraphistand Indoeuropeanist.

Antonio Tovar,with preliminary studies in Berlin, later professor of theUniversity of Salamanca,was professor for Comparative Linguistics in Tübingen from 1967 to 1979. Together with Manuel Agud andKoldo Mitxelenahe prepared an etymological dictionary of theBasque language.

Other authors

Other authors concerned with old European hydronomy are listed below.

Xavier Delamarreis a French linguist whose standard work isDictionnaire de la langue gauloise: Une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental('Dictionary of the Gaulish language: A linguistic approach to continental old Celtic'; 2nd edition, 2003). This is the most comprehensive publication onGaulishwords, with more than 800 terms in alphabetical order, derived from Gaulish–Greek, Gaulish–Etruscan, Gaulish–Latin, or solely Gaulish inscriptions, printed classical languages, coins, and some terms of Celtic substrate inOccitan.He presents all cases of appearance of toponyms and hydronyms in question, cites authors and roots, showing alternatives, and classifies, if necessary, as uncertain or questionable. He shows all river name examples with prefixes. For example, see "comparison of old hydronyms" adding "water", "clear", "hard stone", etc.

The German linguistTheo Vennemannsuggested in 2003 that the language of Old European hydronyms wasagglutinativeandPre-Indo-European.This theory has been criticised as being seriously flawed, and the opinion accepted more generally is that hydronyms are ofIndo-Europeanorigin.

The SpanishphilologistFrancisco Villar Liébana argued in 1990 for Old European preserved in river names and confined to the hydronymic substratum in the Iberian Peninsula as yet another Indo-European layer with no immediate relationship to theLusitanian language.However, the idea of "Old European" was criticized by Untermann in 1999 and De Hoz in 2001.Villar Liébana advocated the theories of Gimbutas against those ofColin Renfrew.In his workIndoeuropeos y No Indoeuropeos en la Hispania Prerromana('Indo-Europeans and Non-Indo-Europeans in Pre-Roman Hispania') he presents a nine-root "series" and a few more collective "series", mainly of toponyms (Hispanic and non-Hispanic) but also including hydronyms.For example, in chapter IV B VII,Villar Liébana discusses hydronyms of the seriesubastartingwith Maenuba (Pliny 3.8) = modernVélez;and, with the same name, a tributary of theBaetis(Pliny 3.11) =Guadiamar,Salduba(close toMálaga). He compares modern rivers names like Ubia, Ove, and Fonte dos Ovos withDanube,Corduba (modernCórdoba, Andalusia), and others.Whereverubaappears, as in the rivers Saruba = modernSaar (river)(an affluent of the riverMosel), Fuente Sarobals (inHuesca), and Sarrubian (Huesca), he acknowledges onlyubaand not the rootdanin Danubius (corresponding to Danube,Dnieper,andDniester) or the rootsarin others, which are all Indo-European roots.

Examples

An example is the old river nameIsar:

• Isar >Isar(Bavaria)
• Isar >Isère(France)
• Isar >Oise(France)
• Isar >Yzeron(France)
• Isar >Jizera(Czech Republic)
• Isar >Aire(Yorkshire)
• Isar >Yser(Belgium)
• Isar >Ypres,Ieperlee(Belgium) (Respectively in French and Dutch)
• Isar >Issel(Germany)
• Isar >IJssel(Netherlands) there are several (parts of) rivers in the Netherlands called IJssel (Yssel), one of which was called "Isala" during Roman times
• Isar >Ézaro(Spain)
• Isar >Ésera(Spain)
• Isar >Iseran(France)
• Isar >Esaro(Italy)
• Isar-ko >Eisack(Italy)
• Isar-na >Isières(Belgium)
• Isar-ellum > Izarillo "little Izar" (Spain)
• Isar >Iza(Romania)

Also relevant might be*ezero(the Slavic word for lake),ežeras(the Lithuanian word for lake), and theAcheronriver in Greece.

See also

• Bell Beaker culture
• Germanic substrate hypothesis
• Pan-Illyrian theories
• Pre-Celtic
• Rigvedic rivers
• Tyrsenian languages
• Urnfield culture
• Vasconic substrate hypothesis

Further reading

• Lühr, Rosemarie (2021)."Spatial cognition in landscape designations in the area of the Old European Hydronymy".Lexicographica.37(1): 59–84.doi:10.1515/lex-2021-0005.S2CID244134360..
• Woudhuizen, Fred C.(2020). "The Old Indo-European Layer in the Mediterranean as Represented by Hydronyms, Toponyms, and Ethnics".Journal of Indo-European Studies.48(1–2): 41–60..

External links

• Wasserwoerter Karte Hessenaccessdate 6-11-14