Jump to content

Operation Catechism

Coordinates:69°38′49″N18°48′26″E/ 69.64694°N 18.80722°E/69.64694; 18.80722
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Catechism
Part ofWorld War II
Painting showing an overturned ship
TheTirpitz's wreck painted byStephen Bone
Date12 November 1944
Location
NearTromsø,Norway
69°38′49″N18°48′26″E/ 69.64694°N 18.80722°E/69.64694; 18.80722
Result British victory
Belligerents
United Kingdom Germany
Commanders and leaders
United KingdomJames Tait Nazi GermanyRobert Weber
Strength
29 bombers BattleshipTirpitz
2 flak ships
Anti-aircraft batteries
Casualties and losses
1 aircraft damaged 940–1,204 killed
Tirpitzdestroyed

Operation Catechismwas a British air raid ofWorld War IIthat destroyed theGerman battleshipTirpitz.It was conducted on 12 November 1944 by 29Royal Air Forceheavy bombersthat attacked the battleship at its anchorage near the Norwegian city ofTromsø.The shipcapsizedafter being hit by at least two bombs and damaged by the explosions of others, killing between 940 and 1,204 members of the crew; the British suffered no casualties.

The attack ended a long-running series of air and naval operations againstTirpitzthat sought to eliminate the threat she posed toAlliedshipping. The battleship had been moved to the Tromsø area in October 1944 after being crippled on 15 September duringOperation Paravane.This attack had been carried out by the RAF's eliteNos. 9and617 Squadrons,who unsuccessfully attempted to strikeTirpitzagain at Tromsø on 29 October duringOperation Obviate.

Operation Catechism re-used the plans for Operation Obviate, and was conducted by the same squadrons. The aircraft departed from bases in northern Scotland and, due to clear weather conditions, theCommonwealthairmen were able to accurately target and bomb the battleship. The bombers were unmolested bya unitof Germanfighter aircraftthat failed to take off from nearby Tromsø in time. One bomber was significantly damaged by anti-aircraft artillery.

Tirpitzcapsized within minutes of being hit. Rescuers picked up hundreds of her crew from the water, but few of those trapped within the hull were saved. Several German military personnel were convicted of dereliction of duty following the attack. The battleship's destruction was celebrated in Allied countries and Norway, and is commemorated by several memorials and displays in museums.

Background

[edit]

From early 1942,Tirpitzposed a significant threat to theAllied convoystransporting supplies through theNorwegian Seato theSoviet Union.Stationed infjordson the Norwegian coast, thebattleshipwas capable of overwhelming the close-escort forces assigned to the Arctic convoys or breaking out into the North Atlantic.[1]To counter this threat, the Allies needed to keep a powerful force of warships with the BritishHome Fleet,andcapital shipsaccompanied most convoys part of the way to the Soviet Union.[2][3]

Northern Norway and nearby areas of Sweden, Finland and the Soviet Union

Tirpitzwas repeatedly attacked by British forces over several years.Royal Air Force(RAF)heavy bombersmade four unsuccessful raids on the battleship between January and April 1942 while she was stationed atFættenfjord.[4]From March 1943,Tirpitzwas based atKaafjordin the far north of Norway. DuringOperation Sourceon 22 September, she was severely damaged by explosives placed on her hull byRoyal Navypersonnel who had usedmidget submarinesto penetrate Kaafjord.[4][5]On 3 April 1944, aircraft flying from Royal Navyaircraft carriersattackedTirpitzduringOperation Tungstenand inflicted further damage.[6]A series of subsequent aircraft carrier attacks were unsuccessful, includingOperation Mascoton 17 July andOperation Goodwoodwhich was conducted between 22 and 29 August 1944.[7][8]

After the failure of Operation Goodwood, it was decided that further carrier attacks againstTirpitzwould be fruitless due to the inadequacies of the Royal Navy's aircraft and their armament. Accordingly, responsibility for sinkingTirpitzwas transferred to the RAF'sBomber Command.[9][10]On 15 September 1944, the eliteNos. 9and617 Squadronsattacked the battleship at Kaafjord during what was designatedOperation Paravane.This operation employedAvro Lancasterheavy bombers armed withTallboyheavy bombs and "Johnnie Walker"mines.[8]The Tallboy bomb weighed 12,000 pounds (5,400 kg) and had been developed to destroy heavilyarmouredtargets. When dropped from a high altitude, the bomb could penetrate a battleship's deck armour before exploding within the vessel.[11]Tirpitzwas struck by a single Tallboy during the attack that caused extensive damage to herbowand rendered her unfit for combat.[8]

AsTirpitzcould not be repaired and Soviet forces were advancing towards Kaafjord,Grand AdmiralKarl Dönitz,the commander of theKriegsmarine(the German Navy), ordered that she be transferred to near the northern Norwegian city ofTromsøand used as an immobile battery to defend the area from attack. Dönitz hoped that this would also convince the Allies thatTirpitzcontinued to pose a threat.[12][13]An anchorage was selected just off the coast of the island ofHåkøyawhere it was believed the water was shallow enough to prevent the battleship from sinking if another attack was successful.[14][15]Tirpitzarrived there on 16 October.[16]The depth of water at the mooring was found to be greater than anticipated, leaving the battleship vulnerable to capsizing. Because of the space needed byTirpitz'storpedo nets,it was not possible to move her closer to shore.[17]

RAF and Royal Navy reconnaissance aircraft locatedTirpitzat Tromsø on 18 October.[15]As the Allied intelligence services had not been able to confirm that the battleship had been crippled, it was considered necessary to conduct further air raids against her.[18]Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons attackedTirpitzon 29 October in what was designatedOperation Obviate.As the Tromsø area was within range of RAF bases in northern Scotland if the Lancasters were modified, this attack was somewhat simpler to conduct than Operation Paravane. To extend their range, the Lancasters were fitted with extra fuel tanks and more powerful engines, and their forward and mid-upper gun turrets and pilot's armour plate were removed.[19]The reduction in armament left the Lancasters very vulnerable to Germanfighter aircraft,and they would have to fly without escort as no British fighters had the range needed to reach Tromsø.[20]

During Operation Obviate, the bombers flew north over the Norwegian Sea, and met up overTorneträsklake in Northern Sweden.[21]This violatedSweden's neutrality,but allowed the bombers to approach Tromsø from the south-east. The Allies believed the Germans would not expect an attack from this direction.[22]Despite clear weather for most of the flight,Tirpitzwas covered by cloud shortly before the Lancasters reached the point where they were to release their Tallboy bombs. This made it impossible to accurately target the battleship, and the 33 aircraft which bombed achieved no hits.Tirpitzwas slightly damaged by a near miss. One of the Lancasters made aforced landingin Sweden after being damaged by anti-aircraft gunfire, and the remainder returned to base.[23][24]

Preparations

[edit]

British

[edit]

Bomber Command remained determined to sinkTirpitzas soon as possible, and preparations for another attack began shortly after Operation Obviate.[25][26]A report issued by the Royal Navy'sNaval Intelligence Divisionon 3 November judged that it remained necessary to attackTirpitzin northern Norway. The report argued that the battleship could potentially be repaired and made fully operational if she was left unmolested and able to reach a major port. As it would be difficult to target the battleship during the period ofnear perpetual darknessin the northern winter, further attacks needed to be made within the 23 days before this commenced.[27]No. 5 Group RAFdirected on 3 November that the next attack onTirpitzwas to take place on 5 November, and would re-use the plans developed for Operation Obviate. The raid was designated Operation Catechism.[27]

Twode Havilland Mosquitometeorological aircraft were stationed atRAF Sumburghfrom 4 November, from where they conducted daily sorties to monitor weather conditions in the Tromsø area.[27][28]On the same day, twenty No. 9 Squadron and nineteen No. 617 Squadron Lancasters were dispatched to airfields in northern Scotland in preparation for the operation. Agale warningwas issued that night and the raid was cancelled as a result on the morning of 5 November. Both squadrons returned to their home bases during the day.[27]The two squadrons deployed again to Scotland on 7 November, but soon returned to their home bases when the attack was cancelled.[29]

On 10 November, the Lancaster crews were briefed for another attack onTirpitz.Both squadrons moved to northern Scotland on 11 November when meteorological reports indicated that there would be clear weather over Tromsø for up to two days.[29][30]The aircraft were split betweenRAF Kinloss,RAF LossiemouthandRAF Milltown.[29]

German

[edit]
Black and white aerial photograph showing a body of water with a large warship near the shore
Tirpitzat her mooring off the island ofHåkøyain northern Norway in November 1944

Tirpitz's defences were improved after Operation Obviate. Additional anti-aircraft guns were emplaced in the Tromsø area and torpedo nets were laid around the battleship.[30]These augmented the protection offered by the anti-aircraft shipsNympheandThetisand several anti-aircraft batteries on the shore.[31]Dredgingoperations to reduce the water level below the battleship's hull began on 1 November. By 12 November these were half complete.[27]The smoke generators that had previously protectedTirpitzat Kaafjord were still being installed at the time of Operation Catechism and were not yet operational. In their place, seven fishing boats fitted with smoke generators were positioned near the battleship; these were not capable of generating a smokescreen that could completely coverTirpitz.[32]

The battleship's crew continued regular training exercises, and remained concerned about further air attacks.[33]On 4 NovemberTirpitz's commanding officer CaptainWolf Jungedeparted. He was replaced by the executive officer, CaptainRobert Weber.[34]Weber believed that within three weeks the days would be short enough to prevent further air attacks.[30]On 12 November around 1,700 men were on boardTirpitz.[35]

A force of 38 fighters was transferred toBardufossafter Operation Obviate to bolster the Tromsø region's air defences.[36]These aircraft formed part ofJagdgeschwader 5(JG 5), and were under the temporary command of MajorHeinrich Ehrler.The unit had been evacuated fromKirkenesin the far northeastern region of Norway as Soviet forcesadvanced towards the town,and was disorganised at the time of Operation Catechism.[37]Most of the pilots at Bardufoss were inexperienced and ill-trained, and the unit had not been properly briefed onTirpitz's presence in the area. Ehrler arrived at Bardufoss on 9 November en route toAlta,and decided to remain there until the morning of 12 November to oversee an emergency training programme for the fighter pilots.[32]

Attack

[edit]

Departure

[edit]

The decision to launch Operation Catechism was made in the early hours of 12 November. Aweather forecastissued on the afternoon of 11 November predicted that clouds might be encountered over northern Norway. One of the Mosquito meteorological aircraft flew over the area that evening, and its crew reported encountering patches of cloud when they returned to Scotland shortly after midnight on the night of 11–12 November.[29]Nevertheless, the commander of No. 5 Group, Air CommodoreRalph Cochrane,decided to attempt another attack in the hope that the bombers would encounter clear weather over Tromsø. The plan for this operation remained the same as that used in Operation Obviate, with the attack force to use identical routes.[38]

A total of 32 Lancasters were dispatched. No. 617 Squadron contributed eighteen bombers, and No. 9 Squadron thirteen. As with Operations Paravane and Obviate, they were joined by a Lancaster fitted out as a film aircraft fromNo. 463 Squadron RAAF.[39]The role of this aircraft was to collect material for use inpropagandafilms.[40]Seven No. 9 Squadron Lancasters, including that of its commanding officer Wing CommanderJames Bazin,were unable to participate, as they could not be cleared in time of the snow and ice that had formed on them overnight.[38][41]The No. 617 Squadron aircraft took off between 2:59 and 3:25 amBST,and the No. 9 Squadron aircraft between 3:00 and 3:35 am BST.[42]The aircraft flown by No. 9 Squadron's deputy commander, Squadron Leader Bill Williams, was among those able to take off and he assumed command of the unit.[43][44]

The Lancasters flew individually over the Norwegian Sea. As had been the case during Operation Obviate, they crossed the Norwegian coast between the towns ofMosjøenandNamsoswhere a gap in German radar coverage had been located. Several of the bombers flew too far to the north, and came within range of German radar stations.[45]The attack force rendezvoused over Torneträsk lake.[38][43]After making two orbits, No. 617 Squadron's commanding officer, Wing Commander"Willie" Tait,fired aflare gunfrom his aircraft to signal the force to proceed to Tromsø.[42]Two No. 9 Squadron Lancasters failed to reach Torneträsk lake in time, and returned to base without attacking.[38][39]

Approach

[edit]

The attack force proceeded north-west towards Tromsø, and climbed to 14,000 feet (4,300 m) to clear the mountains along the border of Sweden and Norway. They were guided by radio homing signals transmitted by a NorwegianMilorgagent stationed near the border between the two countries.[46]By the time they reached the Tromsø area, both of the squadrons had formed up into loose formations.[47]No. 617 Squadron led the attack, followed by No. 9 Squadron. The Lancasters were grouped into "gaggles" of four to six aircraft that flew at altitudes of between 14,000 feet (4,300 m) and 15,000 feet (4,600 m).[39]The No. 463 Squadron film aircraft approached Tromsø at 6,000 feet (1,800 m), and dropped to 2,000 feet (610 m) to evade anti-aircraft fire at the start of the attack.[48]

The German forces in the Tromsø area failed to adequately respond to multiple warnings of the approaching British bombers. Between 7:39 am and 8:50 am BST several observation posts in the area reported sighting Lancasters. As the first aircraft to be spotted were flying east, it was thought that they might be headed to the Soviet Union.Tirpitzwas not notified of the reports until 8:15 am BST and few reports were passed on to the JG 5 detachment at Bardufoss.Tirpitz's air raid siren was sounded at 8:51 am, and Weber informed the ship's crew seven minutes later that an attack was possible.[49]

At around 9:15 am BST,Tirpitzcontacted Bardufoss to request that fighters be dispatched to provide air cover. This was too late for any of the fighters to reach Tromsø before the bombers arrived.[50]The local Luftwaffe command ordered the fighters to bescrambledat 9:18 am. Due to various delays, the aircraft did not begin taking off from Bardufoss until approximately 9:32 am. Ehrler took off first, but the others were delayed from doing so for several minutes while an aircraft landed on the runway. Ehrler proceeded to the Tromsø area by himself, but was unable to locate the British bombers before they attacked. It is not clear where the other fighters were sent. One post-attack report stated they were sent to the border with Sweden, another that they proceeded to Kaafjord and two pilots claimed to have reached Tromsø afterTirpitzwas destroyed.[51]

Weather conditions over Tromsø continued to be clear when the attack force arrived in the area. Tait spottedTirpitzfrom 20 miles (32 km) away, and later recalled that she was "lying squat and black among her torpedo nets like a spider in her web, silhouetted against the glittering blue and green waters of the fjord".[38]

Destruction ofTirpitz

[edit]

Tirpitzfired the first shots of the battle at 9:38 am BST when she opened fire on the bombers with her 15-inch (380 mm) calibre main guns from a range of 13.5 miles (22 km), firing timed-fuze fragmentation shells designed for barrage antiaircraft fire. Other anti-aircraft guns also fired on the Lancasters as they approached, but did not disrupt them. No smokescreen was present as they flew north-west towards their bombing positions.[47][52]

A film showingTirpitzunder attack during Operations Paravane and Catechism

The attack commenced at 9:41 am BST. Tait's aircraft was the first to drop its Tallboy, which hitTirpitz.No. 617 Squadron completed its attack at 9:44 am BST with all aircraft bombing. No. 9 Squadron aircraft began dropping their Tallboys at 9:45 am BST. By this time the battleship was on fire and covered in smoke. The last bomb was released at 9:49 am BST.[53][54][55]

Tirpitzwas rapidly destroyed. She was struck by two Tallboys that penetrated her armoured deck. One hit to the port of "Bruno" turret in the forward section of the ship but did not explode.[56]The other was dropped by Tait's aircraft, struck the port sideamidshipsnear the tracks for theaircraft catapult,and exploded over the portboiler room.This explosion caused severe damage that resulted in extensive flooding, fires throughout the ship and alistof 15 to 20 degrees to port.[52][56][57]Several other bombs detonated in the water nearTirpitz,which caused further damage to her hull and additional flooding. These explosions also created large craters below the ship, and blew away much of the gravel that had been dumped beneath her.[58][59]Another Tallboy probably hitTirpitz.The historian John Sweetman states that this bomb ricocheted off the side of the ship. William H. Garzke and Robert O. Dulin have written that it is likely to have penetrated the armoured deck near "Caesar" turret in thesternof the ship and started a fire near a powder or shellmagazine.[56][60]Almost all the hits and near misses were on the port side ofTirpitz,which destabilised her and led the list to rapidly increase.[61]Many sailors manningTirpitz's anti-aircraft guns were killed or wounded by the bombs, resulting in a significant reduction in the volume of fire directed at the Lancasters.[52]

After the first bomb struck his ship, Weber ordered the crew to evacuate thearmoured citadeland attempt to counter the flooding. Despite the list, Weber expected thatTirpitzwould not sink as the water beneath her hull was too shallow.[58]Counter flooding proved impossible as the controls for the necessary systems had been abandoned, and the volume of water that was entering the ship was well beyond their ability to fight had they been operational. Weber ordered that the lower decks be evacuated at 9:45 am, by which time the list had reached between 30 and 40 degrees.[62]At 9:50 am the magazine for "Caesar" turret exploded, causing extensive damage.Tirpitz's list rapidly increased, and she was soon lying on her side. Weber then gave the order to abandon ship.[58]The battleship continued to heel over, and capsized at 9:52 am.[52]Almost 1,000 of her crew had either been killed by this time, or were trapped inside the hull.[58]

The crews of several Lancasters observedTirpitzcapsize.[63]The No. 463 Squadron film aircraft made a final pass over the battleship at an altitude of just 50 feet (15 m) to capture footage of the event.[64]Just after 11:00 am BST a photo reconnaissance Mosquito overflew the Tromsø region, and photographed the wreck.[65]TheSecret Intelligence ServiceagentEgil Lindbergalso sent radio reports from Tromsø confirming thatTirpitzhad been destroyed.[66]

Aftermath

[edit]

Rescue efforts

[edit]
Black and white aerial photograph showing an overturned ship
The capsizedTirpitzin March 1945

The German forces in the Tromsø area endeavoured to rescue the surviving members ofTirpitz's crew. Within two hours, 596 had swum to shore or been rescued from the water.[59][67]Others were trapped in air pockets within the wreck.[68]These men were doomed unless they were able to move to what was once the bottom of the ship, and be rescued before their air supply ran out.[69]Shortly afterTirpitzcapsized, parties of sailors climbed onto the hull and painted marks on locations where they heard signs of life.[70]Acetylene torcheswere needed to cut into the thick hull, and none were initially available. Local Norwegian civilians who owned torches hid them, and only one could be found.[71]A total of 87 men were rescued from within the hull in the 24 hours after the attack.[68]Cutting continued for two further days, and was finally abandoned when it was assessed that the oxygen supply inside the wreck would have been exhausted; no survivors were recovered during this period.[68][71]Estimates of the total number of sailors and officers killed vary, with the most common figures lying between 940 and 1,204.[71]Weber and all of his senior officers were among the dead.[68][72]

Many Norwegian civilians in Tromsø were pleased thatTirpitzhad been destroyed, not least as it meant the end of an order requiring that theybilletmembers of her crew. Several civilians who showed pleasure at the event in public were arrested by theGestapo.[73]Other Norwegians were saddened by the way that the battleship's crew had died.[74]

Work began on strippingTirpitz's wreck soon after rescue efforts ended, and continued until the late 1950s. Before the end of the war, German personnel removed the ship's bronzepropellersand some other components so they could be melted down.[75]The wreck was sold to a Norwegianscrapdealing company in 1948, and was broken upin situ.Salvage work concluded in 1957, by which time most remnants of the battleship had been removed. The human remains which were recovered from the wreck by scrappers were initially buried alongside unwanted parts ofTirpitz,but this ceased following complaints by a local church minister. The remains of hundreds of others were recovered and buried in Norwegian cemeteries.[76]

Return to base

[edit]

One of the No. 9 Squadron Lancasters was badly damaged by anti-aircraft gunfire, and its pilot decided to attempt a crash-landing in Sweden. The crew were able to make radio contact withSwedish militaryforces manning a small airfield atNaisjärv,who prepared it for the bomber. When one of the Lancaster's engines cut out while attempting to land, the pilot made abelly landingin a field near a village. None of the crew were injured, and all wereinternedby the Swedish Government.[77]They were subsequentlyrepatriatedto the UK.[66]

Black and white photo of six men standing behind an aircraft
A No. 617 Squadron crew shortly after returning from Operation Catechism

The other Lancasters' return flights were complicated by adverse winds. Due to shortages of fuel, many had to divert to alternative airfields but all landed safely during the afternoon of 12 November.[73]Two Lancasters landed atRAF Banff,one of which still carried its Tallboy which had hung up. After taxiing to a halt, and moments after the crew left the aircraft, the Tallboy released itself and clattered to the concrete.[78]The film aircraft flew directly to its home station,RAF Waddington,where its pilot was debriefed by Air Commodore Cochrane.[79]The bomber squadrons returned to their home bases over the next two days.[65]

In the days after the attack, the airmen received congratulations from KingGeorge VI,Prime MinisterWinston Churchill,theWar Cabinetand many others. They were also all granted a 48-hour period of leave.[65]Churchill was congratulated by his fellow Allied leadersFranklin D. RooseveltandJoseph Stalin.[80]TheAir Ministryissued a communique announcingTirpitz's destruction on 13 November, leading to celebratory stories in many British newspapers the next day.[81]The story was also prominently reported in many other countries.[82]Tait and Williams travelled to London on 14 November for apress conference.The two airmen also gave interviews; Tait described the raid in aBBCbroadcast and Williams spoke with AmericanCBScorrespondentEdward R. Murrow.[44]The success of Operation Catechism led to celebrations in Allied countries.Tirpitzwas seen as a symbol of theNaziregime, and her destruction provided further evidence that the war was coming to an end. Tait was privately sceptical of the value of the operation though, and later noted in his private papers that it "had not contributed much to the Allied victory" as the crippled battleship had not posed a threat.[83]

Many of the aircrew involved in Operation Catechism were decorated in recognition of their part in the attack.[84]Cochrane recommended Tait for theVictoria Cross.While the recommendation was endorsed by Air Chief MarshalSir Arthur Harris,the head of Bomber Command, the medal was not awarded.[85]Instead, Tait was awarded a thirdbarto hisDistinguished Service Order(DSO). The citation recognised his "conspicuous bravery and extreme devotion to duty in the face of the enemy, constantly exemplified over a long period of operational flying" and role in leading three attacks onTirpitz.[86]Two other pilots received the DSO and six airmen were awarded theDistinguished Flying Cross.[84]

Tirpitz's destruction freed up Allied resources for other theatres. More than half the Home Fleet was deployed elsewhere, including many ships sent to the Pacific to fight Japanese forces.[87]

Assessments

[edit]

German

[edit]

The loss ofTirpitzwas a disaster for the German military units in northern Norway.[74]In addition to the heavy loss of life, the destruction of the battleship left theKriegsmarinewithout any of the capital ships needed to threaten Allied convoy routes.[88]Ehrler and several personnel assigned to observer posts, anti-aircraft guns and ships werecourt martialledand imprisoned.[89]Ehrler was convicted in relation to leaving his unit's operations room under the command of anon-commissioned officeron 12 November. He was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, but was released after a month and demoted. He was killed in combat on 4 April 1945.[90]Many commentators and members of JG 5 believe that Ehrler was treated as ascapegoat.[91]Dönitz also ordered that an inquiry be held into why the battleship capsized. The inquiry concluded that "the actual depth of the prepared berth did not conform with the requirements and directions of the commander-in-chief".[92]

It is unclear why the fighters at Bardufoss failed to protect the battleship. Much of the relevant documentation did not survive the war, and accounts from survivors are at times contradictory.[93]Sweetman judged that the failure ultimately resulted from the order to intercept the bombers being issued too late, and a lack of clear plans to coordinate the defence.[94]He attributed the former to delays in recognising that the bombers were headed forTirpitz,as well as inefficient chains of communication that slowed the speed with which this information could be acted on. For instance, it was not possible for German naval personnel to pass information directly to theirLuftwaffeequivalents, as messages had to be sent through single-service channels and could only be transmitted between services at relatively senior levels.[89]The historian Daniel Knowles reached a similar conclusion, labellingTirpitz's defences "chaotic" due to the poor communications between the battleship and Bardufoss.[95]

British

[edit]
Black and white photo of two men wearing military uniforms standing on the overturned hull of a ship
RAF Wing CommanderWillie Tait(at left) and an Australian officer standing on the wreck ofTirpitzin late 1945

The British military undertook several analyses of the attack. In December 1944, No. 5 Group's headquarters investigated the accuracy of the bombing. This analysis found that No. 617 Squadron had been much more accurate than No. 9 Squadron, possibly due to the latter squadron's bombardiers inputting an inaccurate wind speed into theirbombsights.The superiorStabilized Automatic Bomb Sightfitted to No. 617 Squadron's aircraft may have also contributed to the difference.[96]

On 21–22 May 1945, afterthe end of the war in Europe,an RAF team travelled to Norway to investigate the causes ofTirpitz's sinking. During the trip they inspected the wreck of the battleship and interviewed key German officers. In their report, the team noted that the damage inflicted onTirpitzduring Operations Source and Paravane had never been fully repaired. The team concluded that the battleship had been directly hit by two Tallboys.[97]A team from the Royal Navy'sDirectorate of Naval Constructionalso inspected the wreck between 4 September and 14 October 1945, and interviewed witnesses to the attack. This team judged that a lack of watertight integrity resulting from flaws inTirpitz's design, as well as the watertight doors that dividedcompartmentsbeing left open as the crew evacuated, led the battleship to rapidly capsize.[98]Sweetman noted that "there was, thus, no single cause ofTirpitz's ultimate loss ", as it resulted from the combination of two direct hits, the damage caused by five near misses and problems with the battleship's design.[99]

Historiography

[edit]
Black and white photograph of a capsized ship
The wreck ofTirpitzafter the war

Historians hold differing views over whether the final attacks onTirpitzwere necessary.Angus Konstamhas written that the battleship posed no threat to Allied shipping from April 1944 due to the damage inflicted in Operations Source and Tungsten. He argued that the subsequent attacks were motivated by Churchill and other members of the War Cabinet having an "obsession" with destroyingTirpitz,and that Operations Obviate and Catechism were mainly undertaken for propaganda purposes.[100]Patrick Bishop has observed that "the zeal of the pursuit, whipped on by Churchill, seems excessive now, but wartime created its own dynamic", and that Operation Catechism contributed little towards ending the war.[83]Similarly, Niklas Zetterling and Michael Tamelander have judged that although "the British were not fully aware that the Germans had written offTirpitzas an offensive weapon in autumn 1944, their final efforts appear almost overzealous ".[101]Theofficial historyof British intelligence in World War II states that Dönitz's use of the battleship to tie down Allied resources was successful, and "in her last days she briefly excelled" in this role.[102]

Other historians believe that the attacks were justified. Sweetman has written that while the Allied intelligence services erred in believing thatTirpitzcould be repaired and returned to service following Operation Paravane, the British leadership acted correctly on the information available to them by ordering further attacks.[103]John Ellis reached a similar conclusion, and also argued that Operations Obviate and Catechism were justified as they contributed to sustaining theFortitude Northdeception campaign that had led the Germans to maintain powerful ground forces in Norway in the mistaken belief that the Allies were planning amphibious landings there.[104]The retiredUnited States NavyRear AdmiralWilliam H. Langenbergjudged that "because of her strategic importance, all the Allied attempts to disable or sinkTirpitzwere justified ".[105]

There is consensus that the engagement was well executed by the Allied forces while the German forces failed. Konstam noted that Operations Paravane, Obviate and Catechism were "well-planned and conducted" and "provided a neat ending to what had been a long and often tortuous aerial campaign".[40]Sweetman wrote that while the Royal Navy's aircraft and bombs could have destroyedTirpitz"with luck", the combination of the highly-capable Lancaster bomber and the powerful Tallboy bomb was better suited to this task as it removed "any element of luck, provided accuracy could be obtained".[106]Bishop stated that whileTirpitz's crew "did their duty and defended their ship to the last", the Luftwaffe failed.[107]Jan Forsgren observed that the lack of attention given to the battleship's defence by the German high command was "quite remarkable" in light of the previous British attacks.[80]

Commemoration

[edit]

Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons have had a long-running rivalry over which unit deserves credit for destroyingTirpitz.This rivalry began immediately after Operation Catechism.[108]In 1950 the Norwegian Government presented the RAF with part of abulkheadremoved from the wreck whichTirpitz's crew had painted with a representation of the battleship. This was initially displayed atRAF Binbrook,from which both Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons had operated during periods of World War II, but was soon stolen by No. 9 Squadron personnel who installed it at the unit's headquarters. Over the next 50 years the squadrons conducted elaborate operations to steal the trophy from one another. It was handed over to theRoyal Air Force Museumin 2002, and is currently on display atRoyal Air Force Museum London.[109]

Tirpitzis commemorated by several monuments. The main memorial is a small granite slab in memory of the ship and the sailors killed on board her, at the Ehrenfriedhof cemetery inWilhelmshaven,Germany.Tirpitzsurvivors held a ceremony at the cemetery's chapel on 12 November each year until at least 2014.[107][110]TheTirpitz Museumat Kaafjord houses items and photographs associated with the battleship.[111]Other items removed from the wreck are on display at a museum in Tromsø as well as other museums around the world.[112]Some of the battleship's armour plates were sold to theNorwegian Public Roads Administration,which still uses them to cover excavations on roads in the Oslo region.[113]The remnants of the battleship that remain in the water off Håkøya have been registered as a protected area, and are treated as awar grave.[114]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Ellis 1999,pp. 294–295.
  2. ^Bennett 2012,p. 9.
  3. ^Faulkner & Wilkinson 2012,p. 109.
  4. ^abKonstam 2018,p. 6.
  5. ^Bennett 2012,pp. 13–14.
  6. ^Bennett 2012,p. 15.
  7. ^Konstam 2018,p. 7.
  8. ^abcBennett 2012,p. 19.
  9. ^Roskill 1961,p. 161.
  10. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 85, 89.
  11. ^Konstam 2018,p. 16.
  12. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 121.
  13. ^Bishop 2012,pp. 340–341.
  14. ^Bishop 2012,p. 341.
  15. ^abKonstam 2018,p. 77.
  16. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 123.
  17. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 125.
  18. ^Zetterling & Tamelander 2009,pp. 296–297.
  19. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 126–127.
  20. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 113.
  21. ^Konstam 2018,p. 81.
  22. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 126.
  23. ^Konstam 2018,pp. 80–82.
  24. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 132–134.
  25. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 132.
  26. ^Roskill 1961,p. 168.
  27. ^abcdeSweetman 2000,p. 137.
  28. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 123.
  29. ^abcdSweetman 2000,p. 138.
  30. ^abcKonstam 2018,p. 82.
  31. ^Konstam 2018,p. 79.
  32. ^abForsgren 2014,p. 126.
  33. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 124.
  34. ^Bishop 2012,p. 350.
  35. ^Knowles 2018,p. 270.
  36. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 122.
  37. ^Zetterling & Tamelander 2009,p. 307.
  38. ^abcdeBishop 2012,p. 352.
  39. ^abcKonstam 2018,p. 83.
  40. ^abKonstam 2018,p. 89.
  41. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 125.
  42. ^abSweetman 2000,p. 139.
  43. ^abZetterling & Tamelander 2009,p. 305.
  44. ^abBishop 2012,p. 364.
  45. ^Zetterling & Tamelander 2009,pp. 298, 305.
  46. ^Forsgren 2014,pp. 127–128.
  47. ^abBishop 2012,p. 354.
  48. ^Nichol 2015,p. 259.
  49. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 128.
  50. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 129.
  51. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 157–159.
  52. ^abcdBrown 1977,p. 43.
  53. ^Bishop 2012,p. 355.
  54. ^Konstam 2018,p. 84.
  55. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 142.
  56. ^abcGarzke & Dulin 1985,p. 272.
  57. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 149.
  58. ^abcdKonstam 2018,p. 85.
  59. ^abForsgren 2014,p. 136.
  60. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 167.
  61. ^Nichol 2015,pp. 261–262.
  62. ^Garzke & Dulin 1985,pp. 273–274.
  63. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 140.
  64. ^Nichol 2015,p. 263.
  65. ^abcSweetman 2000,p. 146.
  66. ^abSweetman 2000,p. 144.
  67. ^Nichol 2015,p. 267.
  68. ^abcdBishop 2012,p. 362.
  69. ^Zetterling & Tamelander 2009,p. 321.
  70. ^Nichol 2015,p. 266.
  71. ^abcForsgren 2014,p. 137.
  72. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 152.
  73. ^abSweetman 2000,p. 145.
  74. ^abForsgren 2014,p. 141.
  75. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 149.
  76. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 154.
  77. ^Forsgren 2014,pp. 145–147.
  78. ^Chorlton 2010,p. 22.
  79. ^Nichol 2015,p. 271.
  80. ^abForsgren 2014,p. 144.
  81. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 147.
  82. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 145.
  83. ^abBishop 2012,p. 370.
  84. ^abNichol 2015,p. 273.
  85. ^Bishop 2012,p. 371.
  86. ^"No. 36883".The London Gazette(Supplement). 5 January 1945. p. 273.
  87. ^Knowles 2018,p. 281.
  88. ^Ellis & Warhurst 1968,p. 129.
  89. ^abSweetman 2000,p. 160.
  90. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 156–157.
  91. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 156.
  92. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 164–165.
  93. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 157.
  94. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 159.
  95. ^Knowles 2018,p. 272.
  96. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 150–151.
  97. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 165–167.
  98. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 167–168.
  99. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 168.
  100. ^Konstam 2018,pp. 88–89.
  101. ^Zetterling & Tamelander 2009,p. 327.
  102. ^Hinsley 1984,p. 277.
  103. ^Sweetman 2000,p. 169.
  104. ^Ellis 1999,pp. 299–300.
  105. ^Langenberg 1981,p. 91.
  106. ^Sweetman 2000,pp. 162–163.
  107. ^abBishop 2012,p. 367.
  108. ^Forsgren 2014,p. 155.
  109. ^Forsgren 2014,pp. 156–157.
  110. ^Koop & Schmolke 2014,p. 67.
  111. ^"Tirpitz Museum".Tirpitz Museum. Archived fromthe originalon 19 February 2019.Retrieved16 August2019.
  112. ^Forsgren 2014,pp. 154–155.
  113. ^Knowles 2018,p. 277.
  114. ^Knowles 2018,p. 279.

Works consulted

[edit]
  • Bennett, G.H. (2012). "Introduction". In Bennett, G.H. (ed.).Hunting Tirpitz: Naval Operations Against Bismarck's Sister Ship.Plymouth, United Kingdom: University of Plymouth Press. pp. 7–25.ISBN978-1-84102-310-6.
  • Bishop, Patrick (2012).Target Tirpitz.London: Harper Press.ISBN978-0-00-743119-9.
  • Brown, David (1977).Tirpitz: The Floating Fortress.London: Arms and Armour Press.ISBN978-0-85368-341-4.
  • Chorlton, Martyn (2010).Scottish Airfields in the Second World War: Vol 3.Newbury: Countryside Books.ISBN978-1-84674-169-2.
  • Ellis, John (1999).One Day in a Very Long War: Wednesday 25th October 1944.London: Pimlico.ISBN978-0-7126-7465-2.
  • Ellis, L.F.; Warhurst, A.E. (1968).Victory in the West. Volume II: The Defeat of Germany.History of the Second World War.London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.OCLC177760.
  • Faulkner, Marcus & Wilkinson, Peter (2012).War at Sea: A Naval Atlas, 1939–1945.Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN978-1-59114-560-8.
  • Forsgren, Jan (2014).Sinking the Beast: The RAF 1944 Lancaster Raids Against Tirpitz.Stroud, United Kingdom: Fonthill Media.ISBN978-1-78155-318-3.
  • Garzke, William H. & Dulin, Robert O. (1985).Battleships: Axis and Neutral Battleships in World War II.Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN978-0-87021-101-0.
  • Hinsley, F.H.; et al. (1984).British Intelligence in the Second World War: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations. Volume Three, Part I.History of the Second World War. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.ISBN978-0-11-630935-8.
  • Knowles, Daniel (2018).Tirpitz: The Life and Death of Germany's Last Great Battleship.Stroud, United Kingdom: Fonthill Media.ISBN978-1-78155-669-6.
  • Konstam, Angus (2018).Sink the Tirpitz 1942–44: The RAF and Fleet Air Arm Duel with Germany's Mighty Battleship.Oxford: Osprey Publishing.ISBN978-1-4728-3159-0.
  • Koop, Gerhard & Schmolke, Klaus-Peter (2014).Battleships of the Bismarck Class: Warships of the Kriegsmarine.Barnsley, United Kingdom: Seaforth Publishing.ISBN978-1-4738-4669-2.
  • Langenberg, William H. (July–August 1981)."The German Battleship" Tirpitz ": A Strategic Warship?".Naval War College Review.34(4): 81–92.
  • Nichol, John (2015).After the Flood: What the Dambusters Did Next.London: William Collins.ISBN978-0-00-810084-1.
  • Roskill, S.W. (1961).The War at Sea 1939–1945. Volume III: The Offensive Part II.History of the Second World War. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.OCLC59005418.
  • Sweetman, John (2000).Tirpitz: Hunting the Beast: Air Attacks on the German Battleship, 1940–44.Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN978-1-55750-822-5.
  • Zetterling, Niklas & Tamelander, Michael (2009).Tirpitz: The Life and Death of Germany's Last Super Battleship.Philadelphia: Casemate.ISBN978-1-935149-18-7.