Jump to content

Paris Agreement

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the 2015 climate accords. For the 1954 conferences to determine the status of West Germany, seeParis Agreements.For the treaty that ended the Cambodian-Vietnamese War, see1991 Paris Peace Agreements.For different topics, seeParis meetings, agreements and declarations (disambiguation).

Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
State parties
Signatories
Parties also covered by European Union ratification
Agreement does not apply
Drafted30 November – 12 December 2015inLe Bourget,France
Signed22 April 2016;8 years ago(22 April 2016)
LocationParis,France
Effective4 November 2016;7 years ago(4 November 2016)[1][2]
ConditionRatification and accession by 55 UNFCCC parties, accounting for 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions
Signatories195[1]
Parties195[1](list)
DepositarySecretary-General of the United Nations
Languages
  • Arabic
  • Chinese
  • English
  • French
  • Russian
  • Spanish
Full text
Paris AgreementatWikisource

TheParis Agreement(also called theParis AccordsorParis Climate Accords) is an international treaty onclimate changethat was signed in 2016.[3]The treaty coversclimate change mitigation,adaptation,andfinance.The Paris Agreement was negotiated by 196partiesat the2015 United Nations Climate Change ConferencenearParis,France. As of February 2023, 195 members of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC) are parties to the agreement. Of the three UNFCCC member states which have notratifiedthe agreement, the only major emitter isIran.TheUnited States withdrewfrom the agreement in 2020,[4]but rejoined in 2021.[5]

The Paris Agreement has a long-term temperature goal which is to keep the rise inglobal surface temperatureto well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) abovepre-industriallevels. The treaty also states that preferably the limit of the increase should only be 1.5 °C (2.7 °F). The lower the temperature increase, the smaller theeffects of climate changecan be expected. To achieve this temperature goal,greenhouse gas emissionsshould be reduced as soon as, and by as much as, possible. They should even reachnet zeroby the middle of the 21st century.[6]To stay below 1.5°C of global warming, emissions need to be cut by roughly 50% by 2030. This figure takes into account eachcountry's documented pledges.[7]

The treaty aims to help countries adapt to climate change effects, and mobilize enough finance. Under the agreement, each country must determine, plan, andregularly reporton its contributions. No mechanism forces a country to set specificemissions targets,but each target should go beyond previous targets. In contrast to the 1997Kyoto Protocol,the distinction between developed and developing countries is blurred, so that the latter also have to submit plans for emission reductions.

The Paris Agreement was opened for signature on 22 April 2016 (Earth Day) at a ceremony inside theUN HeadquartersinNew York.After theEuropean Unionratified the agreement, sufficient countries had ratified the agreement responsible for enough of theworld's greenhouse gasesfor the agreement to enter into force on 4 November 2016.

World leaders have lauded the agreement.[8]However, some environmentalists and analysts have criticized it, saying it is not strict enough. There is debate about the effectiveness of the agreement. While pledges under the Paris Agreement are insufficient for reaching the set temperature goals, there is a mechanism ofincreased ambition.The Paris Agreement has been successfully used inclimate litigationforcing countries and an oil company to strengthen climate action.[9][10]

Aims

[edit]

The aim of the agreement, as described in Article 2, is to have a stronger response to the danger of climate change; it seeks to enhance the implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change through:[3]

(a) Holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change;

(b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and fosterclimate resilienceand low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production;

(c) Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.

Countries furthermore aim to reach "global peaking of greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible."[3]

Development

[edit]
Heads of delegations at the2015 United Nations Climate Change Conferencein Paris

Lead-up

[edit]

TheUN Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC), adopted at the 1992Earth Summitis one of the first international treaties on the topic. It stipulates that parties should meet regularly to address climate change, at theConference of Partiesor COP. It forms the foundation to future climate agreements.[11]

TheKyoto Protocol,adopted in 1997, regulatedgreenhouse gasreductions for a limited set of countries from 2008 to 2012. The protocol was extended until 2020 with the Doha Amendment in 2012.[12]The United States decided not to ratify the Protocol, mainly because of its legally-binding nature. This, and distributional conflict, led to failures of subsequent international climate negotiations. The 2009 negotiations were intended to produce a successor treaty of Kyoto, but the negotiations collapsed and the resultingCopenhagen Accordwas not legally binding and did not get adopted universally.[13][14]

The Accord did lay the framework for bottom-up approach of the Paris Agreement.[13]Under the leadership of UNFCCC executive secretaryChristiana Figueres,negotiation regained momentum after Copenhagen's failure.[15]During the2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference,theDurban Platformwas established to negotiate a legal instrument governingclimate change mitigationmeasures from 2020. The platform had a mandate to be informed by the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC and the work of the subsidiary bodies of the UNFCCC.[16]The resulting agreement was to be adopted in 2015.[17]

Negotiations and adoption

[edit]
Movie showingLaurent Fabiussignalling the formal adoption of the Paris Agreement
Main article:2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference

Negotiations in Paris took place over a two-week span, and continued throughout the three final nights.[18][19]Various drafts and proposals had been debated and streamlined in the preceding year.[20]According to one commentator two ways in which the French increased the likelihood of success were: firstly to ensure thatIntended Nationally Determined Contributions(INDCs) were completed before the start of the negotiations, and secondly to invite leaders just for the beginning of the conference.[21]

The negotiations almost failed because of a single word when the US legal team realized at the last minute that "shall" had been approved, rather than "should", meaning that developed countries would have been legally obliged to cut emissions: the French solved the problem by changing it as a "typographical error".[22]At the conclusion of COP21 (the 21st meeting of the Conference of the Parties), on 12 December 2015, the final wording of the Paris Agreement was adopted by consensus by the 195 UNFCCC participating member states and the European Union.[23]Nicaraguaindicated they had wanted to object to the adoption as they denounced the weakness of the agreement, but were not given a chance.[24][25]In the agreement the members promised toreduce their carbon output"as soon as possible" and to do their best to keep global warming "to well below 2 degrees C"(3.6 °F).[26]

Signing and entry into force

[edit]

The Paris Agreement was open for signature by states and regional economic integration organizations that are parties to the UNFCCC (the convention) from 22 April 2016 to 21 April 2017 at the UN Headquarters in New York.[27]Signing of the agreement is the first step towardsratification,but it is possible toaccedeto the agreement without signing.[28]It binds parties to not act in contravention of the goal of the treaty.[29]On 1 April 2016, the United States and China, which represent almost 40% of global emissions confirmed they would sign the Paris Climate Agreement.[30][31]The agreement was signed by 175 parties (174 states and the European Union) on the first day it was opened for signature.[32][33]As of March 2021, 194 states and the European Union have signed the agreement.[1]

Signing byJohn KerryinUnited Nations General Assembly Hallfor the United States

The agreement would enter into force (and thus become fully effective) if 55 countries that produce at least 55% ofthe world's greenhouse gas emissions(according to a list produced in 2015)[34]ratify or otherwise join the treaty.[35][28]Alternative ways to join the treaty are acceptance, approval or accession. The first two are typically used when a head of state is not necessary to bind a country to a treaty, whereas the latter typically happens when a country joins a treaty already in force.[36]After ratification by the European Union, the agreement obtained enough parties to enter into effect on 4 November 2016.[37]

Both the EU and its member states are individually responsible for ratifying the Paris Agreement. A strong preference was reported that the EU and its 28 member states ratify at the same time to ensure that they do not engage themselves to fulfilling obligations that strictly belong to the other,[38]and there were fears by observers that disagreement over each member state's share of the EU-wide reduction target, as well as Britain'svote to leave the EUmight delay the Paris pact.[39]However, the EU deposited its instruments of ratification on 5 October 2016, along with seven EU member states.[39]

Parties

[edit]
Main article:List of parties to the Paris Agreement
TheIndian Prime Minister,Narendra Modigreeting thePresident of Brazil,Dilma Rousseff,in backgroundPortuguese Prime MinisterAntonio Costaat the COP21 Summit on 30 November 2015

Countries that have ratified or acceded

[edit]

The EU and 194 states, totalling over 98% ofgreenhouse gas emissions,have ratified or acceded to the agreement.[1][40][41]The only countries which have not ratified are somegreenhouse gas emitters in the Middle East:Iran with 2% of the world total being the largest.[42]LibyaandYemenhave also not ratified the agreement.[1]Eritreais the latest country to ratify the agreement, on 7 February 2023.

Article 28 enables parties to withdraw from the agreement after sending a withdrawal notification to thedepositary.Notice can be given no earlier than three years after the agreement goes into force for the country. Withdrawal is effective one year after the depositary is notified.[43]

United States withdrawal and readmittance

[edit]
Main article:United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

On 4 August 2017, theTrump administrationdelivered an official notice to theUnited Nationsthat the United States, the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China,[44]intended to withdraw from the Paris Agreement as soon as it was eligible to do so.[4]The notice of withdrawal could not be submitted until the agreement was in force for three years for the US, on 4 November 2019.[45][46]The U.S. government deposited the notification with the Secretary General of the United Nations and officially withdrew one year later on 4 November 2020.[47][48] PresidentJoe Bidensigned an executive order on his first day in office, 20 January 2021, to re-admit the United States into the Paris Agreement.[49][50]Following the 30-day period set by Article 21.3, the U.S. was readmitted to the agreement.[51][5]United States Climate EnvoyJohn Kerrytook part in virtual events, saying that the US would "earn its way back" into legitimacy in the Paris process.[52]United Nations Secretary-GeneralAntónio Guterreswelcomed the return of the United States as restoring the "missing link that weakened the whole".[52]

Content

[edit]

Structure

[edit]

The Paris Agreement is a short agreement with 16 introductory paragraphs and 29 articles. It contains procedural articles (covering, for example, the criteria for its entry into force) and operational articles (covering, for example, mitigation,adaptationand finance). It is a binding agreement, but many of its articles do not imply obligations or are there to facilitate international collaboration.[53]It covers most greenhouse gas emissions, but does not apply to internationalaviationandshipping,which fall under the responsibility of theInternational Civil Aviation Organizationand theInternational Maritime Organization,respectively.[54]

The Paris Agreement has been described as having a bottom-up structure, as its corepledge and reviewmechanism allows nations to set their own nationally determined contributions (NDCs), rather than having targets imposed top down.[55][56]Unlike its predecessor, the Kyoto Protocol, which sets commitment targets that have legal force, the Paris Agreement, with its emphasis onconsensus building,allows for voluntary and nationally determined targets.[57]The specific climate goals are thus politically encouraged, rather than legally bound. Only the processes governing the reporting and review of these goals are mandated underinternational law.This structure is especially notable for the United States—because there are no legal mitigation or finance targets, the agreement is considered an "executive agreement rather than a treaty". Because the UNFCCC treaty of 1992 received the consent of the US Senate, this new agreement does not require further legislation.[57]

Another key difference between the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol is their scope. The Kyoto Protocol differentiated betweenAnnex-I,richer countries with a historical responsibility for climate change, and non-Annex-I countries, but this division is blurred in the Paris Agreement as all parties are required to submit emissions reduction plans.[58]The Paris Agreement still emphasizes the principle ofCommon but Differentiated Responsibility and Respective Capabilities– the acknowledgement that different nations have different capacities and duties to climate action – but it does not provide a specific division between developed and developing nations.[58]

Nationally determined contributions

[edit]
Main article:Nationally determined contributions
Probability that countries achieve their Paris Agreement Goals according to theirnationally determined contributionsas of 2021 (NDCs)[59]

Countries determine themselves what contributions they should make to achieve the aims of the treaty. As such, these plans are callednationally determined contributions(NDCs).[60]Article 3 requires NDCs to be "ambitious efforts" towards "achieving the purpose of this Agreement" and to "represent a progression over time".[60]The contributions should be set every five years and are to be registered by theUNFCCC Secretariat.[61]Each further ambition should be more ambitious than the previous one, known as the principle ofprogression.[62]Countries can cooperate and pool their nationally determined contributions. The Intended Nationally Determined Contributions pledged during the2015 Climate Change Conferenceare converted to NDCs when a country ratifies the Paris Agreement, unless they submit an update.[63][64]

The Paris Agreement does not prescribe the exact nature of the NDCs. At a minimum, they should contain mitigation provisions, but they may also contain pledges on adaptation, finance,technology transfer,capacity buildingand transparency.[65]Some of the pledges in the NDCs are unconditional, but others are conditional on outside factors such as getting finance and technical support, the ambition from other parties or the details of rules of the Paris Agreement that are yet to be set. Most NDCs have a conditional component.[66]

While the NDCs themselves are not binding, the procedures surrounding them are. These procedures include the obligation to prepare, communicate and maintain successive NDCs, set a new one every five years, and provide information about the implementation.[67]There is no mechanism to force[68]a country to set a NDC target by a specific date, nor to meet their targets.[69][70]There will be only aname and shamesystem[71]or asJános Pásztor,the former U.N. assistant secretary-general on climate change, stated, a "name and encourage" plan.[72]

Global stocktake

[edit]

Under the Paris Agreement, countries must increase their ambition every five years. To facilitate this, the agreement established theGlobal Stocktake,which assesses progress, with the first evaluation in 2023. The outcome is to be used as input for new nationally determined contributions of parties.[73]TheTalanoa Dialoguein 2018 was seen as an example for the global stocktake.[74]After a year of discussion, a report was published and there was a call for action, but countries did not increase ambition afterwards.[75]

The stocktake works as part of the Paris Agreement's effort to create a "ratcheting up" of ambition in emissions cuts. Because analysts agreed in 2014 that the NDCs would not limit rising temperatures below 2 °C, the global stocktake reconvenes parties to assess how their new NDCs must evolve so that they continually reflect a country's "highest possible ambition".[76]While ratcheting up the ambition of NDCs is a major aim of the global stocktake, it assesses efforts beyond mitigation. The five-year reviews will also evaluate adaptation,climate financeprovisions, and technology development and transfer.[76]

On June 4, 2024, the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28) commenced in Dubai with renewed calls for amplified efforts towards climate action.[77]

Mitigation provisions and carbon markets

[edit]

Article 6 has been flagged as containing some of the key provisions of the Paris Agreement.[78]Broadly, it outlines thecooperative approachesthat parties can take in achieving their nationally determined carbon emissions reductions. In doing so, it helps establish the Paris Agreement as a framework for a global carbon market.[79]Article 6 is the only important part of the agreement yet to be resolved;negotiations in 2019did not produce a result.[80]The topic was settled during the2021 COP26 in Glasgow.A mechanism, the "corresponding adjustment", was established to avoid double counting for emission offsets.[81]

Linkage of carbon trading systems and ITMOs

[edit]

Paragraphs 6.2and 6.3 establish a framework to govern theinternational transfer of mitigation outcomes(ITMOs). The agreement recognizes the rights of parties to use emissions reductions outside of their own borders toward their NDC, in a system of carbon accounting and trading.[79]This provision requires the "linkage" of carbon emissions trading systems – because measured emissions reductions must avoid "double counting", transferred mitigation outcomes must be recorded as a gain of emission units for one party and a reduction of emission units for the other,[78]a so called "corresponding adjustment".[82]Because the NDCs, and domestic carbon trading schemes, are heterogeneous, the ITMOs will provide a format for global linkage under the auspices of the UNFCCC.[83]The provision thus also creates a pressure for countries to adopt emissions management systems – if a country wants to use more cost-effective cooperative approaches to achieve their NDCs, they will have to monitor carbon units for their economies.[84]

So far, as the only country who wants to buy ITMOs, Switzerland has signed deals regarding ITMO tradings with Peru, Ghana, Senegal, Georgia, Dominica, Vanuatu, Thailand and Ukraine.

Country Sign date Source
Peru 20 October 2020 [85]
Ghana 23 November 2020 [86]
Senegal 6 July 2021 [87]
Georgia 18 October 2021 [88]
Dominica 11 November 2021 [89]
Vanuatu 11 November 2021 [89]
Thailand 24 June 2022 [89]
Ukraine 4 July 2022 [89]

Sustainable Development Mechanism

[edit]

Paragraphs 6.4–6.7 establish a mechanism "to contribute to the mitigation of greenhouse gases and support sustainable development".[90]Though there is no official name for the mechanism as yet, it has been referred to as the Sustainable Development Mechanism or SDM.[91][80]The SDM is considered to be the successor to theClean Development Mechanism,a mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol by which parties could collaboratively pursue emissions reductions.[92]

The SDM is set to largely resemble the Clean Development Mechanism, with the dual goal of contributing to global GHG emissions reductions and supporting sustainable development.[93]Though the structure and processes governing the SDM are not yet determined, certain similarities and differences from the Clean Development Mechanisms have become clear. A key difference is that the SDM will be available to all parties as opposed to onlyAnnex-I parties,making it much wider in scope.[94]

The Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol was criticized for failing to produce either meaningful emissions reductions or sustainable development benefits in most instances.[95]and for its complexity. It is possible that the SDM will see difficulties.[83]

Climate change adaptation provisions

[edit]

Climate change adaptationreceived more focus in Paris negotiations than in previous climate treaties. Collective, long-term adaptation goals are included in the agreement, and countries must report on their adaptation actions, making it a parallel component with mitigation.[96]The adaptation goals focus on enhancingadaptive capacity,increasingresilience,and limiting vulnerability.[97]

Implementation

[edit]

The Paris Agreement is implemented via national policy. It would involve improvements toenergy efficiencyto decrease theenergy intensityof the global economy. Implementation also requires fossil fuel burning to be cut back and the share ofsustainable energyto grow rapidly. Emissions are being reduced rapidly in the electricity sector, but not in the building, transport and heating sector. Some industries are difficult to decarbonize, and for thosecarbon dioxide removalmay be necessary to achievenet zero emissions.[98]In a report released in 2022 the IPCC promotes the need for innovation and technological changes in combination with consumption and production behavioral changes to meet Paris Agreement objectives.[99]

To stay below 1.5°C of global warming, emissions need to be cut by roughly 50% by 2030. This is an aggregate of each country'snationally determined contributions.By mid-century, CO2emissions would need to be cut to zero, and total greenhouse gases would need to benet zerojust after mid-century.[7]

There are barriers to implementing the agreement. Some countries struggle to attract the finance necessary for investments in decarbonization. Climate finance is fragmented, further complicating investments. Another issue is the lack of capabilities in government and other institutions to implement policy.Clean technologyandknowledgeis often not transferred to countries or places that need it.[98]In December 2020, the former chair of the COP 21,Laurent Fabius,argued that the implementation of the Paris Agreement could be bolstered by the adoption of aGlobal Pact for the Environment.[100]The latter would define the environmental rights and duties of states, individuals and businesses.[101]

Specific topics of concern

[edit]

Effectiveness

[edit]
Scenarios of global greenhouse gas emissions. If all countries achieve their current Paris Agreement pledges, average warming by 2100 would still exceed the maximum 2°C target set by the agreement.

The effectiveness of the Paris Agreement to reach its climate goals is under debate, with most experts saying it is insufficient for its more ambitious goal of keeping global temperature rise under 1.5°C.[102][103]Many of the exact provisions of the Paris Agreement have yet to be straightened out, so that it may be too early to judge effectiveness.[102]According to the 2020 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), with the current climate commitments of the Paris Agreement, global mean temperatures will likely rise by more than 3°C by the end of the 21st century. Newernet zerocommitments were not included in theNationally Determined Contributions,and may bring down temperatures a further 0.5°C.[104]

With initial pledges by countries inadequate, faster and more expensive future mitigation would be needed to still reach the targets.[105]Furthermore, there is a gap between pledges by countries in their NDCs and implementation of these pledges; one third of the emission gap between the lowest-costs and actual reductions in emissions would be closed by implementing existing pledges.[106]A pair of studies inNaturefound that as of 2017 none of the major industrialized nations were implementing the policies they had pledged, and none met their pledged emission reduction targets,[107]and even if they had, the sum of all member pledges (as of 2016) would not keep global temperature rise "well below 2°C".[108][109]

In 2021, a study using aprobabilisticmodel concluded that the rates of emissions reductions would have to increase by 80% beyondNDCsto likely meet the 2°C upper target of the Paris Agreement, that the probabilities of major emitters meeting their NDCs without such an increase is very low. It estimated that with current trends the probability of staying below 2 °C of warming is 5% – and 26% if NDCs were met and continued post-2030 by all signatories.[110]

As of 2020,there is little scientific literature on the topics of the effectiveness of the Paris Agreement oncapacity buildingand adaptation, even though they feature prominently in the Paris Agreement. The literature available is mostly mixed in its conclusions about loss and damage, and adaptation.[102]

According to the stocktake report, the agreement has a significant effect: while in 2010 the expected temperature rise by 2100 was 3.7–4.8 °C, atCOP 27it was 2.4–2.6°C and if all countries will fulfill their long-term pledges even 1.7–2.1 °C. Despite it, the world is still very far from reaching the aim of the agreement: limiting temperature rise to 1.5 degrees. For doing this, emissions must peak by 2025.[111][112]

Fulfillment of requirements

[edit]
Since 2000, rising CO2emissions in China and the rest of the world have surpassed the output of the United States and Europe.
Per person, the United States generates CO2at a far faster rate than other primary regions.

In September 2021, the Climate Action Tracker estimated that, with current policies, global emissions will double above the 2030 target level. The gap is 20-23 Gt CO2e. Countries such as Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and Thailand have been criticised of not doing enough to meet the requirements of the agreement, and are on track to achieve a 4°C warming of the planet if current policies are implemented more widely. Of the world's countries, only the Gambia's emissions are at the level required by the Paris Agreement. Models predicted that if the necessary measures were not implemented by autumn 2021, the global average temperature would rise by 2.9°C. With the implementation of the Paris Agreement pledges, the average temperature would rise by 2.4°C, and with every zero emission target reached, the average temperature would rise by 2.0°C.[113]

TheProduction Gap 2021report states that world governments still plan to produce 110% morefossil fuelsin 2030 (including 240% more coal, 57% more oil and 71% more gas) than the 1.5 degree limit.[114]

In September 2023 the first global stocktake report about the implementation of the agreement was released. According to the report contrarily to expectations, the agreement has a significant effect: while in 2010 the expected temperature rise by 2100 was 3.7–4.8 °C, atCOP 27it was 2.4–2.6°C and if all countries will fulfill their long-term pledges 1.7–2.1 °C. However, the world remains very far from limiting warming to 1.5 degrees. To meet this benchmark, global emissions must peak by 2025, and although emissions have peaked in some countries, global emissions have not.[111][112]

Ensuring finance

[edit]
Further information:Climate financeandGreen Climate Fund
Map showing that the US, various European countries and Japan contributed most the Green Climate Fund
Pledges to the Green Climate Fund in 2018. The numbers represent the signed pledges per year.

Developed countries reaffirmed the commitment to mobilize $100 billion a year inclimate financeby 2020, and agreed to continue mobilising finance at this level until 2025.[115]The money is for supporting mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.[116]It includes finance for theGreen Climate Fund,which is a part of the UNFCCC, but also for a variety of other public and private pledges. The Paris Agreement states that a new commitment of at least $100 billion per year has to be agreed before 2025.[117]

Though both mitigation and adaptation require increased climate financing, adaptation has typically received lower levels of support and has mobilized less action from the private sector.[96]A report by the OECD found that 16% of global climate finance was directed toward climate adaptation in 2013–2014, compared to 77% for mitigation.[118]The Paris Agreement called for a balance of climate finance between adaptation and mitigation, and specifically increasing adaptation support for parties most vulnerable to the effects of climate change, includingLeast developed countriesandSmall Island Developing States.The agreement also reminds parties of the importance of public grants, because adaptation measures receive less investment from the public sector.[96]

In 2015, twenty Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) and members of the International Development Finance Club introduced five principles to maintain widespread climate action in their investments: commitment to climate strategies, managing climate risks, promoting climate smart objectives, improving climate performance and accounting for their own actions. As of January 2020, the number of members abiding by these principles grew to 44.[119]

Some specific outcomes of the elevated attention to adaptation financing in Paris include theG7 countries' announcement to provide US$420 million forclimate risk insurance,and the launching of a Climate Risk and Early Warning Systems (CREWS) Initiative.[120]The largest donors to multilateral climate funds, which includes the Green Climate Fund, are the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, France and Sweden.[121]

Loss and damage

[edit]
Main article:Loss and damage (climate change)

It is not possible to adapt to all effects of climate change: even in the case of optimal adaptation, severe damage may still occur. The Paris Agreement recognizesloss and damageof this kind.[122]Loss and damage can stem fromextreme weather events,or from slow-onset events such as the loss of land tosea level risefor low-lying islands.[57]Previous climate agreements classified loss and damage as a subset of adaptation.[122]

The push to address loss and damage as a distinct issue in the Paris Agreement came from theAlliance of Small Island Statesand the Least Developed Countries, whose economies and livelihoods are most vulnerable to the negative effects of climate change.[57]TheWarsaw Mechanism,established two years earlier during COP19 and set to expire in 2016, categorizes loss and damage as a subset of adaptation, which was unpopular with many countries. It is recognized as a separate pillar of the Paris Agreement.[123]The United States argued against this, possibly worried that classifying the issue as separate from adaptation would create yet another climate finance provision.[57]In the end, the agreement calls for "averting, minimizing, and addressing loss and damage"[3]but specifies that it cannot be used as the basis for liability. The agreement adopts the Warsaw Mechanism, an institution that will attempt to address questions about how to classify, address, and share responsibility for loss.[122]

Transparency

[edit]
Main article:Enhanced Transparency Framework

The parties are legally bound to have their progress tracked by technical expert review to assess achievement toward the NDC and to determine ways to strengthen ambition.[124]Article 13 of the Paris Agreement articulates an "enhanced transparency framework for action and support" that establishes harmonizedmonitoring, reporting, and verification(MRV) requirements. Both developed and developing nations must report every two years on their mitigation efforts, and all parties will be subject to technical and peer review.[124]

While the enhanced transparency framework is universal, the framework is meant to provide "built-in flexibility" to distinguish between developed and developing countries' capacities. The Paris Agreement has provisions for an enhanced framework for capacity building, recognizes the varying circumstances of countries, and notes that the technical expert review for each country consider that country's specific capacity for reporting.[125]Parties to the agreement send their first Biennial Transparency Report (BTR), andgreenhouse gas inventoryfigures to the UNFCCC by 2024 and every two years after that. Developed countries submit their first BTR in 2022 and inventories annually from that year.[126]The agreement also develops a Capacity-Building Initiative for Transparency to assist developing countries in building the necessaryinstitutionsand processes for compliance.[125]

Flexibility can be incorporated into the enhanced transparency framework via the scope, level of detail, or frequency of reporting, tiered based on a country's capacity. The requirement for in-country technical reviews could be lifted for some less developed or small island developing countries. Ways to assess capacity include financial and human resources in a country necessary for NDC review.[125]

Litigation

[edit]
Main article:Climate change litigation

The Paris Agreement has become a focal point of climate change litigation. One of the first major cases in this area wasState of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation,which was raised against the Netherlands' government after it had reduced its planned emissions reductions goal for 2030 prior to the Paris Agreement. After an initial ruling against the government in 2015 that required it to maintain its planned reduction, the decision was upheld on appeals through theSupreme Court of the Netherlandsin 2019, ruling that the Dutch government failed to uphold human rights under Dutch law and theEuropean Convention on Human Rightsby lowering its emission targets.[9]The 2°C temperature target of the Paris Agreement provided part of the judgement's legal basis.[127]The agreement, whose goals are enshrined in German law, also formed part of the argumentation inNeubauer et al. v. Germany,where the court ordered Germany to reconsider its climate targets.[128]

In May 2021, the district court ofThe Hagueruled against oil companyRoyal Dutch ShellinMilieudefensie et al v Royal Dutch Shell.The court ruled that it must cut its global emissions by 45% from 2019 levels by 2030, as it was in violation of human rights. This lawsuit was considered the first major application of the Paris Agreement towards a corporation.[10]

Human rights

[edit]
Further information:Human rights

On 4 July 2022, theSupreme Federal CourtofBrazilrecognized the Paris agreement as a "human rights treaty".According to the ruling of the court in Brazil it should" supersede national law ".[129][130]In the same month theUnited Nations Human Rights Councilin a resolution "(A/HRC/50/L.10/Rev.1) on Human rights and climate change, adopted without a vote" called to ratify and implement the agreement and emphasized the link between stopping climate change and the right to food.[131]

TheOffice of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rightsofficially recognized that "Climate change threatens the effective enjoyment of a range of human rights including those to life, water and sanitation, food, health, housing, self-determination, culture and development."[132]

Reception

[edit]

The agreement was lauded by French PresidentFrançois Hollande,UN Secretary GeneralBan Ki-moonandChristiana Figueres,Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC.[8]The president of Brazil,Dilma Rousseff,called the agreement "balanced and long-lasting",[133]and India's prime ministerNarendra Modicommended the agreement'sclimate justice.[134][135]When the agreement achieved the required signatures in October 2016, US PresidentBarack Obamasaid that "Even if we meet every target, we will only get to part of where we need to go."[136]He also stated "this agreement will help delay or avoid some of the worst consequences of climate change [and] will help other nations ratchet down their emissions over time."[136]

Someenvironmentalistsand analysts reacted cautiously, acknowledging the "spirit of Paris" in bringing together countries, but expressing less optimism about the pace of climate mitigation and how much the agreement could do for poorer countries.[137]James Hansen,a former NASA scientist and leading climate change expert, voiced anger that most of the agreement consists of "promises" or aims and not firm commitments and called the Paris talks a fraud with "no action, just promises".[138]Criticism of the agreement from those arguing against climate action has been diffuse, which may be due to the weakness of the agreement. This type of criticism typically focuses on national sovereignty and ineffectiveness of international action.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdef"Paris Agreement".United Nations Treaty Collection.Archivedfrom the original on 5 July 2021.Retrieved15 July2021.
  2. ^"Paris Climate Agreement Becomes International Law".ABC News. Archived fromthe originalon 4 November 2016.Retrieved4 November2016.
  3. ^abcd"Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1"(PDF).UNFCCC secretariat.Archived(PDF)from the original on 12 December 2015.Retrieved12 December2015.
  4. ^ab"Reference: C.N.464.2017.TREATIES-XXVII.7.d (Depositary Notification)"(PDF).United Nations. 8 August 2017.Archived(PDF)from the original on 15 August 2017.Retrieved14 August2017.
  5. ^ab"US makes official return to Paris climate pact".Associated Press.19 February 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 19 February 2021.Retrieved19 February2021– viaThe Guardian.
  6. ^UNFCCC."The Paris Agreement".unfccc.int.Archivedfrom the original on 19 March 2021.Retrieved18 September2021.
  7. ^abSchleussner, Carl-Friedrich."The Paris Agreement – the 1.5 °C Temperature Goal".Climate Analytics.Retrieved29 January2022.
  8. ^ab"Historic Paris Agreement on Climate Change – 195 Nations Set Path to Keep Temperature Rise Well Below 2 Degrees Celsius".UN Climate Change Newsroom.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 12 December 2015. Archived fromthe originalon 17 January 2016.Retrieved14 December2015.
  9. ^abCorder, Mike (20 December 2019)."Activists cheer victory in landmark Dutch climate case".AP news.Archivedfrom the original on 9 July 2021.Retrieved2 July2021.
  10. ^abBoffey, Daniel (26 May 2021)."Court orders Royal Dutch Shell to cut carbon emissions by 45% by 2030".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 26 May 2021.Retrieved26 May2021.
  11. ^"UN Climate Talks".Council of Foreign Affairs.2021.Archivedfrom the original on 20 July 2021.Retrieved20 July2021.
  12. ^Harrabin, Roger (8 December 2012)."UN climate talks extend Kyoto Protocol, promise compensation".BBC News.Archivedfrom the original on 16 July 2018.Retrieved22 June2018.
  13. ^abFalkner, Robert (2016)."The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics".International Affairs.92(5): 1107–1125.doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12708.ISSN0020-5850.Archivedfrom the original on 3 June 2018.Retrieved7 March2021.
  14. ^Klein, Richard J. T. (7 December 2020)."The Paris Agreement and the future of climate negotiations".Stockholm Environment Institute.Archivedfrom the original on 18 July 2021.Retrieved18 July2021.
  15. ^McGrath, Matt (19 February 2016)."UN climate chief Christiana Figueres to step down".BBC News.Archivedfrom the original on 29 December 2020.Retrieved7 March2021.
  16. ^Orangias, Joseph (1 April 2022)."The Nexus between International Law and Science: An Analysis of Scientific Expert Bodies in Multilateral Treaty-Making".International Community Law Review.doi:10.1163/18719732-bja10068.hdl:1887/3765960.S2CID248057340.
  17. ^"UNFCCC:Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP)".Archivedfrom the original on 2 August 2015.Retrieved2 August2015.
  18. ^Jepsen, Henrik; et al. (2021).Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Insider Stories.Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-1-108-88624-6.
  19. ^Goldenberg, Suzanne (12 December 2015)."Paris climate deal: nearly 200 nations sign in end of fossil fuel era".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 26 July 2021.Retrieved18 July2021.
  20. ^Evans, Simon (7 September 2015)."Bonn climate talks ask for draft Paris text".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 18 July 2021.Retrieved18 July2021.
  21. ^"The Paris Agreement is done! Let the negotiations begin?".GHG and Carbon Accounting, Auditing, Management & Training | Greenhouse Gas Management Institute.24 February 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 22 July 2021.Retrieved22 July2021.
  22. ^"How a 'typo' nearly derailed the Paris climate deal".the Guardian.16 December 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 22 July 2021.Retrieved22 July2021.
  23. ^Sutter, John D.; Berlinger, Joshua (12 December 2015)."Final draft of climate deal formally accepted in Paris".CNN.Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.Archivedfrom the original on 12 December 2015.Retrieved12 December2015.
  24. ^Watts, Joshua; Depledge, Joanna (2018)."Latin America in the climate change negotiations: Exploring the AILAC and ALBA coalitions".WIREs Climate Change.9(6).Bibcode:2018WIRCC...9E.533W.doi:10.1002/wcc.533.S2CID134228301.Archivedfrom the original on 15 July 2021.Retrieved15 July2021.
  25. ^Harvey, Fiona(8 December 2020)."The Paris agreement five years on: Is it strong enough to avert climate catastrophe?".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 15 July 2021.Retrieved15 July2021.
  26. ^"'Historic' Paris climate deal adopted ".CBC News.CBC/Radio Canada. 12 December 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 12 December 2015.Retrieved12 December2015.
  27. ^"Article 20(1)"(PDF).UNFCCC.int.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 November 2017.Retrieved17 November2017.
  28. ^abYeo, Sophie (19 April 2016)."Explainer: The adoption, signing and ratification of the UN climate deal".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 8 May 2021.Retrieved8 May2021.
  29. ^Voigt, Christina (2017). "Institutional Arrangements and Final Clauses". In Klein, Daniel (ed.).The Paris Agreement on Climate Change.p. 363.
  30. ^McGrath, Matt (31 March 2016)."Paris Climate Treaty: 'Significant step' as US and China agree to sign".BBC.Archivedfrom the original on 23 April 2016.Retrieved23 April2016.
  31. ^Davenport, Coral (31 March 2016)."Obama and President Xi of China Vow to Sign Paris Climate Agreement Promptly".The New York Times.Archived fromthe originalon 21 February 2017.
  32. ^"'Today is an historic day,' says Ban, as 175 countries sign Paris climate accord ".United Nations.22 April 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 29 June 2017.Retrieved29 June2017.
  33. ^"Paris Agreement Signature Ceremony"(PDF).UNFCCC.22 April 2016. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 16 May 2017.Retrieved22 April2016.
  34. ^"Information provided in accordance with paragraph 104 of decision 1 CP21 related to entry into force of the Paris Agreement (Article 21)"(PDF).UNFCCC.Archived(PDF)from the original on 21 February 2016.Retrieved23 April2016.
  35. ^Article 21(1)
  36. ^"Glossary of terms relating to Treaty actions".United Nations Treaty Collection.Archivedfrom the original on 22 May 2019.Retrieved18 July2021.
  37. ^Yeo, Sophie (6 October 2016)."Explainer: Paris Agreement on climate change to 'enter into force'".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 8 May 2021.Retrieved8 May2021.
  38. ^Yeo, Sophie (23 June 2016)."Explainer: When will the European Union ratify the Paris Agreement?".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 5 September 2016.Retrieved3 September2016.
  39. ^abSchiermeier, Quirin (4 October 2016)."Paris climate deal to take effect as EU ratifies accord".Nature.doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20735.S2CID158043198.Archivedfrom the original on 5 October 2016.Retrieved5 October2016.
  40. ^"Paris climate deal: US and China formally join pact"Archived2 January 2018 at theWayback Machine,BBC News,3 September 2016 (page visited on 4 September 2016).
  41. ^"India Ratifies Landmark Paris Climate Deal, Says, 'Kept Our Promise'".Archivedfrom the original on 3 October 2016.Retrieved2 October2016.
  42. ^"Each Country's Share of CO2Emissions ".Union of Concerned Scientists.Archivedfrom the original on 24 November 2018.Retrieved27 June2021.
  43. ^"On the Possibility to Withdraw from the Paris Agreement: A Short Overview".UNFCCC.14 June 2017.Archivedfrom the original on 2 December 2018.Retrieved4 April2021.
  44. ^World Resources Institute, 10 December 2010"This Interactive Chart Shows Changes in the World's Top 10 Emitters"Archived14 March 2021 at theWayback Machine
  45. ^Restuccia, Andrew (4 August 2017)."Trump administration delivers notice U.S. intends to withdraw from Paris climate deal".Politico.Archivedfrom the original on 4 August 2017.Retrieved4 August2017.
  46. ^Liptak, Kevin."WH: US staying out of climate accord".CNN.Archivedfrom the original on 17 September 2017.Retrieved17 September2017.
  47. ^Dennis, Brady."Trump makes it official: U.S. will withdraw from the Paris climate accord".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 9 November 2019.Retrieved4 December2019.
  48. ^Schiermeier, Quirin (4 November 2020)."The US has left the Paris climate deal – what's next?".Nature.doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03066-x.PMID33149315.S2CID226257744.Archivedfrom the original on 18 July 2021.Retrieved18 July2021.
  49. ^Medina, Daniella."Biden plans 17 executive orders on student loans, wearing masks and more. See the list".The Tennessean.Archivedfrom the original on 21 January 2021.Retrieved20 January2021.
  50. ^"Paris Climate Agreement".WH.gov.The White House. 20 January 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 21 January 2021.Retrieved21 January2021.
  51. ^"United States officially rejoined the Paris Agreement".Renewable Energy 2050.20 February 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 20 February 2021.Retrieved20 February2021.
  52. ^abVolcovici, Valerie (19 February 2021)."It's official: U.S. back in the Paris climate club".Reuters.Archivedfrom the original on 20 February 2021.Retrieved20 February2021.
  53. ^Savaresi, Annalisa (2016)."The Paris Agreement: a new beginning?"(PDF).Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law.34(1): 16–26.Bibcode:2016JENRL..34...16S.doi:10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983.hdl:1893/24099.ISSN0264-6811.S2CID146999274.Archived(PDF)from the original on 24 July 2021.Retrieved24 July2021.
  54. ^Andrew Dessler;Edward A Parson (2020).The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the Debate.Cambridge University Press.pp. 190–191.ISBN978-1-316-63132-4.
  55. ^Robert Falkner (2016)."The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics"(PDF).International Affairs.92(5): 1107–1125.doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12708.Archived(PDF)from the original on 30 October 2021.Retrieved15 July2021.
  56. ^Andrew Dessler;Edward A Parson (2020).The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the Debate.Cambridge University Press.pp. 28, 137–148, 175–179.ISBN978-1-316-63132-4.
  57. ^abcdeTaraska, Gwynne (15 December 2015)."The Paris Climate Agreement"(PDF).Center for American Progress.Archived(PDF)from the original on 18 November 2016.
  58. ^abSinha, Amitabh (14 December 2015)."Paris climate talks: Differentiation of developed and developing stays, India happy".Archivedfrom the original on 20 September 2016.
  59. ^Liu, Peiran R.; Raftery, Adrian E. (9 February 2021)."Country-based rate of emissions reductions should increase by 80% beyond nationally determined contributions to meet the 2 °C target".Communications Earth & Environment.2(1): 29.Bibcode:2021ComEE...2...29L.doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00097-8.ISSN2662-4435.PMC8064561.PMID33899003.Available underCC BY 4.0.
  60. ^abArticle 3,Paris Agreement (2015)
  61. ^Article 4(9),Paris Agreement (2015)
  62. ^Articles 3, 9(3),Paris Agreement (2015)
  63. ^Taibi, Fatima-Zahra; Konrad, Susanne; Bois von Kursk, Olivier (2020). Sharma, Anju (ed.).Pocket Guide to NDCs: 2020 Edition(PDF).European Capacity Building Initiative. p. 1.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 April 2021.Retrieved15 May2021.
  64. ^Staff (22 November 2019)."National Climate Action under the Paris Agreement".World Resources Institute.Archivedfrom the original on 13 May 2021.Retrieved13 May2021.
  65. ^Taibi, Fatima-Zahra; Konrad, Susanne; Bois von Kursk, Olivier (2020). Sharma, Anju (ed.).Pocket Guide to NDCs: 2020 Edition(PDF).European Capacity Building Initiative. p. 17.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 April 2021.Retrieved15 May2021.
  66. ^Taibi, Fatima-Zahra; Konrad, Susanne; Bois von Kursk, Olivier (2020). Sharma, Anju (ed.).Pocket Guide to NDCs: 2020 Edition(PDF).European Capacity Building Initiative. pp. 32–33.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 April 2021.Retrieved15 May2021.
  67. ^Bodansky, Daniel (2016)."The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement".Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law.25(2): 142–150.doi:10.1111/reel.12154.ISSN2050-0394.Archivedfrom the original on 18 March 2021.Retrieved7 March2021.
  68. ^Reguly, Eric; McCarthy, Shawn (14 December 2015)."Paris climate accord marks shift toward low-carbon economy".Globe and Mail.Toronto, Canada.Archivedfrom the original on 13 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.
  69. ^Mark, Kinver (14 December 2015)."COP21: What does the Paris climate agreement mean for me?".BBC News.BBC.Archivedfrom the original on 14 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.
  70. ^Davenport, Coral (12 December 2015)."Nations Approve Landmark Climate Accord in Paris".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 14 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.
  71. ^Chauhan, Chetan (14 December 2015)."Paris climate deal: What the agreement means for India and the world".Hindustan Times.Archivedfrom the original on 14 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.
  72. ^Falk, Pamela (12 December 2015)."Climate negotiators strike deal to slow global warming".CBS News.Archivedfrom the original on 13 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.
  73. ^article 14"Framework Convention on Climate Change"(PDF).United Nations FCCC Int.United Nations. 12 December 2015.Archived(PDF)from the original on 12 December 2015.Retrieved12 December2015.
  74. ^Höhne, Niklas; Louise, Jeffery; Nilsson, Anna; Fekete, Hanna (November 2019).Guiding questions for the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement(PDF)(Report). NewClimate Institute.Archived(PDF)from the original on 10 March 2021.Retrieved7 March2021.
  75. ^Hermwille, Lukas; Siemons, Anne; Förster, Hannah; Jeffery, Louise (2019)."Catalyzing mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: elements for an effective Global Stocktake".Climate Policy.19(8): 988–1001.Bibcode:2019CliPo..19..988H.doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1624494.ISSN1469-3062.S2CID197773078.
  76. ^abYeo, Sophie (19 January 2016)."The Paris Agreement 'Ratchet Mechanism'".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 19 November 2016.
  77. ^"COP28 Opens in Dubai".4 June 2024.
  78. ^ab"Article 6 Implementation Paper"(PDF).International Emissions Trading Association.20 May 2016.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 October 2016.
  79. ^abStavins, Robert (2016)."Market Mechanisms in the Paris Climate Agreement: International Linkage under Article 6.2"(PDF).Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 19 November 2016.Retrieved18 November2016.
  80. ^abEvans, Simon; Gabbatiss, John (29 November 2019)."In-depth Q&A: How 'Article 6' carbon markets could 'make or break' the Paris Agreement".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 20 April 2020.Retrieved7 March2021.
  81. ^"Climate Explainer: Article 6".World Bank.Retrieved26 January2023.
  82. ^UNFCCC.int – Draft CMA decision on guidance on cooperative approaches referred to in Art. 6, paragraph 2, of the Paris Agreement
  83. ^abMarcu, Andrei (2016). "Governance of Carbon Markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement". In Stavins, Robert (ed.).The Paris agreement and beyond(PDF).Harvard Project on Climate Agreements. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 19 November 2016.Retrieved18 November2016.
  84. ^Hone, David (16 May 2016)."A Vision for Article 6 of the Paris Agreement".The Energy Collective.Archivedfrom the original on 20 November 2016.
  85. ^eda.admin.ch: Bilateral relations Switzerland–Peru
  86. ^eda.admin.ch: Switzerland and Ghana sign an agreement on climate protection
  87. ^swissinfo.ch: Switzerland and Senegal sign climate deal
  88. ^admin.ch: Climate protection: Switzerland signs agreement with Georgia
  89. ^abcdbafu.admin.ch: Bilateral climate agreements
  90. ^United Nations/ Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 21st Conference of the Parties, Paris: United Nations
  91. ^"The Carbon Markets of Tomorrow: Taking Shape Today". Ecosystem Market Place. Retrieved 24 October 2016
  92. ^Kachi, Aki; Voigt, Juliane (May 2017).Building blocks for a robust Sustainable Development Mechanism(PDF).Carbon Market Watch. p. 2.Archived(PDF)from the original on 25 April 2021.Retrieved4 April2021.
  93. ^Marcu, Andrei (January 2016).Carbon Market Provisions in the Paris Agreement (Article 6)(PDF).Centre for Europe and Policy Studies. p. 13.ISBN978-94-6138-501-7.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2 July 2021.Retrieved15 July2021.
  94. ^"Recommendations for Article 6 of the Paris Agreement."Carbon Market Watch,19 May 2016. Web. 10 October 2016.
  95. ^Böhm, Steffen.Upsetting the offset: the political economy of carbon markets.London: MayFlyBooks, 2009,
  96. ^abcMogelgaard, Kathleen (23 December 2015)."What Does the Paris Agreement Mean for Climate Resilience and Adaptation".World Resources Institute.Archivedfrom the original on 19 November 2016.
  97. ^Morgan, Jennifer (12 December 2015)."The Paris Agreement: Turning Point for a Climate Solution".World Resources Institute.Archivedfrom the original on 19 November 2016.
  98. ^abGomez-Echeverri, Luis (2018)."Climate and development: enhancing impact through stronger linkages in the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.376(2119): 20160444.Bibcode:2018RSPTA.37660444G.doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0444.PMC5897818.PMID29610377.
  99. ^"Frequently Asked Questions".IPCC.Retrieved4 April2022.
  100. ^Guibert, Christelle (8 December 2020)."Laurent Fabius: 'Le vrai antidote au réchauffement, c'est l'application de l'Accord de Paris '"[The true antidote to warming is the application of the Paris Accord].Ouest France(in French).Archivedfrom the original on 7 February 2021.Retrieved10 December2020.
  101. ^"Implementation of General Assembly resolution 73/333, entitled" Follow-up to the report of the ad hoc open-ended working group established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 72/277 "".United Nations Environmental Assembly.Archivedfrom the original on 22 January 2021.Retrieved10 December2020.
  102. ^abcRaiser, Kilian; Kornek, Ulrike; Flachsland, Christian; Lamb, William F (19 August 2020)."Is the Paris Agreement effective? A systematic map of the evidence".Environmental Research Letters.15(8): 083006.Bibcode:2020ERL....15h3006R.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab865c.ISSN1748-9326.
  103. ^Maizland, Lindsay (29 April 2021)."Global Climate Agreements: Successes and Failures".Council on Foreign Relations.Archivedfrom the original on 12 June 2021.Retrieved20 June2021.
  104. ^United Nations Environment Programme (2020).Emissions Gap Report.Nairobi. p. XXI.ISBN978-92-807-3812-4.Archivedfrom the original on 9 December 2020.Retrieved9 May2021.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  105. ^"Paris Agreement, Decision 1/CP.21, Article 17"(PDF).UNFCCC secretariat.Archived(PDF)from the original on 1 April 2016.Retrieved6 April2016.
  106. ^Roelfsema, Mark; van Soest, Heleen L.; Harmsen, Mathijs; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Bertram, Christoph; den Elzen, Michel; Höhne, Niklas; Iacobuta, Gabriela; Krey, Volker; Kriegler, Elmar; Luderer, Gunnar (29 April 2020)."Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement".Nature Communications.11(1): 2096.Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.2096R.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15414-6.ISSN2041-1723.PMC7190619.PMID32350258.This article incorporates text available under theCC BY 4.0license.Minor grammatical amendments were made.
  107. ^Victor, David G.; Akimoto, Keigo; Kaya, Yoichi; Yamaguchi, Mitsutsune; Cullenward, Danny; Hepburn, Cameron (3 August 2017)."Prove Paris was more than paper promises".Nature.548(7665): 25–27.Bibcode:2017Natur.548...25V.doi:10.1038/548025a.PMID28770856.S2CID4467912.
  108. ^Rogelj, Joeri;den Elzen, Michel;Höhne, Niklas;Fransen, Taryn; Fekete, Hanna; Winkler, Harald; Schaeffer, Roberto; Sha, Fu; Riahi, Keywan; Meinshausen, Malte (30 June 2016)."Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C"(PDF).Nature.534(7609): 631–639.Bibcode:2016Natur.534..631R.doi:10.1038/nature18307.PMID27357792.S2CID205249514.Archived(PDF)from the original on 19 August 2019.Retrieved9 December2019.
  109. ^Mooney, Chris(29 June 2016)."The world has the right climate goals – but the wrong ambition levels to achieve them".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 29 June 2016.Retrieved29 June2016.
  110. ^Liu, Peiran R.;Raftery, Adrian E.(9 February 2021)."Country-based rate of emissions reductions should increase by 80% beyond nationally determined contributions to meet the 2 °C target".Communications Earth & Environment.2(1): 29.Bibcode:2021ComEE...2...29L.doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00097-8.ISSN2662-4435.PMC8064561.PMID33899003.Available underCC BY 4.0.
  111. ^abNilsen, Ella (8 September 2023)."World isn't moving fast enough to cut pollution and keep warming below 2 degrees Celsius, UN scorecard says".CNN.Retrieved12 September2023.
  112. ^ab"Technical dialogue of the first global stocktake Synthesis report by the co-facilitators on the technical dialogue"(PDF).United Nations.Retrieved12 September2023.
  113. ^"Climate target updates slow as science ramps up need for action"(PDF).Climate Action Tracker Global update.
  114. ^"2021 Report".Production Gap.Retrieved4 July2023.
  115. ^Thwaites, Joe (18 December 2015)."What Does the Paris Agreement do for Finance?".WRI.Archivedfrom the original on 10 April 2017.Retrieved10 April2017.
  116. ^"COP21 climate change summit reaches deal in Paris".BBC News.13 December 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 13 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.
  117. ^Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021)."Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance".Nature Climate Change.11(3): 180–182.Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R.doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.ISSN1758-6798.
  118. ^OECD (2015)."Climate Finance in 2013–14 and the USD 100 billion goal"(PDF).p. 20. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 30 May 2016.Retrieved10 April2017.
  119. ^"Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change".IPCC.Retrieved6 April2022.
  120. ^"Roadmap to US$100 Billion"(PDF).Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.OECD. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 19 November 2016.
  121. ^Timperley, Jocelyn; Pearce, Rosamund (6 November 2017)."Mapped: Where multilateral climate funds spend their money".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 7 May 2021.Retrieved8 May2021.
  122. ^abcMogelgaard, Kathleen (24 December 2015)."When Adaptation is Not Enough".World Resources Institute.Archivedfrom the original on 8 October 2016.
  123. ^Pidcock, Roz (9 May 2017)."Explainer: Dealing with the 'loss and damage' caused by climate change".Carbon Brief.Archivedfrom the original on 8 May 2021.Retrieved8 May2021.
  124. ^ab"The Paris Agreement Summary"(PDF).Climate Focus.28 December 2015.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 May 2016.
  125. ^abcVan Asselt, Harro (2016)."Putting the 'enhanced transparency framework' into action: Priorities for a key pillar of the Paris Agreement"(PDF).Stockholm Environment Institute.Archived(PDF)from the original on 19 November 2016.
  126. ^"Reporting and Review under the Paris Agreement".unfccc.int.Archivedfrom the original on 1 November 2020.Retrieved20 April2020.
  127. ^Backes, C. W. (Chris); Veen, G. A. (Gerrit) van der (2020)."Urgenda: the Final Judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court".Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law.17(3): 307–321.doi:10.1163/18760104-01703004.ISSN1876-0104.Archivedfrom the original on 18 August 2021.Retrieved2 July2021.
  128. ^Setzer, Joana; Higham, Catherine (July 2021).Global trends in climate change litigation: 2021 snapshot(PDF)(Report). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change, Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science. p. 24.Archived(PDF)from the original on 7 July 2021.Retrieved24 July2021.
  129. ^"Arguição de descumprimento de preceito fundamental".Supremo Tribunal Federal(in Portuguese). Archived fromthe originalon 24 July 2022.Retrieved24 July2022.
  130. ^Ciuffo, Leandro Neumann (7 July 2022)."Brazil's High Court First to Declare Paris Agreement a Human Rights Treaty".Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.Archived fromthe originalon 24 July 2022.Retrieved21 July2022.
  131. ^"Human Rights Council Adopts Nine Resolutions – Extends Mandates on Eritrea, Internally Displaced Persons, and Violence Against Women and Girls".The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.United Nations.Retrieved21 July2022.
  132. ^"OHCHR and climate change".United Nations.The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.Retrieved21 July2022.
  133. ^Hulac, Benjamin (14 December 2015)."Pollution from Planes and Ships Left Out of Paris Agreement".Scientific American.Archivedfrom the original on 9 May 2021.Retrieved9 May2021.
  134. ^Goswami, Urmi (14 December 2015)."Paris COP21: Recognition of" common but differentiated responsibilities "key achievement of India".The Economic Times.Archivedfrom the original on 15 July 2021.Retrieved21 July2021.
  135. ^Taylor, Matthew (13 December 2015)."Paris climate deal provides 'best chance we have' of saving the planet".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 13 July 2021.Retrieved21 July2021.
  136. ^ab"A sweeping global climate change agreement was ratified on Wednesday".NBC News.5 October 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 5 October 2016.Retrieved5 October2016.
  137. ^Harvey, Fiona(14 December 2015)."Paris climate change deal too weak to help poor, critics warn".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 30 June 2021.Retrieved26 June2021.
  138. ^Milman, Oliver (12 December 2015)."James Hansen, father of climate change awareness, calls Paris talks 'a fraud'".The Guardian.London, England.Archivedfrom the original on 14 December 2015.Retrieved14 December2015.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toParis Agreement.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paris_Agreement&oldid=1246943819"