Jump to content

Poisoning the well

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Poisoning the well(or attempting topoison the well) is a type ofinformal fallacywhere adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to anaudience,with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing something that the target person is about to say. Poisoning the well can be a special case ofargumentum ad hominem,and the term was first used with this sense byJohn Henry Newmanin his workApologia Pro Vita Sua(1864).[1]

Structure[edit]

Poisoning the well can take the form of an (explicit or implied) argument, and is considered by some philosophers aninformal fallacy.[1]

A poisoned-well "argument" has the following form:

  1. Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented by another (e.g. "Before you listen to my opponent, may I remind you that he has been in jail" ).
  2. Therefore, the claims made by person A will be false.[2]

Poisoned-well arguments are sometimes used with preemptive invocations of theassociation fallacy.In this pattern, an unfavorable attribute is ascribed to any future opponents, in an attempt to discourage debate. For example, "That's my stance on funding the public education system, and anyone who disagrees with me hates children." Any person who steps forward to dispute the claim will then risk applying the tag to themselves in the process. This is afalse dilemma:not all future opponents necessarily have the unfavorable attribute. For example, not everyone who has a different opinion on funding the public education system necessarily hates children.

A poisoned-well "argument" can also be in this form:[3]

  1. Unfavorable definitions (be it true or false) which prevent disagreement (or enforce affirmative position).
  2. Any claims without first agreeing with above definitions are automatically dismissed.

Example: Boss, you heard my side of the story why I think Bill should be fired and not me. Now, I am sure Bill is going to come to you with some pathetic attempt to weasel out of this lie that he has created.

Etymology[edit]

The etymology of the phrase lies inwell poisoning,an ancient wartime practice of pouring poison into sources offresh waterbefore an invading army, to diminish the invading army's strength.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abWalton, Douglas N.(1987).Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms.Pragmatics & beyond companion series. Vol. 4. Amsterdam; Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing.p.218.ISBN1556190107.OCLC14586031.See also:"Newman Reader – Apologia (1865) – Preface".newmanreader.org.
  2. ^Bennett, Bo."Poisoning the Well".Logically Fallacious.RetrievedMay 14,2016.
  3. ^Ruiz, Roberto (2018). "Poisoning the Well".Bad Arguments.pp. 196–200.doi:10.1002/9781119165811.ch40.ISBN9781119165781.S2CID189453536.