Jump to content

Process music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Basic rhythm fromClapping Musicby Steve Reich, which is played against itself. First in rhythmicunison,then with one part moved ahead by aneighth note,then another, and so on, till they are back together—an example ofNyman's process-type 4.
First two patterns, abbreviated

Process musicismusicthat arises from aprocess.It may make that process audible to the listener, or the process may be concealed.

Primarily begun in the 1960s, diverse composers have employed divergent methods and styles of process. "A 'musical process' as Christensen defines it is a highly complex dynamic phenomenon involving audible structures that evolve in the course of the musical performance... 2nd order audibledevelopments,i.e., audible developments within audible developments ".[1]These processes may involve specific systems of choosing and arrangingnotesthroughpitchandtime,often involving a long term change with a limited amount of musical material, or transformations of musical events that are already relatively complex in themselves.

Steve Reichdefines process music not as, "the process ofcompositionbut rather pieces of music that are, literally, processes. The distinctive thing about musical processes is that they determine all the note-to-note (sound-to-sound) details and the overallformsimultaneously. (Think of aroundorinfinite canon.) "[2]

History

[edit]

Although today often used synonymously withminimalism,the term predates the appearance of this style by at least twenty years.Elliott Carter,for example, used the word "process" to describe the complex compositional shapes he began using around 1944,[3][4]with works like the Piano Sonata and First String Quartet, and continued to use throughout his life. Carter came to his conception of music as process fromAlfred North Whitehead's "principle of organism", and particularly from his 1929 book,Process and Reality.[5]

Michael Nymanhas stated that "the origins of this minimal process music lie inserialism".[6]Kyle Gannalso sees many similarities between serialism and minimalism,[7]and Herman Sabbe has demonstrated how process music functions in the early serial works of the Belgian composerKarel Goeyvaerts,[8]especially in his electronic compositionsNr. 4, met dode tonen[with dead tones] (1952) andNr. 5, met zuivere tonen[with pure tones] (1953). Elsewhere, Sabbe makes a similar demonstration forKreuzspiel(1951) byKarlheinz Stockhausen.[9]

Beginning in the early 1960s, Stockhausen composed several instrumental works which he called "process compositions", in which symbols including plus, minus, and equal signs are used to indicate successive transformations of sounds which are unspecified or unforeseeable by the composer. They specify "how sounds are to be changed or imitated rather than what they are to be".[10]In these compositions, "structure is a system of invariants; these invariants are not substances but relations.... Stockhausen's Process Planning is structural analysis in reversed time-direction. Composition as abstraction, as generalization. Analysis of reality before its entry into existence".[11]These works includePlus-Minus(1963),Prozession(1967),Kurzwellen,andSpiral(both 1968), and led to the verbally described processes of theintuitive musiccompositions in the cyclesAus den sieben Tagen(1968) andFür kommende Zeiten(1968–70).[12][13][14])

The termProcess Music(in the minimalist sense) was coined by composer Steve Reich in his 1968 manifesto entitled "Music as a Gradual Process" in which he very carefully yet briefly described the entire concept including such definitions asphasingand the use ofphrasesin composing or creating this music, as well as his ideas as to its purpose and a brief history of his discovery of it.

For Steve Reich it was important that the processes be audible: "I am interested in perceptible processes. I want to be able to hear the process happening throughout the sounding music.... What I'm interested in is a compositional process and a sounding music that are one and the same thing".[2]This has not necessarily been the case for other composers, however. Reich himself points to John Cage as an example of a composer who used compositional processes that could not be heard when the piece was performed.[2]The postminimalistDavid Langis another composer who does not want people to hear the process he uses to build a piece of music.[15]

Theory

[edit]

Michael Nyman has identified five types of process:[16]

  1. Chance determinationprocesses, in which the material is not determined by the composer directly, but through a system he or she creates
  2. People processes, in which performers are allowed to move through given or suggested material, each at his or her own speed
  3. Contextual processes, in which actions depend on unpredictable conditions and on variables arising from the musical continuity
  4. Repetitionprocesses, in which movement is generated solely by extended repetition
  5. Electronicprocesses, in which some or all aspects of the music are determined by the use of electronics. These processes take many forms.

The first type is not necessarily confined to what are normally recognised as "chance" compositions, however. For example, in Karel Goeyvaerts'sSonata for Two Pianos,"registral process created a form that depended neither on conventional models nor... on the composer's taste and judgment. Given a few simple rules, the music did not need to be 'composed' at all: the notes would be at play of themselves".[17]

Galen H. Brown acknowledges Nyman's five categories and proposes adding a sixth: mathematical process, which includes the manipulation of materials by means of permutation, addition, subtraction, multiplication, changes of rate, and so on.[18]

Erik Christensen identifies six process categories:[19]

  1. Rule-determined transformation processes
  2. goal-directed transformation processes
  3. indeterminate transformation processes
  4. Rule-determined generative processes
  5. goal-directed, and generative processes
  6. indeterminate generative processes

He describes Reich'sPiano Phase(1966) as rule-determined transformation process, Cage'sVariations II(1961) as an indeterminate generative process, Ligeti'sIn zart fliessender Bewegung(1976) as a goal-directed transformation process containing a number of evolution processes,[20]andPer Nørgård'sSecond Symphony(1970) as containing a rule-determinedgenerativeprocess of a fractal nature.[21]

Notable works

[edit]
As Slow as Possible(1987)[citation needed]
Sonata for Cello and Piano (1948)[22]
String Quartet No. 1(1950–51)[22][23]
String Quartet No. 2(1959)[24]
Double Concerto for Harpsichord and Piano with Two Chamber Orchestras(1959–61)[25]
Piano Concerto(1964–65)[22]
Duo for Violin and Piano (1974)[26]
Piece for Four Pianos(1957)[27]
Nr. 1, Sonata for Two Pianos(1950–51)[17]
Nr. 4, met dode tonen(1952)[28]
Nr. 5, met zuivere tonen(1953)[29]
Piano Transplant No. 1. Burning Piano[30]
I Am Sitting in a Room[31]
It's Gonna Rain(1965)[32]
Come Out(1966)[32]
Reed Phase(1966)
Violin Phase(1967)
Piano Phase(1967)[33]
Phase Patterns(1970)[34]
Drumming(1971)[34]
In C(1964)[35]
Keyboard Studies[35]
Les Moutons de Panurge(1969)[27]
Kreuzspiel(1951)[36][9]
Kontakte[37]
Plus-Minus(1963)[38]
Mikrophonie I(1964)[38]
Solo(1965–66)[38]
Prozession(1967)[39][38]
Kurzwellen(1968)[40][41][42]
Aus den sieben Tagen(1968)[43]
Spiral(1968)[44]
Pole(1969–70)[44][45]
Expo(1969–70)[46]
Für kommende Zeiten(1968–70)[47]
Ylem(1972)[48]
Michaelion,scene 4 ofMittwoch aus Licht(1997)[49]
For Ann (rising)(1969)
Postal Pieces(1965–71)
Clang(1972)
Spectral CANON for CONLON Nancarrow(1974)
Three Pieces for Drum Quartet (1975)
Chromatic Canon(1980)
Glissade(1982)
Koan for String Quartet(1984)
Poem(1960)[27]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Bernard, Jonathan. 1995. "Carter and the Modern Meaning of Time".The Musical Quarterly79, no. 4 (Winter): 644–682.
  • Brandt, William E. 1974. "The Music of Elliott Carter: Simultaneity and Complexity".Music Educators Journal60, no. 9 (May): 24–32.
  • Brown, Galen H. 2010. "Process as Means and Ends in Minimalist and Postminimalist Music".Perspectives of New Music48, no. 2 (Summer): 180–192.
  • Christensen, Erik. 2004. "Overt and Hidden Processes in 20th Century Music", inProcess Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories,edited by Johanna Seibt, 97–117. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.ISBN1-4020-1751-0.
  • Edwards, Allen. 1971.Flawed Words and Stubborn Sounds: A Conversation with Elliott Carter.New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Fritsch, Johannes.1979. "Prozeßplanung". InImprovisation und neue Musik,Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Neue Musik und Musikerziehung Darmstadt 20, edited byReinhold Brinkmann,108–117. Mainz: B. Schott's Söhne.
  • Gann, Kyle.1987. "Let X = X: Minimalism vs. Serialism".The Village Voice(24 February): 76.
  • Griffiths, Paul.2001. "Aleatory".The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians,2nd edition, edited byStanley SadieandJohn Tyrrell.London: Macmillan Publishers.
  • Griffiths, Paul. 2011.Modern Music and After,3rd edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-974050-5.
  • Hopp, Winrich. 1998.Kurzwellen von Karlheinz Stockhausen: Konzeption und musikalische Poiesis.Kölner Schriften zur neuen Musik 6. Mainz; New York: Schott.
  • Kohl, Jerome.1978. "Intuitive Music and Serial Determinism: An Analysis of Stockhausen'sAus den sieben Tagen."In Theory Only3, no. 2 (March): 7–19.
  • Kohl, Jerome. 1981.Serial and Non-Serial Techniques in the Music of Karlheinz Stockhausen from 1962–1968.Ph.D. diss., Seattle: University of Washington.
  • Kohl, Jerome. 2010. "A Child of the Radio Age". InCut & Splice: Transmission,edited by Daniela Cascella and Lucia Farinati, 135–139. London: Sound and Music.ISBN978-1-907378-03-4.
  • Annea Lockwood(November 11, 2003)."Annea Lockwood Beside the Hudson River".NewMusicBox(Interview). Interviewed byOteri, Frank J.(published January 1, 2004).Piano Transplants
  • Nyman, Michael.1974.Experimental Music. Cage and Beyond.London: Studio Vista.ISBN0-289-70182-1(2nd Edition, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.ISBN0-521-65297-9(cloth);ISBN0-521-65383-5(pbk)).
  • Reich, Steve.2002. "Music as a Gradual Process (1968)".In hisWritings about Music, 1965–2000,edited with an introduction byPaul Hillier,9–11. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-511171-2(cloth);ISBN978-0-19-515115-2(pbk).
  • Sabbe, Herman[nl].1977.Het muzikale serialisme als techniek en als denkmethode: Een onderzoek naar de logische en historische samenhang van de onderscheiden toepassingen van het seriërend beginsel in de muziek van de periode 1950–1975[Musical Serialism as a Technique and as a Method of Thinking: A Study of the Logical and Historical Interconnections Between the Different Applications of the Serial Principle from the Period 1950–1975]. Ghent: Rijksuniversiteit te Gent.
  • Sabbe, Herman. 1981. "Die Einheit der Stockhausen-Zeit...: Neue Erkenntnismöglichkeiten der seriellen Entwicklung anhand des frühen Wirkens von Stockhausen und Goeyvaerts. Dargestellt aufgrund der Briefe Stockhausens an Goeyvaerts". InMusik-Konzepte 19: Karlheinz Stockhausen:... wie die Zeit verging...,edited byHeinz-Klaus MetzgerandRainer Riehn,5–96. Munich: Edition Text + Kritik.
  • Schiff, David.1998.The Music of Elliott Carter,second edition. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Seibt, Johanna (ed.). 2004.Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories.Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.ISBN978-1-4020-1751-3.
  • Wannamaker, Robert (2021).The Music of James Tenney.Vol. 1: Contexts and Paradigms. University of Illinois Press.ISBN978-0-252-04367-3.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Mooney, James. 2016. "Technology, Process and Musical Personality in the Music of Stockhausen, Hugh Davies and Gentle Fire". InThe Musical Legacy of Karlheinz Stockhausen: Looking Back and Forward,edited by M. J. Grant and Imke Misch, 102–115. Hofheim: Wolke Verlag.ISBN978-3-95593-068-4.
  • Quinn, Ian. 2006. "Minimal Challenges: Process Music and the Uses of Formalist Analysis".Contemporary Music Review25, no. 3:283–294.
  • Stockhausen, Karlheinz.1989. "Musik als Prozeß (Gespräch mit Rudolf Frisius am 25. August 1982 in Kürten)", in hisTexte zur Musik6, edited byChristoph von Blumröder,399–426. DuMont Dokumente. Cologne: DuMont Buchverlag.ISBN3-7701-2249-6.