Jump to content

Psionics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, seePsion (disambiguation).

In Americanscience fictionof the 1950s and '60s,psionicswas a proposed discipline that applied principles of engineering (especiallyelectronics) to the study (and employment) ofparanormalorpsychicphenomena, such asextrasensory perception,telepathyandpsychokinesis.[1]The term is ablend wordofpsi(in the sense of "psychic phenomena" ) and the -onicsfromelectronics.[1][2][3][4]The word "psionics" began as, and always remained, aterm of artwithin thescience fiction community[5]and—despite the promotional efforts of editorJohn W. Campbell, Jr.—it never achieved general currency, even among academicparapsychologists.In the years after the term was coined in 1951, it became increasingly evident that no scientific evidence supports the existence of "psionic" abilities.[6]

Etymology[edit]

In 1942, two authors—biologistBertold Wiesnerand psychologistRobert Thouless—had introduced the term "psi" (from ψpsi,23rd letter of theGreek alphabet) to parapsychology in an article published in theBritish Journal of Psychology.[7](This Greek character was chosen as apropos since it is the initial letter of the Greek word ψυχή [psyche]—meaning "mind" or "soul".[8][9]) The intent was that "psi" would represent the "unknown factor" inextrasensory perceptionandpsychokinesis,experiences believed to be unexplained by any known physical or biological mechanisms.[10][11]In a 1972 book,[12]Thouless insisted that he and Wiesner had coined this usage of the term "psi" prior to its use in science fiction circles, explaining that their intent was to provide a more neutral term than "ESP" that would not suggest a pre-existing theory of mechanism.[13]

The word "psionics" first appeared in print in a novella by science fiction writerJack Williamson—The Greatest Invention[14]—published inAstounding Science Fictionmagazine in 1951.[15]Williamson derived it from the "psion", a fictitious "unit of mental energy" described in the same story. (Only later was the term retroactively described in non-fiction articles inAstoundingas a portmanteau of "psychic electronics", by editorJohn W. Campbell.[16][17]) The new word was derived by analogy with the earlier termradionics.[1][18]( “Radionics” combinedradiowithelectronicsand was itself devised in the 1940s[19]to refer to the work of early 20th century physician and pseudoscientistAlbert Abrams.) The same analogy was subsequently taken up in a number of science fiction-themed neologisms, notablybionics(bio-+electronics;coined 1960)[20]andcryonics(cryo-+electronics;coined 1967).[21]

History[edit]

Background[edit]

In the 1930s, three men were crucial to inciting John W. Campbell's early enthusiasm for a "new science of the mind" construed as "engineering [principles] applied to the mind".[22]The first was mathematician and philosopherNorbert Wiener—known as the "father ofcybernetics"—who had befriended Campbell when he was an undergraduate (1928–31) at MIT. The second was parapsychologistJoseph Banks Rhinewhose parapsychology laboratory at Duke University was already famous for its investigations of "ESP" when Campbell was an undergraduate there (1932–34).[23][24]The third was a non-academic:Charles Fort,the author and paranormal popularizer whose 1932 bookWild Talentsstrongly encouraged credence in the testimony of people who had experienced telepathy and other "anomalous phenomena".

Theidea that ordinary people only utilize a small fraction of the (potentially enormous) capabilities of the human brainhad become a particular "pet idea" for Campbell by the time he first published his own science fiction writings as a college student.[25]In a 1932 short story he asserted that "no man in all history ever used even half of the thinking part of his brain".[26]He followed up on this notion in a note to another story published five years later:

The total capacity of the mind, even at present, is to all intents and purposes, infinite. Could the full equipment be hooked into a functioning unit, the resulting intelligence should be able to conquer a world without much difficulty.[27]

In 1939, he wrote in an editorial in the magazineUnknown,which he edited:

Is it so strange a thing that this unknown mass [the human brain] should have some unguessed power by which to feel and see beyond, directly, meeting mind to mind in telepathy, sensing direct the truth of things by clairvoyance?[28]

Along with Charles Fort, Campbell believed that there were already many individuals with latent "psi powers" among us unwittingly and he took this belief a step further in considering development of such powers to be the "next step" in human evolution. Throughout his career, Campbell had sought grounds for a new "scientific psychology" and he was instrumental in formulating the brainchild of one of his more imaginative science fiction writers—the "Dianetics"ofL. Ron Hubbard.[29][30]Campbell's enthusiasm for Dianetics—which later morphed into theChurch of Scientology—was red hot in 1949 and 1950, but had considerably cooled by 1951 when he saw Hubbard for the last time.[31]

The "psi-boom"[edit]

With Campbell's encouragement, or at his direction, "psionic" abilities began to appear frequently in magazine science fiction stories in the mid-1950s, providing characters with supernormal or supernatural abilities.[32]The first example wasMurray Leinster's novellaThe Psionic Mousetrappublished in early 1955.[33][30]Examples of psychic abilities in fiction, whether attributed to supernatural agencies or otherwise, predated the "psionics" vogue. But the editors ofThe Encyclopedia of Science Fiction[34][35]describe and define a post-war "psi-boom" in genre science fiction— "which he [Campbell] engineered" —dating it from the mid-1950s to the early 1960s. They citeJames Blish'sJack of Eagles(1952),Theodore Sturgeon'sMore Than Human(1953),Wilson Tucker'sWild Talent(1954) andFrank M. Robinson'sThe Power(1956) as examples.Alfred Bester'sThe Demolished Man(1953) is a pioneering example of a work depicting a society in which people with "psi" abilities are fully integrated. Since the "psi-boom" years coincided with the darkest and most paranoid period of theCold War,it is natural that many examples of the utility of telepathy in espionage (for example those ofRandall Garrett) would be produced. In terms of literary continuity, the editors ofThe Encyclopedia of Science Fictionpoint out that:

All the psi powers, of course, used to be in the repertoire of powerful magicians, and most are featured in occult romances.[36]

In 1956, Campbell began promoting a psionics device known as theHieronymus machine.It faced skepticism from scientists who viewed it aspseudoscientificand even as an example ofquackery.[37][38]

Some of the wind was taken out of the sails of psionics in 1957 whenMartin Gardner,in the updated edition of his bookFads and Fallacies in the Name of Science,wrote that the study of psionics is "even funnier thanDianeticsorRay Palmer'sShaver stories ", and criticized the beliefs and assertions of Campbell as anti-scientific nonsense.[37]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcWilliams, William F. (2000) [1999 by Facts On File].Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy(Reprinted ed.). Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn. pp. 279–298.ISBN1579582079.OCLC44604048.
  2. ^"psionic".Online Etymology Dictionary.Retrieved2014-01-29.
  3. ^Joyce, Judith (2011).The Weiser Field Guide to the Paranormal: Abductions, Apparitions, ESP, Synchronicity, and More Unexplained Phenomena from Other Realms.San Francisco, California: Weiser Books. p. 157.ISBN978-1609252984.Psionicis a word invented in the 20th century as an umbrella term to describe human paranormal behavior. It refers to all powers of the mind—from the passive (telepathy or clairvoyance) to the active (telekinesis or pyrokinesis). Psionics is the study of all these powers.
  4. ^Gardner, Martin (1957),Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science(Expanded/revised ed.), New York: Dover Publications, p. 346.
  5. ^Nicholls, Peter: Entry, "Psionics" in Clute, John; Nicholls, Peter (1995),The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction,New York: St. Martin's Press, p. 971. This brief entry states that "psionics" is "a common item of s[cience] f[iction] terminology, referring to the study and use of psi powers, under which head it is discussed."
  6. ^Cordón, Luis A. (2005).Popular Psychology: An Encyclopedia.Wesport, Connecticut: Greenwood. p.182.ISBN0313324573.The essential problem is that a large portion of the scientific community, including most research psychologists, regards parapsychology as a pseudoscience, due largely to its failure to move beyond null results in the way science usually does. Ordinarily, when experimental evidence fails repeatedly to support a hypothesis, that hypothesis is abandoned. Within parapsychology, however, more than a century of experimentation has failed to conclusively demonstrate the mere existence of paranormal phenomenon, yet parapsychologists continue to pursue that elusive goal.
  7. ^Thouless, R. H. (1942). "Experiments on paranormal guessing".British Journal of Psychology.33.London, England:Wiley-Blackwell:15–27.doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1942.tb01036.x.
  8. ^"Parapsychology FAQ Page 1".Parapsych.org. 2008-02-28. Archived fromthe originalon 2007-06-26.Retrieved2014-04-11.
  9. ^"Glossary of Psi (Parapsychological) Terms (L-R)".Parapsych.org. Archived fromthe originalon 2010-08-24.Retrieved2014-04-11.
  10. ^Irwin, Harvey J.; Watt, Caroline A. (2007).An Introduction to Parapsychology(5th ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina:McFarland & Company.p. 6.ISBN978-0786430598.
  11. ^Wynn, Charles M.; Wiggins, Arthur W. (2001).Quantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction: Where Real Science Ends...and Pseudoscience Begins.Joseph Henry Press. p.152.ISBN978-0309073097.
  12. ^Thouless, Robert Henry (1972),From Anecdote to Experiment in Psychical Research,Routledge & Kegan Paul Books.
  13. ^Nicholls, Peter and Brian Stableford: Entry, "Psi Powers" in Clute, John; Nicholls, Peter (1995),The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction,New York: St. Martin's Press, p. 971.
  14. ^Williamson, Jack (July 1951),The Greatest Invention,Astounding Science Fiction,pp. 56–96.
  15. ^Nevala-Lee, Alec(2018),Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction,New York: Dey Street Books/HarperCollins, p. 303 and n. p. 470. Nevala-Lee's text has 1950, but his citation has the correct date (1951).
  16. ^Campbell, John W. (February 1956), "The Science of Psionics",Astounding Science Fiction.
  17. ^Williamson, Jack (1984),Wonder's Child: My Life in Science Fiction;New York: Bluejay Books, p. 189.
  18. ^Raso, Jack (1992).Mystical Diets: Paranormal, Spiritual, and Occult Nutrition Practices.Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books. p.268.ISBN0879757612.
  19. ^Entry “Radionic” in theOxford English Dictionary,2nd ed. (1989), Vol. XIII, p. 105. The earliest citation in this sense (number 2) is from 1947.
  20. ^Entry “Bionics” in theMerriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary,10th ed. (1993), p. 115.
  21. ^Entry “Cryonics” in theMerriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary,10th ed. (1993), p. 280.
  22. ^Bould, Mark (2011).The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction(Paperback ed.). London: Routledge. p. 410.ISBN978-0415453790.Retrieved11 December2015.
  23. ^"Full text of 'Who Goes There?'".Archived fromthe originalon 2016-03-20.Retrieved2018-03-26.'I guess you and I, Doc, weren't so sensitive – if you want to believe in telepathy.' 'I have to,' Copper sighted. 'Dr. Rhine of Duke University has shown that it exist, shown that some are much more sensitive than others.'
  24. ^Larry McCaffery (July 1991)."An Interview with Jack Williamson".Science Fiction Studies.18, Part 2.ISSN0091-7729.He had gotten interested in the work that Joseph Rhine was conducting in psi phenomena at Duke University. I had writtenWith Folded Handswithout consultation with Campbell at all. He liked it and accepted it for publication, but he suggested that I look into Rhine.
  25. ^Nevala-Lee, Alec(2018),Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction,New York: Dey Street Books/HarperCollins, p. 67.
  26. ^Campbell, John W. (Spring/Summer 1932), "Invaders from the Infinite",Amazing Stories Quarterly,p. 216.
  27. ^Campbell, John W. (August 1937), "The Story Behind the Story",Thrilling Wonder Stories(note to the short story "The Double Minds" ).
  28. ^Campbell, John W. [writing as "Don A Stuart" ] (April 1939), "Strange Worlds",Unknown,p. 162.
  29. ^Nevala-Lee, Alec(2018),Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction,New York: Dey Street Books/HarperCollins,passim.
  30. ^abWestfahl, Gary (2005),The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy,Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, p. 167.
  31. ^Nevala-Lee, Alec(2018),Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction,New York: Dey Street Books/HarperCollins, p. 302.
  32. ^Anderson, Poul (1981).Fantasy(1st ed.). Tom Doherty Associates. p. 270.ISBN9780523485157.
  33. ^Leinster, Murray (March 1955),The Psionic Mousetrap,Amazing Stories.
  34. ^Nicholls, Peter and Brian Stableford: Entry, "ESP" in Clute, John; Nicholls, Peter (1995),The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction,New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 390–391.
  35. ^Nicholls, Peter; Stableford, Brian (18 November 2019). Clute, John (ed.).The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, Themes: ESP.Gollancz.Retrieved13 January2020.
  36. ^The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction,p. 972.
  37. ^abGardner, Martin(1986).Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science(2nd ed.). New York: Dover Publications.ISBN0486203948.
  38. ^Sladek, John(1974).The New Apocrypha: A Guide to Strange Science and Occult Beliefs.New York: Stein and Day. p.269.ISBN9780812817126.

Further reading[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psionics&oldid=1229705123"