Jump to content

San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Class overview
Builders
OperatorsUnited States Navy
Preceded by
Cost
  • $1.602 billion (ave. for class, FY2012)[1]
  • $2.021 billion (last ship, FY2012)[1]
Built2000–present
In commission2006–present
Planned26 (13 for Flight I and 13 for Flight II)
On order2
Building2
Completed12
Active12
General characteristics[2]
TypeAmphibious transport dock
Displacement25,300 t (full)
Length684 ft (208 m)
Beam105 ft (32 m)
Draft23 ft (7.0 m), full load
PropulsionFour sequentially turbocharged marineColt-Pielstickdiesel engines,two shafts, 41,600 shp
SpeedIn excess of 22 knots (25 mph; 41 km/h)
Boats & landing
craft carried
Complement
  • Crew: 28 officers, and 333enlistedsailors
  • Landing force: 66 officers, and 633 enlisted troops
Sensors and
processing systems		AN/SPS-48G,AN/SPQ-9B[1]
Electronic warfare
& decoys		AN/SLQ-32[1]
Armament
Aircraft carriedLaunch or land up to twoMV-22 Ospreytilt-rotor aircraft simultaneously with room to place four MV-22s on theflight deckand one in the hangar deck

TheSan Antonioclassis aclassofamphibious transport docks,also called a "landing platform, dock" (LPD), used by theUnited States Navy.These warships replace theAustin-classLPDs (includingClevelandandTrentonsub-classes), as well as theNewport-classtank landing ships,theAnchorage-classdock landing ships, and theCharleston-classamphibious cargo shipsthat have already been retired.[2]

Twelve ships of theSan Antonioclass were originally proposed, their original target price wasUS$890 million;[3]as built, their average cost is $1.6 billion.[1]Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2015 included partial funding for the twelfthSan Antonio-class ship. As of December 2022eleven warships of this class were in service with the U.S. Navy, with an additional three ships under construction.[2]The Navy decided in 2018 to produce a second flight of 13 planned LPD Flight II ships, for a total of 26 in the LPD 17 class; LPD 30,Harrisburg,is the first Flight II ship.[2]

Design[edit]

Artist's concept of the San Antonio Class amphibious transport dock ships

TheSan Antonioclass was designed to provide the Navy andU.S. Marine Corpswith modern, sea-based platforms that are networked, survivable, and built to operate with 21st century transformational platforms, such as theMV-22 Osprey,the (since canceled)Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle(EFV),air-cushioned landing craft(LCACs), and future means by which Marines are delivered ashore.[2]The ship is more than 45 percent larger than theAustinclass, displacing more than 25,000 tons at full load. It carries fewer troops, but has twice as much space for vehicles, landing craft, and aircraft.[4]The ships are also suited to act as recovery ships for spacecraft, with a floodable well deck at the back of the vessel into which a capsule can float;Portlandwas the recovery ship for theOrion capsuleof theArtemis 1uncrewed Moon-orbiting mission on 11 December 2022.[5]

The project embraced a "Design for Ownership" philosophy; a concurrent engineering approach that injects operator, maintainer, and trainer input into the design development process. The goal was to ensure that operational realities are considered throughout the total ship design, integration, construction, test and life cycle support of the new ships and their systems.[6]This process was intended to improve combat readiness, enhance quality of life, and reduce Total Ownership Costs, and resulted in numerous changes during the project.[7]

TheSan Antonioclass has significant survivability features and computer technology. In addition toRolling Airframe Missile(RAM) protection from air threats, the class was designed to minimize radar signature. Techniques that reduceradar cross-section(RCS) make the ships more difficult to locate and target.[7]Enhanced survivability features include improved nuclear blast and fragmentation protection and a shock-hardened structure.[8]The fiber-optic shipboard-wide area network (SWAN) connects onboard-integrated systems. The network will allow "plug in and fight" configuration, updating and replacing hardware more easily when newer technology becomes available. Moreover, the class has extensive communications, command, control, and intelligence systems to support current and projected expeditionary warfare missions of the 21st century.[7]

The class is fitted with the integrated Ship Self-Defense System (SSDS). The system fuses the radars and other sensors and controls the weapons systems for an automated fast reaction capability against air threats.[9]

TheAdvanced Enclosed Mast/Sensors(AEM/S) System mast, a 93-foot-high octagonal structure 35 feet in diameter, is constructed of a multi-layer frequency-selective composite material. It is designed to permit the ship's own sensor frequencies with very low loss while reflecting other frequencies. The tapered octagonal shape of the AEM/S is designed to reduce the radar cross section, and enclosing the antennas provides improved performance and greatly reduces maintenance costs.[10]The composite mast was replaced by a conventional mast starting fromUSSFort Lauderdaleas a transition to theLX(R)-class amphibious warfare shipdesign.[11]

TheSan Antonio-class also incorporates the latest quality of life standards for the embarked Marines and sailors, including sit-up berths, a ship services mall, a learning resource center, and a fitness center. Medical facilities include two operating rooms and 124 beds. Additionally, they are the first USN ships designed to accommodate sailors and Marines of both sexes as part of the crew and embarked troops.[4]

By mid-2016, the Navy and Marine Corps were studying installing avertical launch system(VLS) intoSan Antonio-class ships so they could field larger offensive missiles. The original ship concept included two 8-cellMk 41 VLSin the bow, which is being reexamined to addTomahawk cruise missilesto support Marines ashore with little modification to the combat system.[12]

History[edit]

Following the extendedproblems and incidentsexperienced byUSSSan Antonio,the U.S. Department of Defense'sDirector, Operational Test and Evaluation(DOT&E), stated in 2010 that the ships are "capable of operating 'in a benign environment', but not effective, suitable and not survivable in a combat situation".[13]The DOT&E found in 2011 that the first ship of the class, USSSan Antonio,had several deficiencies which rendered it "not operationally effective, suitable, or survivable in a hostile environment".[14]In April 2015, the USN proposed adding a 12th ship to the class,[15]which will be built at Ingalls in exchange for a destroyer to be named later.[16]On 4 December 2015, the 12th ship was ordered.[17]

Derivatives[edit]

See also:LX(R)-class amphibious warfare ship

U.S. senatorKay Haganhas asked if the LPD-17 construction line should be extended to a 12th ship as a bridge to building theLX(R)(formerly LSD(X)) on the same hull, but the USN has indicated that the requirements of the LX(R) have not yet been settled and that the LPD-17 hull might be too large for such a mission.[18]However, CommandantJames F. Amoshad also endorsed dropping LSD in favor of continued LPD production.[19]

In October 2014, Secretary of the NavyRay Mabussigned an internal memo recommending that the LX(R) warship be based on the existingSan Antonio-class design. The LPD-17 design was selected over a foreign variant, and an entirely new design to meet required capability, capacity, and cost parameters. Official selection of basing the LX(R) off the LPD-17 design still has to come with Milestone A approval.[20]TheNational Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015included partial funding for a twelfthSan Antonio-class ship (LPD-28).[21]In early 2014, Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) displayed its Flight IIA version of the LPD-17 hull for the Navy's LX(R) amphibious ship. The design is further modified by removing some of the higher-end capabilities of theSan Antonioclass to create an "amphibious truck" to replace theWhidbey IslandandHarpers Ferrylanding ship docks.The Flight IIA has improved command and control (C2) features over the LSDs, half the medical spaces of the LPD-17, a smaller hangar, no composite masts, two unspecified main propulsion diesel engines (MPDE), two spots for LCACs or one LCU, a reduced troop capacity (500), and a crew of about 400 sailors.[22]In January 2015, the Navy and Marine Corps decided to go with the modified LPD-17 hull for the LX(R) program.[23]

Chief of Naval Operations Greenert considered using some of the extra space in theSan Antonioclass to mount modular equipment in the same fashion as thelittoral combat ships.[24]As part of their bid to offer "Flight II" LPD-17s for thedock landing shipreplacement contract, HII has suggested fitting out the ships to carry theAegis Ballistic Missile Defense System.[25][26]Although there is no formal requirement for the BMD variant, HII report unofficial support for it within the U.S. Navy, such that it will be modeled in wargame scenarios in 2016 and 2017. It could accommodate up to 288 Mk41 VLS missile tubes and a radar with 1000 times the sensitivity of the SPY-1D radar of the Burke destroyers.[27]

Flight II[edit]

Main article:LX(R)-class amphibious warfare ship

On 2 August 2018, the U.S. Navy and Huntington Ingalls signed a contract for long lead items for LPD-30, the first of the 13-ship more affordable Flight II class. The contract was for US$165.5M. The cost goal is for US$1.64B for the first ship, and $1.4B for subsequent ships. LPD-30 will be fitted with a RaytheonAN/SPY-6Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar,an upgrade over theAN/SPS-48currently in LPD-17s.[28]Huntington Ingalls will build the new flight exclusively.[citation needed]On 26 March 2019, Huntington Ingalls announced the award of a US$1.47 billion, fixed-price incentive contract for LPD 30 (14th ship and first of Flight II). On 10 October 2019, the name of the ship was announced asUSSHarrisburgforHarrisburg, Pennsylvania,thestate's capital.[29]On 3 April 2020, Huntington Ingalls announced that it was awarded a $1.5 billion contract modification for the construction ofUSSPittsburgh,named forPittsburgh, Pennsylvania.[30]

The Flight II ships are intended to provide the mission currently provided by the Whidbey Island-class dock landing ships and incorporate more than 200 changes over the Flight I ships. The mission provided by Flight II ships will include airport, seaport, and hospital operations and incorporate modifications to the ships’ well decks.[31]

As of March 2023,the US Navy is proposing to temporarily halt acquiring additionalSan Antonioclass ships beyond LPD-32. This move would be part of a "strategic pause," according to Navy SecretaryCarlos Del Toro,that would allow the force to better examine what they need to get out of the ships and how many they ultimately need. Under this plan, LPD-32 would be purchased in the 2022–2023 fiscal year.[32][33]

Ships of the class[edit]

Name Hull number Builder Laid down Launched Commissioned Home port Status
Flight I
San Antonio LPD-17 Avondale 9 December 2000 12 July 2003 14 January 2006 Norfolk,Virginia Active
New Orleans LPD-18 Avondale 14 October 2002 11 December 2004 10 March 2007 Sasebo, Nagasaki Active
Mesa Verde LPD-19 Ingalls 25 February 2003 19 November 2004 15 December 2007 Norfolk,Virginia Active
Green Bay LPD-20 Avondale 11 August 2003 11 August 2006 24 January 2009 Sasebo, Nagasaki,Japan Active
New York LPD-21 Avondale 10 September 2004 19 December 2007 7 November 2009 Norfolk,Virginia Active
San Diego LPD-22 Ingalls 23 May 2007 7 May 2010 19 May 2012 San Diego,California Active
Anchorage LPD-23 Avondale 24 September 2007 12 February 2011 4 May 2013 San Diego,California Active
Arlington LPD-24 Ingalls 26 May 2008 23 November 2010 8 February 2013 Norfolk,Virginia Active
Somerset LPD-25 Avondale 11 December 2009 14 April 2012 1 March 2014 San Diego,California Active[34]
John P. Murtha LPD-26 Ingalls 6 February 2012 30 October 2014[35] 8 October 2016 San Diego,California Active[36]
Portland LPD-27 Ingalls 2 August 2013 13 February 2016[37] 14 December 2017[38] San Diego,California Active
Fort Lauderdale LPD-28 Ingalls 13 October 2017 28 March 2020 30 July 2022[39] Norfolk,Virginia Active
Richard M. McCool Jr. LPD-29 Ingalls 12 April 2019 5 January 2022 Delivered
Flight II
Harrisburg LPD-30 Ingalls 28 January 2022[40] Under construction[41]
Pittsburgh LPD-31 Ingalls 2 June 2023 Under construction[30][42]
Philadelphia LPD-32 Ingalls Awarded[43][44]
TBD LPD-33 Ingalls Authorized[45]

Gallery[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcde"DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATES Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy"(PDF).Department of the Navy. February 2012. p. 13-1.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 February 2013.Retrieved10 January2013.LPD-27 is the last scheduled member of the class, bought with $2.021B (FY2012)
  2. ^abcde"Amphibious Transport Dock - LPD".U.S. Navy. 21 January 2021.
  3. ^"LPD-17 Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)"(PDF).Department of Defense. 31 December 2011. p. 21.Archived(PDF)from the original on 11 February 2013.Retrieved10 January2013.
  4. ^ab"LPD-17 SAN ANTONIO Class".Globalsecurity.org. 7 July 2011.Archivedfrom the original on 16 September 2007.
  5. ^Amos, Jonathan (11 December 2022)."Nasa's Orion capsule on target for splashdown".BBC News.
  6. ^"LPD 17 WORKSHOP REPORT / MISSIONS AND OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES / (MONTEREY II)".Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division. April 1996.Archivedfrom the original on 13 April 2014.Retrieved9 April2014.
  7. ^abcGary L Pickens and Rear Admiral L. F. Picotte, USN (Ret.) (January 1999)."LPD 17—A Ship Built By and For the Expeditionary Warrior".NAVSEA's Deckplate.Archivedfrom the original on 22 July 2014.Retrieved9 April2014.
  8. ^"San Antonio Class Landing Platform Dock".naval-technology.com.Archivedfrom the original on 21 March 2013.Retrieved9 April2014.
  9. ^"Ship Self-Defense System Architecture"(PDF).Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest.22(4). 2001.Archived(PDF)from the original on 10 September 2016.
  10. ^"LPD-17 SAN ANTONIO-class".Federation of American Scientists. 15 September 2004.Archivedfrom the original on 21 July 2014.Retrieved9 April2014.
  11. ^"Huntington Ingalls Industries Authenticates Keel Of Amphibious Transport Ship Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28)"(Press release). Huntington Ingalls Industries. 13 October 2017.Retrieved13 October2017.
  12. ^Navy, Marine Corps Considering Adding Vertical Launch System to San Antonio AmphibsArchived18 October 2016 at theWayback Machine- News.USNI.org, 13 October 2016
  13. ^Capaccio, TonyNorthrop Navy Ships `Not Survivable' in Combat, Official SaysArchived5 January 2015 at theWayback MachineBloomberg, 28 October 2010
  14. ^"LPD-17 San Antonio Class Amphibious Transport Dock"Archived2 February 2014 at theWayback Machine.DOT&E
  15. ^Cavas, Christopher P. (5 April 2015)."New US Navy Fleet Goal: 308 Ships".defensenews.com.Gannett.Retrieved6 April2015.
  16. ^Cavas, Christopher P. (4 December 2015)."New Amphibious Ship Ordered for Navy, Destroyer To Come".defensenews.com.TEGNA.Retrieved4 December2015.
  17. ^"2 New Warships en Route to U.S. Navy".26 December 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 29 December 2015.Retrieved27 December2015.
  18. ^O'Rourke, Ronald."Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress."Archived12 March 2012 at theWayback MachineCongressional Research Service,16 March 2011.
  19. ^"Navy League Conference 2013 speeches on the future of the maritime services."
  20. ^Memo: Hull Based on San Antonio Design is Navy’s Preferred Option for Next Generation AmphibArchived21 October 2014 at theWayback Machine- USNI.org, 20 October 2014.
  21. ^"Navy Gains a Ship, 15 Growlers in Defense Bill".Defense News.Archived fromthe originalon 17 December 2014.Retrieved2 November2021.
  22. ^"What the Navy’s Next Generation Amphibious Ship Could Look Like"Archived23 November 2014 at theWayback MachineNews.USNI.org, 21 November 2014
  23. ^"Bidding for New Oiler, Amphibs to be Bundled".8 August 2017.
  24. ^Freedberg, Sydney J. Jr."Modular 'Trucks' Will Rule The Waves: CNO."Archived22 April 2012 at theWayback MachineAol Defense.18 April 2012.
  25. ^"HII Pitching BMD Role For LPD-17 Hull."
  26. ^"LPD Flight II".Archivedfrom the original on 22 January 2013.Retrieved23 January2013.
  27. ^Fisher Jr, Richard D (19 May 2016)."Navy League 2016: Huntington Ingalls Industries notes increasing interest in BMD ship concept".IHS Jane's Navy International.Archivedfrom the original on 20 May 2016.Retrieved22 May2016.
  28. ^"US Navy awards major contract to Huntington Ingalls for its newest class of amphibious vessels",David B. Larter,Defense News,2018-08-03
  29. ^The Navy named its next warship after this city,Navy Times,2019-10-10
  30. ^ab"Huntington Ingalls Industries Awarded $1.50 Billion Contract for the Construction of LPD 31"(Press release).Huntington Ingalls Industries.3 April 2020.Retrieved5 April2020.
  31. ^Osborne, Kris (24 January 2022)."The Navy Is Building the First Flight II San Antonio-Class Amphibious Transport Docks".National Interest.Retrieved31 July2022.
  32. ^Eckstein, Megan (28 February 2023)."US Navy reviews cost-saving design changes before resuming amphib buys".Defense News.Retrieved14 March2023.
  33. ^Shelbourne, Mallory (10 March 2023)."FY2024 Budget: Navy Won't Buy Any More San Antonio Amphibs in the Next Five Years".USNI News.Retrieved14 March2023.
  34. ^"Ingalls-built Amphibious Transport Dock Somerset (LPD 25) Completes Acceptance Trials".11 October 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 14 October 2013.Retrieved13 October2013.
  35. ^"John P Murtha (LPD 26)".Naval Vessel Register.Retrieved25 July2016.
  36. ^"Navy to Commission Amphibious Transport Dock John P. Murtha"(Press release). U.S. Department of Defense. 7 October 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 10 October 2016.Retrieved8 October2016.
  37. ^"Future USS Portland (LPD 27) Launches".United States Navy.14 February 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 15 February 2016.Retrieved14 February2016.
  38. ^"Portland (LPD 27)".Naval Vessel Register.Retrieved25 July2016.
  39. ^"Navy to Commission Amphibious Transport Dock Ship Fort Lauderdale".navy.mil. 29 July 2022.Retrieved30 July2022.
  40. ^"Keel Authenticated for Future USS Harrisburg"(Press release). United States Navy. 28 January 2022.Retrieved31 January2022.
  41. ^"Harrisburg (LPD-30)".Naval Vessel Register.Retrieved15 January2022.
  42. ^Archived atGhostarchiveand theWayback Machine:"Secretary of the Navy Kenneth J. Braithwaite - Growing the Fleet".YouTube.
  43. ^"HII Awarded $240 Million Advance Procurement Contract for LPD 32"(Press release). [Huntington Ingalls Industries]. 16 June 2022.Retrieved29 July2022.
  44. ^"Final San Antonio-Class LPD Will Be Named USS Philadelphia".navalnews.com.12 October 2023.Retrieved30 October2023.
  45. ^"Senate FY 2023 Appropriations Bill Adds $4B to Navy Shipbuilding, Money for New Amphibs".USNI News.28 July 2022.Retrieved28 July2022.

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related toSan Antonio class amphibious transport docks.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=San_Antonio-class_amphibious_transport_dock&oldid=1219430633"