Sannyasa
| Part ofa serieson |
| Hinduism |
|---|
 |
Sannyasa(Sanskrit:संन्यास;IAST:Saṃnyāsa), sometimes spelledSanyasaorSanyasi(for the person), is life of renunciation and the fourth stage within theHindusystem of four life stages known asAshramas,with the first three beingBrahmacharya(bachelor student),Grihastha(householder) andVanaprastha(forest dweller, retired).[1]Sannyasa is traditionally conceptualized for men or women in late years of their life, but young brahmacharis have had the choice to skip the householder and retirement stages, renounce worldly and materialistic pursuits and dedicate their lives to spiritual pursuits.
Sannyasa, a form ofasceticismmarked by renunciation of material desires and prejudices, is represented by a state of disinterest in and detachment from material life, whose purpose is spending one's life in peaceful, spiritual pursuits.[2][3]An individual in Sanyasa is known as asannyasi(male) orsannyasini(female) inHinduism.[note 1]Sannyasa shares similarities with theSadhuand Sadhvi traditions ofJain monasticism,and the sannyasi and sannyasini share similarity with thebhikkhusandbhikkhunisofBuddhism.[5]
Sannyasahas historically been a stage of renunciation,ahimsa(non-violence), a peaceful and simple life and spiritual pursuit in Indian traditions. However, this has not always been the case. After the invasions and establishment of Muslim rule in India, from the 12th century through theBritish Raj,parts of theShaiva(Gossain) andVaishnava(Bairagi) ascetics metamorphosed into a military order, where they developed martial arts, created military strategies, and engaged inguerrilla warfare.[6]These warriorsanyasi(ascetics) played an important role in helping Europeancolonial powersestablish themselves in theIndian subcontinent.[7]
Etymology and synonyms[edit]
SaṃnyāsainSanskritnyasa means purification, sannyasa means "Purification of Everything".[8]It is a composite word ofsaṃ-which means "together, all",ni-which means "down" andāsafrom the rootas,meaning "to throw" or "to put".[9]A literal translation of Sannyāsa is thus "to put down everything, all of it". Sannyasa is sometimes spelled asSanyasa.[9]
The termSaṃnyasamakes appearance in theSamhitas,AranyakasandBrahmanas,the earliest layers ofVedic literature(2nd millennium BCE), but it is rare.[10]It is not found in ancient Buddhist or Jaina vocabularies, and only appears in Hindu texts of the 1st millennium BCE, in the context of those who have given up ritual activity and taken up non-ritualistic spiritual pursuits discussed in theUpanishads.[10]The termSannyasaevolves into a rite of renunciation in ancientSutratexts, and thereafter became a recognized, well discussed stage of life (Ashrama) by about the 3rd and 4th century CE.[10]
Sanyasis are also known as Bhiksu, Pravrajita/Pravrajitā,[11]Yati,[12]Sramanaand Parivrajaka in Hindu texts.[10]
History[edit]
Jamison andWitzelstate[13]early Vedic texts make no mention ofSannyasa,orAshrama system,unlike the concepts ofBrahmacharinandGrihasthawhich they do mention.[14]Instead,Rig Vedauses the termAntigriha(अन्तिगृह) in hymn 10.95.4, as still a part of the extended family, where older people lived in ancient India, with an outwardly role.[13]It is in later Vedic era and over time, thatSannyasaand other new concepts emerged, while older ideas evolved and expanded. A three-stage Ashrama concept, along withVanaprastha,emerged about or after 7th Century BC, when sages such asYājñavalkyaleft their homes and roamed around as spiritual recluses and pursued theirPravrajika(wanderer) lifestyle.[15]The explicit use of the four-stage Ashrama concept appeared a few centuries later.[13][16]
However, early Vedic literature from 2nd millennium BC mentionsMuni(मुनि, monks, mendicants, holy men), with characteristics that mirror those found in laterSannyasinsandSannyasinis.For example, theRig Veda,in Book 10 Chapter 136, mentions Munis as those withKesin(केशिन्, long haired) andMalaclothes (मल, soil-colored, yellow, orange, saffron), engaged in the affairs ofMananat(mind, meditation).[17]The Rigveda, however, refers to these people asMuniandVati(वति, monks who beg).
केश्यग्निं केशी विषं केशी बिभर्ति रोदसी । केशी विश्वं स्वर्दृशे केशीदं ज्योतिरुच्यते ॥१॥ मुनयो वातरशनाः पिशङ्गा वसते मला । वातस्यानु ध्राजिं यन्ति यद्देवासो अविक्षत ॥२॥
He with the long loose locks (of hair) supports Agni, and moisture, heaven, and earth; He is all sky to look upon: he with long hair is called this light. TheMunis,girdled with the wind, wear garments of soil hue; They, following the wind's swift course, go where the Gods have gone before.
— Rig Veda, Hymn 10.CXXXVI.1-2[17]
TheseMunis,their lifestyle and spiritual pursuit, likely influenced the Sannyasa concept, as well as the ideas behind the ancient concept ofBrahmacharya(bachelor student). One class ofMuniswere associated with Rudra.[18]Another wereVratyas.[citation needed]
Lifestyle and goals[edit]
Hinduismhas no formal demands nor requirements on the lifestyle or spiritual discipline, method or deity a Sanyasin or Sanyasini must pursue – it is left to the choice and preferences of the individual.[19]This freedom has led to diversity and significant differences in the lifestyle and goals of those who adopt Sannyasa. There are, however, some common themes. A person inSannyasalives a simple life, typically detached, itinerant, drifting from place to place, with no material possessions or emotional attachments. They may have a walking stick, a book, a container or vessel for food and drink, often wearing yellow,saffron,orange,ochreor soil colored clothes. They may have long hair and appear disheveled, and are usually vegetarians.[19]Some minorUpanishadsas well as monastic orders consider women, children, students, fallen men (those with a criminal record) and others as not qualified to becomeSannyasa;while other texts place no restrictions.[20]The dress, the equipage and lifestyle varies between groups. For example, Sannyasa Upanishad in verses 2.23 to 2.29, identifies six lifestyles for six types of renunciates.[21]One of them is described as living with the following possessions,[22]
Pot, drinking cup and flask – the three supports, a pair of shoes,
a patched robe giving protection – in heat and cold, a loin cloth,
bathing drawers and straining cloth, triple staff and coverlet.— Sannyasa Upanishad, 1.4[22]
Those who enter Sannyasa may choose whether they join a group (similar to Christianmendicant orders). Some areanchorites,homeless mendicants preferring solitude and seclusion in remote parts, without affiliation.[23]Others arecenobites,living and traveling with kindred fellow-Sannyasi in the pursuit of their spiritual journey, sometimes inAshramasorMatha/Sangha (aHermitage,the practice of seclusion known generally asmonasticism).[23]
Most Hindu ascetics adoptcelibacywhen they begin Sannyasa. However, there are exceptions, such as the Saiva Tantra school of asceticism where ritual sex is considered part of liberation process.[24]Sex is viewed by them as a transcendence from a personal, intimate act to something impersonal and ascetic.[24]
The goal[edit]
The goal of the Hindu Sannyasin ismoksha(liberation).[25][26]The idea of what that means varies from tradition to tradition.
Who am I, and in what really do I consist? What is this cage of suffering?
For theBhakti(devotion) traditions, liberation consists of being an eternal servant to the Divine and release fromSaṃsāra(rebirth in future life);[27]forYogatraditions, liberation is the experience of the highestSamādhi(deep awareness in this life);[28]and for theAdvaitatradition, liberation isjivanmukti– the awareness of the Supreme Reality (Brahman) and Self-realization in this life.[29][30]Sannyasa is a means and an end in itself. It is a means to decreasing and then ultimately ending all ties of any kind. It is a means to the soul and meaning, but not ego nor personalities. Sannyasa does not abandon the society, it abandons the ritual mores of the social world and one's attachment to all its other manifestations.[31]The end is a liberated, content, free and blissful existence.[32][33]
The behaviors and characteristics[edit]
The behavioral state of a person inSannyasais described by many ancient and medieval era Indian texts. Bhagavad Gita discusses it in many verses, for example:[34]
ज्ञेयः स नित्यसंन्यासीयो न द्वेष्टि न काङ् क्षति । निर्द्वन्द्वो हि महाबाहो सुखं बन्धात्प्रमुच्यते ॥५-३॥
He is known as a permanentSannyasinwho does not hate, does not desire, is without dualities (opposites). Truly, Mahabaho (Arjuna), he is liberated from bondage.
— Bhagavad Gita,Hymn 5.3[34]
Other behavioral characteristics, in addition to renunciation, during Sannyasa include:ahimsa(non-violence),akrodha(not become angry even if you are abused by others), disarmament (no weapons), chastity, bachelorhood (no marriage), avyati (non-desirous), amati (poverty), self-restraint, truthfulness, sarvabhutahita (kindness to all creatures),asteya(non-stealing),aparigraha(non-acceptance of gifts, non-possessiveness) andshaucha(purity of body, speech and mind).[35][36]Some Hindu monastic orders require the above behavior in form of a vow, before a renunciate can enter the order.[35]Tiwari notes that these virtues are not unique toSannyasa,and other than renunciation, all of these virtues are revered in ancient texts for all fourAshramas(stages) of human life.[37]
BaudhayanaDharmasūtra,completed by about 7th century BC, states the following behavioral vows for a person inSannyasa[38]
These are the vows a Sannyasi must keep –
Abstention from injuring living beings, truthfulness, abstention from appropriating the property of others, abstention from sex, liberality (kindness, gentleness) are the major vows. There are five minor vows: abstention from anger, obedience towards the guru, avoidance of rashness, cleanliness, and purity in eating. He should beg (for food) without annoying others, any food he gets he must compassionately share a portion with other living beings, sprinkling the remainder with water he should eat it as if it were a medicine.
— Baudhayana,Dharmasūtra, II.10.18.1-10[38]
Types[edit]
Ashrama Upanishad identified various types of Sannyasi renouncers based on their different goals:[39]Kutichaka – seeking atmospheric world; Bahudaka – seeking heavenly world; Hamsa – seeking penance world;Paramahamsa– seeking truth world; and Turiyatitas and Avadhutas seeking liberation in this life.
In some texts, such as Sannyasa Upanishad,[21]these were classified by the symbolic items the Sannyasins carried and their lifestyle. For example, Kutichaka sannyasis carried triple staffs, Hamsa sannyasis carried single staffs, while Paramahamsas went without them. This method of classification based on emblematic items became controversial, as anti-thematic to the idea of renunciation. Later texts, such as Naradaparivrajaka Upanishad stated that all renunciation is one, but people enter the state of Sannyasa for different reasons – for detachment and getting away from their routine meaningless world, to seek knowledge and meaning in life, to honor rites of Sannyasa they have undertaken, and because he already has liberating knowledge.[40]
- Other classifications
There were many groups of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist Sannyasis co-existing in pre-Maurya Empire era, each classified by their attributes, such as:[41]Achelakas (without clothes), Ajivika, Aviruddhaka, Devadhammika, Eka-satakas, Gotamaka, Jatilaka, Magandika, Mundasavaka, Nigrantha (Jains), Paribbajaka, Tedandikas, Titthiya and others.
Literature[edit]
TheDharmasūtrasandDharmaśāstras,composed about mid 1st millennium BC and later, place increasing emphasis on all four stages ofAshrama systemincludingSannyasa.[42]TheBaudhayanaDharmasūtra, in verses 2.11.9 to 2.11.12, describes the four Ashramas as "a fourfold division ofDharma".[42]The newer Dharmaśāstra vary widely in their discussion ofAshramasystem.[43]
TheDharmasūtrasandDharmaśāstrasgive a number of detailed but widely divergent guidelines on renunciation. In all cases, Sannyasa was never mandatory and was one of the choices before an individual. Only a small percentage chose this path. Olivelle[43]posits that the older Dharmasūtras present theAshramasincludingSannyasaas four alternative ways of life and options available, but not as sequential stage that any individual must follow.[42]Olivelle also states thatSannyasaalong with the Ashrama system gained mainstream scholarly acceptance about 2nd century BC.[44]
Ancient and medieval era texts of Hinduism considerGrihastha(householder) stage as the most important of all stages in sociological context, as human beings in this stage not only pursue a virtuous life, they produce food and wealth that sustains people in other stages of life, as well as the offspring that continues mankind.[1][45]However, an individual had the choice to renounce any time he or she wanted, including straight after student life.[46]
When can a person renounce?[edit]
Baudhayana Dharmasūtra,[47]in verse II.10.17.2 states that anyone who has finishedBrahmacharya(student) life stage may become ascetic immediately, in II.10.17.3 that any childless couple may enter Sannyasa anytime they wish, while verse II.10.17.4 states that a widower may choose Sannyasa if desired, but in general, states verse II.10.17.5, Sannyasa is suited after the completion of age 70 and after one's children have been firmly settled.[47]Other texts suggest the age of 75.[48]
TheVasiṣṭhaandĀpastamba Dharmasūtras, and the laterManusmṛtidescribe theāśramas as sequential stages which would allow one to pass from Vedic studentship to householder to forest-dwelling hermit to renouncer.[49]However, these texts differ with each other.Yājñavalkya Smṛti,for example, differs from Manusmṛti and states in verse 3.56 that one may skipVanaprastha(forest dwelling, retired) stage and go straight from theGrihastha(householder) stage toSannyasa.
Who may renounce?[edit]
The Jabala Upanishad mentions one who gets vairagya of any class or gender can renounce or take sanyasa.[50]Nevertheless, Dharmaśāstra texts document people of all castes as well as women, enteredSannyasain practice.[51]
What happened to renouncers' property and human rights?[edit]
After renouncing the world, the ascetic's financial obligations and property were adjudicated by the state, in the manner of a decedent's estate.[52]Viṣṇu Smriti in verse 6.27, for example, states that if a debtor takesSannyasa,his sons or grandsons should settle his debts.[53]As to the little property a Sannyasin may collect or possess after renunciation, Book III Chapter XVI of Kautiliya'sArthashastrastates that the property of hermits (vánaprastha), ascetics (yati, sannyasa), and student bachelors (Brahmachári) shall on their death be taken by theirguru,disciples, theirdharmabhratri(brother in the monastic order), or classmates in succession.[54]
Although a renouncer's practitioner's obligations and property rights were reassigned, he or she continued to enjoy basic human rights such as the protection from injury by others and the freedom to travel. Likewise, someone practicing Sannyasa was subject to the same laws as common citizens; stealing, harming, or killing a human being by a Sannyasi were all serious crimes in Kautiliya's Arthashastra.[55]
Renunciation in daily life[edit]
Later Indian literature debates whether the benefit of renunciation can be achieved (moksha,or liberation) without asceticism in the earlier stages of one's life. For example,Bhagavad Gita,Vidyaranya'sJivanmukti Viveka,and others believed that various alternate forms ofyogaand the importance of yogic discipline could serve as paths to spirituality, and ultimatelymoksha.[56][57]Over time, four paths to liberating spirituality have emerged in Hinduism: Jñāna yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Rāja yoga.[58]Acting without greed or craving for results, in Karma yoga for example, is considered a form of detachment in daily life similar toSannyasa.Sharma[59]states that, "the basic principle of Karma yoga is that it is not what one does, but how one does it that counts and if one has the know-how in this sense, one can become liberated by doing whatever it is one does", and "(one must do) whatever one does without attachment to the results, with efficiency and to the best of one's ability".[59]
Warrior ascetics[edit]
Ascetic life was historically a life of renunciation, non-violence and spiritual pursuit. However, in India, this has not always been the case. For example, after the Mongol and Persian Islamic invasions in the 12th century, and the establishment ofDelhi Sultanate,the ensuing Hindu-Muslim conflicts provoked the creation of a military order of Hindu ascetics in India.[6][7]These warrior ascetics formed paramilitary groups called ‘‘Akharas'’ and they invented a range of martial arts.[6]
Nath Siddhasof the 12th century AD, may have been the earliest Hindu monks to resort to a military response after the Muslim conquest.[60]Ascetics, by tradition, led a nomadic and unattached lifestyle. As these ascetics dedicated themselves to rebellion, their groups sought stallions, developed techniques for spying and targeting, and they adopted strategies of war against Muslim nobles and the Sultanate state. Many of these groups were devotees of Hindu deityMahadeva,and were calledMahants.[6]Other popular names for them wasSannyasis,Yogis,Nagas(followers of Shiva),Bairagis(followers of Vishnu) andGosainsfrom the 16th to the 19th centuries; in some cases, these Hindu monks cooperated with Muslim fakirs who were Sufi and also persecuted.[7]
Warrior monks continued their rebellion through the Mughal Empire, and became a political force during the early years ofBritish Raj.In some cases, these regiments of soldier monks shifted from guerrilla campaigns to war alliances, and these Hindu warrior monks played a key role in helping British establish themselves in India.[61]The significance of warrior ascetics rapidly declined with the consolidation of British Raj in late 19th century, and with the rise in non-violence movement byMahatma Gandhi.[6]
Novetzke states that some of these Hindu warrior ascetics were treated as folk heroes, aided by villagers and townspeople, because they targeted figures of political and economic power in a discriminatory state, and some of these warriors paralleledRobin Hood's lifestyle.[62]
Upanishads[edit]
Sannyasa, or the renunciant way of life, is discussed in various Upanishads.
Major Upanishads[edit]
Among the thirteen major orPrincipal Upanishads,all from the ancient era, many include sections related toSannyasa.[63]TheMundaka Upanishaddiscusses the path ofSannyasaas a means to attain spiritual knowledge and liberation. It emphasizes the renunciant's simple and austere lifestyle in pursuit of wisdom.[64]The motivations and state of aSannyasiare mentioned inMaitrāyaṇi Upanishad,a classical major Upanishad that Robert Hume included among his list of "Thirteen Principal Upanishads" of Hinduism.[64]Maitrāyaṇi starts with the question, "given the nature of life, how is joy possible?" and "how can one achievemoksha(liberation)? "; in later sections it offers a debate on possible answers and its views on Sannyasa.[65]
In this body infected with passions, anger, greed, delusion, fright, despondency, grudge, separation from what is dear and desirable, attachment to what is not desirable, hunger, thirst, old age, death, illness, sorrow and the rest - how can one experience only joy? – Hymn I.3
The drying up of great oceans, the crumbling down of the mountains, the instability of the pole-star, the tearing of the wind-chords, the sinking down, the submergence of the earth, the tumbling down of the gods from their place - in a world in which such things occur, how can one experience only joy?! – Hymn I.4
— Maitrayaniya Upanishad, Translated byPaul Deussen[66]
Dragged away and polluted by the river of theGunas(personality), one becomes rootless, tottering, broken down, greedy, uncomposed and falling in the delusion of I-consciousness, he imagines: "I am this, this is mine" and binds himself, like a bird in the net. – Hymn VI.30
Just as the fire without fuel comes to rest in its place,
so also the passive mind comes to rest in its source;
When it (mind) is infatuated by the objects of sense, he falls away from truth and acts;
Mind alone is theSamsara,one should purify it with diligence;
You are what your mind is, a mystery, a perpetual one;
The mind which is serene, cancels all actions good and bad;
He, who, himself, serene, remains steadfast in himself - he attains imperishable happiness. – Hymn VI.34— Maitrayaniya Upanishad, Translated byPaul Deussen[67]
Sannyasa Upanishads[edit]
Of the 108Upanishadsof theMuktika,the largest corpus is dedicated toSannyasaand toYoga,or about 20 each, with some overlap. The renunciation-related texts are called theSannyasa Upanishads.[68]These are as follows:
| Veda | Sannyāsa |
|---|---|
| Ṛigveda | Nirvāṇa |
| Samaveda | Āruṇeya,Maitreya,Sannyāsa,Kuṇḍika |
| Krishna Yajurveda | Brahma,Avadhūta,[69]SeeKathashruti |
| Shukla Yajurveda | Jābāla,Paramahaṃsa,Advayatāraka,Bhikṣuka,Turīyātīta,Yājñavalkya,Śāṭyāyani |
| Atharvaveda | Ashrama,[70]Nāradaparivrājaka(Parivrāt),Paramahaṃsa parivrājaka,Parabrahma |
Six of the Sannyasa Upanishads – Aruni, Kundika, Kathashruti, Paramahamsa, Jabala and Brahma – were composed before the 3rd-century CE, likely in the centuries before or after the start of the common era, states Sprockhoff; the Asrama Upanishad is dated to the 3rd-century, the Naradaparivrajaka and Satyayaniya Upanishads to around the 12th-century, and about ten of the remaining Sannyasa Upanishads are dated to have been composed in the 14th- to 15th-century CE well after the start of Islamic Sultanates period of South Asia in late 12th-century.[71][72]
The oldest Sannyasa Upanishads have a strongAdvaita Vedantaoutlook, and these pre-dateAdi Shankara.[73]Most of the Sannyasa Upanishads present a Yoga and nondualism (Advaita) Vedanta philosophy.[74]This may be, statesPatrick Olivelle,because major Hindu monasteries of early medieval period (1st millennium CE) belonged to the Advaita Vedanta tradition.[75]The 12th-centuryShatyayaniya Upanishadis a significant exception, which presents qualified dualistic andVaishnavism(VishishtadvaitaVedanta) philosophy.[75][76]
See also[edit]
Notes[edit]
References[edit]
- ^abRK Sharma (1999), Indian Society, Institutions and Change,ISBN978-8171566655,page 28
- ^S. Radhakrishnan (1922), The Hindu Dharma, International Journal of Ethics, 33(1): 1-22
- ^DP Bhawuk (2011), The Paths of Bondage and Liberation, in Spirituality and Indian Psychology, Springer,ISBN978-1-4419-8109-7,pages 93-110
- ^Alessandro Monti (2002).Hindu Masculinities Across the Ages: Updating the Past.L'Harmattan Italia. pp. 41, 101–111.ISBN978-88-88684-03-1.Archivedfrom the original on 1 March 2017.Retrieved28 February2017.
- ^Harvey J. Sindima (2009), Introduction to Religious Studies, University Press of America,ISBN978-0761847618,pages 93-94, 99-100
- ^abcdeDavid N. Lorenzen (1978),Warrior Ascetics in Indian HistoryArchived5 November 2020 at theWayback Machine,Journal of the American Oriental Society, 98(1): 61-75
- ^abcWilliam Pinch (2012), Warrior Ascetics and Indian Empires, Cambridge University Press,ISBN978-1107406377
- ^saMnyAsaArchived20 August 2016 at theWayback MachineMonier-Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany
- ^abAngus Stevenson and Maurice Wait (2011), Concise Oxford English Dictionary,ISBN978-019-9601080,page 1275
- ^abcdPatrick Olivelle (1981), Contributions to the Semantic History of Saṃnyāsa, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 101, No. 3, pages 265-274
- ^pravrajitAArchived1 July 2017 at theWayback MachineSanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany
- ^yatinArchived1 July 2017 at theWayback MachineSanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany
- ^abcJamison and Witzel (1992),Vedic HinduismArchived13 April 2018 at theWayback Machine,Harvard University Archives, page 47
- ^JF Sprockhoff (1981), Aranyaka und Vanaprastha in der vedischen Literatur, Neue Erwägungen zu einer alten Legende und ihren Problemen. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für Indische Philosophie Wien, 25, pages 19-90
- ^JF Sprockhoff (1976), Sanyāsa, Quellenstudien zur Askese im Hinduismus I: Untersuchungen über die Sannyåsa-Upaninshads, Wiesbaden,OCLC644380709
- ^Patrick Olivelle(1976), Vasudevåśrama Yatidharmaprakåśa: a treatise on world renunciation, Brill Netherlands,OCLC4113269
- ^abGS Ghurye (1952), Ascetic Origins, Sociological Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 2, pages 162-184;
For Sanskrit original:RigvedaArchived14 January 2015 at theWayback MachineWikisource;
For English translation:KesinsRig Veda, Hymn CXXXVI, Ralph Griffith (Translator) - ^Arthur Llewellyn Basham,The Origins and Development of Classical Hinduism,OCLC19066012,ISBN978-0807073001
- ^abM Khandelwal (2003), Women in Ochre Robes: Gendering Hindu Renunciation, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791459225,pages 24-29
- ^In practice, women for example, entered Sannyasa in enough numbers that Chanakya'sArthashastrain 3rd century BC, mentions women ascetics (प्रव्रजिता,pravrajitā) in several chapters; see for example, R. Shamasastry (Translator)Chapter 23page 160; also page 551
- ^abA. A. Ramanathan,Sannyasa UpanishadArchived1 July 2017 at theWayback MachineThe Theosophical Publishing House, Chennai, verses 2.23 - 2.29
- ^abMariasusai Dhavamony (2002), Hindu-Christian Dialogue: Theological Soundings and Perspectives,ISBN978-9042015104,page 97
- ^abSS Subramuniyaswami,The Two Paths of Dharma,p. 102, atGoogle Books,in What Is Hinduism? (Editors of Hinduism Today), Jan-Mar 2006,ISBN978-1934145005,page 102
- ^abcGavin Flood(2005), The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition, Cambridge University Press,ISBN978-0521604017,Chapter 4 with pages 105-107 in particular
- ^A Bhattacharya (2009), Applied Ethics, Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy, Hokkaido University,ISBN978-4990404611,pages 63-64
- ^Andrew Fort and Patricia Mumme (1996), Living Liberation in Hindu Thought,ISBN978-0-7914-2706-4
- ^NE Thomas (1988), Liberation for Life: A Hindu Liberation Philosophy,Missiology: An International Review,16(2): 149-162
- ^Knut Jacobsen (2011), in Jessica Frazier (Editor), The Bloomsbury companion to Hindu studies, Bloomsbury Academic,ISBN978-1472511515,pages 74-83
- ^Klaus Klostermaier (1985), Mokṣa and Critical Theory, Philosophy East and West, 35(1): 61-71
- ^Andrew Fort (1998), Jivanmukti in Transformation, State University of New York Press,ISBN0-7914-3904-6
- ^Lynn Denton (2004), Female Ascetics in Hinduism, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791461808,page 100
- ^M Khandelwal (2003), Women in Ochre Robes: Gendering Hindu Renunciation, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791459225,pages 34-40, 173
- ^P Van der Veer (1987), Taming the ascetic: Devotionalism in a Hindu monastic order, Man, 22(4): 680-695
- ^abEnglish Translation 1: Jeaneane D. Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita: A Text and Commentary for Students, Sussex Academic Press,ISBN978-1845193461,page 93;
English Translation 2: Edwin Arnold,Bhagavad GitaChapter 5, Wikisource - ^abMariasusai Dhavamony (2002), Hindu-Christian Dialogue: Theological Soundings and Perspectives,ISBN978-9042015104,page 96-97, 111-114
- ^Barbara Powell (2010), Windows into the Infinite: A Guide to the Hindu Scriptures, Asian Humanities Press,ISBN978-0875730714,pages 292-297
- ^KN Tiwari (2009), Comparative Religion, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120802933,pages 33-35
- ^abMax Muller(Translator),Baudhayana Dharmasūtra Prasna II, Adhyaya 10, Kandika 18,TheSacred Books of the East,Vol. XIV, Oxford University Press, pages 279-281
- ^The Samnyasa Upanisads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation.Oxford University Press. 13 February 1992. pp. 98–99.ISBN9780195361377.Archivedfrom the original on 27 December 2021.Retrieved18 September2014.
- ^The Samnyasa Upanisads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation.Oxford University Press. 13 February 1992. p. 99.ISBN9780195361377.Archivedfrom the original on 27 December 2021.Retrieved18 September2014.
- ^MM Singh (1967),Life in North-Eastern India in Pre-Mauryan TimesatGoogle Books,Motilal Banarsidass, pages 131-139
- ^abcBarbara Holdrege (2004), Dharma, in The Hindu World (Editors: Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby), Routledge,ISBN0 41521527-7,page 231
- ^abPatrick Olivelle (1993), The Ashrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution, Oxford University Press,ISBN978-0195344783
- ^Patrick Olivelle (1993), The Ashrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution, Oxford University Press,ISBN978-0195344783,page 94
- ^Alban Widgery (1930),The Principles of Hindu EthicsArchived3 October 2022 at theWayback Machine,International Journal of Ethics, 40(2): 232-245
- ^What is Hinduism? (Editors of Hinduism Today),Two noble paths of Dharma,p. 101, atGoogle Books,Family Life and Monastic Life, Chapter 10 with page 101 in particular
- ^abMax Muller(Translator),Baudhayana Dharmasūtra Prasna II, Adhyaya 10, Kandika 17,The Sacred Books of the East, Vol. XIV, Oxford University Press
- ^Dharm Bhawuk (2011), Spirituality and Indian Psychology: Lessons from the Bhagavad-Gita, Springer Science,ISBN978-1441981097,page 66
- ^See (Olivelle 1993,pp. 84–106) discussion of the development of theāśramasystem in "Renouncer and Renunciation in theDharmaśāstras."
- ^See (Olivelle 1993,p. 111), "Renouncer and Renunciation in theDharmaśāstras."p. 111
- ^(Olivelle 1993,pp. 111–115), "Renouncer and Renunciation in theDharmaśāstras."
- ^See (Olivelle 1993,pp. 89–91),Saṃnyāsa Upaniṣads
- ^Law of DebtVishnu Smriti, Julius Jolly (Translator), page 45
- ^Arthashastra - CHAPTER XVI: RESUMPTION OF GIFTS, SALE WITHOUT OWNERSHIP AND OWNERSHIPBook III, Wikisource
- ^See for example,Arthasastra - CHAPTER X: Fines in Lieu of Mutilation of LimbsBook IV, Wikisource; see also Book IV, Chapter XI which declared murder of an ascetic as a capital crime.
- ^Andrew O. Fort and Patricia Y. Mumme (1996), Living Liberation in Hindu Thought, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791427057,pages 8-12
- ^Gavin Flood (2005), The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition, Cambridge University Press,ISBN978-0521604017,pages 60-74
- ^Thor Johansen (2009), Religion and Spirituality in Psychotherapy: An Individual Psychology Perspective, Springer,ISBN978-0826103857,pages 148-154
- ^abA Sharma (2000), Classical Hindu Thought: An Introduction, Oxford University Press,ISBN978-0195644418,pages 24-28
- ^Alf Hiltebeitel,Their name is Legion, in Rethinking India's Oral and Classical Epics, University of Chicago Press,ISBN978-0226340500,page 332-334 and footnote 104 on page 333
- ^P van der Veer (2007), Book Review, The American Historical Review, 112(1): 177-178,doi:10.1086/ahr.112.1.177
- ^Christian Novetzke (2011), Religion and Public Memory: A Cultural History of Saint Namdev in India, Columbia University Press,ISBN978-0231141857,pages 173-175
- ^Olivelle, Patrick (1992).The Samnyasa Upanisads.Oxford University Press. pp. x–xi, 4–9.ISBN978-0195070453.
- ^abHume, Robert Ernest (1921),The Thirteen Principal Upanishads,Oxford University Press
- ^Paul Deussen (Translator), Sixty Upanisads of the Veda, Vol 1, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120814684,pages 327-386
- ^Paul Deussen (Translator), Sixty Upanisads of the Veda, Vol 1, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120814684,pages 332-333
- ^Paul Deussen (Translator), Sixty Upanisads of the Veda, Vol 1, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120814684,pages 367, 373
- ^Patrick Olivelle (1998), Upaniṣhads. Oxford University Press,ISBN978-0199540259
- ^Note: This exists in two manuscripts, Brihat and Laghu.Olivelle, Patrick (1992).The Samnyasa Upanisads.Oxford University Press. pp. x–xi.ISBN978-0195070453.
- ^Paul Deussen (Translator), Sixty Upanisads of the Veda, Vol 2, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120814684,pages 568, 763-767
- ^Olivelle, Patrick (1992).The Samnyasa Upanisads.Oxford University Press. pp. x–xi, 8–18.ISBN978-0195070453.
- ^Sprockhoff, Joachim F (1976).Samnyasa: Quellenstudien zur Askese im Hinduismus(in German). Wiesbaden: Kommissionsverlag Franz Steiner. pp. 277–294, 319–377.ISBN978-3515019057.
- ^Stephen H Phillips (1995), Classical Indian Metaphysics, Columbia University Press,ISBN978-0812692983,page 332 with note 68
- ^Antonio Rigopoulos (1998), Dattatreya: The Immortal Guru, Yogin, and Avatara, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791436967,pages 62-63
- ^abOlivelle, Patrick (1992).The Samnyasa Upanisads.Oxford University Press. pp. 17–18.ISBN978-0195070453.
- ^Antonio Rigopoulos (1998), Dattatreya: The Immortal Guru, Yogin, and Avatara, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791436967,page 81 note 27
Cited books:
- Olivelle, Patrick (1993).The Ashrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution.Oxford University Press.OCLC466428084.
External links[edit]
- Articles on aspects of Sannyasa, Vairagya, and Brahmacharya(archived 30 December 2004)
- 'The Song of the Sannyasin', poem by Swami Vivekananda.Archived1 March 2021 at theWayback Machine.
- Vows of SannyasaSaiva Siddhanta – Example covenant between a Hindu Sannyasin and a Hindu Monastic Order (PDF download)
