Santosha

This article containsIndic text.Without properrendering support,you may seequestion marks or boxes,misplaced vowels or missing conjuncts instead of Indic text.

Santosha(skt.संतोषsaṃtoṣa) literally means "contentment, satisfaction".^[1]^[2]It is also an ethical concept inIndian philosophy,^[3]particularlyYoga,where it is included as one of theNiyamasbyPatanjali.^[4]

Definition[edit]

Santosha,sometimes spelledSantosa,is a portmanteau in Sanskrit, derived fromSaṃ-prefix(सं-, सम्-) andTosha(तोष (from root √तुष्, √tuṣ)). SaM-, means "completely", "altogether" or "entirely",^[5]andTosha(from the root √tus), "contentment", "satisfaction", "acceptance", "being comfortable".^[6]Combined, the wordSantoshameans "completely content with, or satisfied with, accepting and comfortable". Other words based on the rootTuṣht(तुष्टः), such as Santusht (सन्तुष्ट) and Tushayati (तुष्यति) are synonymous withSantosha,and found in ancient and medieval era Indian texts.^[7]^[8]

Isaacs^[9]translatesSantoshaas “contentment, accepting one's circumstances”. Woods^[10]describes it as the lack ofTrsna(तृष्णा, craving) and desiring that which is necessary for one's life, while translating verse II.42 and II.32 of Yoga Sutrās, respectively. Others^[11]^[12]define it as an attitude of contentment, one of understanding and accepting oneself and one's environment and circumstances as they are, a spiritual state necessary for optimism and effort to change the future. Bhatta^[13]clarifiesSantoshaas inner contentment, a state of inner peace.

Yoga Darshana, which includes commentary of RishiVyasaon Patanjali's Yogasutra, defines contentment as the inner state where, "exists a joyful and satisfied mind regardless of one's environment, whether one meets with pleasure or pain, profit or loss, fame or contempt, success or failure, sympathy or hatred".^[14]

Discussion[edit]

Santoshaas aNiyamais discussed in Indian texts at various levels - intent, inner state and its expression. As intent, Santosha is doing one's best and accepting the results of one's efforts.^[9]^[15]As inner state, it is contentment that combines with and works with other virtues such asAsteya(non-coveting, non-stealing),Aparigraha(non-hoarding, non-possessiveness) andDaya(compassion for others).^[16]^[17]As outward expression, Santosha is the observed "serenity", of being “totally satisfied, not desiring anything other than the fundamental".^[18]

Maréchal^[18]states thatSantoshais rooted in the desire to avoid anything negative to self, to others, to all living beings and to nature. It is not the state of abandonment or being without any needs, rather the state of neither taking too much nor taking less than what one needs, one of contended optimism.^[19]^[14]It is the habit of being able to accept circumstances one finds self in, without being upset, of accepting oneself, and of equanimity with others who are balancing their own needs as they share what they have.^[18]Santoshais also abstaining from taking and consuming something to excess, even if its appearance makes it tempting. Maréchal states, that in cases the environment is one where one is forced to listen to a painful speech or someone's anger,Santoshais the serenity of accepting it completely as an instructive and constructive message, understanding the other, then detaching oneself and patiently seeking reform and change in one's environment.^[18]

Śankarâchârya,of theVedantaschool of Hinduism, in verses 521-548 of the textVivekachudamani(The Crest-Jewel of Wisdom), states thatSantoshais a necessary virtue because it frees a human being from the compulsions of all bondage, manipulation and fears, whereafter he can "dwell according to his will", do what he thinks is right, pursue his own calling wherever, whenever and however he wants.^[20]^[21]Johnston^[22]translates Śankarâchârya view onSantoshaas the inner state where, "things neither distress him nor elate him much, nor is he attached to or repelled by them; in his own Self he ever joys, the Self is his rejoicing; altogether contented by the essence of uninterrupted bliss; with Santosha (contentment), he knows his Self – the Eternal, he is free from bondage, he is delighted no matter what, his life is victory; he moves where fancy leads him, unconstrained; he sleeps by the river-bank or the wood, his couch is the world; he moves in paths where the beaten road has ended; he then is one delighting in the supreme Eternal".^[22]

Literature[edit]

Santoshais a broadly discussed virtue in over thirty five ancient and medieval era texts of Hinduism.^[23]Most of these are in Sanskrit, but some are in regional Indian languages. As a few examples,Santoshais discussed as an important virtue and ethical concept in verses 2.1.39 through 2.1.48 of PuranaSamhita,verse I.218-12 of Garuda Purana, verse 11-20 of Kurma Purana, verse 19.18 of Prapancha Sara, verse 24.156 of Paramananda, verse 3.18 of Shandilya Yoga Shastra, verses 2.1 to 2.2 ofYoga Yajnavalkya,and in verses 1.53 through 1.66 of Vasishtha Samhita.^[23]In some texts, such as Trishikhi BrahmanaUpanishadand Sutrās, synonymous concepts and words such asSantusti(सन्तुष्टि)^[24]andAkama(अकाम, non-desire, non-neediness)^[25]are used, calling it as a virtue that represents "affection for the Supreme Reality".Samkhya Karika,in its section on ethics and the effect of virtues and vices on a human being, states contentment is achieved in nine categories, four of which are external^[26]and five internal^[27]to him.^[28]

Yoga Vashista describes the path toSantoshaas follows,^[29]

There are four soldiers who guard the road tomoksha(liberation). They are Patience (or peace of mind),Atma(आत्म, Self) Inquiry,Santosha(Contentment), and Association with the Wise. If you can succeed in making one of these a friend, then the others will be easy. That one will introduce you to the other three.
— Yoga Vasistha, Book 1^[29]

In the Indian EpicMahabharata,the virtue ofSantoshais discussed in many books. For example, in Shanti Parva (the Book of Peace),^[30]

Santosha(contentment) is the highest heaven, santosha is the highest bliss. There is no higher experience than santosha. When one draws away all his craving desires like a tortoise drawing in all it limbs, then the natural resplendence of his soul soon manifests itself. When one does not fear any creature, nor any creature is frightened by him, when one conquers one's cravings and aversion, then is one said to behold one's soul. When one, indeed, in word and thought, seeks to injure nobody and cherishes no desire, one is said to attainBrahman(consciousness-bliss).
— Shanti Parva,Chapter 21^[30]

To the man of knowledge, all that is perceived, there is bothSatandAsat.To him, this all is both the end and the middle. This truth is in all the Vedas. Then again the highest contentment (Santosha) rests upon Emancipation, which is absolute, which exists as the Soul of all mortal and immortal things, which is well-known as Universal Soul, which is the highest object of knowledge, which is everywhere, which is in everyone and everything, which is full, which is perfect intense happiness, which is without duality, which is the foremost of all things, which isBrahma,which is Unmanifest and the Cause also, from which the Unmanifest has sprung, and which never deteriorates. Ability to sense beyond the senses, the ability to forgive, and the ability to abstain from craving superficial desires – these together are the causes of perfect, intense happiness.
— Shanti Parva,Chapter 270^[30]

Mythology[edit]

TheVishnu Puranarecites a myth that includesSantoshaas a progeny ofTushtiandDharma,and it is loaded with symbolism. The myth is as follows,

The progeny ofDharmaby the daughters of Daksha were as follows: by Sraddhá (devotion) he hadKama(desire); by Lakshmí (wealth, prosperity), was born Darpa (pride); by Dhriti (courage), the progeny wasNiyama(precept); by Tusht́i (inner comfort),Santosha(contentment); by Pusht́i (opulence), the progeny was Lobha (cupidity, greed); by Medhá (wisdom, experience), Sruta (sacred tradition); by Kriyá (hard work, labour), the progeny were Dańd́a, Naya, and Vinaya (justice, politics, and education); by Buddhi (intellect), Bodha (understanding); by Lajjá (shame, humility), Vinaya (good behaviour); by Vapu (body, strength), Vyavasaya (perseverance). Shanti (peace) gave birth to Kshama (forgiveness); Siddhi (excellence) to Sukha (enjoyment); and Kírtti (glorious speech) gave birth to Yasha (reputation). These were the sons of Dharma; one of whom, Kama (love, emotional fulfillment) had baby Hersha (joy) by his wife Nandi (delight).
The wife of Adharma (vice, wrong, evil) was Hinsá (violence), on whom he begot a son Anrita (falsehood), and a daughter Nikriti (immorality): they intermarried, and had two sons, Bhaya (fear) and Naraka (hell); and twins to them, two daughters, Máyá (deceit) and Vedaná (torture), who became their wives. The son of Bhaya (fear) and Máyá (deceit) was the destroyer of living creatures, or Mrityu (death); and Dukha (pain) was the offspring of Naraka (hell) and Vedaná (torture). The children of Mrityu were Vyádhi (disease), Jará (decay), Soka (sorrow), Trishńa (greediness), and Krodha (wrath). These are all called the inflictors of misery, and are characterised as the progeny of Vice (Adharma). They are all without wives, without posterity, without the faculty to procreate; they perpetually operate as causes of the destruction of this world. On the contrary, Daksha and the other Rishis, the elders of mankind, tend perpetually to influence its renovation: whilst the Manus and their sons, the heroes endowed with mighty power, and treading in the path of truth, as constantly contribute to its preservation.
— Vishnu Purana, Chapter 7, Translated byHorace Hayman Wilson^[31]

The desire paradox[edit]

Scholars^[32]have questioned whether contentment (Santosha) is equal to having the "desire to be without desire", and if so, is it a paradox in itself? This question is of interest to both Hinduism and Buddhism. Herman^[33]states that there is a difference between the mindless pursuit of "craving" and mindful pursuit of "needs". The former is of concern to Indian philosophies, while for latter they acknowledge and encourage the proper pursuit of "needs".

Craving is an intense, ever-expansive compulsion to hoarding material possessions, an addiction for something or someone, and a state where the person accumulates the target of his greed or lust while ignoringdharma.Contentment is the opposite state, free from cravings that create bondage and dependence, an understanding of the minimum he needs and alternate ways to meet those needs, thus liberated to do whatever he wants and what feels right, proper, meaningful to him. Proper and simultaneous pursuit of dharma, artha and kama is respected in Hindu texts. For example, in Book 9, theShalya Parvaof the Epic Mahabharata, the proper and simultaneous pursuit ofartha(wealth, profit, means of livelihood),dharma(righteousness, morality, ethics) andkama(love, pleasure, emotional contentment) is recommended,^[34]

धर्मः सुचरितः सद्भिः सह दवाभ्यां नियच्छति
अर्थश चात्यर्थ लुब्धस्य कामश चातिप्रसङ्गिनः
धर्मार्थौ धर्मकामौ च कामार्थौ चाप्य अपीडयन
धर्मार्थकामान यॊ भयेति सॊ तयन्तं सुखम अश्नुते
Morality (Dharma) is well practiced by the good. Morality, however, is always afflicted by two things, the desire of Profit (Artha) entertained by those that covet it, and the desire for Pleasure (Kama) cherished by those that are wedded to it. Whoever without afflicting Morality and Profit, or Morality and Pleasure, or Pleasure and Profit, followeth all three – Morality, Profit and Pleasure – always succeeds in obtaining great happiness.
— TheMahabharata,Shalya Parva, IX.60.17-19^[34]

In cases where there is conflict between Artha, Kama and Dharma,Vatsyayanastates Artha precedes Kama, while Dharma precedes both Kama and Artha.^[35]

References[edit]

^Apte, Vaman Shivaram."The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary".Archived fromthe originalon July 9, 2012.Retrieved2011-08-15.
^Peter H Van Ness,Yoga as Spiritual but not Religious: A Pragmatic Perspective,American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 1 (January 1999), pages 15-30
^Andrea Hornett (2012), Ancient Ethics and Contemporary Systems: The Yamas, the Niyamas and Forms of Organization, in Leadership through the Classics (Editors: Prastacos et al), Springer-Verlag, Berlin,ISBN 978-3-642-32444-4,pages 63-78
^Gerstein, Nancy (2008)."Niyamas".Guiding Yoga's Light: Lessons for Yoga Teachers(illustrated, revised ed.). Human Kinetics. p. 117.ISBN 9780736074285.Retrieved2009-09-13.
^saMMonier Williams Sanskrit English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany
^toSaMonier Williams Sanskrit English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany
^tuSandsantuSTa,Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany
^Kiran Salagame (2013),Well-being from the Hindu/Sanātana Dharma Perspective,in Susan A. David et al. (Editors) - Oxford Handbook of Happiness, Oxford University Press,ISBN 978-0199557257,pages 371-382
^^a ^bNora Isaacs (2014), The Little Book of Yoga, Chronicle,ISBN 978-1452129204,page 154
^Means of Attainment or SadhanaThe yoga-system of Patanjali or the ancient Hindu doctrine of concentration of mind, James Haughton Woods, Harvard University Press, page 189, 182
^Meadow, M. J. (1978), The cross and the seed: Active and receptive spiritualities, Journal of religion and health, 17(1): 57-69
^Donna Farhi(2011), Yoga Mind, Body & Spirit: A Return to Wholeness, MacMillan,ISBN 978-0805059700,page 13
^Bhatta (2009), Holistic Personality Development through Education Ancient Indian Cultural Experiences, Journal of Human Values, 15(1): 49-59
^^a ^bAlain Daniélou(1991), Yoga: Mastering the Secrets of Matter and the Universe,ISBN 978-0892813018,page 36
^JM Mehta (2006), Essence of Maharishi Patanjali's Ashtang Yoga,ISBN 978-8122309218,pages 60-62
^Helena Echlin, When less is more, Yoga Journal, December 2006, page 91-95
^Showkeir and Showkeir, Yoga Wisdom at Work,ISBN 978-1609947972,page 84
^^a ^b ^c ^dClaude Maréchal (1984),La integración,Granollers: Viniyoga, in Traducción y comentario de los aforismos sobre el Yoga Sûtra de Patanjali, En La integración. Libro I. Barcelona
^Stuart Sovatsky (1998), Words from the Soul, SUNY Series in Transpersonal and Humanistic Psychology, State University of New York Press,ISBN 978-0791439494,pages 21-22
^Original (see the whole chapter, as "virtue of contentment" is discussed from verse 521 onwards):
कामान्निष्कामरूपी संश्चरत्येकचारो मुनिः ।
स्वात्मनैव सदातुष्टःस्वयं सर्वात्मना स्थितः ॥
क्वचिन्मूढो विद्वान् क्वचिदपि महाराजविभवः
क्वचिद्भ्रान्तः सौम्यः क्वचिदजगराचारकलितः ।
क्वचित्पात्रीभूतः क्वचिदवमतः क्वाप्यविदितः
चरत्येवं प्राज्ञः सततपरमानन्दसुखितः ॥
निर्धनोऽपि सदातुष्टोऽप्यसहायोमहाबलः ।
नित्यतृप्तोऽप्यभुञ्जानोऽप्यसमः समदर्शनः ॥ ५४३ ॥
For translation: Charles Johnston, The Crest-Jewel of Wisdom, Freedom Religion Press,ISBN 978-1937995997
^John Grimes (2004), The Vivekacudamani Of Sankaracarya, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN 978-8120820395,Part 2, Verses 521-548
^^a ^bŚankarâchârya (Translated by Charles Johnston),Vivekachudamanior The Crest-Jewel of Wisdom, Freedom Religion Press,ISBN 978-1937995997;For original sanskrit, seeVivekachudamani;For one version of a free online translation of these verses by Adi Shankara, seewikisource
^^a ^bSV Bharti (2001), Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: With the Exposition of Vyasa, Motilal Banarsidas,ISBN 978-8120818255,Appendix I, pages 680-691
^santuSTiSanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany
^akAmaMonier Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany
^Samkhya Karika lists these as Prakrti (nature), Upadhana (means), Kala (time) and Bhagya (luck)
^Samkhya Karika lists these as material and non-material desires related to five senses: sight, sound, taste, touch and smell
^Original:
आध्यात्मिक्यश्चतस्रः प्रकृत्युपादानकालभाग्याख्याः ।
बाह्या विषयोपरमात्पञ्च नव चतुष्टयोऽभिहिताः
Source:Samkhya Karika
Discussion:Samkhya KarikaVerse 50, (in Sanskrit), Calicut, India, pages 41-42; for context see discussion starting from Verse 27 onwards
^^a ^bFor Sanskrit Original:The Yogavasishtha Of ValmikiGovernment of India Archives; For translation: RS Gherwal,ISBN 978-1432515263
^^a ^b ^cShanti Parva Archived2014-02-22 at theWayback MachineThe Mahabharata, Translated by Manmatha Nath Dutt (1903), Government of India Archives
^Vishnu PuranaChapter 7
^S. Schiffer (1976), A paradox of desire, American Philosophical Quarterly, 13(3): 195-203
^A.L. Herman (1979),A Solution to the Paradox of Desire in Buddhism,Philosophy East and West, 29(1): 91-94
^^a ^bSection LXKisari Mohan Ganguli (Translator), The Mahabharata, page 567
^Vatsyayana, Translated by The Hindu Kama Shastra Society (1925),The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana,page 8