Jump to content

Signature

Page semi-protected
Listen to this article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSignatures)

John Hancock's signature is the most prominent on theUnited States Declaration of Independenceand theArticles of Confederation.The name "John Hancock" or just "Hancock" has become a synonym for "signature" in the United States.[1]

Asignature(/ˈsɪɡnɪər,ˈsɪɡnəər/;fromLatin:signare,"to sign" ) is ahandwritten(and oftenstylized) depiction of someone's name, nickname, or even a simple "X" or other mark that a person writes on documents as a proof of identity and intent. The writer of a signature is asignatoryorsigner.Similar to a handwritten signature, asignature workdescribes the work as readily identifying its creator. A signature may be confused with anautograph,which is chiefly an artistic signature. This can lead to confusion when people have both an autograph and signature and as such some people in the public eye keep their signatures private whilst fully publishing their autograph.

Function and types

Signature ofBenjamin Franklin.
Signature ofEmpressFarah PahlaviofIraninPersian Handwriting.

The traditional function of a signature is to permanently affix to a document a person's uniquely personal, undeniable self-identification as physical evidence of that person's personal witness and certification of the content of all, or a specified part, of the document. For example, the role of a signature in many consumer contracts is not solely to provide evidence of the identity of the contracting party, but also to provide evidence of deliberation and informed consent. In many countries, signatures may be witnessed and recorded in the presence of anotary publicto carry additional legal force. In some jurisdictions, an illiterate signatory can make a "mark" (often an "X" but occasionally a personalized symbol) on legal documents, so long as the document is countersigned by a literate witness.[2]In some countries, illiterate people place a thumbprint on legal documents in lieu of a written signature.

In the United States, signatures encompass marks and actions of all sorts that are indicative of identity and intent. The legal rule is that unless a statute specifically prescribes a particular method of making a signature it may be made in any number of ways. These include by a mechanical or rubber stamp facsimile. A signature may be made by the purported signatory; alternatively someone else duly authorized by the signatory, acting in the signer's presence and at the signatory's direction, may make the signature.[3]

Many individuals have much more fanciful signatures than their normalcursivewriting, including elaborateascenders,descendersand exoticflourishes,much as one would find incalligraphicwriting. As an example, the final "k" inJohn Hancock's famous signature on the US Declaration of Independence loops back to underline his name. This kind of flourish is also known as aparaph,aFrenchterm meaning flourish, initial or signature. The paraph is used ingraphologyanalyses.

Several cultures whose languages use writing systems other than alphabets do not share the Western notion of signatures per se: the "signing" of one's name results in a written product no different from the result of "writing" one's name in the standard way. For these languages, to write or to sign involves the same written characters. Also seeCalligraphy.

Mechanically produced signatures

Từ vĩnh dụ ấn;Xú Yǒngyù yìn,rotating character seal of Xú Yǒngyù
Fingerprints may be used instead of signatures where the signer is illiterate. Here on an Indian legal document of 1952.

Special signature machines, calledautopens,are capable of automatically reproducing an individual's signature. These are typically used by people required to sign a lot of printed matter, such as celebrities, heads of state or CEOs.[4]More recently,Members of Congressin the United States have begun having their signature made into aTrueTypefont file. This allows staff members in the Congressman's office to easily reproduce it on correspondence, legislation, and official documents. In the East Asian languages ofChinese,Japanese,andKorean,people traditionally use stamp-like objects known asname-sealswith the name carved intenshoscript (seal script) in lieu of a handwritten signature.[citation needed]

Wet signatures

A wet signature is a person's name written in their own hand with ink. Some government agencies require that professional persons or official reviewers sign originals and all copies of originals to authenticate that they personally viewed the content. In the United States this is prevalent with architectural and construction plans. Its intent is to prevent mistakes or fraud but the practice is not known to be effective.[citation needed]

Detection of forged signatures

Handwriting experts say "it is extremely difficult for anyone to be able to figure out if a signature or other very limited writing sample has been forged."[5] High volume review of signatures, to decide if a signature is true or forged, occurs when election offices decide whether to acceptabsentee ballotsarriving from voters,[6] and possibly when banks decide whether to paychecks.[7][8] The highest error rates in signature verification are found with lay people, higher than for computers, which in turn make more errors than experts.[9]

There have been concerns that signature reviews improperly reject ballots from young and minority voters at higher rates than others, with no or limited ability of voters to appeal the rejection.[10] [11]When errors are made with bank checks, the payer can ask the bank for corrections.

In 2018, a fifth of adults in the United Kingdom said they sign so rarely they have no consistent signature, including 21% of people 18-24 and 16% of people over age 55. 55% of UK adults said they rarely sign anything.[12]

Researchers have published error rates for computerized signature verification. They compare different systems on a common database of true and false signatures. The best system falsely rejects 10% of true signatures, while it accepts 10% of forgeries. Another system has error rates on both of 14%, and the third-best has error rates of 17%.[13][14]It is possible to be less stringent and reject fewer true signatures, at the cost of also rejecting fewer forgeries.[15]Computer algorithms:

look for a certain number of points of similarity between the compared signatures... a wide range of algorithms and standards, each particular to that machine's manufacturer, are used to verify signatures. In addition, counties have discretion in managing the settings and implementing manufacturers' guidelines... there are no statewide standards for automatic signature verification... most counties do not have a publicly available, written explanation of the signature verification criteria and processes they use.[16]

In an experiment, experts rejected 5% of true signatures and 71% of forgeries. They were doubtful about another 57% of true signatures and 27% of forgeries. If computer verification is adjusted to reflect what experts are sure about, it will wrongly reject 5% of true signatures and wrongly accept 29% of forgeries. If computers were adjusted more strictly, rejecting all signatures which experts have doubts about, the computers would set aside 62% of true signatures, and still wrongly accept 2% of forgeries. Lay people made more mistakes and were doubtful less often, though the study does not report whether their mistakes were to accept more forgeries or reject more true signatures.[17]

Voters with short names are at a disadvantage, since experts make more mistakes on signatures with fewer "turning points and intersections." Participants in this study had 10 true signatures to compare to, which is more than most postal ballot verifications have.[17]A more recent study for the US Department of Justice confirms the probabilistic nature of signature verification, though it does not provide numbers.[9]

Online usage

Ine-mailandnewsgroupusage, another type of signature exists which is independent of one's language. Users can set one or more lines of custom text known as asignature blockto be automatically appended to their messages. This text usually includes a name, contact information, and sometimes quotations andASCII art.A shortened form of a signature block, only including one's name, often with some distinguishing prefix, can be used to simply indicate the end of apostor response. Some web sites also allow graphics to be used. Note, however, that this type of signature is not related toelectronic signaturesordigital signatures,which are more technical in nature and not directly understandable by humans.

Reusing signature pages

For guidance applicable inEngland and Waleson the use of pre-signed signature pages being subsequently attached to documents to effect a "virtual" signing, seeLaw of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989#Validity of execution under Mercury.

Art

Vermeer's signature

Thesignatureon a painting or other work of art has always been an important item in the assessment of art. Fake signatures are sometimes added to enhance the value of a painting, or are added to a fake painting to support its authenticity. A notorious case was the signature ofJohannes Vermeeron the fake "Supper at Emmaus" made by the art-forgerHan van Meegeren.However, the fact that painters' signatures often vary over time (particularly in the modern and contemporary periods) might complicate the issue. The signatures of some painters take on an artistic form that may be of less value in determining forgeries. If a painting isabstractorambiguous,the signature can be the only clue to determine which side is the top.

Under British law, the appearance of signatures (not the names themselves) may be protected undercopyright law.[18]

UnderUnited States copyright law,"titles, names [I c...]; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring" are not eligible for copyright;[19]however, the appearance of signatures (not the names themselves) may be protected under copyright law.[18]

Uniform Commercial Code

Uniform Commercial Code§1-201(37) of the United States generally definessignedas "using any symbol executed or adopted with present intention to adopt or accept a writing." The Uniform Commercial Code §3-401(b) fornegotiable instrumentsstates "A signature may be made (i) manually or by means of a device or machine, and (ii) by the use of any name, including atradeor assumed name, or by a word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a person with present intention to authenticate a writing. "

See also

Listen to this article(5minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio filewas created from a revision of this article dated 21 May 2006(2006-05-21),and does not reflect subsequent edits.

References

  1. ^"John Hancock".Merriam-Webster.Retrieved2 August2014.
  2. ^"Horton v. Murden, 117 Ga. 72".Caselaw Access Project.Harvard Law School. 1903.Retrieved10 October2022.
  3. ^80Corpus Juris Secundum,Signatures, sections 2 through 7
  4. ^"10 facts about the 'autopen' - POLITICO".Politico.3 January 2013.
  5. ^Armitage, Susie (2018-11-05)."Handwriting Disputes Cause Headaches for Some Absentee Voters".ProPublica.Retrieved2020-06-01.
  6. ^"Voting Outside the Polling Place: Absentee, All-Mail and other Voting at Home Options".www.ncsl.org.Retrieved2020-07-02.
  7. ^"What Is Automated Signature Verification?".SQN Banking Systems.Retrieved2020-08-07.
  8. ^Mayhew, Stephen (2012-05-14)."Banks Are Now Embracing The Newer And Tougher Signature Verification System".Biometric Update.Retrieved2020-08-07.
  9. ^abSrihari, Sangur (December 2010).Computational Methods for Handwritten Questioned Document Examination(Report).National Institute of Justice.
  10. ^Smith, Daniel (2018-09-18)."Vote-By-Mail Ballots Cast in Florida"(PDF).ACLU-Florida.Retrieved2020-06-01.
  11. ^Wilkie, Jordan (2018-10-12)."Exclusive: High Rate of Absentee Ballot Rejection Reeks of Voter Suppression".Who What Why.Retrieved2020-06-18.
  12. ^"Sign Of The Times - One In Five Adults Don't Have Their Own Signature".OSS Technology.2018.Retrieved2021-03-19.
  13. ^These systems handle scanned ( "offline" ) signatures from multiple people ( "WI, writer-independent" ).Hafemann, Luiz G.; Sabourin, Robert; Oliveira, Luiz S. (2017-10-16). "Offline handwritten signature verification — Literature review".2017 Seventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA).IEEE. pp. 1–8.arXiv:1507.07909.doi:10.1109/IPTA.2017.8310112.ISBN978-1-5386-1842-4.S2CID206932295.
  14. ^Bibi, Kiran; Naz, Saeeda; Rehman, Arshia (2020-01-01)."Biometric signature authentication using machine learning techniques: Current trends, challenges and opportunities".Multimedia Tools and Applications.79(1): 289–340.doi:10.1007/s11042-019-08022-0.ISSN1573-7721.S2CID199576552.
  15. ^Igarza, Juan; Goirizelaia, Iñaki; Espinosa, Koldo; Hernáez, Inmaculada; Méndez, Raúl; Sanchez, Jon (2003-11-26).Online Handwritten Signature Verification Using Hidden Markov Models.CIARP 2003. Vol. 2905. pp. 391–399.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24586-5_48.
  16. ^"Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity"(PDF).Stanford University. 2020-04-15.Retrieved2020-06-01.
  17. ^abSita, Jodi; Found, Bryan; Rogers, Douglas K. (September 2002)."Forensic Handwriting Examiners' Expertise for Signature Comparison".Journal of Forensic Sciences.47(5): 1117–1124.doi:10.1520/JFS15521J.ISSN0022-1198.PMID12353558.
  18. ^abSpilsbury, Sallie (2000).Media Law.Cavendish Publishing. p.p. 439.ISBN978-1-85941-530-6.An individual's signature may be protected under law as an artistic work. If so, the unauthorised reproduction of the signature will infringe copyright. The name itself willnotbe protected by copyright; it is theappearanceof the signature which is protected.
  19. ^"Copyright BasicsArchived2011-03-05 at theWayback Machine",United States Copyright Office.Retrieved 15 March 2011.