Jump to content

Richard Burchett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSouth Kensington system)

View acrossSandown Bay,Isle of Wightprobably of 1855,Victoria and Albert Museum.
Sanctuary,orEdward IV Withheld by Ecclesiastics from Pursuing Lancastrian Fugitives into a Church,1867,Guildhall Art Gallery.One of the largehistory paintingswith which Burchett hoped to make his reputation

Richard Burchett(1815–1875) was a British artist and educator on the fringes of thePre-Raphaelitemovement, who was for over twenty years the Headmaster of what later became theRoyal College of Art.

He was later described as "a prominent figure in the art-schools, a well-instructed painter, and a teacher exceptionally equipped with all the learning of his craft" by his ex-pupil, the poetAustin Dobson.Burchett's pupils included the extremely varied talents ofKate Greenaway,Christopher Dresser,Elizabeth Thompson(Lady Butler), SirGeorge Clausen,SirLuke Fildes,Gertrude Jekyll,Hubert von Herkomer,Evelyn De Morgan,William HarbuttandHelen Allingham.Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll,Queen Victoria's daughter, and a talented artist, was also a student.[1]

As an artist he achieved some reputation for large history paintings, and decorated public buildings including parts of thePalace of Westminsterand theVictoria and Albert Museum,but hisView acrossSandown Bay,Isle of Wightis seen by modern art historians as his best work. Burchett published collections of his lectures as text-books for the South Kensington system ofart education,which he helped to devise.

Life

[edit]
Portrait published 1875, after an unknown artist (the age appears to be wrong).

Burchett was born in Brighton on 30 January 1815. He attended the "London Mechanics Institute" inChancery Lane(founded 1823, the forerunner ofBirkbeck College,University of London), before in about 1841 entering the "Government School of Design", founded three years before in 1837, which he was later to head, and which eventually became the Royal College of Art.[2]In 1845 he was a ringleader of students protesting to theBoard of Tradeabout the teaching methods, in what was at the time a controversy that attracted a great deal of public attention, and finally a Parliamentary Committee of Enquiry.[3]He gave evidence to this in 1846-7, by which time he had become a master at the school (the "Master of Form", from 1845), remaining on the staff until his death in 1875, from 1852 as Headmaster.[4]

Burchett spent most of his time throughout his adult life on his work at the school, and that his most highly regarded work today is an atypical landscape subject is an indication of how much his personal painting was neglected for teaching, and public commissions through the school. According to theMemoirsofWilliam Bell Scott,who had worked under him, Burchett was: "an able, self-dependent actor in the affairs of life, yet one whose action was rarely to his own benefit, although largely to the benefit of those under him in his official position".[5]

In the mid-1850s Burchett converted toRoman Catholicism;it is presumed that he was influenced by the already-converted Pre-RaphaeliteJames Collinson,with whom he was living after Collinson's engagement toChristina Rossettihad broken down for the second time.[6]He married twice, and had several children. What appear to be a son and grandson are recorded exhibiting paintings in London. Ebenezer Stanley Burchett (1837–1916) worked at South Kensington and then was Head Master of theBedford ParkSchool of Arts & Crafts.[7]In 1870 Richard Burchett is described as "formerly of 43BromptonSquare [very near the School], but now of 8 Bedford Road,Clapham."[8]Burchett was in very bad health for the last years of his life, and when he died in Dublin, on 27 May 1875, he was staying with his wife's uncle, SirSamuel Ferguson,for his health.[6]He had only been in the School for 133 days in 1872, arriving punctually on only seven of these.[9]

In 1870, he began proceedings for bankruptcy,[8]which were still not concluded by his death.[10]Scott says he "took to a sort of farming at considerable expense... He began to get into deep water, and into the hands of 20 per cent money-lenders. Still he fought bravely with his difficulties, and even when his large salary was placed under trustees, he went on with his historic subjects".[11]His venture was ill-timed, hitting a period of agricultural depression. A series of twelve dividends to his creditors, between 1871 and September 1876, paid off at least 7s 734d in the pound - dividends number 1, 7 & 8 seem not to appear in the London Gazette search results.[12] His will wasprobatedat less than £200,[6]and Frayling records that a letter from his widow asking for a pension was found unanswered in the school files thirteen years later.[13]Obituaries were published in theAthenaeum,theArt Journal,andThe Graphic.[14]

Artist

[edit]
William Torrel(1291–1303), design for a mosaic in the Victoria and Albert Museum, now also on display there

Burchett exhibited five works, apparently all largehistory paintings,at the Royal Academy between 1847, includingThe Death of Marmion,"famous in its day" according toHugh Thomas[15]) and 1873 (The Making of theNew Forest). These are rather generously described as "in thePre-Raphaelitestyle "by theDNB.He exhibited a work at theBritish Institutionin 1855.[14]His best-known work in this genre isSanctuary(RA, 1867), the snappy modern title forEdward IV Withheld by Ecclesiastics from Pursuing Lancastrian Fugitives into a Church,in theGuildhall Art Gallery,London, showing an incident after theBattle of Tewkesburyof 1471, during theWars of the Roses.[16]

William Bell Scott has an anecdote of Burchett, who "had chosen the subject as a glorious example of the power of the Church and the faith of the prince at that blessed period in Merry England" failing to sell the painting to an "extreme Radical" shipping magnate: "" I admire the picture, Mr. Burchett, it is excellently painted, and I like it for its subject; these men in full armour won't go in, they won't end the day completely after risking all their lives, because of that old priest with the jack-in-the-box! Superstition, you see, turns them into caitiffs! "This knocked over poor Burchett so much, the transaction came to nothing"[17]Scott comments that Burchett: "gave himself up to historical painting on a rather large scale, just the kind of art which English taste and the R. Academy as the mediocre exponent of the same would like to crush out of existence".[11]

However the work which has attracted the most attention and praise from critics in recent decades is what appears to be his "only known landscape",[18]View across Sandown Bay, Isle of Wightprobably of 1855, in theVictoria and Albert Museum,who describe it as a "minor masterpiece".[19]This small painting, which more closely approaches a Pre-Raphaelite landscape style, shows a half-harvested cornfield, with tools and jugs of the farm-workers piled up beside a corn stook. But the only figures visible are two clearly middle-class women, no doubt part of the same party as the artist, one sitting against a stook reading a book, and the other walking with aparasol.Anygeorgicor realist focus on agriculture is absent "his cornfield is just part of a landscape where middle-class people take their leisure. The corn is no more or no less useful than the beaches which we imagine to be in the distance of this brilliantly coloured painting".[20]Here too a more subtle hint of religious feeling is found: "the church in the distance hints at the source of the bounty represented by the partially garnered harvest in the foreground fields".[21]Treatments of the almost identical view byWilliam Dyceand James Collinson (Mother and Child,Mellon Centre, Yale[22]), both Burchett's colleagues at the school, are taken byGeoffrey Grigsonto mean that the three artists were on a visit, or holiday, together.[23]Dyce, like Burchett, was an artist who saw himself as a history painter but is now most often remembered for a single Pre-Raphaelitish landscape, hisPegwell Bay, Kent – a Recollection of October 5th 1858.

There are a number of public paintings by Burchett, with help of his students, commissioned through the school. He and his students painted, from Renaissance portraits, a number of full-length portraits of theHouse of Tudorfor the royal antechamber to theHouse of Lordsin thePalace of Westminster(1855-9).[24]He painted other works for the new Palace, including a largeSpanish ArmadasceneThe English Fleet Pursuing the Spanish Fleet Against Fowey,copying from an 18th-century print a one of a set of tapestries made forLord Howard of Effingham,the victorious admiral. The death ofPrince Albertbrought the project to reproduce the full set to an end, but it was revived in the 21st century, and finally completed in 2010.[25]Like the works in the Palace by better-known painters like Dyce, these have been generally disliked by critics from their first unveiling; the overall painting of the Palace after its rebuilding was probably the largest public painting commission in England during the 19th century, and, unlike the architecture of the Palace, has been regarded as very disappointing by most critics from the start.

From a number of designs formosaicsfor the exteriors to the south court of the Victoria and Albert Museum he producedWilliam Torrell(two versions in fact) andWilliam of Wykeham.The mosaics remain in place, and two of the cartoons are now themselves on display in the staircase on the Exhibition Road side of the building. He and his students decorated large medallions in the dome of the now-vanishedGreat Exhibition buildingof 1862 atSouth Kensington,[26]and he painted a window in theGreenwich Hospital.

The South Kensington system

[edit]
Margaret Tudor, Queen of Scots,Houses of Parliament

The controversy at the school in 1845 was about the Headmaster and his teaching methods, but reflected wider issues about the aims of the school in terms of the balance between fine art and applied and commercial art and design; these questions were to remain a perennial bone of contention for at least another century, and are a recurring theme inChristopher Frayling's 1987 history of the College. The new teaching methods implemented by Burchett were themselves to become a matter of controversy.

The school had been founded in 1837, as theGovernment School of Design,occupying part ofSomerset Houseonthe Strand,until the space was needed for theRegister of Births, Deaths and Marriages.It became theNational Art Training Schoolin 1853, moving to the equally palatial setting ofMarlborough House,thanks toPrince Albert,leaving a section just for training art teachers on the Strand, and establishing a separate "Female School" in Gower St,[27]from 1861Queen Square, Bloomsbury.[28]In 1861 the main school moved again to buildings adjoining (and now absorbed by) theVictoria and Albert MuseuminSouth Kensington,and long after Burchett's death it became in 1896The Royal College of Art.It is often referred to as the "Government Art School", and later the "South Kensington Schools", in the 19th century (the school was at various points divided into different sections, such as the "Female School", also under Burchett, and there were also science schools run by theScience and Art Department,hence the plural).

The main art school in London was theRoyal AcademySchools, which made space for the new school by its decision to vacate Somerset House for the newNational Gallerybuilding, where it stayed until 1867. They had been established decades before the Government School, to provide a full training inAcademic art;by the 1830s the majority of successful English artists had trained there. The Government School was funded by the Board of Trade, and intended, at least by them, for different purposes, though precisely what these were remained a political battleground for decades. The school was not founded to train academic painters; this at least was clear, although in fact many ex-students became just that. The Government had recognised that British industrial design was falling behind that of the Continent, and believed that the training of designers was worth public subsidy. Later, a national network of schools to train students in applied art and design was established, and the central London school was both to be the flagship of the network, and to train teachers for the rest of the schools.[29]

Botany Diagram, about 1855 byChristopher Dresserto illustrate his teaching at the school, V&A Museum.

William Dyce was the first Director, and Burchett studied under him, and then worked with him as a colleague, until Dyce left in 1848. The Isle of Wight paintings from 1855 suggest the two remained friends.

After the internal disputes of the 1840s, the school acquired a firm sense of control and direction when in 1853 the Government placed it under the control ofHenry Cole,for whom the Science and Art Department was set up, with a large tract of land, and much of the large profit from the 1852Great Exhibitionto spend. Cole was an extremely dynamic figure, with some training as a painter, and experience as an entrepreneurial designer of china. He made the young painterRichard Redgrave,master of botany at the school since 1847, responsible for the superintendence of the national system, and appointed Burchett as Headmaster of the London School.

Redgrave, drawing on Dyce's ideas, and propelled by Cole, set out the "South Kensington system",a highly specificsyllabusfor the teaching of art, which was to be dominant in the UK, and other English-speaking countries, at least until the end of the century, and not to entirely vanish until the 1930s.[30]Burchett was the first to implement the course in London, and worked with Redgrave in drawing it up - Redgrave had much less teaching experience.[31]Burchett's published lectures reflected the system, and were widely used as text-books for it; how far he was involved in devising it cannot be said.[32]

The full course was divided into twenty-three stages, most with several sections. Different types of students were to take different combinations of stages: "machinists, engineers and foremen of works" should take stages 1–5, and then skip to the final 23rd stage, "Technical Studies", while designers and "ornamentalists" took most stages.[13]

There were several types of students, pursuing different courses: the "general students", who paid no fees and were given a small living allowance, training to be teachers of art (though many ended up elsewhere), the "National Scholars" intended for industrial designers, and fee-paying students, pursuing a course more oriented to the fine arts. Latterly these were in fact the majority.[33]Women pupils were taught at least partly separately, and theirlife classesconsisted of drawing a man wearing a suit of armour. The Royal Academy Schools did not accept women students until 1861, although there were other alternatives for women. The female school, under Royal patronage, became a rather fashionable place for young ladies, able to support its expansion by society fundraising.[28]

Author and collector

[edit]
The Six Wives of Henry VIII, by Burchett and his students, 1854–1860,Houses of Parliament.

Collections of Burchett's lectures from the school were published in book form, throughChapman and Hall:Practical Geometry(1855),Practical Perspective(1857), which was translated into Chinese,[34]Linear Perspective for the Use of Schools of Art(1872).

He appears buying a number of lots for the school ( "Marlborough House" ) and a few for himself in the huge (4294 lot) sale in 1855 of the distinguished collection ofRalph Bernal.[35]He was also at the studio sale ofAugustus Egg,buying two paintings now in the Victoria and Albert Museum, probably on their behalf, although he also sold them works apparently from his collection, as well as his Sandown landscape (in 1861).[14]

Burchett looked after a number of paintings by his colleague, the Pre-RaphaeliteWalter Howell Deverell(1827–54) for a decade after Deverell's early death, before handing them on toDante Gabriel Rossetti.These includedTwelfth Night,Deverell's major work, which fetched £600,650 ($957,436) in an auction atChristie'sin 2003.[36]He must have known Deverell as a boy, as his father had been Secretary to the school, and the family lived on the premises until 1852. Deverell joined the staff of the school in 1848, and was there until his death.[37]

Apart from his own students, Burchett encouraged other young artists, sending theRoyal Academyschools a letter of recommendation for the youngAlbert Moore.

Portraits

[edit]

Portraits of the heavily-bearded Burchett include a marble bust by his pupilHenrietta Montalbain an elaborate pink alabaster frame designed byGeorge Clausenthat has followed the Royal College to its new Darwin Building onKensington Gore,where it is installed in a courtyard.[38]He was painted byVal Prinsepstanding next toLord Leightonin hisDistribution of Art Prizes(1869, Victoria and Albert Museum),[39]and there is awood engravingafter an unknown artist, very likely a student (above) published with an obituary.[40]His necessarily imagined "portrait" of the medieval metalworkerWilliam Torrellfor the Victoria & Albert Museum mosaics (above) shows considerable similarity to his other portraits, and may be a self-portrait.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^MacDonald:173 describesRosa Bonheuras a "student", but this seems dubious. She may have visited for a time before taking over her father's position running an art school for girls, the "École Gratuite de Dessins des Jeunes Filles" in 1849.
  2. ^DNB, V&A
  3. ^Elizabeth Bonython and Anthony Burton,The Great Exhibitor: the Life and Work of Henry Cole,V&A Publications, London, p.150.
  4. ^V&A says from 1851 as Head of the "Department of Practical Art" section, for training teachers.
  5. ^Scott, 272
  6. ^abcDNB
  7. ^In 1875, he was at 20 Brompton Sq., where he registered a patent "for improvements in boxes for containing matches and other articles" -London Gazette,March 29, 1878,p. 2259.By 1878 he had moved toRavenscourt Park,where he played a crucial role in developing the present public park. Obituary of Mr E. S. Burchett by F.E. Hayes, A.R.C.A., F.R.G.S. West London Observer 24 March 1916
  8. ^ab"No. 23599".The London Gazette.18 March 1870. p. 1811.
  9. ^Frayling:52
  10. ^"No. 24353".The London Gazette.11 August 1876. p. 4524.
  11. ^abScott, 272-273
  12. ^Brompton Square was home to many artists, writers and actors etcSurvey of London Artists, musicians and writers resident in Brompton, 1790–1870.Charles Dickens, Jr.(eldest child ofCharles Dickens) wrote in his 1879 bookDickens's Dictionary of Londonthat "[Brompton] was at one time almost exclusively the artist quarter and is still largely frequented by the votaries of the brush and chisel, though of late years Belgravia has been encroaching upon its boundaries, and Belgravian rents are stealing westward." Dickens, Charles Jr.(1879)."Brompton".Dickens's Dictionary of London.Retrieved22 August2007.
  13. ^abFrayling
  14. ^abcV&A
  15. ^Articles(in Spanish)inEl País,probably quoting another source.
  16. ^ImageThe two titles are mentioned separately by the DNB, who give the GuildhallSanctuary,but there seems only to be the one painting (exhibited RA 1867)
  17. ^Scott, 274-275
  18. ^So the DNB, but Howard D. Rodee:The "Dreary Landscape" as a Background for Scenes of Rural Poverty in Victorian Paintings,Art Journal, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Summer, 1977) refers to another, also a view of the Isle of Wight: "Scene in the Isles (sic) of Wight" of 1865. This has cheerful farmworkers' children, so must be a different work.
  19. ^For quote, search online collection on Burchett (accessed February 15, 2008).V&A image
  20. ^Rosenthal:130
  21. ^Christie'sCatalogue, King St, Sale 7279, Lot 219Showing a Preference,John Calcott Horsley,R.A. (1817–1903). - Horsley was also a colleague of Burchett's
  22. ^Collinson ImageThe Mellon Centre now date this 1849-50 however. Burchett sold his painting to the V&A in 1861.
  23. ^Grigson, G,Britain Observed,1975, pp 134–7, ref. in V&A,
  24. ^Lady Jane Grey image
  25. ^History Today;Image, Palace of Westminster
  26. ^Survey of London
  27. ^Frayling:38
  28. ^abMacDonald:173
  29. '^Survey of London, vol 38;South Kensington' and the Science and Art Department
  30. ^Frayling:41
  31. ^MacDonald:226
  32. ^Teaching by Example:Education and the Formation of South Kensington's Museums Rafael Cardoso Denis, V&A
  33. ^MacDonald:172-3
  34. ^translation per DNB, although they sayLinear Perspectiveof 1856 - the 1872 work may be a new editiondigitized, Google Books
  35. ^Published "Names of Purchasers and Prices..."digitised on Google Books
  36. ^Christopher Wood Report
  37. ^Artfact/Christie'scatalogue entry (2003) for Deverell'sTwelfth Night.
  38. ^Survey of Londonpre-move
  39. ^DNB, Frayling - possibly destroyed in World War II?
  40. ^Copy in the National Portrait Gallery

Main references

[edit]
[edit]