Jump to content

Talk:Africana womanism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between20 August 2020and4 December 2020.Further details are availableon the course page.Student editor(s):Bmsloanbarbour.Peer reviewers:Tsupatterson.

Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT(talk)13:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify

[edit]

This article does not follow the formatting and lay-out set out inWikipedia's formatting guidelines.Please do not remove the wikify banner until the formatting has been corrected.Toby32225(talk)19:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

This article is written as anApologia!There must be a neutral and balanced depiction of the subject.The Ogre(talk)13:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference citations unclear

[edit]

It is not clear which book the "Hudson-Weems" citations refer to. The publication year or book title should be included in the citations so that it is not ambiguous. See how it is done atEmma Goldmanfor example.Kaldari(talk)15:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion perTemplate:POV

[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions atTemplate:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --Khazar2(talk)02:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onAfricana womanism.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)18:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serious POV issues

[edit]

This article is pure apologia.

(Aside from numerous other issues: Formatting, length, references, the fact that it reads like something a 2nd year critical theory student, hopped up on ritalin, threw together in one night.)

What do other feminists say about it? We don't know.

Would a Marxist say that Africana Womanism is the bastard child of intersectional theory and bourgeois intellectual snobbery, that completely ignores issues of class, in favor of racialist pseudo intellectual garbage? Probably, but apparently no criticism has ever been put forward of African Womanism, according to this article.

What do actual African women say about it? That would be a logical question, considering that the article exclusively mentions North American intellectuals/activists. But again, we have no idea after spending the 30-40 minutes it takes to soldier through this article.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by192.38.143.54(talk)21:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]