This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons(BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediatelyfrom the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous.If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography,a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the projectandcontribute to the discussion.For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject California,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. stateofCaliforniaon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject San Diego,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related toSan DiegoandSan Diego Countyon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles
Hello! I'm a frequent reader of Wikipedia and was a little surprised by how this page reads. It kinds of seems like an ad for Barbara Bry, which I don't think is supposed to be the point of Wikipedia, am I right in thinking that? Is there any way to mark this page for potential bias, and to remove bizarre language. E.g. the entire "Later Life and Career" section reads in a very fishy way. There are a number of places where her intention is assumed which seems odd. (Also, should we be citing her campaign website? New Wikipedian, so actually unsure what is appropriate here.)2600:8801:C000:4C3:31FB:5AD9:2B7D:F989(talk)17:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! The phrasing and verbage of this article suggests a close and biased connection to the subject by the author. Article contains promotional, rather than neutral, language. Where information cannot be backed up by sources and appears "bizarre," as you mentioned, remove such information. Wikipedia is meant to be strictly informative and factual, and is not the place for disputed information to be characterized in one light or another.jj956004492(talk)04:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]