Talk:Fulla

Fullahas been listed as one of thePhilosophy and religion good articlesunder thegood article criteria.If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassessit.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 29, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Norse history and cultureMid‑importance

	This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Norse history and culture,aWikiProjectrelated to all activities of theNorth Germanic peoples,both inScandinaviaand abroad, prior to the formation of theKalmar Unionin 1397.If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page,where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
Mid	This article has been rated asMid-importanceon theproject's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Women,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofwomenon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review

This review istranscludedfromTalk:Fulla/GA1.The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GAreview(seeherefor criteria)

It isreasonably well written.
a(prose):b(MoS):
It isfactually accurateandverifiable.
a(references):b(citations toreliable sources):c(OR):
It isbroad in its coverage.
a(major aspects):b(focused):
It follows theneutral point of viewpolicy.
Fair representation without bias:
It isstable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated byimages,where possible and appropriate.
a(images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales):b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Congratulations, the article meets all the GA criteria.Arsenikk ^(talk)08:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, I seemed to have missed this review. Sorry about that - thanks for the review!:bloodofox:(talk)08:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]