Talk:WPWR-TV

Dropping the UPN trademark

Somebody jumped the gun in saying, "...many of its sister stations (likeWWOR-TVandKCOP) began to drop all refrence [sic] to UPN almost immediately. "I just retrieved the WWOR website, and am finding several instances of the UPN name, including in the station's branding (UPN 9) and logo. Let's remember thatThe CW Television Network"contains information about a future television station or television network," as the boilerplate states. Some of the "factual" information to be found is actually still speculative at this point. --SwissCelt03:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MyWPWR.PNG

Image:MyWPWR.PNGis being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair usebut there is noexplanation or rationaleas to why its use inthisWikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template,you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description pageand edit it to include afair use rationale.Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guidelineis an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion.If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.

BetacommandBot(talk)21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wpwr93.jpg

Image:Wpwr93.jpgis being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair usebut there is noexplanation or rationaleas to why its use inthisWikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template,you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description pageand edit it to include afair use rationale.Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guidelineis an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion.If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.

BetacommandBot(talk)12:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Upnchicago.jpg

Image:Upnchicago.jpgis being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair usebut there is noexplanation or rationaleas to why its use inthisWikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template,you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description pageand edit it to include afair use rationale.Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guidelineis an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion.If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.

BetacommandBot(talk)02:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Approved fair use rationale has been added.dhett^{(talk•contribs)}22:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

New logo for WPWR-TV on September 1, 2016

Do you guys have any idea what the new logo for WPWR-TV will look like afterWGN-TVbecomes an independent station on September 1, 2016?AdamDeanHall(talk)20:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Miyares' role as described may be fiction

I'm presently doing research on the handful of time share television operations that have taken place in the 1950s through early 1970s.

The narrative given here about Marcelino Miyares owning the license is at odds with what was reported in Broadcasting in their "For The Record" listings of FCC actions. In fact, the narrative here is at odds with that of the Wikipedia listing for WXFT-TV (which is what WBBS-TV morphed into post-time share).

There are numerous Broadcasting articles which also refer to the WPWR-TV/WBBS-TV sharing of channel 50 as two separate licenses.

Given that the statement about the license ownership can be disproved, it is likely the rest of the narrative about Miyares may also have statements based on hearsay, and the verbiage from the WXFT-TV entry appears to be more accurate.

I suggest a wholesale replacement of the narrative here with the narrative on the WXFT-TV page, at least until further research can clarify some of the "gray areas".63.196.158.105(talk)00:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Journal of Management

Mahakavi Devkota Campus Sunwal-4, Nawalparasi, Lumabin, nepal

CAMPUS WILL PUBLISH JOURNAL AND TITLE IS "RESEARCH OF MANAGEMENT"— Precedingunsignedcomment added byMdcampus60(talk•contribs)14:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Light TV

As on WFLD, Light TV is not actually being aired right now. It should not be listed as a digital channel until then, assuming it actually will be on WPWR. Would Fox actually put it on both?Andyross(talk)22:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)