Titular nation
This articleneeds additional citations forverification.(December 2009) |
Thetitular nationis the single dominantethnic groupin a particular state, typically after which the state was named. The term was first used byMaurice Barrèsin the late 19th century.
Soviet Union[edit]
The notion was used in theSoviet Unionto denote nations that give rise to titles of autonomous entities within the union:Soviet republics,autonomous republics,autonomous regions,etc., such asByelorussian SSRforBelarusians.
For anethnosto become a Soviet titular nation, it had to satisfy certain criteria in terms of the amount of population and compactness of its settlement. The language of a titular nation was declared an additional (after Russian) official language of the corresponding administrative unit.[citation needed]
In a number of cases, in certain highly multiethnic regions, such asNorth Caucasus,the notion of a titular nation introduced intrinsic inequality between titular and non-titular nations, especially since the introduction of the "korenizatsiya"politics of the 1920s, according to which representatives of a titular nation were promoted to management positions. From the 1930s, Soviet policies led to continuing Russification ofIndigenous peoplesin the USSR.
China[edit]
ThePeople's Republic of Chinagovernmenthas adopted some of the principles behind this Soviet concept in itsethnic minoritypolicy—seeAutonomous administrative divisions of China.
Yugoslavia[edit]
The federal republics ofSocialist Yugoslaviawere perceived as nation-states of the constitutional peoples.[1]After thebreakup of Yugoslavia,onlyBosnia and Herzegovinawas not defined in its constitution as a nation-state of its titular nation.
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^Stephen Tierney (8 October 2015).Nationalism and Globalisation.Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 81.ISBN978-1-5099-0206-4.