Treaty of Antwerp (1609)

TheTreaty of Antwerp,which initiated theTwelve Years' Truce,was anarmisticesigned inAntwerpon 9 April 1609 betweenSpainand theNetherlands,creating the major break in hostilities during theEighty Years' Warfor independence conducted by theSeventeen Provincesin theLow Countries.

Proposals and terms

In February 1608Dutchnegotiators submitted to theirSpanishcounterparts three different proposals regarding overseas trade in theEast Indies.The first proposal suggested that peace inEuropebe established with free trade permitted in overseas territories that were not controlled by theSpanish Empire.The second proposal suggested that peace in Europe be established along with a truce permitting free overseas trade for a period of years. The third proposal suggested that overseas trade be based on a "one's own risk" policy. Ultimately, the Spanish chose the second of the three proposals. Based on the terms of the accord, the Netherlands was granted the right to trade within overseas territories controlled by the Spanish Empire under the condition that it acquire an express license from theKing of Spain.Moreover, the Dutch were allowed to engage in unhindered trade outside of Spanish colonial possessions and with the permission of the natives. According to a protocol written byEnglishandFrenchenvoys, the Dutch managed during the negotiations to reserve the right to help any natives that concluded treaty relations with them and that such actions would not constitute a violation of the overall armistice.^[1]

Hugo Grotius

On a sidenote, the formation of the accord was influenced by the writings ofHugo GrotiusinMare Liberum( "The Free Seas" ), which was published in 1609 at the insistence of theDutch East India Company;the pamphlet was published anonymously inLeidenroughly one month prior to the conclusion of the treaty.^[2]

Johan van Oldenbarnevelt

Johan van Oldenbarneveltand the urban oligarchies ofHollanddeveloped another peace treaty in order to prevent any renewed hostilities with Spain once the Treaty of Antwerp expired in 1621. However, StadtholderMaurice of Nassau,Oldenbarnevelt's chief rival in the government of the United Provinces, led a faction of nobles that supported renewing hostilities with Spain and managed to have Oldenbarnevelt arrested in 1618.^[3]

References

^Grewe, p. 159. "In February 1608 the Dutch negotiators submitted to their Spanish counterparts three alternative proposals relating to the question of the Indies: 1) Peace in Europe and free trade with those overseas territories that were not in Spanish possession at that time; 2) Peace in Europe and a truce in the overseas regions for a period of years in which the overseas trade was to be free; or 3) Overseas trade at one's own risk according to the English-French model. The Spanish accepted as a basis of discussion the second proposal only. They did so only after a temporary interruption of negotiations, when the Armistice Treaty of Antwerp was concluded on 9 April 1609. It granted the Netherlands the right to trade with Spanish possessions only under the condition of an express license from the king. However, outside the Spanish possessions the Dutch were to be allowed, with the permission of the natives, to engage in unhindered trade. A protocol written by the English and French envoys stated that the Dutch, in the negotiations, had reserved the right to provide assistance to those natives with whom they had already concluded treaty relations, and that this would not violate the armistice."
^Armitage, pp. 52-53. "The publication of Hugo Grotius'sMare Liberumin 1609 coincided withJames'spolicy of restricting Dutch fishing in British waters, thus putting a specifically Scoto-British argument formare clausumat the centre of a global argument over rights ofdominium.The work, a fragment of the larger treatiseDe Jure Prede,was published at the insistence of the Dutch East India Company in the context of the negotiations towards what would become the Twelve Years Truce between Spain and the United Provinces. Grotius justified Dutch rights of trade and navigation in the East Indies against the claims of the Portuguese by arguing from natural law principles that anythingpublicum- such as the air, the sea, and the shore of that sea - was the common property of all, and hence could be the private property of none. The polemical purpose of this was clear: to deny that any state could make the sea an accessory to its realm, and to enforce freedom of navigation throughout the ocean, as a Dutch counterblast to Portuguese claims of dominium over the seas on grounds of first discovery,papal donation,rights of conquest or title of occupation. Though the East Indian context was uppermost in Grotius's argument and provided the spur for its publication, this did not prevent James's subjects from imagining that his claims to freedom of the seas were made at the expense of their own demands for new restrictions on Dutch fishing rights: 'K[ing] James coming in the Dutch put outMare Liberum,made as if aimed at mortifying the Spaniards' usurpation in the W. and E. Indyes, but aimed indeed at England', noted one commentator in 1673. Indeed, the Treaty of Antwerp (1609) secured Dutch rights of navigation in the East Indies only a month after Grotius's pamphlet was published anonymously in Leiden. "
^Fix, p. 67. "Oldenbarnevelt and the urban oligarchies of Holland formed a peace treaty opposing renewed hostilities with Spain when the so-called Twelve Year Truce expired in 1621, but Nassau, Oldenbarnevelt's chief rival for power within the government of the United Provinces, led a noble faction favoring a resumption of the war as well as a greater centralization of the Dutch government than the oligarchs were willing to permit.... As the end of the truce neared the political quarrel reached crisis point in 1618 when Nassau managed to have Oldenbarnevelt arrested."

Sources

Armitage, David. "Making the Empire British: Scotland in the Atlantic World 1542-1707".Past and Present,No. 155. (May, 1997), pp. 34–63.
Fix, Andrew. "Radical Reformation and Second Reformation in Holland: The Intellectual Consequences of the Sixteenth-Century Religious Upheaval and the Coming of a Rational World View".Sixteenth Century Journal,Volume 18, No. 1 (Spring, 1987), pp. 63–80.
Grewe, Wilhelm Georg (translated by Michael Byers).The Epochs of International Law.Walter de Gruyter, 2000.ISBN 3-11-015339-4
Dlugaiczyk, Martina. Der Waffenstillstand (1609–1621) als Medienereignis. Politische Bildpropaganda in den Niederlanden, Münster, New.York 2005.

[1] Grewe, p. 159. "In February 1608 the Dutch negotiators submitted to their Spanish counterparts three alternative proposals relating to the question of the Indies: 1) Peace in Europe and free trade with those overseas territories that were not in Spanish possession at that time; 2) Peace in Europe and a truce in the overseas regions for a period of years in which the overseas trade was to be free; or 3) Overseas trade at one's own risk according to the English-French model. The Spanish accepted as a basis of discussion the second proposal only. They did so only after a temporary interruption of negotiations, when the Armistice Treaty of Antwerp was concluded on 9 April 1609. It granted the Netherlands the right to trade with Spanish possessions only under the condition of an express license from the king. However, outside the Spanish possessions the Dutch were to be allowed, with the permission of the natives, to engage in unhindered trade. A protocol written by the English and French envoys stated that the Dutch, in the negotiations, had reserved the right to provide assistance to those natives with whom they had already concluded treaty relations, and that this would not violate the armistice."

[2] Armitage, pp. 52-53. "The publication of Hugo Grotius'sMare Liberumin 1609 coincided withJames'spolicy of restricting Dutch fishing in British waters, thus putting a specifically Scoto-British argument formare clausumat the centre of a global argument over rights ofdominium.The work, a fragment of the larger treatiseDe Jure Prede,was published at the insistence of the Dutch East India Company in the context of the negotiations towards what would become the Twelve Years Truce between Spain and the United Provinces. Grotius justified Dutch rights of trade and navigation in the East Indies against the claims of the Portuguese by arguing from natural law principles that anythingpublicum- such as the air, the sea, and the shore of that sea - was the common property of all, and hence could be the private property of none. The polemical purpose of this was clear: to deny that any state could make the sea an accessory to its realm, and to enforce freedom of navigation throughout the ocean, as a Dutch counterblast to Portuguese claims of dominium over the seas on grounds of first discovery,papal donation,rights of conquest or title of occupation. Though the East Indian context was uppermost in Grotius's argument and provided the spur for its publication, this did not prevent James's subjects from imagining that his claims to freedom of the seas were made at the expense of their own demands for new restrictions on Dutch fishing rights: 'K[ing] James coming in the Dutch put outMare Liberum,made as if aimed at mortifying the Spaniards' usurpation in the W. and E. Indyes, but aimed indeed at England', noted one commentator in 1673. Indeed, the Treaty of Antwerp (1609) secured Dutch rights of navigation in the East Indies only a month after Grotius's pamphlet was published anonymously in Leiden. "

[3] Fix, p. 67. "Oldenbarnevelt and the urban oligarchies of Holland formed a peace treaty opposing renewed hostilities with Spain when the so-called Twelve Year Truce expired in 1621, but Nassau, Oldenbarnevelt's chief rival for power within the government of the United Provinces, led a noble faction favoring a resumption of the war as well as a greater centralization of the Dutch government than the oligarchs were willing to permit.... As the end of the truce neared the political quarrel reached crisis point in 1618 when Nassau managed to have Oldenbarnevelt arrested."

[1]

[2]

[3]

Proposals and terms

Hugo Grotius

Johan van Oldenbarnevelt

See also

References

Sources