Tukoji Rao Pawar

Tukoji Rao Pawar
Tukoji Rao Pawar
Member of Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly
	In office; 1990–2015
Preceded by	Chandra Prabash Shekhar
Succeeded by	Gayatri Raje Pawar
Constituency	Dewas
Personal details
Born	17 November 1963
Died	19 June 2015
Political party	Bharatiya Janata Party
Spouse	Gayatri Raje Pawar
Children	Vikram Singh Rao II Puar

Tukoji Rao IV Pawar(17 November 1963 – 19 June 2015) was an Indian politician belonging to theBharatiya Janata Party(BJP). Mr. Pawar was member of the Legislative Assembly ofMadhya Pradesh.

He was a descendant of thePawardynasty of theMarathas.His fatherKrishnajirao IIIwas the last ruler ofDewas (Senior) Statewhich was a '15Gun Salute'princely statein India. He was the titularMaharajaofDewas (Senior) Stateuntil 1971 when in the 26th amendment^[1]to theConstitution of Indiapromulgated in 1971, the Government of India abolished all official symbols ofprincely India,including titles, privileges, and remuneration (privy purses).^[2]

He was theMember of Legislative AssemblyfromDewasfor six terms from 1990 to 2015. He was inducted in the state cabinet for two terms serving as Minister for Higher Education, Technical Education and later Tourism, Sports and Youth Welfare. He was elected as the President of the Board of Governors of TheDaly College,Indore in 2004, again in 2005, in 2010 and in 2015.^[3]His wifeGayatri Raje Pawarhas been representing the assembly seat since his death.

He died in 2015 of brain haemorrhage.^[4]Vikram Singh Rao II Pawaris his son.

References[edit]

^"The Constitution (26 Amendment) Act, 1971",indiacode.nic.in,Government of India, 1971, archived fromthe originalon 6 December 2011,retrieved9 November2011
^1.Ramusack, Barbara N.(2004).The Indian princes and their states.Cambridge University Press. p. 278.ISBN 978-0-521-26727-4.Retrieved6 November2011.,"Through a constitutional amendment passed in 1971, Indira Gandhi stripped the princes of thetitles,privy purses and regal privileges which her father's government had granted. "(p 278).2.Naipaul, V. S.(8 April 2003),India: A Wounded Civilization,Random House Digital, Inc., pp. 37–,ISBN 978-1-4000-3075-0,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "The princes of India – their number and variety reflecting to a large extent the chaos that had come to the country with the break up of the Mughal empire – had lost real power in the British time. Through generations of idle servitude they had grown to specialize only in style. A bogus, extinguishable glamour: in 1947, with Independence, they had lost their state, and Mrs. Gandhi in 1971 had, without much public outcry, abolished their privy purses andtitles."(pp 37–38).3.Schmidt, Karl J. (1995),An atlas and survey of South Asian history,M.E. Sharpe, p. 78,ISBN 978-1-56324-334-9,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "Although the Indian states were alternately requested or forced into union with either India or Pakistan, the real death of princely India came when the Twenty-sixth Amendment Act (1971) abolished the princes'titles,privileges, and privy purses. "(page 78).4.Breckenridge, Carol Appadurai(1995),Consuming modernity: public culture in a South Asian world,U of Minnesota Press, pp. 84–,ISBN 978-0-8166-2306-8,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "The third stage in the political evolution of the princes from rulers to citizens occurred in 1971, when the constitution ceased to recognize them as princes and their privy purses,titles,and special privileges were abolished. "(page 84).5.Guha, Ramachandra(5 August 2008),India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy,HarperCollins, pp. 441–,ISBN 978-0-06-095858-9,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "Her success at the polls emboldened Mrs. Gandhi to act decisively against the princes. Through 1971, the two sides tried and failed to find a settlement. The princes were willing to forgo their privy purses, but hoped at least to save their titles. But with her overwhelming majority in Parliament, the prime minister had no need to compromise. On 2 December she introduced a bill to amend the constitution and abolish all princely privileges. It was passed in the Lok Sabha by 381 votes to six, and in the Rajya Sabha by 167 votes to seven. In her own speech, the prime minister invited 'the princes to join the elite of the modern age, the elite which earns respect by its talent, energy and contribution to human progress, all of which can only be done when we work together as equals without regarding anybody as of special status.'" (page 441).6.Cheesman, David (1997).Landlord power and rural indebtedness in colonial Sind, 1865-1901.London: Routledge. pp. 10–.ISBN 978-0-7007-0470-5.Retrieved6 November2011.Quote: "The Indian princes survived the British Raj by only a few years. The Indian republic stripped them of their powers and then theirtitles."(page 10).7.Merriam-Webster, Inc (1997),Merriam-Webster's geographical dictionary,Merriam-Webster, pp. 520–,ISBN 978-0-87779-546-9,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "Indian States:"Various (formerly) semi-independent areas in India ruled by native princes.... Under British rule... administered by residents assisted by political agents. Titles and remaining privileges of princes abolished by Indian government 1971." (page 520).8.Ward, Philip (September 1989),Northern India, Rajasthan, Agra, Delhi: a travel guide,Pelican Publishing, pp. 91–,ISBN 978-0-88289-753-0,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "A monarchy is only as good as the reigning monarch: thus it is with the princely states. Once they seemed immutable, invincible. In 1971 they were" derecognized, "their privileges, privy purses andtitlesall abolished at a stroke "(page 91)
^Hindustan Times
^"Tukoji Rao dies of brain haemorrhage in Dewas".

Titles in pretence
Tukoji Rao Pawar Puar Dynasty Born:17 Nov 1963Died:19 June 2015
Preceded by Krishnajirao III	— TITULAR — Maharaja of Dewas (senior) 1999-2015 Reason for succession failure: Monarchy abolished in 1948	Succeeded by Vikram Singh Rao II Puar

[1] "The Constitution (26 Amendment) Act, 1971",indiacode.nic.in,Government of India, 1971, archived fromthe originalon 6 December 2011,retrieved9 November2011

[2] 1.Ramusack, Barbara N.(2004).The Indian princes and their states.Cambridge University Press. p. 278.ISBN 978-0-521-26727-4.Retrieved6 November2011.,"Through a constitutional amendment passed in 1971, Indira Gandhi stripped the princes of thetitles,privy purses and regal privileges which her father's government had granted. "(p 278).2.Naipaul, V. S.(8 April 2003),India: A Wounded Civilization,Random House Digital, Inc., pp. 37–,ISBN 978-1-4000-3075-0,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "The princes of India – their number and variety reflecting to a large extent the chaos that had come to the country with the break up of the Mughal empire – had lost real power in the British time. Through generations of idle servitude they had grown to specialize only in style. A bogus, extinguishable glamour: in 1947, with Independence, they had lost their state, and Mrs. Gandhi in 1971 had, without much public outcry, abolished their privy purses andtitles."(pp 37–38).3.Schmidt, Karl J. (1995),An atlas and survey of South Asian history,M.E. Sharpe, p. 78,ISBN 978-1-56324-334-9,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "Although the Indian states were alternately requested or forced into union with either India or Pakistan, the real death of princely India came when the Twenty-sixth Amendment Act (1971) abolished the princes'titles,privileges, and privy purses. "(page 78).4.Breckenridge, Carol Appadurai(1995),Consuming modernity: public culture in a South Asian world,U of Minnesota Press, pp. 84–,ISBN 978-0-8166-2306-8,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "The third stage in the political evolution of the princes from rulers to citizens occurred in 1971, when the constitution ceased to recognize them as princes and their privy purses,titles,and special privileges were abolished. "(page 84).5.Guha, Ramachandra(5 August 2008),India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy,HarperCollins, pp. 441–,ISBN 978-0-06-095858-9,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "Her success at the polls emboldened Mrs. Gandhi to act decisively against the princes. Through 1971, the two sides tried and failed to find a settlement. The princes were willing to forgo their privy purses, but hoped at least to save their titles. But with her overwhelming majority in Parliament, the prime minister had no need to compromise. On 2 December she introduced a bill to amend the constitution and abolish all princely privileges. It was passed in the Lok Sabha by 381 votes to six, and in the Rajya Sabha by 167 votes to seven. In her own speech, the prime minister invited 'the princes to join the elite of the modern age, the elite which earns respect by its talent, energy and contribution to human progress, all of which can only be done when we work together as equals without regarding anybody as of special status.'" (page 441).6.Cheesman, David (1997).Landlord power and rural indebtedness in colonial Sind, 1865-1901.London: Routledge. pp. 10–.ISBN 978-0-7007-0470-5.Retrieved6 November2011.Quote: "The Indian princes survived the British Raj by only a few years. The Indian republic stripped them of their powers and then theirtitles."(page 10).7.Merriam-Webster, Inc (1997),Merriam-Webster's geographical dictionary,Merriam-Webster, pp. 520–,ISBN 978-0-87779-546-9,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "Indian States:"Various (formerly) semi-independent areas in India ruled by native princes.... Under British rule... administered by residents assisted by political agents. Titles and remaining privileges of princes abolished by Indian government 1971." (page 520).8.Ward, Philip (September 1989),Northern India, Rajasthan, Agra, Delhi: a travel guide,Pelican Publishing, pp. 91–,ISBN 978-0-88289-753-0,retrieved6 November2011Quote: "A monarchy is only as good as the reigning monarch: thus it is with the princely states. Once they seemed immutable, invincible. In 1971 they were" derecognized, "their privileges, privy purses andtitlesall abolished at a stroke "(page 91)

[3] Hindustan Times

[4] "Tukoji Rao dies of brain haemorrhage in Dewas".

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

See also[edit]

References[edit]