Tyrannosaurus
| Tyrannosaurus Temporal range:Late Cretaceous,
| |
|---|---|
| |
| Reconstruction of theT. rextype specimenat theCarnegie Museum of Natural History | |
Scientific classification
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | Saurischia |
| Clade: | Theropoda |
| Family: | †Tyrannosauridae |
| Subfamily: | †Tyrannosaurinae |
| Clade: | †Tyrannosaurini |
| Genus: | †Tyrannosaurus Osborn, 1905 |
| Type species | |
| †Tyrannosaurus rex Osborn, 1905
| |
| Otherspecies | |
| Synonyms | |
|
Genus synonymy
Species synonymy
| |
Tyrannosaurus(/tɪˌrænəˈsɔːrəs,taɪ-/)[a]is agenusof largetheropoddinosaur.Thetype speciesTyrannosaurus rex(rexmeaning "king" inLatin), often shortened toT. rexor colloquiallyT-Rex,is one of the best represented theropods. It lived throughout what is now westernNorth America,on what was then an island continent known asLaramidia.Tyrannosaurushad a much wider range than othertyrannosaurids.Fossilsare found in a variety ofrock formationsdating to the latestCampanian-Maastrichtianagesof the LateCretaceousperiod,72.7 to 66million years ago.It was the last known member of the tyrannosaurids and among the last non-aviandinosaurs to exist before theCretaceous–Paleogene extinction event.
Like other tyrannosaurids,Tyrannosauruswas abipedalcarnivorewith a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to its large and powerful hind limbs, the forelimbs ofTyrannosauruswere short but unusually powerful for their size, and they had two clawed digits. The most complete specimen measures 12.3–12.4 m (40–41 ft) in length, but according to most modern estimates,Tyrannosauruscould have exceeded sizes of 13 m (43 ft) in length, 3.7–4 m (12–13 ft) in hip height, and 8.8 tonnes (8.7 long tons; 9.7 short tons) in mass. Although some other theropods might have rivaled or exceededTyrannosaurusinsize,it is still among the largest known land predators, with its estimated bite force being the largest among all terrestrial animals. By far the largest carnivore in its environment,Tyrannosaurus rexwas most likely anapex predator,preying uponhadrosaurs,juvenile armored herbivores likeceratopsiansandankylosaurs,and possiblysauropods.Some experts have suggested the dinosaur was primarily ascavenger.The question of whetherTyrannosauruswas an apex predator or a pure scavenger was among the longest debates inpaleontology.Most paleontologists today accept thatTyrannosauruswas both an active predator and a scavenger.
Specimens ofTyrannosaurus rexinclude some that are nearly complete skeletons.Soft tissueandproteinshave been reported in at least one of these specimens. The abundance of fossil material has allowed significant research into many aspects of its biology, including its life history andbiomechanics.The feeding habits,physiology,and potential speed ofTyrannosaurus rexare a few subjects of debate. Itstaxonomyis also controversial, as some scientists considerTarbosaurus bataarfrom Asia to be a thirdTyrannosaurusspecies, while others maintainTarbosaurusis a separate genus. Several other genera of North American tyrannosaurids have also beensynonymizedwithTyrannosaurus.At present, two species ofTyrannosaurusare considered valid; the type species,T. rex,and the earlier and more recently discoveredT. mcraeensis.
As the archetypal theropod,Tyrannosaurushas been one of the best-known dinosaurs since the early 20th century and has been featured in film, advertising, postal stamps, and many other media.
History of research
Earliest finds
A tooth from what is now documented as aTyrannosaurus rexwas found in July 1874 uponSouth Table Mountain (Colorado)byJarvis Hall (Colorado)student Peter T. Dotson under the auspices of Prof.Arthur LakesnearGolden, Colorado.[1]In the early 1890s,John Bell Hatchercollected postcranial elements in easternWyoming.The fossils were believed to be from the large speciesOrnithomimus grandis(nowDeinodon) but are now consideredT. rexremains.[2]
In 1892,Edward Drinker Copefound two vertebral fragments of a large dinosaur. Cope believed the fragments belonged to an "agathaumid" (ceratopsid) dinosaur, and named themManospondylus gigas,meaning "giant porous vertebra", in reference to the numerous openings for blood vessels he found in the bone.[2]TheM. gigasremains were, in 1907, identified by Hatcher as those of a theropod rather than a ceratopsid.[3]
Henry Fairfield Osbornrecognized the similarity betweenManospondylus gigasandT. rexas early as 1917, by which time the second vertebra had been lost. Owing to the fragmentary nature of theManospondylusvertebrae, Osborn did not synonymize the two genera, instead considering the older genus indeterminate.[4]In June 2000, theBlack Hills Institutefound around 10% of aTyrannosaurusskeleton (BHI6248) at a site that might have been the originalM. gigaslocality.[5]
Skeleton discovery and naming
Barnum Brown,assistant curator of theAmerican Museum of Natural History,found the first partial skeleton ofT. rexin eastern Wyoming in 1900. Brown found another partial skeleton in theHell Creek Formationin Montana in 1902, comprising approximately 34 fossilized bones.[6]Writing at the time Brown said "Quarry No. 1 contains the femur, pubes, humerus, three vertebrae and two undetermined bones of a large Carnivorous Dinosaur not described byMarsh.... I have never seen anything like it from theCretaceous."[7]Henry Fairfield Osborn,president of theAmerican Museum of Natural History,named the second skeletonT. rexin 1905. The generic name is derived from theGreekwordsτύραννος(tyrannos,meaning "tyrant" ) andσαῦρος(sauros,meaning "lizard" ). Osborn used theLatinwordrex,meaning "king", for the specific name. The fullbinomialtherefore translates to "tyrant lizard the king" or "King Tyrant Lizard", emphasizing the animal's size and presumed dominance over other species of the time.[6]
Osborn named the other specimenDynamosaurus imperiosusin a paper in 1905.[6]In 1906, Osborn recognized that the two skeletons were from the same species and selectedTyrannosaurusas the preferred name.[8]The originalDynamosaurusmaterial resides in the collections of theNatural History Museum,London.[9]In 1941, theT. rextype specimen was sold to theCarnegie Museum of Natural Historyin Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for $7,000.[7]Dynamosauruswould later be honored by the 2018 description of another species of tyrannosaurid by Andrew McDonald and colleagues,Dynamoterror dynastes,whose name was chosen in reference to the 1905 name, as it had been a "childhood favorite" of McDonald's.[10]
From the 1910s through the end of the 1950s, Barnum's discoveries remained the only specimens ofTyrannosaurus,as theGreat Depressionand wars kept many paleontologists out of the field.[5]
Resurgent interest
Beginning in the 1960s, there was renewed interest inTyrannosaurus,resulting in the recovery of 42 skeletons (5–80% complete by bone count) from Western North America.[5]In 1967, Dr. William MacMannis located and recovered the skeleton named "MOR 008", which is 15% complete by bone count and has a reconstructed skull displayed at theMuseum of the Rockies.The 1990s saw numerous discoveries, with nearly twice as many finds as in all previous years, including two of the most complete skeletons found to date:SueandStan.[5]
Sue Hendrickson,anamateurpaleontologist, discovered the most complete (approximately 85%) and largestTyrannosaurusskeleton in theHell Creek Formationon August 12, 1990. The specimen Sue, named after the discoverer, was the object of a legal battle over its ownership. In 1997, the litigation was settled in favor of Maurice Williams, the original land owner. The fossil collection was purchased by theField Museum of Natural Historyat auction for $7.6 million, making it the most expensive dinosaur skeleton until the sale of Stan for $31.8 million in 2020.[11]From 1998 to 1999, Field Museum of Natural History staff spent over 25,000 hours taking the rock off the bones.[12]The bones were then shipped toNew Jerseywhere the mount was constructed, then shipped back to Chicago for the final assembly. The mounted skeleton opened to the public on May 17, 2000, in the Field Museum of Natural History. A study of this specimen's fossilized bones showed that Sue reached full size at age 19 and died at the age of 28, the longest estimated life of any tyrannosaur known.[13]
AnotherTyrannosaurus,nicknamed Stan (BHI 3033), in honor of amateur paleontologist Stan Sacrison, was recovered from the Hell Creek Formation in 1992. Stan is the second most complete skeleton found, with 199 bones recovered representing 70% of the total.[14]This tyrannosaur also had many bone pathologies, including broken and healed ribs, a broken (and healed) neck, and a substantial hole in the back of its head, about the size of aTyrannosaurustooth.[15]
In 1998, Bucky Derflinger noticed aT. rextoe exposed above ground, making Derflinger, who was 20 years old at the time, the youngest person to discover aTyrannosaurus.The specimen, dubbedBuckyin honor of its discoverer, was a young adult, 3.0 metres (10 ft) tall and 11 metres (35 ft) long. Bucky is the firstTyrannosaurusto be found that preserved afurcula(wishbone). Bucky is permanently displayed atThe Children's Museum of Indianapolis.[16]
In the summer of 2000, crews organized byJack Hornerdiscovered fiveTyrannosaurusskeletons near theFort Peck Reservoir.[17]In 2001, a 50% complete skeleton of a juvenileTyrannosauruswas discovered in the Hell Creek Formation by a crew from theBurpee Museum of Natural History.Dubbed Jane (BMRP 2002.4.1), the find was thought to be the first known skeleton of apygmytyrannosaurid,Nanotyrannus,but subsequent research revealed that it is more likely a juvenileTyrannosaurus,and the most complete juvenile example known;[18]Jane is exhibited at the Burpee Museum of Natural History.[19]In 2002, a skeleton nicknamed "Wyrex", discovered by amateur collectors Dan Wells and Don Wyrick, had 114 bones and was 38% complete. The dig was concluded over 3 weeks in 2004 by theBlack Hills Institutewith the first liveonlineTyrannosaurusexcavation providing daily reports, photos, and video.[5]
In 2006,Montana State Universityrevealed that it possessed the largestTyrannosaurusskull yet discovered (from a specimen named MOR 008), measuring 5 feet (152 cm) long.[20]Subsequent comparisons indicated that the longest head was 136.5 centimetres (53.7 in) (from specimen LACM 23844) and the widest head was 90.2 centimetres (35.5 in) (from Sue).[21]
Footprints
Two isolated fossilizedfootprintshave been tentatively assigned toT. rex.The first was discovered atPhilmont Scout Ranch,New Mexico, in 1983 by American geologist Charles Pillmore. Originally thought to belong to ahadrosaurid,examination of the footprint revealed a large 'heel' unknown inornithopoddinosaur tracks, and traces of what may have been ahallux,the dewclaw-like fourth digit of the tyrannosaur foot. The footprint was published as theichnogenusTyrannosauripus pillmoreiin 1994, byMartin Lockleyand Adrian Hunt. Lockley and Hunt suggested that it was very likely the track was made by aT. rex,which would make it the first known footprint from this species. The track was made in what was once a vegetated wetland mudflat. It measures 83 centimeters (33 in) long by 71 centimeters (28 in) wide.[22]
A second footprint that may have been made by aTyrannosauruswas first reported in 2007 by British paleontologist Phil Manning, from theHell Creek Formationof Montana. This second track measures 72 centimeters (28 in) long, shorter than the track described by Lockley and Hunt. Whether or not the track was made byTyrannosaurusis unclear, thoughTyrannosaurusis the only large theropod known to have existed in the Hell Creek Formation.[23][24]
A set of footprints in Glenrock, Wyoming dating to theMaastrichtianstage of the Late Cretaceous and hailing from theLance Formationwere described by Scott Persons, Phil Currie and colleagues in 2016, and are believed to belong to either a juvenileT. rexor the dubious tyrannosauridNanotyrannus lancensis.From measurements and based on the positions of the footprints, the animal was believed to be traveling at a walking speed of around 2.8 to 5 miles per hour and was estimated to have a hip height of 1.56 to 2.06 m (5.1 to 6.8 ft).[25][26][27]A follow-up paper appeared in 2017, increasing the speed estimations by 50–80%.[28]
Description
Size
T. rexwas one of the largest land carnivores of all time. One of its largest and the most complete specimens, nicknamedSue(FMNH PR2081), is located at theField Museum of Natural Historyin Chicago. Sue measured 12.3–12.4 m (40.4–40.7 ft) long,[29][30]was 3.66–3.96 meters (12–13 ft) tall at the hips,[31][32][33]and according to the most recent studies, using a variety of techniques, maximum body masses have been estimated approximately 8.4–8.46 metric tons (9.26–9.33 short tons).[34][35]A specimen nicknamedScotty(RSM P2523.8), located at theRoyal Saskatchewan Museum,is reported to measure 13 m (43 ft) in length. Using a mass estimation technique that extrapolates from thecircumferenceof the femur, Scotty was estimated as the largest known specimen at 8.87 metric tons (9.78 short tons) in body mass.[34][36]
Not every adultTyrannosaurusspecimen recovered is as big. Historically average adult mass estimates have varied widely over the years, from as low as 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons),[37][38]to more than 7.2 metric tons (7.9 short tons),[39]with most modern estimates ranging between 5.4 and 8.0 metric tons (6.0 and 8.8 short tons).[29][40][41][42][43]
Skull
The largest knownT. rexskulls measure up to 1.54 meters (5 ft) in length.[20][31]Largefenestrae(openings) in the skull reduced weight, as in all carnivorous theropods. In other respectsTyrannosaurus's skull was significantly different from those of large non-tyrannosauridtheropods. It was extremely wide at the rear but had a narrow snout, allowing unusually goodbinocular vision.[44][45]The skull bones were massive and thenasalsand some other bones were fused, preventing movement between them; but many werepneumatized(contained a "honeycomb" of tiny air spaces) and thus lighter. These and other skull-strengthening features are part of thetyrannosauridtrend towards an increasingly powerful bite, which easily surpassed that of all non-tyrannosaurids.[46][47][48]The tip of the upper jaw was U-shaped (most non-tyrannosauroid carnivores had V-shaped upper jaws), which increased the amount of tissue and bone a tyrannosaur could rip out with one bite, although it also increased the stresses on the front teeth.[49]
The teeth ofT. rexdisplayed markedheterodonty(differences in shape).[50][51]Thepremaxillaryteeth, four per side at the front of the upper jaw, were closely packed,D-shaped in cross-section, had reinforcing ridges on the rear surface, wereincisiform(their tips were chisel-like blades) and curved backwards. TheD-shaped cross-section, reinforcing ridges and backwards curve reduced the risk that the teeth would snap whenTyrannosaurusbit and pulled. The remaining teeth were robust, like "lethal bananas" rather than daggers, more widely spaced and also had reinforcing ridges.[52]Those in the upper jaw, twelve per side in mature individuals,[50]were larger than their counterparts of the lower jaw, except at the rear. The largest found so far is estimated to have been 30.5 centimeters (12 in) long including the root when the animal was alive, making it the largest tooth of any carnivorous dinosaur yet found.[53]The lower jaw was robust. Its frontdentary bonebore thirteen teeth. Behind the tooth row, the lower jaw became notably taller.[50]The upper and lower jaws ofTyrannosaurus,like those of many dinosaurs, possessed numerousforamina,or small holes in the bone. Various functions have been proposed for these foramina, such as a crocodile-like sensory system[54]or evidence ofextra-oral structuressuch as scales or potentially lips,[55][56][57]with subsequent research on theropod tooth wear patterns supporting such a proposition.[58]
Skeleton
Thevertebral columnofTyrannosaurusconsisted of ten neck vertebrae, thirteen back vertebrae and five sacral vertebrae. The number of tail vertebrae is unknown and could well have varied between individuals but probably numbered at least forty. Sue was mounted with forty-seven of such caudal vertebrae.[50]The neck ofT. rexformed a natural S-shaped curve like that of other theropods. Compared to these, it was exceptionally short, deep and muscular to support the massive head. The second vertebra, the axis, was especially short. The remaining neck vertebrae were weakly opisthocoelous, i.e. with a convex front of the vertebral body and a concave rear. The vertebral bodies had single pleurocoels, pneumatic depressions created byair sacs,on their sides.[50]The vertebral bodies of the torso were robust but with a narrow waist. Their undersides were keeled. The front sides were concave with a deep vertical trough. They had large pleurocoels. Their neural spines had very rough front and rear sides for the attachment of strong tendons. The sacral vertebrae were fused to each other, both in their vertebral bodies and neural spines. They were pneumatized. They were connected to the pelvis by transverse processes and sacral ribs. The tail was heavy and moderately long, in order to balance the massive head and torso and to provide space for massivelocomotor musclesthat attached to the thighbones. The thirteenth tail vertebra formed the transition point between the deep tail base and the middle tail that was stiffened by a rather long front articulation processes. The underside of the trunk was covered by eighteen or nineteen pairs of segmented belly ribs.[50]
Theshoulder girdlewas longer than the entire forelimb. The shoulder blade had a narrow shaft but was exceptionally expanded at its upper end. It connected via a long forward protrusion to thecoracoid,which was rounded. Both shoulder blades were connected by a smallfurcula.The paired breast bones possibly were made ofcartilageonly.[50]
The forelimb or arm was very short. The upper arm bone, the humerus, was short but robust. It had a narrow upper end with an exceptionally rounded head. The lower arm bones, theulnaand radius, were straight elements, much shorter than the humerus. The secondmetacarpalwas longer and wider than the first, whereas normally in theropods the opposite is true. The forelimbs had only two clawed fingers,[50]along with an additional splint-like small thirdmetacarpalrepresenting the remnant of a third digit.[59]
Thepelviswas a large structure. Its upper bone, theilium,was both very long and high, providing an extensive attachment area for hindlimb muscles. The frontpubic boneended in an enormous pubic boot, longer than the entire shaft of the element. The rearischiumwas slender and straight, pointing obliquely to behind and below.[50]
In contrast to the arms, the hindlimbs were among the longest in proportion to body size of any theropod. In the foot, themetatarsuswas "arctometatarsalian", meaning that the part of the third metatarsal near the ankle was pinched. The third metatarsal was also exceptionally sinuous.[50]Compensating for the immense bulk of the animal, many bones throughout the skeleton were hollowed, reducing its weight without significant loss of strength.[50]
Classification
Tyrannosaurusis thetypegenus of the superfamilyTyrannosauroidea,thefamilyTyrannosauridae,and the subfamily Tyrannosaurinae; in other words it is the standard by which paleontologists decide whether to include other species in the same group. Other members of the tyrannosaurine subfamily include the North AmericanDaspletosaurusand theAsianTarbosaurus,[18][60]both of which have occasionally been synonymized withTyrannosaurus.[61]
Tyrannosaurids were once commonly thought to be descendants of earlier large theropods such asmegalosaursandcarnosaurs,although more recently they were reclassified with the generally smallercoelurosaurs.[49]The earliest tyrannosaur group were the crested proceratosaurids, while later and more derived members belong to thePantyrannosauria.Tyrannosaurs started out as small theropods; however at least some became larger by theEarly Cretaceous.
Tyrannosauroids are characterized by their fused nasals and dental arrangement. Pantyrannosaurs are characterized by unique features in their hips as well as an enlarged foramen in the quadrate, a broad postorbital and hourglass shaped nasals. Some of the more derived pantyrannosaurs lack nasal pneumaticity and have a lower humerus to femur ratio with their arms starting to see some reduction. Some pantyrannosaurs started developing an arctometatarsus. Eutyrannosaurs have a rough texture on their nasal bones and their mandibular fenestra is reduced externally. Tyrannosaurids lack kinetic skulls or special crests on their nasal bones, and have a lacrimal with a distinctive process on it. Tyrannosaurids also have an interfenestral strut that is less than half as big as the maxillary fenestra.[62]
It is quite likely that tyrannosauroids rose to prominence after the decline in allosauroid and megalosauroid diversity seen during the early stages of the Late Cretaceous. Below is a simple cladogram of general tyrannosauroid relationships that was found after an analysis conducted by Li and colleagues in 2009.[63]
Manyphylogeneticanalyses have foundTarbosaurus bataarto be thesister taxonofT. rex.[60]The discovery of the tyrannosauridLythronaxfurther indicates thatTarbosaurusandTyrannosaurusare closely related, forming a clade with fellow Asian tyrannosauridZhuchengtyrannus,withLythronaxbeing their sister taxon.[64][65]A further study from 2016 by Steve Brusatte, Thomas Carr and colleagues, also indicates thatTyrannosaurusmay have been an immigrant from Asia, as well as a possible descendant ofTarbosaurus.[66]
Below is the cladogram of Tyrannosauridae based on thephylogenetic analysisconducted by Loewen and colleagues in 2013.[64]
In their 2024 description ofTyrannosaurus mcraeensis,Dalmanet al.recovered similar results to previous analyses, withTyrannosaurusas the sister taxon to the clade formed byTarbosaurusandZhuchengtyrannus,called the Tyrannosaurini. They also found support for amonophyleticclade containingDaspletosaurusandThanatotheristes,typically referred to as theDaspletosaurini.[67][68]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional species
In 1955, SovietpaleontologistEvgeny Maleevnamed a new species,Tyrannosaurus bataar,fromMongolia.[69]By 1965, this species was renamed as a distinct genus,Tarbosaurus bataar.[70]While most palaeontologists continue to maintain the two as distinct genera, some authors such asThomas Holtz,Kenneth Carpenter,andThomas Carrargue that the two species are similar enough to be considered members of the same genus, restoring the Mongoliantaxon's originalbinomial name.[49][71][54]
Some specimens from the Late Cretaceous deposits ofChinahave been described as new species ofTyrannosaurus:T. lanpingensisbased on isolatedlateraltooth from the red beds ofYunnanin 1975;T. turpanensisfrom theSubashi Formation,Turpan Basin,Xinjiangin 1978; andT. luanchuanensisfrom theQuiba Formation,Tantou Basin,Henan Provincein 1979–1980.[72][73][74]All these taxa were published without detailed descriptions and were later accepted asjunior synonymsofTarbosaurus bataarby Holtz in 2004.[60][73][74]
VGI, no. 231/3, a largephalanx bone,assigned toTyrannosaurussp. by Yarkov in 2000, was found in the Lower Maastrichtian ofBereslavka, Russia.In 2004, Averianov and Yarkov reinterpreted it as ametacarpalI ormetatarsalI that possibly belongs toceratosaur.[75]In their 2023 overview, Averianov and Lopatin mention this specimen as well as a single tooth from the same site only as Theropoda indet.[76]
In 2001, various tyrannosaurid teeth and a metatarsal unearthed in a quarry nearZhucheng,China were assigned by Chinese paleontologistHu Chengzhito the newly erected speciesTyrannosaurus zhuchengensis.However, in a nearby site, a right maxilla and left jawbone were assigned to the newly erected tyrannosaurid genusZhuchengtyrannusin 2011. It is possible thatT. zhuchengensisissynonymouswithZhuchengtyrannus.In any case,T. zhuchengensisis considered to be anomen dubiumas the holotype lacksdiagnosticfeatures below the level Tyrannosaurinae.[77]
In a 2022 study, Gregory S. Paul and colleagues argued thatTyrannosaurus rex,as traditionally understood, actually represents three species: the type speciesTyrannosaurus rex,and two new species:T. imperator(meaning "tyrant lizard emperor" ) andT. regina(meaning "tyrant lizard queen" ). The holotype of the former (T. imperator) is theSuespecimen, and the holotype of the latter (T. regina) isWankel rex.The division into multiple species was primarily based on the observation of a very high degree of variation in the proportions and robusticity of thefemur(and other skeletal elements) across cataloguedT. rexspecimens, more so than that observed in other theropods recognized as one species. Differences of general body proportions representing robust and gracile morphotypes were also used as a line of evidence, in addition to the number of small, slender incisiform teeth in the dentary, as based on tooth sockets. Specifically, the paper'sT. rexwas distinguished by robust anatomy, a moderate ratio of femur length vs circumference, and the possession of a singular slender incisiform dentary tooth;T. imperatorwas considered to be robust with a small femur length to circumference ratio and two of the slender teeth; andT. reginawas a gracile form with a high femur ratio and one of the slender teeth. It was observed that variation in proportions and robustness became more extreme higher up in the sample,stratigraphically.This was interpreted as a single earlier population,T. imperator,speciating into more than one taxon,T. rexandT. regina.[78]
However, several other leading paleontologists, includingStephen Brusatte,Thomas Carr,Thomas Holtz,David Hone,Jingmai O'Connor,andLindsay Zanno,criticized the study or expressed skepticism of its conclusions when approached by various media outlets for comment.[79][80][81]Their criticism was subsequently published in a technical paper.[82]Holtz and Zanno both remarked that it was plausible that more than one species ofTyrannosaurusexisted, but felt the new study was insufficient to support the species it proposed. Holtz remarked that, even ifTyrannosaurus imperatorrepresented a distinct species fromTyrannosaurus rex,it may represent the same species asNanotyrannus lancensisand would need to be calledTyrannosaurus lancensis.O'Connor, a curator at the Field Museum, where theT. imperatorholotype Sue is displayed, regarded the new species as too poorly-supported to justify modifying the exhibit signs. Brusatte, Carr, and O'Connor viewed the distinguishing features proposed between the species as reflecting natural variation within a species. Both Carr and O'Connor expressed concerns about the study's inability to determine which of the proposed species several well-preserved specimens belonged to. Another paleontologist,Philip J. Currie,originally co-authored the study but withdrew from it as he did not want to be involved in naming the new species.[79]Paul still rejected the objections raised by critics, insisting that they are unwilling to consider thatTyrannosaurusmight represent more than one species.[83]
Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis
In 2024, Dalman and colleaguesdescribedthe remains of a tyrannosaur discovered in 1983 in the Campanian-early MaastrichtianHall Lake Formationin New Mexico. Reposited at theNew Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science,the fossil material (NMMNH P-3698) consists of the rightpostorbital,rightsquamosal,leftpalatine,and an incompletemaxillafrom the skull, the leftdentary,rightsplenial,right prearticular, rightangularand rightarticularfrom the lower jaws, isolated teeth, andchevrons.[67]Some of the bones were briefly mentioned in 1984 as belonging toT. rex,[84]and described in 1986.[85]
Lehman and Carpenter (1990) suggested that NMMNH P-3698 belonged to a new tyrannosaurid genus,[86]while Carr and Williamson (2000) disagreed with their claim.[87]Sullivan and Lucas (2015) argued that there is little evidence to support NMMNH P-3698 as a specimen ofTyrannosaurus rex,so they tentatively classified it as cf.Tyrannosaurussp.; they also considered that the McRae tyrannosaur lived beforeLancian(before 67 million years ago) based on its coexistence withAlamosaurus.[88]
Dalmanet al.(2024) proposed the new nameTyrannosaurus mcraeensisfor the holotype (NMMNH P-3698), referencing the McRae Group, the rock layers to which the Hall Lake Formation belongs. These rock layers were estimated to date to between 72.7 and 70.9 Ma, correlating to the latest Campanian or earliest Maastrichtian.[67]U-Pb zircon age estimates by Schantz and Amato (2024) also support the lateCampanianto earlyMaastrichtianage of the Hall Lake Formation.[89]This is approximately 5–7 million years beforeT. rex,which existed at the end of the Maastrichtian.T. mcraeensiswas estimated at 12 metres (39 ft) long, which is similar to the size of an adultT. rex.The two are distinguished by characters of the skull. Amongst these, the dentary ofT. mcraeensisis proportionately longer and possesses a less prominent chin, and the lower jaw shallower than that ofT. rex,suggesting a weaker bite. The teeth are likewise blunter and more laterally compressed, while the post orbital crests are less prominent. Likewise, the skeletal anatomy showcases shared characteristics withTarbosaurusandZhuchengtyrannus.[67][90]
Nanotyrannus
Other tyrannosaurid fossils found in the same formations asT. rexwere originally classified as separate taxa, includingAublysodonandAlbertosaurus megagracilis,[61]the latter being namedDinotyrannus megagracilisin 1995.[91]These fossils are now universally considered to belong to juvenileT. rex.[92]A small but nearly complete skull from Montana, 60 centimeters (2.0 ft) long, might be an exception. This skull,CMNH7541, was originally classified as a species ofGorgosaurus(G. lancensis) byCharles W. Gilmorein 1946.[93]In 1988, the specimen was re-described byRobert T. Bakker,Phil Currie,and Michael Williams, then the curator of paleontology at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, where the original specimen was housed and is now on display. Their initial research indicated that the skull bones were fused, and that it therefore represented an adult specimen. In light of this, Bakker and colleagues assigned the skull to a new genus namedNanotyrannus(meaning "dwarf tyrant", for its apparently small adult size). The specimen is estimated to have been around 5.2 meters (17 ft) long when it died.[94]However, In 1999, a detailed analysis byThomas Carrrevealed the specimen to be a juvenile, leading Carr and many other paleontologists to consider it a juvenileT. rexindividual.[95][96]
In 2001, a more complete juvenile tyrannosaur (nicknamed "Jane",catalog number BMRP 2002.4.1), belonging to the same species as the originalNanotyrannusspecimen, was uncovered. This discovery prompted a conference on tyrannosaurs focused on the issues ofNanotyrannusvalidity at theBurpee Museum of Natural Historyin 2005. Several paleontologists who had previously published opinions thatN. lancensiswas a valid species, including Currie and Williams, saw the discovery of "Jane" as a confirmation thatNanotyrannuswas, in fact, a juvenileT. rex.[97][98][99]Peter Larsoncontinued to support the hypothesis thatN.lancensiswas a separate but closely related species, based on skull features such as two more teeth in both jaws thanT. rex;as well as proportionately larger hands with phalanges on the third metacarpal and differentwishboneanatomy in an undescribed specimen. He also argued thatStygivenator,generally considered to be a juvenileT. rex,may be a youngerNanotyrannusspecimen.[100][101]Later research revealed that other tyrannosaurids such asGorgosaurusalso experienced reduction in tooth count during growth,[95]and given the disparity in tooth count between individuals of the same age group in this genus andTyrannosaurus,this feature may also be due toindividual variation.[96]In 2013, Carr noted that all of the differences claimed to supportNanotyrannushave turned out to be individually or ontogenetically variable features or products ofdistortion of the bones.[102]
In 2016, analysis of limb proportions by Persons and Currie suggestedNanotyrannusspecimens to have differing cursoriality levels, potentially separating it fromT. rex.[103]However, paleontologist Manabu Sakomoto has commented that this conclusion may be impacted by lowsample size,and the discrepancy does not necessarily reflect taxonomic distinction.[104]In 2016, Joshua Schmerge argued forNanotyrannus' validity based on skull features, including a dentary groove in BMRP 2002.4.1's skull. According to Schmerge, as that feature is absent inT. rexand found only inDryptosaurusand albertosaurines, this suggestsNanotyrannusis a distinct taxon within the Albertosaurinae.[105]The same year, Carr and colleagues noted that this was not sufficient enough to clarifyNanotyrannus' validity or classification, being a common and ontogenetically variable feature among tyrannosauroids.[106]
A 2020 study by Holly Woodward and colleagues showed the specimens referred toNanotyrannuswere all ontogenetically immature and found it probable that these specimens belonged toT. rex.[107]The same year, Carr published a paper onT.rex's growth history, finding that CMNH 7541 fit within the expected ontogenetic variation of the taxon and displayed juvenile characteristics found in other specimens. It was classified as a juvenile, under 13 years old with a skull less than 80 cm (31 in). No significant sexual or phylogenetic variation was discernible among any of the 44 specimens studied, with Carr stating that characters of potential phylogenetic importance decrease throughout age at the same rate as growth occurs.[108]Discussing the paper's results, Carr described how allNanotyrannusspecimens formed a continual growth transition between the smallest juveniles and the subadults, unlike what would be expected if it were a distinct taxon where the specimens would group to the exclusion ofTyrannosaurus.Carr concluded that "the 'nanomorphs' are not all that similar to each other and instead form an important bridge in the growth series ofT. rexthat captures the beginnings of the profound change from the shallow skull of juveniles to the deep skull that is seen in fully-developed adults. "[109]
However, a 2024 paper published by Nick Longrich and Evan Thomas Saitta reexamined the holotype and referred specimens ofNanotyrannus.Based on several factors, including differences in morphology, ontogeny, and phylogeny, Longrich and Saitta suggest thatNanotyrannusis a distinct taxon which may fall outside ofTyrannosauridae,based on some of their phylogenetic analyses.[110]
Paleobiology
Life history
The identification of several specimens as juvenileT. rexhas allowed scientists to documentontogeneticchanges in the species, estimate the lifespan, and determine how quickly the animals would have grown. The smallest known individual (LACM28471, the "Jordan theropod" ) is estimated to have weighed only 30 kg (66 lb), while the largest adults, such asFMNHPR2081 (Sue) most likely weighed about 5,650 kg (12,460 lb).Histologicanalysis ofT. rexbones showed LACM 28471 had aged only 2 years when it died, while Sue was 28 years old, an age which may have been close to the maximum for the species.[40]
Histology has also allowed the age of other specimens to be determined. Growth curves can be developed when the ages of different specimens are plotted on a graph along with their mass. AT. rexgrowth curve is S-shaped, with juveniles remaining under 1,800 kg (4,000 lb) until approximately 14 years of age, when body size began to increase dramatically. During this rapid growth phase, a youngT. rexwould gain an average of 600 kg (1,300 lb) a year for the next four years. At 18 years of age, the curve plateaus again, indicating that growth slowed dramatically. For example, only 600 kg (1,300 lb) separated the 28-year-old Sue from a 22-year-old Canadian specimen (RTMP81.12.1).[40]A 2004 histological study performed by different workers corroborates these results, finding that rapid growth began to slow at around 16 years of age.[111]
A study by Hutchinson and colleagues in 2011 corroborated the previous estimation methods in general, but their estimation of peak growth rates is significantly higher; it found that the "maximum growth rates for T. rex during the exponential stage are 1790 kg/year".[29]Although these results were much higher than previous estimations, the authors noted that these results significantly lowered the great difference between its actual growth rate and the one which would be expected of an animal of its size.[29]The sudden change in growth rate at the end of the growth spurt may indicate physical maturity, a hypothesis which is supported by the discovery of medullary tissue in thefemurof a 16 to 20-year-oldT. rexfrom Montana (MOR1125, also known asB-rex). Medullary tissue is found only in female birds during ovulation, indicating that B-rex was of reproductive age.[112]Further study indicates an age of 18 for this specimen.[113]In 2016, it was finally confirmed by Mary Higby Schweitzer and Lindsay Zanno and colleagues that the soft tissue within the femur of MOR 1125 was medullary tissue. This also confirmed the identity of the specimen as a female. The discovery of medullary bone tissue withinTyrannosaurusmay prove valuable in determining the sex of other dinosaur species in future examinations, as the chemical makeup of medullary tissue is unmistakable.[114]Other tyrannosaurids exhibit extremely similar growth curves, although with lower growth rates corresponding to their lower adult sizes.[115]
An additional study published in 2020 by Woodward and colleagues, for the journalScience Advancesindicates that during their growth from juvenile to adult,Tyrannosauruswas capable of slowing down its growth to counter environmental factors such as lack of food. The study, focusing on two juvenile specimens between 13 and 15 years old housed at the Burpee Museum in Illinois, indicates that the rate of maturation forTyrannosauruswas dependent on resource abundance. This study also indicates that in such changing environments,Tyrannosauruswas particularly well-suited to an environment that shifted yearly in regards to resource abundance, hinting that other midsize predators might have had difficulty surviving in such harsh conditions and explaining the niche partitioning between juvenile and adult tyrannosaurs. The study further indicates thatTyrannosaurusand the dubious genusNanotyrannusare synonymous, due to analysis of the growth rings in the bones of the two specimens studied.[116][117]
Over half of the knownT. rexspecimens appear to have died within six years of reaching sexual maturity, a pattern which is also seen in other tyrannosaurs and in some large, long-lived birds and mammals today. These species are characterized by high infant mortality rates, followed by relatively low mortality among juveniles. Mortality increases again following sexual maturity, partly due to the stresses of reproduction. One study suggests that the rarity of juvenileT. rexfossils is due in part to low juvenile mortality rates; the animals were not dying in large numbers at these ages, and thus were not often fossilized. This rarity may also be due to the incompleteness of thefossil recordor to the bias of fossil collectors towards larger, more spectacular specimens.[115]In a 2013 lecture, Thomas Holtz Jr. suggested that dinosaurs "lived fast and died young" because they reproduced quickly whereas mammals have long life spans because they take longer to reproduce.[118]Gregory S. Paul also writes thatTyrannosaurusreproduced quickly and died young, but attributes their short life spans to the dangerous lives they lived.[119]
Skin and possible filamentous feathering
The discovery offeathered dinosaursled to debate regarding whether, and to what extent,Tyrannosaurusmight have been feathered.[120][121]Filamentous structures, which are commonly recognized as the precursors offeathers,have been reported in the small-bodied, basal tyrannosauroidDilong paradoxusfrom the Early CretaceousYixian Formationof China in 2004.[122]Becauseintegumentaryimpressions of larger tyrannosauroids known at that time showed evidence ofscales,the researchers who studiedDilongspeculated that insulating feathers might have been lost by larger species due to their smaller surface-to-volume ratio.[122]The subsequent discovery of the giant speciesYutyrannus huali,also from the Yixian, showed that even some large tyrannosauroids had feathers covering much of their bodies, casting doubt on the hypothesis that they were a size-related feature.[123]A 2017 study reviewed known skin impressions of tyrannosaurids, including those of aTyrannosaurusspecimen nicknamed "Wyrex" (HMNS 2006.1743.01, formerly known as BHI 6230) which preserves patches of mosaic scales on the tail, hip, and neck.[120]The study concluded that feather covering of large tyrannosaurids such asTyrannosauruswas, if present, limited to the upper side of the trunk.[120]
A conference abstract published in 2016 posited that theropods such asTyrannosaurushad their upper teeth covered in lips, instead of bare teeth as seen incrocodilians.This was based on the presence ofenamel,which according to the study needs to remain hydrated, an issue not faced by aquatic animals like crocodilians.[56]However, there has been criticism where it favors the idea for lips, with the 2017 analytical study proposing that tyrannosaurids had large, flat scales on their snouts instead of lips, as modern crocodiles do.[54][124]But crocodiles possess rather cracked keratinized skin, not flat scales; by observing the hummocky rugosity of tyrannosaurids, and comparing it to extant lizards, researchers have found that tyrannosaurids had squamose scales rather than a crocodillian-like skin.[125][126]
In 2023, Cullen and colleagues supported the idea that theropods like tyrannosaurids had lips based on anatomical patterns, such as those of the foramina on their face and jaws, more similar to those of modernsquamatessuch asmonitor lizardsormarine iguanasthan those of moderncrocodilianslikealligators.By comparatively analysing the dentition ofDaspletosaurusand theAmerican alligator,it was shown that the enamel of tyrannosaurids had no significant wear, while that of modern crocodilians had erosion on the labial side and substantial wear. This suggests that it is likely that theropod teeth existed under hydrated conditions (i.e. extraoral tissues). On the basis of the relationship between hydration and wear resistance, the authors argued that it is unlikely that the teeth of theropods including tyrannosaurids would have remained unworn when exposed for a long time, as it would have been difficult to maintain hydration. The authors also performed regression analyses to demonstrate the relationship between tooth height and skull length, and found thatvaranidslike thecrocodile monitorhad substantially greater tooth height–to–skull length ratios thanTyrannosaurus,indicating that the teeth of theropods were not too big to be covered by extraoral tissues when the mouth was closed.[58]
Sexual dimorphism
As the number of known specimens increased, scientists began to analyze the variation between individuals and discovered what appeared to be two distinct body types, ormorphs,similar to some other theropod species. As one of these morphs was more solidly built, it was termed the 'robust' morph while the other was termed 'gracile'. Severalmorphologicaldifferences associated with the two morphs were used to analyzesexual dimorphisminT. rex,with the 'robust' morph usually suggested to be female. For example, thepelvisof several 'robust' specimens seemed to be wider, perhaps to allow the passage ofeggs.[127]It was also thought that the 'robust' morphology correlated with a reducedchevronon the first tail vertebra, also ostensibly to allow eggs to pass out of thereproductive tract,as had been erroneously reported forcrocodiles.[128]
In recent years, evidence for sexual dimorphism has been weakened. A 2005 study reported that previous claims of sexual dimorphism in crocodile chevron anatomy were in error, casting doubt on the existence of similar dimorphism betweenT. rexsexes.[129]A full-sized chevron was discovered on the first tail vertebra of Sue, an extremely robust individual, indicating that this feature could not be used to differentiate the two morphs anyway. AsT. rexspecimens have been found fromSaskatchewantoNew Mexico,differences between individuals may be indicative of geographic variation rather than sexual dimorphism. The differences could also be age-related, with 'robust' individuals being older animals.[50]
Only a singleTyrannosaurusspecimen has been conclusively shown to belong to a specific sex. Examination of B-rex demonstrated the preservation ofsoft tissuewithin several bones. Some of this tissue has been identified as a medullary tissue, a specialized tissue grown only in modern birds as a source ofcalciumfor the production ofeggshellduringovulation.As only female birds lay eggs, medullary tissue is only found naturally in females, although males are capable of producing it when injected with female reproductivehormoneslikeestrogen.This strongly suggests that B-rex was female and that she died during ovulation.[112]Recent research has shown that medullary tissue is never found in crocodiles, which are thought to be the closest living relatives of dinosaurs. The shared presence of medullary tissue in birds and other theropod dinosaurs is further evidence of the closeevolutionaryrelationship between the two.[130]
Posture
Like manybipedaldinosaurs,T. rexwas historically depicted as a 'living tripod', with the body at 45 degrees or less from the vertical and the tail dragging along the ground, similar to akangaroo.This concept dates fromJoseph Leidy's 1865 reconstruction ofHadrosaurus,the first to depict a dinosaur in a bipedal posture.[131]In 1915, convinced that the creature stood upright,Henry Fairfield Osborn,former president of the American Museum of Natural History, further reinforced the notion in unveiling the first completeT. rexskeleton arranged this way. It stood in an upright pose for 77 years, until it was dismantled in 1992.[132]
By 1970, scientists realized this pose was incorrect and could not have been maintained by a living animal, as it would have resulted in thedislocationor weakening of severaljoints,including the hips and the articulation between the head and thespinal column.[133]The inaccurate AMNH mount inspired similar depictions in many films and paintings (such asRudolph Zallinger's famous muralThe Age of ReptilesinYale University'sPeabody Museum of Natural History)[134]until the 1990s, when films such asJurassic Parkintroduced a more accurate posture to the general public.[135]Modern representations in museums, art, and film showT. rexwith its body approximately parallel to the ground with the tail extended behind the body to balance the head.[136]
To sit down,Tyrannosaurusmay have settled its weight backwards and rested its weight on a pubic boot, the wide expansion at the end of the pubis in some dinosaurs. With its weight rested on the pelvis, it may have been free to move the hindlimbs. Getting back up again might have involved some stabilization from the diminutive forelimbs.[137][133]The latter known as Newman's pushup theory has been debated. Nonetheless,Tyrannosauruswas probably able to get up if it fell, which only would have required placing the limbs below the center of gravity, with the tail as an effective counterbalance. Healed stress fractures in the forelimbs have been put forward both as evidence that the arms cannot have been very useful[138][139]and as evidence that they were indeed used and acquired wounds,[140]like the rest of the body.
Arms
WhenT. rexwas first discovered, thehumeruswas the only element of the forelimb known.[6]For the initial mounted skeleton as seen by the public in 1915, Osborn substituted longer, three-fingered forelimbs like those ofAllosaurus.[4]A year earlier,Lawrence Lambedescribed the short, two-fingered forelimbs of the closely relatedGorgosaurus.[141]This strongly suggested thatT. rexhad similar forelimbs, but thishypothesiswas not confirmed until the first completeT. rexforelimbs were identified in 1989, belonging to MOR 555 (the "Wankel rex" ).[142][143]The remains of Sue also include complete forelimbs.[50]T. rexarms are very small relative to overall body size, measuring only 1 meter (3.3 ft) long, and some scholars have labelled them asvestigial.However, the bones show large areas formuscleattachment, indicating considerable strength. This was recognized as early as 1906 by Osborn, who speculated that the forelimbs may have been used to grasp a mate duringcopulation.[8]Newman (1970) suggested that the forelimbs were used to assistTyrannosaurusin rising from a prone position.[133]Since then, other functions have been proposed, although some scholars find them implausible.[139]Padian(2022) argued that the reduction of the arms in tyrannosaurids did not serve a particular function but was a secondary adaptation, stating that as tyrannosaurids developed larger and more powerful skulls and jaws, the arms got smaller to avoid being bitten or torn by other individuals, particularly during group feedings.[139]
Another possibility is that the forelimbs held struggling prey while it was killed by the tyrannosaur's enormous jaws. This hypothesis may be supported bybiomechanicalanalysis.T. rexforelimb bones exhibit extremely thickcortical bone,which has been interpreted as evidence that they were developed to withstand heavy loads. Thebiceps brachiimuscle of an adultT. rexwas capable of lifting 199 kilograms (439 lb) by itself; other muscles such as thebrachialiswould work along with the biceps to make elbow flexion even more powerful. TheM. bicepsmuscle ofT. rexwas 3.5 times as powerful as thehuman equivalent.AT. rexforearm had a limited range of motion, with the shoulder and elbow joints allowing only 40 and 45 degrees of motion, respectively. In contrast, the same two joints inDeinonychusallow up to 88 and 130 degrees of motion, respectively, while a human arm can rotate 360 degrees at the shoulder and move through 165 degrees at the elbow. The heavy build of the arm bones, strength of the muscles, and limited range of motion may indicate a system evolved to hold fast despite the stresses of a struggling prey animal. In the first detailed scientific description ofTyrannosaurusforelimbs, paleontologists Kenneth Carpenter and Matt Smith dismissed notions that the forelimbs were useless or thatTyrannosauruswas an obligate scavenger.[144]
The idea that the arms served as weapons when hunting prey have also been proposed bySteven M. Stanley,who suggested that the arms were used for slashing prey, especially by using the claws to rapidly inflict long, deep gashes to its prey.[145]This was dismissed by Padian, who argued that Stanley based his conclusion on incorrectly estimated forelimb size and range of motion.[139]
Thermoregulation
Tyrannosaurus,like most dinosaurs, was long thought to have anectothermic( "cold-blooded" ) reptilianmetabolism.The idea of dinosaur ectothermy was challenged by scientists likeRobert T. BakkerandJohn Ostromin the early years of the "Dinosaur Renaissance",beginning in the late 1960s.[146][147]T. rexitself was claimed to have beenendothermic( "warm-blooded" ), implying a very active lifestyle.[38]Since then, several paleontologists have sought to determine the ability ofTyrannosaurustoregulateits body temperature. Histological evidence of high growth rates in youngT. rex,comparable to those of mammals and birds, may support the hypothesis of a high metabolism. Growth curves indicate that, as in mammals and birds,T. rexgrowth was limited mostly to immature animals, rather than theindeterminate growthseen in most othervertebrates.[111]
Oxygen isotoperatios in fossilized bone are sometimes used to determine the temperature at which the bone was deposited, as the ratio between certain isotopes correlates with temperature. In one specimen, the isotope ratios in bones from different parts of the body indicated a temperature difference of no more than 4 to 5 °C (7 to 9 °F) between the vertebrae of the torso and thetibiaof the lower leg. This small temperature range between the body core and the extremities was claimed by paleontologist Reese Barrick andgeochemistWilliam Showers to indicate thatT. rexmaintained a constant internal body temperature (homeothermy) and that it enjoyed a metabolism somewhere between ectothermic reptiles and endothermic mammals.[148]Other scientists have pointed out that the ratio of oxygen isotopes in the fossils today does not necessarily represent the same ratio in the distant past, and may have been altered during or after fossilization (diagenesis).[149]Barrick and Showers have defended their conclusions in subsequent papers, finding similar results in another theropod dinosaur from a different continent and tens of millions of years earlier in time (Giganotosaurus).[150]Ornithischiandinosaurs also showed evidence of homeothermy, whilevaranidlizardsfrom the same formation did not.[151]In 2022, Wiemann and colleagues used a different approach—thespectroscopyof lipoxidation signals, which are byproducts ofoxidative phosphorylationand correlate with metabolic rates—to show that various dinosaur genera includingTyrannosaurushad endothermic metabolisms, on par with that of modern birds and higher than that of mammals. They also suggested that such a metabolism was ancestrally common to all dinosaurs.[152]
Even ifT. rexdoes exhibit evidence of homeothermy, it does not necessarily mean that it was endothermic. Such thermoregulation may also be explained bygigantothermy,as in some livingsea turtles.[153][154][155]Similar to contemporary crocodilians, openings (dorsotemporal fenestrae) in the skull roofs ofTyrannosaurusmay have aided thermoregulation.[156]
Soft tissue
In the March 2005 issue ofScience,Mary Higby SchweitzerofNorth Carolina State Universityand colleagues announced the recovery of soft tissue from the marrow cavity of a fossilized leg bone from aT. rex.The bone had been intentionally, though reluctantly, broken for shipping and then not preserved in the normal manner, specifically because Schweitzer was hoping to test it for soft tissue.[157]Designated as the Museum of the Rockies specimen 1125, or MOR 1125, the dinosaur was previously excavated from theHell Creek Formation.Flexible, bifurcatingblood vesselsand fibrous but elasticbonematrix tissue were recognized. In addition, microstructures resemblingblood cellswere found inside the matrix and vessels. The structures bear resemblance toostrichblood cells and vessels. Whether an unknown process, distinct from normal fossilization, preserved the material, or the material is original, the researchers do not know, and they are careful not to make any claims about preservation.[158]If it is found to be original material, any surviving proteins may be used as a means of indirectly guessing some of the DNA content of the dinosaurs involved, because each protein is typically created by a specific gene. The absence of previous finds may be the result of people assuming preserved tissue was impossible, therefore not looking. Since the first, two more tyrannosaurs and a hadrosaur have also been found to have such tissue-like structures.[157]Research on some of the tissues involved has suggested that birds are closer relatives to tyrannosaurs than other modern animals.[159]The original endogenous chemistry was also found in MOR 1125 based on preservation of elements associated with bone remodeling and redeposition (sulfur, calcium, zinc), which showed that the bone cortices are similar to those of extant birds.[160]
In studies reported inSciencein April 2007, Asara and colleagues concluded that seven traces ofcollagenproteins detected in purifiedT. rexbone most closely match those reported inchickens,followed by frogs and newts. The discovery of proteins from a creature tens of millions of years old, along with similar traces the team found in a mastodon bone at least 160,000 years old, upends the conventional view of fossils and may shift paleontologists' focus from bone hunting to biochemistry. Until these finds, most scientists presumed that fossilization replaced all living tissue with inert minerals. Paleontologist Hans Larsson of McGill University in Montreal, who was not part of the studies, called the finds "a milestone", and suggested that dinosaurs could "enter the field of molecular biology and really slingshot paleontology into the modern world".[161]
The presumed soft tissue was called into question by Thomas Kaye of theUniversity of Washingtonand his co-authors in 2008. They contend that what was really inside the tyrannosaur bone was slimybiofilmcreated by bacteria that coated the voids once occupied by blood vessels and cells.[162]The researchers found that what previously had been identified as remnants of blood cells, because of the presence of iron, were actuallyframboids,microscopic mineral spheres bearing iron. They found similar spheres in a variety of other fossils from various periods, including anammonite.In the ammonite, they found the spheres in a place where the iron they contain could not have had any relationship to the presence of blood.[163]Schweitzer has strongly criticized Kaye's claims and argues that there is no reported evidence that biofilms can produce branching, hollow tubes like those noted in her study.[164]San Antonio, Schweitzer and colleagues published an analysis in 2011 of what parts of the collagen had been recovered, finding that it was the inner parts of the collagen coil that had been preserved, as would have been expected from a long period of protein degradation.[165]Other research challenges the identification of soft tissue as biofilm and confirms finding "branching, vessel-like structures" from within fossilized bone.[166]
Speed
Scientists have produced a wide range of possible maximum running speeds forTyrannosaurus:mostly around 9 meters per second (32 km/h; 20 mph), but as low as 4.5–6.8 meters per second (16–24 km/h; 10–15 mph) and as high as 20 meters per second (72 km/h; 45 mph), though it running this speed is very unlikely.Tyrannosauruswas a bulky and heavy carnivore so it is unlikely to run very fast at all compared to other theropods likeCarnotaurusorGiganotosaurus.[167]Researchers have relied on various estimating techniques because, while there are manytracksof large theropods walking, none showed evidence of running.[168]
A 2002 report used a mathematical model (validated by applying it to three living animals:alligators,chickens,andhumans;and eight more species, including emus and ostriches[168]) to gauge the leg muscle mass needed for fast running (over 40 km/h or 25 mph).[167]Scientists who think thatTyrannosauruswas able to run point out that hollow bones and other features that would have lightened its body may have kept adult weight to a mere 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons) or so, or that other animals likeostrichesandhorseswith long, flexible legs are able to achieve high speeds through slower but longer strides.[168]Proposed top speeds exceeded 40 kilometers per hour (25 mph) forTyrannosaurus,but were deemed infeasible because they would require exceptional leg muscles of approximately 40–86% of total body mass. Even moderately fast speeds would have required large leg muscles. If the muscle mass was less, only 18 kilometers per hour (11 mph) for walking or jogging would have been possible.[167]Holtz noted that tyrannosaurids and some closely related groups had significantly longerdistalhindlimb components (shin plus foot plus toes) relative to the femur length than most other theropods, and that tyrannosaurids and their close relatives had a tightly interlockedmetatarsus(foot bones).[169]The third metatarsal was squeezed between the second and fourth metatarsals to form a single unit called anarctometatarsus.This ankle feature may have helped the animal to run more efficiently.[170]Together, these leg features allowedTyrannosaurusto transmit locomotory forces from the foot to the lower leg more effectively than in earlier theropods.[169]
Additionally, a 2020 study indicates thatTyrannosaurusand other tyrannosaurids were exceptionally efficient walkers. Studies by Dececchiet al.,compared the leg proportions, body mass, and the gaits of more than 70 species of theropod dinosaurs includingTyrannosaurusand its relatives. The research team then applied a variety of methods to estimate each dinosaur's top speed when running as well as how much energy each dinosaur expended while moving at more relaxed speeds such as when walking. Among smaller to medium-sized species such as dromaeosaurids, longer legs appear to be an adaptation for faster running, in line with previous results by other researchers. But for theropods weighing over 1,000 kg (2,200 lb), top running speed is limited by body size, so longer legs instead were found to have correlated with low-energy walking. The results further indicate that smaller theropods evolved long legs as a means to both aid in hunting and escape from larger predators while larger theropods that evolved long legs did so to reduce the energy costs and increase foraging efficiency, as they were freed from the demands of predation pressure due to their role as apex predators. Compared to more basal groups of theropods in the study, tyrannosaurs likeTyrannosaurusitself showed a marked increase in foraging efficiency due to reduced energy expenditures during hunting or scavenging. This in turn likely resulted in tyrannosaurs having a reduced need for hunting forays and requiring less food to sustain themselves as a result. Additionally, the research, in conjunction with studies that show tyrannosaurs were more agile than other large-bodied theropods, indicates they were quite well-adapted to a long-distance stalking approach followed by a quick burst of speed to go for the kill. Analogies can be noted between tyrannosaurids and modern wolves as a result, supported by evidence that at least some tyrannosaurids were hunting in group settings.[171][172]
A study published in 2021 by Pasha van Bijlertet al.,calculated thepreferred walking speedofTyrannosaurus,reporting a speed of 1.28 meters per second (4.6 km/h; 2.9 mph). While walking, animals reduce theirenergy expenditureby choosing certain step rhythms at which their body partsresonate.The same would have been true fordinosaurs,but previous studies did not fully account for the impact the tail had on their walking speeds. According to the authors, when a dinosaur walked, its tail would slightly sway up and down with each step as a result of theinterspinous ligamentssuspending the tail. Like rubber bands, these ligaments stored energy when they are stretched due to the swaying of the tail. Using a 3-D model ofTyrannosaurusspecimenTrix,muscles and ligaments were reconstructed to simulate the tail movements. This results in a rhythmic, energy-efficient walking speed forTyrannosaurussimilar to that seen in living animals such as humans, ostriches and giraffes.[173]
A 2017 study estimated the top running speed ofTyrannosaurusas 17 mph (27 km/h), speculating thatTyrannosaurusexhausted its energy reserves long before reaching top speed, resulting in a parabola-like relationship between size and speed.[174][175]Another 2017 study hypothesized that an adultTyrannosauruswas incapable of running due to high skeletal loads. Using a calculated weight estimate of 7 tons, the model showed that speeds above 11 mph (18 km/h) would have probably shattered the leg bones ofTyrannosaurus.The finding may mean that running was also not possible for other giant theropod dinosaurs likeGiganotosaurus,MapusaurusandAcrocanthosaurus.[176] However, studies by Eric Snively and colleagues,published in 2019 indicate thatTyrannosaurusand other tyrannosaurids were more maneuverable than allosauroids and other theropods of comparable size due to low rotational inertia compared to their body mass combined with large leg muscles. As a result, it is hypothesized thatTyrannosauruswas capable of making relatively quick turns and could likely pivot its body more quickly when close to its prey, or that while turning, the theropod could "pirouette" on a single planted foot while the alternating leg was held out in a suspended swing during a pursuit. The results of this study potentially could shed light on how agility could have contributed to the success of tyrannosaurid evolution.[177]
Possible footprints
Rare fossil footprints and trackways found in New Mexico and Wyoming that are assigned to the ichnogenusTyrannosauripushave been attributed to being made byTyrannosaurus,based on the stratigraphic age of the rocks they are preserved in. The first specimen, found in 1994 was described by Lockley and Hunt and consists of a single, large footprint. Another pair of ichnofossils, described in 2021, show a large tyrannosaurid rising from a prone position by rising up using its elbows in conjunction with the pads on their feet to stand. These two unique sets of fossils were found in Ludlow, Colorado and Cimarron, New Mexico.[178]Another ichnofossil described in 2018, perhaps belonging to a juvenileTyrannosaurusor the dubious genusNanotyrannuswas uncovered in the Lance Formation of Wyoming. The trackway itself offers a rare glimpse into the walking speed of tyrannosaurids, and the trackmaker is estimated to have been moving at a speed of 4.5–8.0 kilometers per hour (2.8–5.0 mph), significantly faster than previously assumed for estimations of walking speed in tyrannosaurids.[179][180]
Brain and senses
A study conducted byLawrence Witmerand Ryan Ridgely of Ohio University found thatTyrannosaurusshared the heightened sensory abilities of othercoelurosaurs,highlighting relatively rapid and coordinated eye and head movements; an enhanced ability to sense low frequency sounds, which would allow tyrannosaurs to track prey movements from long distances; and an enhanced sense of smell.[181]A study published by Kent Stevens concluded thatTyrannosaurushad keen vision. By applying modifiedperimetryto facial reconstructions of several dinosaurs includingTyrannosaurus,the study found thatTyrannosaurushad a binocular range of 55 degrees, surpassing that of modern hawks. Stevens estimated thatTyrannosaurushad 13 times the visual acuity of a human and surpassed the visual acuity of an eagle, which is 3.6 times that of a person. Stevens estimated a limiting far point (that is, the distance at which an object can be seen as separate from the horizon) as far as 6 km (3.7 mi) away, which is greater than the 1.6 km (1 mi) that a human can see.[44][45][182]
Thomas Holtz Jr. would note that high depth perception ofTyrannosaurusmay have been due to the prey it had to hunt, noting that it had to hunt ceratopsians such asTriceratops,ankylosaurs such asAnkylosaurus,and hadrosaurs. He would suggest that this made precision more crucial forTyrannosaurusenabling it to, "get in, get that blow in and take it down." In contrast,Acrocanthosaurushad limited depth perception because they hunted large sauropods, which were relatively rare during the time ofTyrannosaurus.[118]
Though noTyrannosaurussclerotic ringhas been found,Kenneth Carpenterestimated its size based on that ofGorgosaurus.The inferred sclerotic ring for theStan specimenis ~7 cm (2.8 in) in diameter with an internal aperture diameter of ~3.5 cm (1.4 in). Based on eye proportions in living reptiles, this implies a pupil diameter of about 2.5 cm (0.98 in), an iris diameter about that of the sclerotic ring, and an eyeball diameter of 11–12 cm (4.3–4.7 in). Carpenter also estimated an eyeball depth of ~7.7–9.6 cm (3.0–3.8 in). Based on these calculations, thef-numberfor Stan's eye is 3–3.8; sincediurnalanimals have f-numbers of 2.1 or higher, this would indicate thatTyrannosaurushad poor low-light vision and hunted during the day.[183]
Tyrannosaurushad very largeolfactory bulbsandolfactory nervesrelative to their brain size, the organs responsible for a heightened sense of smell. This suggests that the sense of smell was highly developed, and implies that tyrannosaurs could detect carcasses by scent alone across great distances. The sense of smell in tyrannosaurs may have been comparable to modernvultures,which use scent to track carcasses for scavenging. Research on the olfactory bulbs has shown thatT. rexhad the most highly developed sense of smell of 21 sampled non-avian dinosaur species.[184]
Somewhat unusually among theropods,T. rexhad a very longcochlea.The length of the cochlea is often related to hearing acuity, or at least the importance of hearing in behavior, implying that hearing was a particularly important sense to tyrannosaurs. Specifically, data suggests thatT. rexheard best in the low-frequency range, and that low-frequency sounds were an important part of tyrannosaur behavior.[181]A 2017 study by Thomas Carr and colleagues found that the snout of tyrannosaurids was highly sensitive, based on a high number of small openings in the facial bones of the relatedDaspletosaurusthat containedsensory neurons.The study speculated that tyrannosaurs might have used their sensitive snouts to measure the temperature of their nests and to gently pick up eggs and hatchlings, as seen in modern crocodylians.[54] Another study published in 2021 further suggests thatTyrannosaurushad an acute sense of touch, based on neurovascular canals in the front of its jaws, which it could utilize to better detect and consume prey. The study, published by Kawabe and Hittoriet al.,suggests thatTyrannosauruscould also accurately sense slight differences in material and movement, allowing it to utilize different feeding strategies on different parts of its prey's carcasses depending on the situation. The sensitive neurovascular canals ofTyrannosaurusalso likely were adapted to performing fine movements and behaviors such as nest building, parental care, and other social behavior such as intraspecific communication. The results of this study also align with results made in studying the related tyrannosauridDaspletosaurus horneriand theallosauroidNeovenator,which have similar neurovascular adaptations, suggesting that the faces of theropods were highly sensitive to pressure and touch.[185][186]However, a more recent study reviewing the evolution of the trigeminal canals among sauropsids notes that a much denser network of neurovascular canals in the snout and lower jaw is more commonly encountered in aquatic or semiaquatic taxa (e.g.,Spinosaurus,Halszkaraptor,Plesiosaurus), and taxa that developed a rhamphotheca (e.g.,Caenagnathasia), while the network of canals inTyrannosaurusappears simpler, though still more derived than in most ornithischians, and overall terrestrial taxa such as tyrannosaurids andNeovenatormay have had average facial sensitivity for non-edentulous terrestrial theropods, although further research is needed. The neurovascular canals inTyrannosaurusmay instead have supported soft tissue structures for thermoregulation or social signaling, the latter of which could be confirmed by the fact that the neurovascular network of canals may have changed during ontogeny.[187]
A study by Grant R. Hurlburt, Ryan C. Ridgely and Lawrence Witmer obtained estimates forEncephalization Quotients(EQs), based on reptiles and birds, as well as estimates for the ratio of cerebrum to brain mass. The study concluded thatTyrannosaurushad the relatively largest brain of all adult non-avian dinosaurs with the exception of certain small maniraptoriforms (Bambiraptor,TroodonandOrnithomimus). The study found thatTyrannosaurus's relative brain size was still within the range of modern reptiles, being at most 2standard deviationsabove the mean of non-avian reptile EQs. The estimates for the ratio of cerebrum mass to brain mass would range from 47.5 to 49.53 percent. According to the study, this is more than the lowest estimates for extant birds (44.6 percent), but still close to the typical ratios of the smallest sexually mature alligators which range from 45.9–47.9 percent.[188]Other studies, such as those by Steve Brusatte, indicate the encephalization quotient ofTyrannosauruswas similar in range (2.0–2.4) to achimpanzee(2.2–2.5), though this may be debatable as reptilian and mammalian encephalization quotients are not equivalent.[189]
Social behavior
Philip J. Curriesuggested that Tyrannosaurus may have beenpack hunters,comparingT. rexto related speciesTarbosaurus bataarandAlbertosaurus sarcophagus,citing fossil evidence that may indicategregarious(describing animals that travel in herds or packs) behavior.[190]A find inSouth Dakotawhere threeT. rexskeletons were in close proximity may suggest the formation of a pack.[191][192]Cooperative pack hunting may have been an effective strategy for subduing prey with advancedanti-predator adaptationswhich pose potential lethality such asTriceratopsandAnkylosaurus.[190]
Currie's pack-huntingT. rexhypothesis has been criticized for not having beenpeer-reviewed,but rather was discussed in a television interview and book calledDino Gangs.[193]The Currie theory for pack hunting byT. rexis based mainly by analogy to a different species,Tarbosaurus bataar.Evidence of gregariousness inT. bataaritself has not been peer-reviewed, and to Currie's own admission, can only be interpreted with reference to evidence in other closely related species. According to Currie gregariousness inAlbertosaurus sarcophagusis supported by the discovery of 26 individuals with varied ages in the Dry Island bonebed. He ruled out the possibility of a predator trap due to the similar preservation state of individuals and the near absence of herbivores.[193][194]
Additional support of tyrannosaurid gregariousness can be found in fossilizedtrackwaysfrom the Upper CretaceousWapiti Formationof northeasternBritish Columbia,Canada, left by three tyrannosaurids traveling in the same direction.[195][196]According to scientists assessing the Dino Gangs program, the evidence for pack hunting inTarbosaurusandAlbertosaurusis weak and based on group skeletal remains for which alternate explanations may apply (such as drought or a flood forcing dinosaurs to die together in one place).[193]Others researchers have speculated that instead of large theropod social groups, some of these finds represent behavior more akin toKomodo dragon-like mobbing of carcasses, even going as far as to say true pack-hunting behavior may not exist in any non-avian dinosaurs due to its rarity in modern predators.[197]
Evidence of intraspecific attack was found by Joseph Peterson and his colleagues in the juvenileTyrannosaurusnicknamedJane.Peterson and his team found that Jane's skull showed healed puncture wounds on the upper jaw and snout which they believe came from another juvenileTyrannosaurus.Subsequent CT scans of Jane's skull would further confirm the team's hypothesis, showing that the puncture wounds came from a traumatic injury and that there was subsequent healing.[198]The team would also state that Jane's injuries were structurally different from the parasite-induced lesions found in Sue and that Jane's injuries were on its face whereas the parasite that infected Sue caused lesions to the lower jaw.[199]Pathologies of otherTyrannosaurusspecimens have been suggested as evidence of conspecific attack, including "Wyrex" with a hole penetrating its jugual and severe trauma on its tail that shows signs ofbone remodeling(not regrowth).[200][201]
Feeding strategies
Most paleontologists accept thatTyrannosauruswas both an activepredatorand ascavengerlike most largecarnivores.[202]By far the largest carnivore in its environment,T. rexwas most likely anapex predator,preying uponhadrosaurs,armored herbivores likeceratopsiansandankylosaurs,and possiblysauropods.[203]A study in 2012 by Karl Bates and Peter Falkingham found thatTyrannosaurushad the most powerful bite of any terrestrial animal that has ever lived, finding an adultTyrannosauruscould have exerted 35,000 to 57,000N(7,868 to 12,814lbf) of force in the back teeth.[204][205][206]Even higher estimates were made by Mason B. Meers in 2003.[47]This allowed it to crush bones during repetitive biting and fully consume the carcasses of large dinosaurs.[21]Stephan Lautenschlager and colleagues calculated thatTyrannosauruswas capable of a maximum jaw gape of around 80 degrees, a necessary adaptation for a wide range of jaw angles to power the creature's strong bite.[207][208]
A debate exists, however, about whetherTyrannosauruswas primarily apredatoror a purescavenger.The debate originated in a 1917 study by Lambe which argued that large theropods were pure scavengers becauseGorgosaurusteeth showed hardly any wear.[209]This argument disregarded the fact that theropods replaced their teeth quite rapidly. Ever since the first discovery ofTyrannosaurusmost scientists have speculated that it was a predator; like modern large predators it would readily scavenge or steal another predator's kill if it had the opportunity.[210]
PaleontologistJack Hornerhas been a major proponent of the view thatTyrannosauruswas not a predator at all but instead was exclusively a scavenger.[142][211][212]He has put forward arguments in the popular literature to support the pure scavenger hypothesis:
- Tyrannosaur arms are short when compared to other known predators. Horner argues that the arms were too short to make the necessary gripping force to hold on to prey.[213]Other paleontologists such asThomas Holtz Jr.argued that there are plenty of modern-day predators that do not use their forelimbs to hunt such aswolves,hyenas,andsecretary birdsas well as other extinct animals thought to be predators that would not have used their forelimbs such asphorusrhacids.[214][215]
- Tyrannosaurs had largeolfactory bulbsandolfactory nerves(relative to their brain size). These suggest a highly developed sense of smell which could sniff out carcasses over great distances, as modernvulturesdo. Research on the olfactory bulbs of dinosaurs has shown thatTyrannosaurushad the most highly developed sense of smell of 21 sampled dinosaurs.[184]
- Tyrannosaur teeth could crush bone, and therefore could extract as much food (bone marrow) as possible from carcass remnants, usually the least nutritious parts. Karen Chin and colleagues have found bone fragments incoprolites(fossilized feces) that they attribute to tyrannosaurs, but point out that a tyrannosaur's teeth were not well adapted to systematically chewing bone likehyenasdo to extract marrow.[216]
- Since at least some ofTyrannosaurus's potential prey could move quickly, evidence that it walked instead of ran could indicate that it was a scavenger.[211]On the other hand, recent analyses suggest thatTyrannosaurus,while slower than large modern terrestrial predators, may well have been fast enough to prey on largehadrosaursandceratopsians.[167][24]
Other evidence suggests hunting behavior inTyrannosaurus.The eye sockets of tyrannosaurs are positioned so that the eyes would point forward, giving thembinocular visionslightly better than that of modernhawks.It is not obvious whynatural selectionwould have favored this long-term trend if tyrannosaurs had been pure scavengers, which would not have needed the advanceddepth perceptionthatstereoscopic visionprovides.[44][45]In modern animals, binocular vision is found mainly in predators.
A skeleton of the hadrosauridEdmontosaurusannectenshas been described from Montana with healed tyrannosaur-inflicted damage on its tailvertebrae.The fact that the damage seems to have healed suggests that theEdmontosaurussurvived a tyrannosaur's attack on a living target, i.e. the tyrannosaur had attempted active predation.[217]Despite the consensus that the tail bites were caused byTyrannosaurus,there has been some evidence to show that they might have been created by other factors. For example, a 2014 study suggested that the tail injuries might have been due toEdmontosaurusindividuals stepping on each other,[218]while another study in 2020 backs up the hypothesis that biomechanical stress is the cause for the tail injuries.[219]There is also evidence for an aggressive interaction between aTriceratopsand aTyrannosaurusin the form of partially healed tyrannosaur tooth marks on aTriceratopsbrow horn andsquamosal(a bone of theneck frill); the bitten horn is also broken, with new bone growth after the break. It is not known what the exact nature of the interaction was, though: either animal could have been the aggressor.[220]Since theTriceratopswounds healed, it is most likely that theTriceratopssurvived the encounter and managed to overcome theTyrannosaurus.In a battle against a bullTriceratops,theTriceratopswould likely defend itself by inflicting fatal wounds to theTyrannosaurususing its sharp horns.[221]Studies ofSuefound a broken and healedfibulaand tail vertebrae, scarred facial bones and a tooth from anotherTyrannosaurusembedded in a neck vertebra, providing evidence for aggressive behavior.[222]Studies on hadrosaur vertebrae from the Hell Creek Formation that were punctured by the teeth of what appears to be a late-stage juvenileTyrannosaurusindicate that despite lacking the bone-crushing adaptations of the adults, young individuals were still capable of using the same bone-puncturing feeding technique as their adult counterparts.[223]
Tyrannosaurusmay have had infectioussalivaused to kill its prey, as proposed byWilliam Ablerin 1992. Abler observed that theserrations(tiny protuberances) on the cutting edges of the teeth are closely spaced, enclosing little chambers. These chambers might have trapped pieces of carcass with bacteria, givingTyrannosaurusa deadly, infectious bite much like theKomodo dragonwas thought to have.[224][225]Jack Horner and Don Lessem, in a 1993 popular book, questioned Abler's hypothesis, arguing thatTyrannosaurus's tooth serrations as more like cubes in shape than the serrations on a Komodo monitor's teeth, which are rounded.[142]: 214–215
Tyrannosaurus,and most other theropods, probably primarily processed carcasses with lateral shakes of the head, like crocodilians. The head was not as maneuverable as the skulls ofallosauroids,due to flat joints of the neck vertebrae.[226]
Cannibalism
Evidence also strongly suggests that tyrannosaurs were at least occasionally cannibalistic.Tyrannosaurusitself has strong evidence pointing towards it having been cannibalistic in at least a scavenging capacity based on tooth marks on the foot bones, humerus, and metatarsals of one specimen.[227]Fossils from theFruitland Formation,Kirtland Formation(both Campanian in age) and the Maastrichtian agedOjo Alamo Formationsuggest that cannibalism was present in various tyrannosaurid genera of the San Juan Basin. The evidence gathered from the specimens suggests opportunistic feeding behavior in tyrannosaurids that cannibalized members of their own species.[228]A study from Currie, Horner, Erickson and Longrich in 2010 has been put forward as evidence of cannibalism in the genusTyrannosaurus.[227]They studied someTyrannosaurusspecimens with tooth marks in the bones, attributable to the same genus. The tooth marks were identified in thehumerus,foot bones andmetatarsals,and this was seen as evidence for opportunistic scavenging, rather than wounds caused by intraspecific combat. In a fight, they proposed it would be difficult to reach down to bite in the feet of a rival, making it more likely that the bitemarks were made in a carcass. As the bitemarks were made in body parts with relatively scantly amounts of flesh, it is suggested that theTyrannosauruswas feeding on a cadaver in which the more fleshy parts already had been consumed. They were also open to the possibility that othertyrannosauridspracticed cannibalism.[227]
Parenting
While there is no direct evidence ofTyrannosaurusraising their young (the rarity of juvenile and nest Tyrannosaur fossils has left researchers guessing), it has been suggested by some that like its closest living relatives, modern archosaurs (birds and crocodiles)Tyrannosaurusmay have protected and fed its young. Crocodilians and birds are often suggested by some paleontologists to be modern analogues for dinosaur parenting.[229]Direct evidence of parental behavior exists in other dinosaurs such asMaiasaura peeblesorum,the first dinosaur to have been discovered to raise its young, as well as more closely relatedOviraptorids,the latter suggesting parental behavior in theropods.[230][231][232][233][234]
Pathology
In 2001, Bruce Rothschild and others published a study examining evidence forstress fracturesandtendon avulsionsintheropoddinosaurs and the implications for their behavior. Since stress fractures are caused by repeated trauma rather than singular events they are more likely to be caused by regular behavior than other types of injuries. Of the 81Tyrannosaurusfoot bones examined in the study, one was found to have a stress fracture, while none of the 10 hand bones were found to have stress fractures. The researchers found tendon avulsions only amongTyrannosaurusandAllosaurus.An avulsion injury left a divot on the humerus of Sue theT. rex,apparently located at the origin of thedeltoidorteres majormuscles. The presence of avulsion injuries being limited to the forelimb and shoulder in bothTyrannosaurusandAllosaurussuggests that theropods may have had a musculature more complex than and functionally different from those of birds. The researchers concluded that Sue's tendon avulsion was probably obtained from struggling prey. The presence of stress fractures and tendon avulsions, in general, provides evidence for a "very active" predation-based diet rather than obligate scavenging.[235]
A 2009 study showed that smooth-edged holes in the skulls of several specimens might have been caused byTrichomonas-like parasites that commonly infectbirds.According to the study, seriously infected individuals, including "Sue" and MOR 980 ( "Peck's Rex" ), might therefore have died from starvation after feeding became increasingly difficult. Previously, these holes had been explained by the bacterious bone infectionActinomycosisor by intraspecific attacks.[236]A subsequent study found that while trichomoniasis has many attributes of the model proposed (osteolytic, intra oral) several features make the assumption that it was the cause of death less supportable by evidence. For example, the observed sharp margins with little reactive bone shown by the radiographs ofTrichomonas-infected birds are dissimilar to the reactive bone seen in the affectedT. rexspecimens. Also, trichomoniasis can be very rapidly fatal in birds (14 days or less) albeit in its milder form, and this suggests that if aTrichomonas-like protozoan is the culprit, trichomoniasis was less acute in its non-avian dinosaur form during the Late Cretaceous. Finally, the relative size of this type of lesions is much larger in small bird throats, and may not have been enough to choke aT. rex.[237]A more recent study examining the pathologies concluded that the osseous alteration observed most closely resembles those around healing human cranial trepanations and healing fractures in the Triassic reptileStagonolepis,in the absence of infection. The possible cause may instead have been intraspecific combat.[238]
One study ofTyrannosaurusspecimens with tooth marks in the bones attributable to the same genus was presented as evidence ofcannibalism.[227]Tooth marks in thehumerus,foot bones andmetatarsals,may indicate opportunistic scavenging, rather than wounds caused by combat with anotherT. rex.[227][239]Othertyrannosauridsmay also have practiced cannibalism.[227]
Paleoecology
Tyrannosauruslived during what is referred to as theLancianfaunal stage (Maastrichtianage) at the end of the Late Cretaceous.Tyrannosaurusranged fromCanadain the north to at least New Mexico in the south ofLaramidia.[5]During this timeTriceratopswas the major herbivore in the northern portion of its range, while thetitanosauriansauropodAlamosaurus"dominated" its southern range.Tyrannosaurusremains have been discovered in different ecosystems, including inland and coastal subtropical, and semi-arid plains.
Several notableTyrannosaurusremains have been found in theHell Creek Formation.During the Maastrichtian this area wassubtropical,with a warm and humid climate. The flora consisted mostly ofangiosperms,but also included trees like dawn redwood (Metasequoia) andAraucaria.Tyrannosaurusshared this ecosystem withceratopsiansLeptoceratops,Torosaurus,andTriceratops,the hadrosauridEdmontosaurus annectens,theparksosauridThescelosaurus,theankylosaursAnkylosaurusandDenversaurus,thepachycephalosaursPachycephalosaurusandSphaerotholus,and the theropodsOrnithomimus,Struthiomimus,Acheroraptor,Dakotaraptor,PectinodonandAnzu.[240]
Another formation withTyrannosaurusremains is theLance Formationof Wyoming. This has been interpreted as abayouenvironment similar to today's Gulf Coast. The fauna was very similar to Hell Creek, but withStruthiomimusreplacing its relativeOrnithomimus.The small ceratopsianLeptoceratopsalso lived in the area.[241]
In its southern range, specifically based on remains discovered from theNorth Horn FormationofUtah,Tyrannosaurus rexlived alongside thetitanosaurAlamosaurus,theceratopsidTorosaurusand the indeterminatetroodontidsandhadrosaurids.[242][243]Tyrannosaurus mcraeensisfrom theMcRae GroupofNew Mexicocoexisted with theceratopsidSierraceratopsand possibly the titanosaurAlamosaurus.[67]Potential remains identified as cf.Tyrannosaurushave also been discovered from theJavelina FormationofTexas,[67]where the remains of the titanosaurAlamosaurus,the ceratopsidBravoceratops,thepterosaursQuetzalcoatlusandWellnhopterus,and possible species of troodontids and hadrosaurids are found.[244][245][246]Its southern range is thought to have been dominated by semi-arid inland plains, following the probable retreat of theWestern Interior Seawayas global sea levels fell.[247]
Tyrannosaurusmay have also inhabited Mexico'sLomas Coloradas Formationin Sonora. Though skeletal evidence is lacking, six shed and broken teeth from the fossil bed have been thoroughly compared with other theropod genera and appear to be identical to those ofTyrannosaurus.If true, the evidence indicates the range ofTyrannosauruswas possibly more extensive than previously believed.[248]It is possible that tyrannosaurs were originally Asian species, migrating to North America before the end of the Cretaceous period.[249]
Population estimates
According to studies published in 2021 by Charles Marshallet al.,the total population of adultTyrannosaurusat any given time was perhaps 20,000 individuals, with computer estimations also suggesting a total population no lower than 1,300 and no higher than 328,000. The authors themselves suggest that the estimate of 20,000 individuals is probably lower than what should be expected, especially when factoring in that disease pandemics could easily wipe out such a small population. Over the span of the genus' existence, it is estimated that there were about 127,000 generations and that this added up to a total of roughly 2.5 billion animals until their extinction.[250][251]
In the same paper, it is suggested that in a population ofTyrannosaurusadults numbering 20,000, the number of individuals living in an area the size of California could be as high as 3,800 animals, while an area the size of Washington D.C. could support a population of only two adultTyrannosaurus.The study does not take into account the number of juvenile animals in the genus present in this population estimate due to their occupation of a different niche than the adults, and thus it is likely the total population was much higher when accounting for this factor. Simultaneously, studies of living carnivores suggest that some predator populations are higher in density than others of similar weight (such as jaguars and hyenas, which are similar in weight but have vastly differing population densities). Lastly, the study suggests that in most cases, only one in 80 millionTyrannosauruswould become fossilized, while the chances were likely as high as one in every 16,000 of an individual becoming fossilized in areas that had more dense populations.[250][251]
Meiri (2022) questioned the reliability of the estimates, citing uncertainty in metabolic rate, body size, sex and age-specific survival rates, habitat requirements and range size variability as shortcomings Marshallet al.did not take into account.[252]The authors of the original publication replied that while they agree that their reported uncertainties were probably too small, their framework is flexible enough to accommodate uncerainty in physiology, and that their calculations do not depend on short-term changes in population density and geographic range, but rather on their long-term averages. Finally, they remark that they did estimate the range of reasonable survivorship curves and that they did include uncertainty in the time of onset of sexual maturity and in the growth curve by incorporating the uncertainty in the maximum body mass.[253]
Cultural significance
Since it was first described in 1905,T. rexhas become the most widely recognized dinosaur species inpopular culture.It is the only dinosaur that is commonly known to the general public by its full scientific name (binomial name) and the scientific abbreviationT. rexhas also come into wide usage.[50]Robert T. Bakkernotes this inThe Dinosaur Heresiesand explains that, "a name like'T. rex'is just irresistible to the tongue. "[38]
See also
- History of paleontology
- Sue (dinosaur)(FMNH-PR-2081)
- Tyrannosauridae
Notes
- ^lit. 'tyrant lizard';fromAncient Greekτύραννος(túrannos)'tyrant', andσαῦρος(saûros)'lizard'
References
- ^"The Colorado Transcript". July 8, 1874 – via www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org.
- ^abBreithaupt, B. H.; Southwell, E. H.; Matthews, N. A. (October 15, 2005)."In Celebration of 100 years ofTyrannosaurus rex:Manospondylus gigas,Ornithomimus grandis,andDynamosaurus imperiosus,the Earliest Discoveries ofTyrannosaurus rexin the West ".Abstracts with Programs; 2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting.37(7).Geological Society of America:406.ISSN0016-7592.Archived fromthe originalon May 30, 2012.RetrievedOctober 8,2008.
- ^Hatcher, J. B. (1907)."The Ceratopsia".Monographs of the United States Geological Survey.49:113–114.ISSN0886-7550.
- ^abOsborn, H. F.(1917). "Skeletal adaptations ofOrnitholestes,Struthiomimus,Tyrannosaurus".Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.35(43): 733–771.hdl:2246/1334.
- ^abcdefLarson, N. L. (2008). "One hundred years ofTyrannosaurus rex:the skeletons ". In Larson, P.; Carpenter, K. (eds.).Tyrannosaurus rex,The Tyrant King.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. pp.1–55.ISBN978-0-253-35087-9.
- ^abcdOsborn, H. F.(1905). "Tyrannosaurusand other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs ".Bulletin of the AMNH.21(14): 259–265.hdl:2246/1464.Retrieved October 6, 2008.
- ^abDingus, L.; Norell, M. (May 3, 2010).Barnum Brown: The Man Who DiscoveredTyrannosaurus rex.University of California Press. pp.90,124.ISBN978-0-520-94552-4.
- ^abOsborn, H. F.;Brown, B.(1906). "Tyrannosaurus,Upper Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaur ".Bulletin of the AMNH.22(16): 281–296.hdl:2246/1473.
- ^Breithaupt, B. H.; Southwell, E. H.; Matthews, N. A. (2006). Lucas, S. G.; Sullivan, R. M. (eds.)."Dynamosaurus imperiosusand the earliest discoveries ofTyrannosaurus rexin Wyoming and the West "(PDF).New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin.35:258.
The original skeleton ofDynamosaurus imperiosus(AMNH 5866/BM R7995), together with otherT. rexmaterial (including parts of AMNH 973, 5027, and 5881), were sold to the British Museum of Natural History (now The Natural History Museum) in 1960. This material was used in an interesting 'half-mount' display of this dinosaur in London. Currently the material resides in the research collections.
- ^McDonald, A. T.; Wolfe, D. G.; Dooley, A. C. Jr. (2018)."A new tyrannosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous Menefee Formation of New Mexico".PeerJ.6:6:e5749.doi:10.7717/peerj.5749.PMC6183510.PMID30324024.
- ^Small, Zachary (October 7, 2020)."T. Rex Skeleton Brings $31.8 Million at Christie's Auction".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on October 7, 2020.RetrievedMay 5,2021.
- ^"Preparing Sue's bones".Sue at the Field Museum.The Field Museum. 2007.RetrievedOctober 24,2014.
- ^Erickson, G.; Makovicky, P. J.; Currie, P. J.; Norell, M.; Yerby, S.; Brochu, C. A. (May 26, 2004)."Gigantism and life history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs"(PDF).Nature.430(7001): 772–775.Bibcode:2004Natur.430..772E.doi:10.1038/nature02699.PMID15306807.S2CID4404887.(Erratum:doi:10.1038/nature16487,PMID26675726,Retraction Watch)
- ^"Stan".The University of Manchester.September 18, 2010. Archived fromthe originalon September 18, 2010.
- ^Fiffer, S. (2000). "Jurassic Farce".TyrannosaurusSue.W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. pp.121–122.ISBN978-0-7167-4017-9.
- ^"Meet Bucky The Teenage T. Rex".Children's Museum of Indianapolis.July 7, 2014.Archivedfrom the original on December 27, 2014.RetrievedDecember 2,2019.
- ^"Dig pulls up five T. rex specimens".BBC News.October 10, 2000.RetrievedDecember 13,2008.
- ^abCurrie, P. J.; Hurum, J. H.; Sabath, K. (2003)."Skull structure and evolution in tyrannosaurid dinosaurs"(PDF).Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.48(2): 227–234.RetrievedOctober 8,2008.
- ^Black, Riley (October 28, 2015)."Tiny terror: Controversial dinosaur species is just an awkward tweenTyrannosaurus".Smithsonian Magazine.RetrievedDecember 10,2018.
- ^ab"Museum unveils world's largestT-rexskull ".2006. Archived fromthe originalon April 14, 2006.RetrievedApril 7,2006.
- ^abGignac, P. M.; Erickson, G. M. (2017)."The biomechanics behind extreme osteophagy inTyrannosaurus rex".Scientific Reports.7(1): 2012.Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.2012G.doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02161-w.PMC5435714.PMID28515439.
- ^Lockley, M. G.; Hunt, A. P. (1994). "A track of the giant theropod dinosaurTyrannosaurusfrom close to the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, northern New Mexico ".Ichnos.3(3): 213–218.Bibcode:1994Ichno...3..213L.doi:10.1080/10420949409386390.
- ^"A Probable Tyrannosaurid Track From the Hell Creek Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Montana, United States".National Museum of History News.2007. Archived fromthe originalon December 14, 2007.RetrievedDecember 18,2007.
- ^abManning, P. L.; Ott, C.; Falkingham, P. L. (2009). "The first tyrannosaurid track from the Hell Creek Formation (Late Cretaceous), Montana, U.S.A".PALAIOS.23(10): 645–647.Bibcode:2008Palai..23..645M.doi:10.2110/palo.2008.p08-030r.S2CID129985735.
- ^Smith, S. D.; Persons, W. S.; Xing, L. (2016)."A" Tyrannosaur "trackway at Glenrock, Lance Formation (Maastrichtian), Wyoming".Cretaceous Research.61(1): 1–4.Bibcode:2016CrRes..61....1S.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2015.12.020.
- ^Perkins, S. (2016)."You could probably have outrun aT. rex".Palaeontology.doi:10.1126/science.aae0270.
- ^Walton, T. (2016)."Forget all you know from Jurassic Park: For speed,T. rexbeatsvelociraptors ".USA Today.RetrievedMarch 13,2016.
- ^Ruiz, J. (2017). "Comments on" A tyrannosaur trackway at Glenrock, Lance Formation (Maastrichtian), Wyoming "(Smithet al.,Cretaceous Research,v. 61, pp. 1–4, 2016) ".Cretaceous Research.82:81–82.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2017.05.033.
- ^abcdHutchinson, J. R.; Bates, K. T.; Molnar, J.; Allen, V.; Makovicky, P. J. (2011)."A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth".PLOS ONE.6(10): e26037.Bibcode:2011PLoSO...626037H.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.PMC3192160.PMID22022500.
- ^Holtz, T. R. (2011)."Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages, Winter 2011 Appendix"(PDF).RetrievedJanuary 13,2012.
- ^ab"Sue Fact Sheet"(PDF).Sue at the Field Museum.Field Museum of Natural History.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on August 18, 2016.
- ^"How well do you know SUE?".Field Museum of Natural History. August 11, 2016.RetrievedDecember 31,2018.
- ^"Sue the T. Rex".Field Museum.February 5, 2018.RetrievedJuly 20,2018.
- ^abPersons, S. W.; Currie, P. J.; Erickson, G. M. (2019)."An Older and Exceptionally Large Adult Specimen ofTyrannosaurus rex".The Anatomical Record.303(4): 656–672.doi:10.1002/ar.24118.ISSN1932-8486.PMID30897281.
- ^Hartman, Scott (July 7, 2013)."Mass estimates: North vs South redux".Scott Hartman's Skeletal Drawing.com.Archivedfrom the original on October 12, 2013.RetrievedAugust 24,2013.
- ^Lyle, A. (March 22, 2019)."Paleontologists identify biggestTyrannosaurus rexever discovered ".Folio, University of Alberta.RetrievedMarch 25,2019.
- ^Anderson, J. F.; Hall-Martin, A. J.;Russell, D.(1985). "Long bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs".Journal of Zoology.207(1): 53–61.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04915.x.
- ^abcBakker, R. T.(1986).The Dinosaur Heresies.New York: Kensington Publishing. p.241.ISBN978-0-688-04287-5.OCLC13699558.
- ^Henderson, D. M. (January 1, 1999)."Estimating the masses and centers of mass of extinct animals by 3-D mathematical slicing".Paleobiology.25(1): 88–106.
- ^abcErickson, G. M.; Makovicky, P. J.;Currie, P. J.;Norell, M. A.; Yerby, S. A.; Brochu, C. A. (2004)."Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs"(PDF).Nature.430(7001): 772–775.Bibcode:2004Natur.430..772E.doi:10.1038/nature02699.PMID15306807.S2CID4404887.(Erratum:doi:10.1038/nature16487,PMID26675726,Retraction Watch)
- ^Farlow, J. O.; Smith, M. B.; Robinson, J. M. (1995)."Body mass, bone 'strength indicator', and cursorial potential ofTyrannosaurus rex".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.15(4): 713–725.Bibcode:1995JVPal..15..713F.doi:10.1080/02724634.1995.10011257.Archived fromthe originalon October 23, 2008.
- ^Seebacher, F. (2001)."A new method to calculate allometric length–mass relationships of dinosaurs"(PDF).Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.21(1): 51–60.CiteSeerX10.1.1.462.255.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0051:ANMTCA]2.0.CO;2.S2CID53446536.
- ^Christiansen, P.; Fariña, R. A. (2004). "Mass prediction in theropod dinosaurs".Historical Biology.16(2–4): 85–92.Bibcode:2004HBio...16...85C.doi:10.1080/08912960412331284313.S2CID84322349.
- ^abcStevens, Kent A. (June 2006). "Binocular vision in theropod dinosaurs".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.26(2): 321–330.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[321:BVITD]2.0.CO;2.S2CID85694979.
- ^abcJaffe, E. (July 1, 2006)."Sight for 'Saur Eyes:T. rexvision was among nature's best ".Science News.170(1): 3–4.doi:10.2307/4017288.JSTOR4017288.Archived fromthe originalon September 29, 2012.RetrievedOctober 6,2008.
- ^Snively, E.; Henderson, D. M.; Phillips, D. S. (2006)."Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics"(PDF).Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.51(3): 435–454.RetrievedOctober 8,2008.
- ^abMeers, M. B. (August 2003). "Maximum bite force and prey size ofTyrannosaurus rexand their relationships to the inference of feeding behavior ".Historical Biology.16(1): 1–12.doi:10.1080/0891296021000050755.S2CID86782853.
- ^Erickson, G. M.; Van Kirk, S. D.; Su, J.; Levenston, M. E.; Caler, W. E.; Carter, D. R. (1996)."Bite-force estimation forTyrannosaurus rexfrom tooth-marked bones ".Nature.382(6593): 706–708.Bibcode:1996Natur.382..706E.doi:10.1038/382706a0.S2CID4325859.
- ^abcHoltz, T. R.(1994). "The Phylogenetic Position of the Tyrannosauridae: Implications for Theropod Systematics".Journal of Paleontology.68(5): 1100–1117.Bibcode:1994JPal...68.1100H.doi:10.1017/S0022336000026706.JSTOR1306180.S2CID129684676.
- ^abcdefghijklmnBrochu, C. R. (2003). "Osteology ofTyrannosaurus rex:insights from a nearly complete skeleton and high-resolution computed tomographic analysis of the skull ".Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoirs.7:1–138.doi:10.2307/3889334.JSTOR3889334.
- ^Smith, J. B. (December 1, 2005). "Heterodonty inTyrannosaurus rex:implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions ".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.25(4): 865–887.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0865:HITRIF]2.0.CO;2.S2CID86184190.
- ^Douglas, K.; Young, S. (1998)."The dinosaur detectives".New Scientist.RetrievedOctober 16,2008.
One palaeontologist memorably described the huge, curved teeth of T. rex as 'lethal bananas'
- ^"Sue's vital statistics".Sue at the Field Museum.Field Museum of Natural History.Archived fromthe originalon September 29, 2007.RetrievedSeptember 15,2007.
- ^abcdCarr, T. D.; Varricchio, D. J.; Sedlmayr, J. C.; Roberts, E. M.; Moore, J. R. (March 30, 2017)."A new tyrannosaur with evidence for anagenesis and crocodile-like facial sensory system".Scientific Reports.7:44942.Bibcode:2017NatSR...744942C.doi:10.1038/srep44942.ISSN2045-2322.PMC5372470.PMID28358353.
- ^Morhardt, Ashley (2009).Dinosaur smiles: Do the texture and morphology of the premaxilla, maxilla, and dentary bones of sauropsids provide osteological correlates for inferring extra-oral structures reliably in dinosaurs?(MSc thesis). Western Illinois University.
- ^abReisz, R. R.; Larson, D. (2016)."Dental anatomy and skull length to tooth size ratios support the hypothesis that theropod dinosaurs had lips".4th Annual Meeting, 2016, Canadian Society of Vertebrate Palaeontology.ISSN2292-1389.
- ^MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE MONTEVIALE CROCODYLIANS (OLIGOCENE, ITALY).2018. p. 67.RetrievedOctober 9,2020.
- ^abCullen, Thomas M.; Larson, Derek W.; Witton, Mark P.; Scott, Diane; Maho, Tea; Brink, Kirstin S.; Evans, David C.; Reisz, Robert (March 31, 2023)."Theropod dinosaur facial reconstruction and the importance of soft tissues in paleobiology".Science.379(6639): 1348–1352.Bibcode:2023Sci...379.1348C.doi:10.1126/science.abo7877.ISSN0036-8075.PMID36996202.S2CID257836765.
- ^Lipkin, C.; Carpenter, K. (2008). "Looking again at the forelimb ofTyrannosaurus rex".In Carpenter, K.; Larson, P. E. (eds.).Tyrannosaurus rex,the Tyrant King.Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp.167–190.ISBN978-0-253-35087-9.
- ^abcHoltz, T. R. Jr.(2004). "Tyrannosauroidea". InWeishampel, D. B.;Dodson, P.;Osmólska, H.(eds.).The dinosauria.Berkeley: University of California Press. pp.111–136.ISBN978-0-520-24209-8.
- ^abPaul, Gregory S.(1988).Predatory dinosaurs of the world: a complete illustrated guide.New York: Simon and Schuster. p.228.ISBN978-0-671-61946-6.OCLC18350868.
- ^Brusatte, Stephen L.; Norell, Mark A.; Carr, Thomas D.; Erickson, Gregory M.; Hutchinson, John R.; Balanoff, Amy M.; Bever, Gabe S.; Choiniere, Jonah N.; Makovicky, Peter J.; Xu, Xing (September 17, 2010)."Tyrannosaur Paleobiology: New Research on Ancient Exemplar Organisms".Science.329(5998): 1481–1485.Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1481B.doi:10.1126/science.1193304.ISSN0036-8075.PMID20847260.
- ^Li, Daqing; Norell, Mark A.; Gao, Ke-Qin; Smith, Nathan D.; Makovicky, Peter J. (2009)."A longirostrine tyrannosauroid from the Early Cretaceous of China".Proc Biol Sci.277(1679): 183–190.doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0249.PMC2842666.PMID19386654.
- ^abLoewen, M. A.; Irmis, R. B.; Sertich, J. J. W.;Currie, P. J.;Sampson, S. D.(2013).Evans, D. C(ed.)."Tyrant Dinosaur Evolution Tracks the Rise and Fall of Late Cretaceous Oceans".PLoS ONE.8(11): e79420.Bibcode:2013PLoSO...879420L.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079420.PMC3819173.PMID24223179.
- ^Vergano, D. (November 7, 2013)."Newfound" King of Gore "Dinosaur Ruled Before T. Rex".National Geographic.Archived fromthe originalon November 8, 2013.RetrievedNovember 10,2017.
- ^Geggel, L. (February 29, 2016)."T. RexWas Likely an Invasive Species ".Live Science.RetrievedNovember 10,2017.
- ^abcdefDalman, Sebastian G.; Loewen, Mark A.; Pyron, R. Alexander; Jasinski, Steven E.; Malinzak, D. Edward; Lucas, Spencer G.; Fiorillo, Anthony R.; Currie, Philip J.; Longrich, Nicholas R. (January 11, 2024)."A giant tyrannosaur from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of southern North America and the evolution of tyrannosaurid gigantism".Scientific Reports.13(1): 22124.doi:10.1038/s41598-023-47011-0.ISSN2045-2322.PMC10784284.PMID38212342.
- ^Scherer, Charlie Roger; Voiculescu-Holvad, Christian (2024)."Re-analysis of a dataset refutes claims of anagenesis withinTyrannosaurus-line tyrannosaurines (Theropoda, Tyrannosauridae) ".Cretaceous Research.155.105780.Bibcode:2024CrRes.15505780S.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105780.ISSN0195-6671.
- ^Maleev, E. A. (1955)."(title in Russian)"[Gigantic carnivorous dinosaurs of Mongolia](PDF).Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR(in Russian).104(4). translated by F. J. Alcock: 634–637.
- ^Rozhdestvensky, A. K. (1965). "Growth changes in Asian dinosaurs and some problems of their taxonomy".Paleontological Journal.3:95–109.
- ^Carpenter, K.(1992). "Tyrannosaurids (Dinosauria) of Asia and North America". In Mateer, N. J.; Chen, P.-j. (eds.).Aspects of nonmarine Cretaceous geology.Beijing: China Ocean Press. pp. 250–268.ISBN978-7-5027-1463-5.OCLC28260578.
- ^Hurum, J.H., Sabath, K. (2003)."Giant theropod dinosaurs from Asia and North America: Skulls ofTarbosaurus bataarandTyrannosaurus rexcompared "(PDF).Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.48(2): 161–190. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on May 17, 2023.
{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^abLi Feng, Bi Shundong, Michael Pittman, Stephen L. Brusatte, Xu Xing (2016)."A new tyrannosaurine specimen (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea) with insect borings from the Upper Cretaceous Honglishan Formation of Northwestern China".Cretaceous Research.66:155–162.Bibcode:2016CrRes..66..155L.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2016.06.002.hdl:20.500.11820/a49b0878-3ba2-4c3e-b4b1-70fe282e43ea.
{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^abSebastian G. Dalman, Spencer G. Lucas (January 2018)."Tyrannosaurid dinosaurs (Theropoda: Tyrannosauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous (Early Campanian) Allison Member of the Menefee Formation, New Mexico: Implications for the origin of Tyrannosauridae in North America".Fossil Record.New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin.6(79): 99–112.
- ^A. O. Averianov, A. A. Yarkov (2004)."Carnivorous dinosaurs (Saurischia, Theropoda) from the Maastrichtian of the Volga-Don Interfluve, Russia"(PDF).Paleontological Journal.38(1): 78–82.Archived(PDF)from the original on March 5, 2024.
- ^A. O. Averianov, A. V. Lopatin (2023)."Динозавры России: обзор местонахождений [Dinosaurs of Russia: Overview of locations]"(PDF).Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk(in Russian).93(4): 342–354.doi:10.31857/S0869587323040023.Archived(PDF)from the original on February 16, 2024.
- ^Hone, D. W. E.; Wang, K.; Sullivan, C.; Zhao, X.; Chen, S.; Li, D.; Ji, S.; Ji, Q.; Xu, X. (2011). "A new, large tyrannosaurine theropod from the Upper Cretaceous of China".Cretaceous Research.32(4): 495–503.Bibcode:2011CrRes..32..495H.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2011.03.005.
- ^Paul, Gregory S.; Persons IV, W. Scott; van Raalte, Jay (2022)."The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Morphological and Stratigraphic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Speciation Within the North American Genus Tyrannosaurus".Evolutionary Biology.49(2): 156–179.Bibcode:2022EvBio..49..156P.doi:10.1007/s11692-022-09561-5.S2CID247200214.
- ^abElbein, Asher (February 28, 2022)."They Want to Break T. Rex Into 3 Species. Other Paleontologists Aren't Pleased".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on March 1, 2022.RetrievedMarch 1,2022.
- ^Hunt, Katie (March 1, 2022)."Tyrannosaurus rex may have been misunderstood".CNN.
- ^Greshko, Michael (March 1, 2022)."Call to split T. rex into 3 species sparks fierce debate".National Geographic.Archived fromthe originalon March 1, 2022.
- ^Carr, T.D.; Napoli, J.G.; Brusatte, S.L.; Holtz, T.R.; Hone, D.W.E.; Williamson, T.E.; Zanno, L.E. (2022)."Insufficient Evidence for Multiple Species ofTyrannosaurusin the Latest Cretaceous of North America: A Comment on "The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Morphological and Stratigraphic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Speciation Within the North American GenusTyrannosaurus"".Evolutionary Biology.49(3): 314–341.Bibcode:2022EvBio..49..327C.doi:10.1007/s11692-022-09573-1.
- ^Osborne M."Study Refutes Controversial Research That Divided the T. Rex Into Three Species".Smithsonian Magazine July 27, 2022
- ^Lozinsky, Richard P.; Hunt, Adrian P.; Wolberg, Donald L.; Lucas, Spencer G. (1984)."Late Cretaceous (Lancian) dinosaurs from the McRae Formation, Sierra County, New Mexico"(PDF).New Mexico Geology.6(4): 72–77.doi:10.58799/NMG-v6n4.72.ISSN0196-948X.S2CID237011797.
- ^Gillette, David D.; Wolberg, Donald L.; Hunt, Adrian P. (1986)."Tyrannosaurus rexfrom the McRae Formation (Lancian, Upper Cretaceous), Elephant Butte reservoir, Sierra County, New Mexico "(PDF).New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook.37:235–238.doi:10.56577/FFC-37.235.S2CID251985284.
- ^Lehman, Thomas M.;Carpenter, Kenneth(1990)."A partial skeleton of the tyrannosaurid dinosaurAublysodonfrom the Upper Cretaceous of New Mexico ".Journal of Paleontology.64(6): 1026–1032.Bibcode:1990JPal...64.1026L.doi:10.1017/S0022336000019843.JSTOR1305741.S2CID132662000.
- ^Carr, Thomas D.; Williamson, Thomas E. (2000)."A review of Tyrannosauridae (Dinosauria: Coelurosauria) from New Mexico".Bulletin.17.New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science:113–145.
- ^Sullivan, Robert M.; Lucas, Spencer G. (2015)."Cretaceous Vertebrates of New Mexico".New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin.68.
- ^Schantz, Emma E.; Amato, Jeffrey M. (2024). "Age Constraints on Late Cretaceous Dinosaurs: Geochronologic and Stratigraphic Analysis of the McRae Formation within the Laramide Love Ranch Basin, New Mexico".New Mexico Geological Society.New Mexico Geological Society, 2024 Annual Spring Meeting, Proceedings Volume, Theme: "The Energy Transition in New Mexico".doi:10.56577/SM-2024.3002.
- ^Elbein, Asher (January 11, 2024)."New Origin Story forTyrannosaurus RexSuggested by Fossil - Researchers say the species they namedTyrannosaurus mcraeensispredated the dinosaur era's great predator ".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on January 12, 2024.RetrievedJanuary 12,2024.
- ^Olshevsky, G. (1995). "The origin and evolution of the tyrannosaurids".Kyoryugaku Saizensen [Dino Frontline].9–10:92–119.
- ^Carr, T. D.; Williamson, T. E. (2004)."Diversity of late Maastrichtian Tyrannosauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from western North America".Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.142(4): 479–523.doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00130.x.
- ^Gilmore, C. W. (1946). "A new carnivorous dinosaur from the Lance Formation of Montana".Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections.106:1–19.
- ^Bakker, R.T.; Williams, M.; Currie, P.J. (1988). "Nanotyrannus,a new genus of pygmy tyrannosaur, from the latest Cretaceous of Montana ".Hunteria.1:1–30.
- ^abCarr, T.D. (1999)."Craniofacial ontogeny in Tyrannosauridae (Dinosauria, Coelurosauria)".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.19(3): 497–520.Bibcode:1999JVPal..19..497C.doi:10.1080/02724634.1999.10011161.S2CID83744433.
- ^abTsuihiji, T.; Watabe, M.; Tsogtbaatar, K.; Tsubamoto, T.; Barsbold, R.; Suzuki, S.; Lee, A.H.; Ridgely, R.C.; Kawahara, Y.; Witmer, L.M. (2011). "Cranial osteology of a juvenile specimen ofTarbosaurus bataarfrom the Nemegt Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Bugin Tsav, Mongolia ".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.31(3): 497–517.Bibcode:2011JVPal..31..497T.doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.557116.S2CID15369707.
- ^Currie, P.J. (2003a). "Cranial anatomy of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada".Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.48:191–226.
- ^Currie, Henderson, Horner and Williams (2005). "On tyrannosaur teeth, tooth positions and the taxonomic status ofNanotyrannus lancensis."In" The origin, systematics, and paleobiology of Tyrannosauridae ", a symposium hosted jointly by Burpee Museum of Natural History and Northern Illinois University.
- ^Henderson (2005). "Nano No More: The death of the pygmy tyrant." In "The origin, systematics, and paleobiology of Tyrannosauridae", a symposium hosted jointly by Burpee Museum of Natural History and Northern Illinois University.
- ^Larson (2005). "A case forNanotyrannus."In" The origin, systematics, and paleobiology of Tyrannosauridae ", a symposium hosted jointly by Burpee Museum of Natural History and Northern Illinois University.
- ^Larson P (2013), "The validity of Nanotyrannus Lancensis (Theropoda, Lancian – Upper Maastrichtian of North America)", Society of Vertebrate Paleontology: 73rd annual meeting,Abstracts with Programs,p. 159.
- ^D. Carr, Thomas (September 15, 2013)."Nanotyrannus isn't real, really".Tyrannosauroidea Central.RetrievedMay 28,2019.
- ^Persons, W. S.; Currie, P. J. (2016)."An approach to scoring cursorial limb proportions in carnivorous dinosaurs and an attempt to account for allometry".Scientific Reports.6.19828.Bibcode:2016NatSR...619828P.doi:10.1038/srep19828.PMC4728391.PMID26813782.
- ^"Hind limb proportions do not support the validity of Nanotyrannus".mambobob-raptorsnest.blogspot.com.
- ^Schmerge, Joshua D.; Rothschild, Bruce M. (2016). "Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988".Cretaceous Research.61:26–33.Bibcode:2016CrRes..61...26S.doi:10.1016/J.CRETRES.2015.12.016.S2CID85736236.
- ^Brusatte, Stephen L.; Carr, Thomas D.; Williamson, Thomas E.; Holtz, Thomas R.; Hone, David W.E.; Williams, Scott A. (2016)."Dentary groove morphology does not distinguish 'Nanotyrannus' as a valid taxon of tyrannosauroid dinosaur. Comment on:" Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988 ""(PDF).Cretaceous Research.65:232–237.Bibcode:2016CrRes..65..232B.doi:10.1016/J.CRETRES.2016.02.007.hdl:20.500.11820/f1e76074-47eb-4c25-b4c1-a3782551fd5a.S2CID56090258.
- ^Woodward, Holly N.; Tremaine, Katie; Williams, Scott A.; Zanno, Lindsay E.; Horner, John R.; Myhrvold, Nathan (2020)."Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy" Nanotyrannus "and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenileTyrannosaurus".Science Advances.6(1): eaax6250.Bibcode:2020SciA....6.6250W.doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax6250.ISSN2375-2548.PMC6938697.PMID31911944.
- ^Carr, T.D. (2020)."A high-resolution growth series ofTyrannosaurus rexobtained from multiple lines of evidence ".PeerJ.8:e9192.doi:10.7717/peerj.9192.
- ^Carr, T.D. (June 5, 2020)."A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence–Author Dr. Thomas D. Carr discusses his new study".PeerJblog.RetrievedJune 10,2020.
- ^Longrich, Nicholas R.; Saitta, Evan T. (March 1, 2024)."Taxonomic Status ofNanotyrannus lancensis(Dinosauria: Tyrannosauroidea)—A Distinct Taxon of Small-Bodied Tyrannosaur ".Fossil Studies.2(1): 1–65.doi:10.3390/fossils2010001.eISSN2813-6284.
- ^abHorner, J. R.; Padian, K. (2004)."Age and growth dynamics of Tyrannosaurus rex".Proceedings: Biological Sciences.271(1551): 1875–80.doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2829.PMC1691809.PMID15347508.
- ^abSchweitzer, M. H.; Wittmeyer, J. L.; Horner, J. R. (2005)."Gender-specific reproductive tissue in ratites andTyrannosaurus rex"(PDF).Science.308(5727): 1456–60.Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1456S.doi:10.1126/science.1112158.PMID15933198.S2CID30264554.
- ^Lee, A. H.; Werning, S. (2008)."Sexual maturity in growing dinosaurs does not fit reptilian growth models".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.105(2): 582–587.Bibcode:2008PNAS..105..582L.doi:10.1073/pnas.0708903105.PMC2206579.PMID18195356.
- ^Schweitzer, M. H.; Zheng, W.; Zanno, L.; Werning, S.; Sugiyama, T. (2016)."Chemistry supports the identification of gender-specific reproductive tissue in Tyrannosaurus rex".Scientific Reports.6(23099): 23099.Bibcode:2016NatSR...623099S.doi:10.1038/srep23099.PMC4791554.PMID26975806.
- ^abErickson, G. M.; Currie, P. J.; Inouye, B. D.; Winn, A. A. (2006). "Tyrannosaur life tables: an example of nonavian dinosaur population biology".Science.313(5784): 213–7.Bibcode:2006Sci...313..213E.doi:10.1126/science.1125721.PMID16840697.S2CID34191607.
- ^Woodward, Holly N; Tremaine, Katie; Williams, Scott A; Zanno, Lindsay E; Horner, John R; Myhrvold, Nathan (January 1, 2020)."Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy" Nanotyrannus "and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus".Science Advances.6(1): eaax6250.Bibcode:2020SciA....6.6250W.doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax6250.PMC6938697.PMID31911944.
- ^Greshko, Michael (January 1, 2020)."These sleek predatory dinosaurs really are teenage T. rex".National Geographic.Archived fromthe originalon January 1, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 2,2020.
- ^abHoltz, T. R. Jr. (March 19, 2013) [Lecture held March 8, 2013].The Life and Times of Tyrannosaurus rex, with Dr. Thomas Holtz(Lecture). Seattle, WA:Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture.Archivedfrom the original on December 11, 2021.RetrievedOctober 12,2013.
- ^Paul, G. S. (2008)."Chapter 18: The Extreme Life Style and Habits of the Gigantic Tyrannosaurid Superpredators of the Cretaceous North America and Asia".In Larson, P. L.; Carpenter, K. (eds.).Tyrannosaurus,The Tyrant King.Indiana University Press. pp. 307–345.ISBN978-0-253-35087-9.RetrievedSeptember 14,2013.
- ^abcBell, P. R.; Campione, N. E.; Persons IV, W. S.; Currie, P. J.; Larson, P. L.; Tanke, D. H.; Bakker, R. T. (2017)."Tyrannosauroid integument reveals conflicting patterns of gigantism and feather evolution".Biology Letters.13(6): 20170092.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2017.0092.PMC5493735.PMID28592520.
- ^Farago, J. (March 7, 2019)."T. Rex Like You Haven't Seen Him: With Feathers".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on March 8, 2019.RetrievedMarch 7,2019.
- ^abXing, X.; Norell, M. A.; Kuang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Jia, C. (October 7, 2004)."Basal tyrannosauroids from China and evidence for protofeathers in tyrannosauroids"(PDF).Nature.431(7009): 680–684.Bibcode:2004Natur.431..680X.doi:10.1038/nature02855.PMID15470426.S2CID4381777.
- ^Xing, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang; Ma, Q.; Xing, L.; Sullivan, C.; Hu, D.; Cheng, S.; Wang, S. (April 5, 2012)."A gigantic feathered dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of China"(PDF).Nature.484(7392): 92–95.Bibcode:2012Natur.484...92X.doi:10.1038/nature10906.PMID22481363.S2CID29689629.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on April 17, 2012.
- ^Naish, D."The Sensitive Face of a Big Predatory Dinosaur".Tetrapod Zoology.Scientific American Blog Network.RetrievedDecember 5,2018.
- ^"MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE MONTEVIALE CROCODYLIANS (OLIGOCENE, ITALY). p. 67".The Annual Symposium of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Comparative Anatomy.RetrievedOctober 9,2020.
- ^Milinkovitch, Michel; Manukyan, Liana; Debry, Adrien; Di-Poi, Nicolas; Martin, Samuel; Singh, Daljit; Lambert, Dominique; Zwicker, Matthias (January 4, 2013)."Crocodile Head Scales Are Not Developmental Units But Emerge from Physical Cracking".Science.339(6115): 78–81.Bibcode:2013Sci...339...78M.doi:10.1126/science.1226265.PMID23196908.S2CID6859452.
- ^Carpenter, K.(1992). "Variation inTyrannosaurus rex".In Carpenter, K.; Currie, P. J. (eds.).Dinosaur Systematics: Approaches and Perspectives.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.pp. 141–145.ISBN978-0-521-43810-0.
- ^Larson, P. L. (1994). "Tyrannosaurussex ". In Rosenberg, G. D.; Wolberg, D. L. (eds.).Dino Fest.Vol. 7. The Paleontological Society Special Publications. pp. 139–155.
- ^Erickson, G. M.; Kristopher, L. A.; Larson, P. (2005)."Androgynous rex – the utility of chevrons for determining the sex of crocodilians and non-avian dinosaurs"(PDF).Zoology (Jena, Germany).108(4): 277–86.Bibcode:2005Zool..108..277E.doi:10.1016/j.zool.2005.08.001.PMID16351976.
- ^Schweitzer, M. H.; Elsey, R. M.; Dacke, C. G.; Horner, J. R.; Lamm, E. T. (2007). "Do egg-laying crocodilian (Alligator mississippiensis) archosaurs form medullary bone? ".Bone.40(4): 1152–8.doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.029.PMID17223615.
- ^Leidy, J. (1865). "Memoir on the extinct reptiles of the Cretaceous formations of the United States".Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge.14:1–135.
- ^"Tyrannosaurus".American Museum of Natural History.Archived fromthe originalon December 8, 2008.RetrievedOctober 16,2008.
- ^abcNewman, B. H. (1970)."Stance and gait in the flesh-eatingTyrannosaurus".Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.2(2): 119–123.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1970.tb01707.x.
- ^"The Age of Reptiles Mural".Yale University. 2008. Archived fromthe originalon September 29, 2018.RetrievedOctober 16,2008.
- ^Ross, R. M.; Duggan-Haas, D.; Allmon, W. D. (2013). "The Posture ofTyrannosaurus rex:Why Do Student Views Lag Behind the Science? ".Journal of Geoscience Education.61(1): 145–160.Bibcode:2013JGeEd..61..145R.doi:10.5408/11-259.1.S2CID162343784.
- ^"Tyrannosaurus Rex:Not a tripod anymore ".American Association for the Advancement of Science.April 2, 2013.
- ^Stevens, Kent A. (2011)."Tyrannosaurus rex –" Rex, sit "".ix.cs.uoregon.edu.RetrievedJuly 26,2020.
- ^"If T. rex fell, how did it get up, given its tiny arms and low center of gravity?".Scientific American.RetrievedJuly 26,2020.
- ^abcdPadian K (2022)."Why tyrannosaurid forelimbs were so short: An integrative hypothesis".Acta Palaeontologica Polonica67(1): p. 63-76
- ^Stevens K.A., Larson P, Willis E.D. & Anderson A. "Rex, sit: digital modeling ofTyrannosaurus rexat rest ". In Larson P & Carpenter K (eds.).Tyrannosaurus rex, the tyrant king(Indiana University Press, 2008). p. 192-203
- ^Lambe, L. M.(1914). "On a new genus and species of carnivorous dinosaur from the Belly River Formation of Alberta, with a description of the skull ofStephanosaurus marginatusfrom the same horizon ".Ottawa Naturalist.27:129–135.
- ^abcHorner, J. R.;Lessem, D.(1993).The complete T. rex.New York City:Simon & Schuster.ISBN978-0-671-74185-3.
- ^"A New View of T. Rex | Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History".April 13, 2020. Archived fromthe originalon April 13, 2020.RetrievedApril 13,2020.
- ^Carpenter, K.;Smith, M. (2001)."Forelimb Osteology and Biomechanics ofTyrannosaurus rex".InTanke, D. H.;Carpenter, K.(eds.).Mesozoic vertebrate life.Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp.90–116.ISBN978-0-253-33907-2.
- ^Pickrell, J. (November 2, 2017)."T. Rex's Tiny Arms May Have Been Vicious Weapons".National Geographic.Archived fromthe originalon November 2, 2017.RetrievedDecember 10,2018.
- ^Bakker, R. T.(1968)."The superiority of dinosaurs"(PDF).Discovery.3(2): 11–12. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 9, 2006.RetrievedOctober 7,2008.
- ^Bakker, R. T.(1972)."Anatomical and ecological evidence of endothermy in dinosaurs"(PDF).Nature.238(5359): 81–85.Bibcode:1972Natur.238...81B.doi:10.1038/238081a0.S2CID4176132.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 9, 2006.RetrievedOctober 7,2008.
- ^Barrick, R. E.; Showers, W. J. (1994). "Thermophysiology ofTyrannosaurus rex:Evidence from Oxygen Isotopes ".Science.265(5169): 222–224.Bibcode:1994Sci...265..222B.doi:10.1126/science.265.5169.222.PMID17750663.S2CID39392327.
- ^Trueman, C.; Chenery, C.; Eberth, D. A.; Spiro, B. (2003)."Diagenetic effects on the oxygen isotope composition of bones of dinosaurs and other vertebrates recovered from terrestrial and marine sediments"(PDF).Journal of the Geological Society.160(6): 895–901.Bibcode:2003JGSoc.160..895T.doi:10.1144/0016-764903-019.S2CID130658189.
- ^Barrick, R. E.; Showers, W. J. (1999)."Thermophysiology and biology ofGiganotosaurus:comparison withTyrannosaurus".Palaeontologia Electronica.2(2). Archived fromthe originalon May 17, 2011.RetrievedOctober 7,2008.
- ^Barrick, R. E.; Stoskopf, M. K.; Showers, W. J. (1999). "Oxygen isotopes in dinosaur bones". In Farlow, J. O.; Brett-Surman, M. K. (eds.).The Complete Dinosaur.Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 474–490.ISBN978-0-253-21313-6.
- ^Wiemann, J.; Menéndez, I.; Crawford, J.M.; Fabbri, M.; Gauthier, J.A.; Hull, P.M.; Norell, M.A.; Briggs, D.E.G. (2022)."Fossil biomolecules reveal an avian metabolism in the ancestral dinosaur".Nature.606(7914): 522–526.Bibcode:2022Natur.606..522W.doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04770-6.PMID35614213.S2CID249064466.
- ^Paladino, F. V.; Spotila, J. R.; Dodson, P. (1999). "A blueprint for giants: modeling the physiology of large dinosaurs". In Farlow, J. O.; Brett-Surman, M. K. (eds.).The Complete Dinosaur.Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 491–504.ISBN978-0-253-21313-6.
- ^Chinsamy, A.; Hillenius, W. J. (2004). "Physiology of nonavian dinosaurs". In Weishampel, D. B.; Dodson, P.; Osmólska, H. (eds.).The dinosauria.Berkeley: University of California Press. pp.643–659.ISBN978-0-520-24209-8.
- ^Seymour, R. S. (July 5, 2013)."Maximal Aerobic and Anaerobic Power Generation in Large Crocodiles versus Mammals: Implications for Dinosaur Gigantothermy".PLOS ONE.8(7): e69361.Bibcode:2013PLoSO...869361S.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069361.ISSN1932-6203.PMC3702618.PMID23861968.
- ^Holliday, C.M.; Porter, W.R.; Vilet, K.A.; Witmer, L.M. (2019)."The Frontoparietal Fossa and Dorsotemporal Fenestra of Archosaurs and Their Significance for Interpretations of Vascular and Muscular Anatomy in Dinosaurs".The Anatomical Record.303(4): 1060–1074.doi:10.1002/ar.24218.PMID31260177.S2CID195756776.
- ^abFields, H. (2006)."Dinosaur Shocker".Smithsonian Magazine.Archived fromthe originalon October 14, 2008.RetrievedOctober 2,2008.
- ^Schweitzer, M. H.;Wittmeyer, J. L.; Horner, J. R.; Toporski, J. K. (2005). "Soft-tissue vessels and cellular preservation inTyrannosaurus rex".Science.307(5717): 1952–5.Bibcode:2005Sci...307.1952S.doi:10.1126/science.1108397.PMID15790853.S2CID30456613.
- ^Rincon, P. (April 12, 2007)."Protein links T. rex to chickens".BBC News.RetrievedOctober 2,2008.
- ^Anné, J.; Canoville, A.; Edwards, N. P.; Schweitzer, M. H.; Zanno, L. E. (2023)."Independent Evidence for the Preservation of Endogenous Bone Biochemistry in a Specimen ofTyrannosaurus rex".Biology.12(2). 264.doi:10.3390/biology12020264.PMC9953530.PMID36829540.
- ^Vergano, D. (April 13, 2007)."Yesterday's T. Rex is today's chicken".USA Today.RetrievedOctober 8,2008.
- ^Kaye, T. G.; Gaugler, G.; Sawlowicz, Z. (2008). Stepanova, A. (ed.)."Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms".PLOS ONE.3(7): e2808.Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2808K.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002808.PMC2483347.PMID18665236.
- ^"New Research Challenges Notion That Dinosaur Soft Tissues Still Survive"(Press release). Newswise. July 24, 2008.RetrievedOctober 8,2008.
- ^"Researchers Debate: Is It Preserved Dinosaur Tissue, or Bacterial Slime?"(Press release). Discover. July 30, 2008. Archived fromthe originalon August 7, 2008.RetrievedSeptember 4,2008.
- ^San Antonio, J. D.; Schweitzer, M. H.; Jensen, S. T.; Kalluri, R.; Buckley, M.; Orgel, J. P. R. O. (2011). Van Veen, H. W. (ed.)."Dinosaur Peptides Suggest Mechanisms of Protein Survival".PLOS ONE.6(6): e20381.Bibcode:2011PLoSO...620381S.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020381.PMC3110760.PMID21687667.
- ^Peterson, J. E.; Lenczewski, M. E.; Scherer, R. P. (October 12, 2010)."Influence of Microbial Biofilms on the Preservation of Primary Soft Tissue in Fossil and Extant Archosaurs".PLOS ONE.5(10): e13334.Bibcode:2010PLoSO...513334P.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.PMC2953520.PMID20967227.
[T]he interpretation of preserved organic remains as microbial biofilm [is] highly unlikely
- ^abcdHutchinson, J. R.; Garcia, M. (2002)."Tyrannosauruswas not a fast runner ".Nature.415(6875): 1018–21.Bibcode:2002Natur.415.1018H.doi:10.1038/4151018a.PMID11875567.S2CID4389633.
- ^abcHutchinson, J. R. (2004)."Biomechanical Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Bipedal Running Ability. II. Extinct Taxa"(PDF).Journal of Morphology.262(1): 441–461.doi:10.1002/jmor.10240.PMID15352202.S2CID15677774.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on October 31, 2008.
- ^abHoltz, T. R.(May 1, 1996)."Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Coelurosauria (Dinosauria; Theropoda)".Journal of Paleontology.70(3): 536–538.Bibcode:1996JPal...70..536H.doi:10.1017/S0022336000038506.S2CID87599102.RetrievedOctober 3,2008.
- ^Benton, M. (2014).Vertebrate Palaeontology(4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 193.ISBN978-1-118-40755-4.
- ^Dececchi, T. Alexander; Mloszewska, Aleksandra M.; Holtz, Thomas R. Jr.; Habib, Michael B.; Larsson, Hans C. E. (May 13, 2020)."The fast and the frugal: Divergent locomotory strategies drive limb lengthening in theropod dinosaurs".PLOS ONE.15(5): e0223698.Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1523698D.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223698.PMC7220109.PMID32401793.
- ^"T. rex was a champion walker, super-efficient at lower speeds".EurekAlert!.May 13, 2020.RetrievedAugust 16,2023.
- ^van Bijlert, P. A.; van Soest, A. J. K.; Schulp, A. S. (2021)."Natural Frequency Method: estimating the preferred walking speed ofTyrannosaurus rexbased on tail natural frequency ".Royal Society Open Science.8(4): 201441.Bibcode:2021RSOS....801441V.doi:10.1098/rsos.201441.PMC8059583.PMID33996115.S2CID233312053.
- ^"WhyTyrannosauruswas a slow runner and why the largest are not always the fastest ".ScienceDaily.July 17, 2017.RetrievedNovember 10,2017.
- ^Hirt, M. R.; Jetz, W.; Rall, B. C.; Brose, U. (2017). "A general scaling law reveals why the largest animals are not the fastest".Nature Ecology & Evolution.1(8): 1116–1122.Bibcode:2017NatEE...1.1116H.doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0241-4.PMID29046579.S2CID425473.
- ^Sellers, W. I.; Pond, S. B.; Brassey, C. A.; Manning, P. L.; Bates, K. T. (July 18, 2017)."Investigating the running abilities ofTyrannosaurus rexusing stress-constrained multibody dynamic analysis ".PeerJ.5:e3420.doi:10.7717/peerj.3420.ISSN2167-8359.PMC5518979.PMID28740745.
- ^Cotton, J. R.; Hartman, S. A.; Currie, P. J.; Witmer, L. M.; Russell, A. P.; Holtz, T. R. Jr.; Burns, M. E.; Surring, L. A.; Mallison, H.; Henderson, D. M.; O'Brien, H.; Snively, E. (February 21, 2019)."Lower rotational inertia and larger leg muscles indicate more rapid turns in tyrannosaurids than in other large theropods".PeerJ.7:e6432.doi:10.7717/peerj.6432.PMC6387760.PMID30809441.
- ^Caneer, T.; Molkestad, T.; Lucas, S.G. (2021)."TRACKS IN THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF THE RATON BASIN POSSIBLY SHOW TYRANNOSAURID RISING FROM A PRONE POSITION".New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science:29–37.
- ^Smith, S.D; Persons, W.S.; Xing, Lida (2016)."A tyrannosaur trackway at Glenrock, Lance Formation (Maastrichtian), Wyoming".Cretaceous Research.61:1–4.Bibcode:2016CrRes..61....1S.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2015.12.020.
- ^De Pastino, B. (2016)."Tyrannosaur Tracks Discovered in Wyoming Reveal Dinosaur's Speed".Western Digs.61:1–4.Bibcode:2016CrRes..61....1S.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2015.12.020.Archived fromthe originalon January 18, 2021.RetrievedJanuary 3,2021.
- ^abWitmer, L. M.; Ridgely, R. C. (2009)."New Insights into the Brain, Braincase, and Ear Region of Tyrannosaurs (Dinosauria, Theropoda), with Implications for Sensory Organization and Behavior".The Anatomical Record.292(9): 1266–1296.doi:10.1002/ar.20983.PMID19711459.S2CID17978731.
- ^Stevens, K. A. (April 1, 2011)."The Binocular Vision of Theropod Dinosaurs".RetrievedJuly 19,2013.
- ^Carpenter, K. (2013). "A Closer Look at the Scavenging versus Predation byTyrannosaurus rex".In Parrish, M. J.; Molnar, R. E.; Currie, P. J.; Koppelhus, E. B. (eds.).Tyrannosaurid Paleobiology.Life of the Past. Bloomington (Ind.): Indiana University Press. pp. 265–278.ISBN978-0-253-00930-2.
- ^ab"T. Rexbrain study reveals a refined 'nose'".Calgary Herald.October 28, 2008.RetrievedOctober 29,2008.
- ^Kawabe, Soichiro; Hattori, Soki (2021)."Complex neurovascular system in the dentary of Tyrannosaurus".Historical Biology.34(7): 1137–1145.Bibcode:2022HBio...34.1137K.doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.1965137.
- ^"T. rex's jaw had sensors that made it an even more fearsome predator".phys.org.
- ^Benoit, Florian Bouabdellah, Emily Lessner, and Julien (January 20, 2022)."The rostral neurovascular system of Tyrannosaurus rex".Palaeontologia Electronica.25(1): 1–20.doi:10.26879/1178.ISSN1094-8074.S2CID246204236.
{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^Hurlburt, G. S.; Ridgely, R. C.; Witmer, L. M. (July 5, 2013)."Relative size of brain and cerebrum in Tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: an analysis using brain-endocast quantitative relationships in extant alligators".In Parrish, M. J.; Molnar, R. E.; Currie, P. J.; Koppelhus, E. B. (eds.).Tyrannosaurid Paleobiology.Indiana University Press. pp. 134–154.ISBN978-0-253-00947-0.RetrievedOctober 20,2013.
- ^Brusatten, Steve (2018).The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs.New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers. p. 219.ISBN978-0-06-249043-8.
- ^ab"Dino Gangs".Discovery Channel.June 22, 2011. Archived fromthe originalon January 19, 2012.RetrievedJanuary 19,2012.
- ^Collins, N. (June 22, 2011)."Tyrannosaurus Rex 'hunted in packs'".The Telegraph.Archivedfrom the original on January 10, 2022.RetrievedMarch 23,2014.
- ^Wallis, P. (June 11, 2012)."Op-Ed: T. Rex pack hunters? Scary, but likely to be true".Digitaljournal.com.RetrievedDecember 23,2015.
- ^abcSwitek, B. (July 25, 2011)."A bunch of bones doesn't make a gang of bloodthirsty tyrannosaurs".The Guardian.RetrievedJune 21,2015.
- ^Currie, Philip J.(1998)."Possible evidence of gregarious behaviour in tyrannosaurids"(PDF).Gaia.15:271–277. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on March 26, 2009.RetrievedMay 3,2009.(not printed until 2000)
- ^Sample, I. (July 23, 2014)."Researchers find first sign that tyrannosaurs hunted in packs".The Guardian.RetrievedJuly 28,2014.
- ^McCrea, R. T. (2014)."A 'Terror of Tyrannosaurs': The First Trackways of Tyrannosaurids and Evidence of Gregariousness and Pathology in Tyrannosauridae".PLOS ONE.9(7): e103613.Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j3613M.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103613.PMC4108409.PMID25054328.
- ^Roach, Brian T.; Brinkman, Daniel T. (2007). "A reevaluation of cooperative pack hunting and gregariousness inDeinonychus antirrhopusand other nonavian theropod dinosaurs ".Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History.48(1): 103–138.doi:10.3374/0079-032X(2007)48[103:AROCPH]2.0.CO;2.S2CID84175628.
- ^Peterson, J. E.; Henderson, M. D.; Sherer, R. P.; Vittore, C. P. (2009)."Face Biting On A Juvenile Tyrannosaurid And Behavioral Implications".PALAIOS.24(11): 780–784.Bibcode:2009Palai..24..780P.doi:10.2110/palo.2009.p09-056r.S2CID85602478.Archived fromthe originalon August 11, 2013.
- ^Parisi, T. (November 2, 2009)."The terrible teens ofT. rexNIU scientists: Young tyrannosaurs did serious battle against each other ".Northern Illinois University. Archived fromthe originalon August 14, 2013.RetrievedAugust 10,2013.
- ^Rothschild, B.M. (2013). "Clawing Their Way to the Top: Tyrannosaurid Pathology and Lifestyle". In Parrish, M. J.; Molnar, R. E.; Currie, P. J.; Koppelhus, E. B. (eds.).Tyrannosaurid Paleobiology.Life of the Past. Bloomington (Ind.): Indiana University Press. pp. 211–222.ISBN978-0-253-00930-2.
- ^Anné, J.; Whitney, M.; Brocklehurst, R.; Donnelly, K.; Rothschild, B. (2023). "Unusual lesions seen in the caudals of the hadrosaur,Edmontosaurus annectens".The Anatomical Record.306(3): 594–606.doi:10.1002/ar.25078.PMID36089756.
- ^"Time to Slay theT. rexScavenger "Debate"".National Geographic.July 16, 2013. Archived fromthe originalon July 12, 2018.
- ^Black, Riley (April 13, 2012)."WhenTyrannosaurusChomped Sauropods ".Smithsonian Magazine.25.Smithsonian Media: 469.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0469:TRFTUC]2.0.CO;2.S2CID131583311.RetrievedAugust 24,2013.
- ^Black, Riley (2012)."TheTyrannosaurus rexs Dangerous and Deadly Bite ".Smithsonian Magazine.Smithsonian Institution.
- ^Bates, K. T.; Falkingham, P. L. (February 29, 2012)."Estimating maximum bite performance inTyrannosaurus rexusing multi-body dynamics ".Biological Letters.8(4): 660–664.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0056.PMC3391458.PMID22378742.
- ^Scully, C. (2002).Oxford Handbook of Applied Dental Sciences.Oxford University Press. p.156.ISBN978-0-19-851096-3.
- ^Lautenschlager, Stephan (November 4, 2015)."Estimating cranial musculoskeletal constraints in theropod dinosaurs".Royal Society Open Science.2(11): 150495.Bibcode:2015RSOS....250495L.doi:10.1098/rsos.150495.PMC4680622.PMID26716007.
- ^"The better to eat you with? How dinosaurs' jaws influenced diet".Science Daily.November 3, 2015. Archived fromthe originalon November 4, 2015.RetrievedSeptember 14,2018.
- ^Lambe, L. B. (1917)."The Cretaceous theropodous dinosaurGorgosaurus".Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Canada.100:1–84.doi:10.4095/101672.
- ^Farlow, J. O.; Holtz (2002)."The fossil record of predation in dinosaurs"(PDF).In Kowalewski, M.; Kelley, P. H. (eds.).The Fossil Record of Predation.The Paleontological Society Papers. Vol. 8. T. R. Jr. pp. 251–266. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on October 31, 2008.
- ^abHorner, J. R. (1994). "Steak knives, beady eyes, and tiny little arms (a portrait ofTyrannosaurusas a scavenger) ".The Paleontological Society Special Publication.7:157–164.doi:10.1017/S2475262200009497.
- ^Amos, J. (July 31, 2003)."Science/Nature:T. rexgoes on trial ".BBC News.RetrievedDecember 23,2015.
- ^Amos, J. (July 31, 2003)."Science/Nature:T. rexgoes on trial ".BBC News.RetrievedDecember 23,2015.
- ^Farlow, J. O.; Holtz, T.R. (2002). Kowalewski, M.; Kelley, P. H. (eds.)."The Fossil Record of Predation in Dinosaurs"(PDF).The Paleontological Society Papers.8:251–266.doi:10.1017/S108933260000111X.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on October 31, 2008.
- ^Holtz, Thomas R. (2008)."Chapter 20: A critical re-appraisal of the obligate scavenging hypothesis for Tyrannosaurus rex and other tyrant dinosaurs".In Larson, Peter; Carpenter, Kenneth (eds.).Tyrannosaurus rex: The Tyrant King.Book Publishers. pp. 371–394.ISBN978-0-253-35087-9.
- ^Chin, K.; Tokaryk, T. T.; Erickson, G. M.; Calk, L. C. (June 18, 1998)."A king-sized theropod coprolite".Nature.393(6686): 680–682.Bibcode:1998Natur.393..680C.doi:10.1038/31461.S2CID4343329.Summary atMonastersky, R. (June 20, 1998)."Getting the scoop from the poop ofT. rex".Science News.153(25): 391.doi:10.2307/4010364.JSTOR4010364.Archived fromthe originalon May 11, 2013.
- ^Carpenter, K.(1998)."Evidence of predatory behavior by theropod dinosaurs".Gaia.15:135–144. Archived fromthe originalon November 17, 2007.RetrievedDecember 5,2007.
- ^Eberth, David A.; Evans, David C., eds. (2015). "Paleopathology in Late Cretaceous Hadrosauridae from Alberta, Canada".Hadrosaurs.Indiana University Press. pp. 540–571.ISBN978-0-253-01390-3.preprint
- ^Siviero, ART V.; Brand, Leonard R.; Cooper, Allen M.; Hayes, William K.; Rega, Elizabeth; Siviero, Bethania C.T. (2020)."Skeletal Trauma with Implications for Intratail Mobility in Edmontosaurus Annectens from a Monodominant Bonebed, Lance Formation (Maastrichtian), Wyoming USA".PALAIOS.35(4): 201–214.Bibcode:2020Palai..35..201S.doi:10.2110/palo.2019.079.S2CID218503493.
- ^Happ, J.; Carpenter, K. (2008). "An analysis of predator–prey behavior in a head-to-head encounter betweenTyrannosaurus rexandTriceratops".In Carpenter, K.; Larson, P. E. (eds.).Tyrannosaurus rex, the Tyrant King (Life of the Past).Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 355–368.ISBN978-0-253-35087-9.
- ^Dodson, P. (1996).The Horned Dinosaurs.Princeton University Press. p.19.
- ^Tanke, D. H.;Currie, P. J. (1998)."Head-biting behavior in theropod dinosaurs: paleopathological evidence"(PDF).Gaia(15): 167–184.ISSN0871-5424.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on February 27, 2008.
- ^Peterson, J. E.; Daus, K. N. (March 4, 2019)."Feeding traces attributable to juvenileTyrannosaurus rexoffer insight into ontogenetic dietary trends ".PeerJ.7:e6573.doi:10.7717/peerj.6573.ISSN2167-8359.PMC6404657.PMID30863686.
- ^Abler, W. L. (1992). "The serrated teeth of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs, and biting structures in other animals".Paleobiology.18(2): 161–183.Bibcode:1992Pbio...18..161A.doi:10.1017/S0094837300013956.S2CID88238481.
- ^Goldstein, E. J. C.; Tyrrell, K. L.; Citron, D. M.; Cox, C. R.; Recchio, I. M.; Okimoto, B.; Bryja, J.; Fry, B. G. (June 1, 2013). "Anaerobic and aerobic bacteriology of the saliva and gingiva from 16 captive Komodo dragons (Varanus komodoensis): new implications for the "bacteria as venom" model ".Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine.44(2): 262–272.doi:10.1638/2012-0022R.1.ISSN1042-7260.PMID23805543.S2CID9932073.
- ^Snively, E.; Cotton, J. R.; Ridgely, R.; Witmer, L. M. (2013)."Multibody dynamics model of head and neck function inAllosaurus(Dinosauria, Theropoda) ".Palaeontologia Electronica.16(2).doi:10.26879/338.
- ^abcdefLongrich, N. R.; Horner, J. R.; Erickson, G. M.; Currie, P. J. (2010)."Cannibalism inTyrannosaurus rex".PLOS ONE.5(10): e13419.Bibcode:2010PLoSO...513419L.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013419.PMC2955550.PMID20976177.
- ^"NEW EVIDENCE FOR CANNIBALISM IN TYRANNOSAURID DINOSAURS FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS (CAMPANIAN/MAASTRICHTIAN) SAN JUAN BASIN OF NEW MEXICO".ResearchGate.
- ^Farlow, James Orville (1989).Paleobiology of the Dinosaurs.Geological Society of America.ISBN978-0-8137-2238-2.
- ^"Maiasaura," Dodson, et al. (1994); pages 116-117
- ^Horner, J.R.; Makela, R. (1979). "Nest of juveniles provides evidence of family structure among dinosaurs".Nature.282(5736): 296–298.Bibcode:1979Natur.282..296H.doi:10.1038/282296a0.S2CID4370793.
- ^""The Best of all Mothers" Maiasaura peeblesorum ".bioweb.uwlax.edu/.University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.RetrievedMarch 22,2021.
- ^Norell, Mark A.; Clark, James M.; Chiappe, Luis M.; Dashzeveg, Demberelyin (1995)."A nesting dinosaur".Nature.378(6559): 774–776.Bibcode:1995Natur.378..774N.doi:10.1038/378774a0.ISSN1476-4687.S2CID4245228.
- ^Watanabe, Myrna E. (March 1, 2009). "Evolving Ideas on the Origins of Parental Care".BioScience.59(3): 272.doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.3.17.ISSN0006-3568.S2CID85066992.
- ^Rothschild, B.; Tanke, D. H.; Ford, T. L. (2001). "Theropod stress fractures and tendon avulsions as a clue to activity". In Tanke, D. H.; Carpenter, K. (eds.).Mesozoic Vertebrate Life.Indiana University Press. pp. 331–336.
- ^Wolff, E. D. S.; Salisbury, S. W.; Horner, J. R.; Varricchi, D. J. (2009). Hansen, D. M. (ed.)."Common Avian Infection Plagued the Tyrant Dinosaurs".PLOS ONE.4(9): e7288.Bibcode:2009PLoSO...4.7288W.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007288.PMC2748709.PMID19789646.
- ^Rega, E. (2012). "Disease in Dinosaurs". In Brett-Surman, M.; Holtz, T.; Farlow, J. (eds.).The Complete Dinosaur.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- ^Rothschild, Bruce; O'Connor, Jingmai; Lozado, María Cecilia (December 1, 2022)."Closer examination does not support infection as cause for enigmatic Tyrannosaurus rex mandibular pathologies".Cretaceous Research.140:105353.Bibcode:2022CrRes.14005353R.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105353.ISSN0195-6671.S2CID252055157.
- ^Perkins, S. (October 29, 2015)."Tyrannosaurs were probably cannibals (Comment)".Science.RetrievedNovember 2,2015.
- ^Estes, R.; Berberian, P. (1970). "Paleoecology of a late Cretaceous vertebrate community from Montana".Breviora.343:1–35.
- ^Derstler, K. (1994). "Dinosaurs of the Lance Formation in eastern Wyoming". In Nelson, G. E. (ed.).The Dinosaurs of Wyoming.Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, 44th Annual Field Conference. Wyoming Geological Association. pp. 127–146.
- ^Sampson, Scott D.; Loewon, Mark A. (June 27, 2005)."Tyrannosaurus rexfrom the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) North Horn Formation of Utah: Biogeographic and Paleoecologic Implications ".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.25(2): 469–472.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0469:TRFTUC]2.0.CO;2.JSTOR4524461.S2CID131583311.
- ^Cifelli, Richard L.; Nydam, Randall L.; Eaton, Jeffrey G.; Gardner, James D.; Kirkland, James I. (1999). "Vertebrate faunas of the North Horn Formation (Upper Cretaceous–Lower Paleocene), Emery and Sanpete Counties, Utah". In Gillette, David D. (ed.).Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah.Salt Lake City: Utah Geological Survey. pp. 377–388.ISBN1-55791-634-9.
- ^Wick, Steven L.; Lehman, Thomas M. (July 1, 2013)."A new ceratopsian dinosaur from the Javelina Formation (Maastrichtian) of West Texas and implications for chasmosaurine phylogeny".Naturwissenschaften.100(7): 667–682.Bibcode:2013NW....100..667W.doi:10.1007/s00114-013-1063-0.PMID23728202.S2CID16048008.RetrievedNovember 27,2020.
- ^Andres, B.; Langston, W. Jr. (2021)."Morphology and taxonomy ofQuetzalcoatlusLawson 1975 (Pterodactyloidea: Azhdarchoidea) ".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.41(sup1): 142.Bibcode:2021JVPal..41S..46A.doi:10.1080/02724634.2021.1907587.ISSN0272-4634.S2CID245125409.
- ^Tweet, J.S.; Santucci, V.L. (2018)."An Inventory of Non-Avian Dinosaurs from National Park Service Areas"(PDF).New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin.79:703–730.
- ^Jasinski, S. E.; Sullivan, R. M.; Lucas, S. G. (2011). "Taxonomic composition of the Alamo Wash local fauna from the Upper Cretaceous Ojo Alamo Formation (Naashoibito Member) San Juan Basin, New Mexico".Bulletin.53:216–271.
- ^Serrano-Brañas, C. I.; Torres-Rodrígueza, E.; Luna, P. C. R.; González, I.; González-León, C. (2014). "Tyrannosaurid teeth from the Lomas Coloradas Formation, Cabullona Group (Upper Cretaceous) Sonora, México".Cretaceous Research.49:163–171.Bibcode:2014CrRes..49..163S.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2014.02.018.
- ^Brusatte, S. L.; Carr, T. D. (2016)."The phylogeny and evolutionary history of tyrannosauroid dinosaurs".Scientific Reports.6:20252.Bibcode:2016NatSR...620252B.doi:10.1038/srep20252.PMC4735739.PMID26830019.
- ^abChang, Kenneth (April 15, 2021)."How Many Tyrannosaurus Rexes Ever Lived on Earth? Here's a New Clue".The New York Times.Archived fromthe originalon December 28, 2021.
- ^abMarshall, Charles R.; Latorre, Daniel V.; Wilson, Connor J.; Frank, Tanner M.; Magoulick, Katherine M.; Zimmt, Joshua B.; Poust, Ashley W. (April 16, 2021)."Absolute abundance and preservation rate of Tyrannosaurus rex".Science.372(6539): 284–287.Bibcode:2021Sci...372..284M.doi:10.1126/science.abc8300.PMID33859033.
- ^Meiri, Shai (2022)."Population sizes of T. rex cannot be precisely estimated".Frontiers of Biogeography.14(2).doi:10.21425/F5FBG53781.S2CID245288933.
- ^Marshall, Charles R.; Latorre, Daniel V.; Wilson, Connor J.; Frank, Tanner M.; Magoulick, Katherine M.; Zimmt, Joshua P.; Poust, Ashley W. (2022)."With what precision can the population size of Tyrannosaurus rex be estimated? A reply to Meiri".Frontiers of Biogeography.14(2).doi:10.21425/F5FBG55042.hdl:10852/101238.S2CID245314491.
Text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Further reading
- Farlow, J. O.; Gatesy, S. M.; Holtz, T. R. Jr.; Hutchinson, J. R.; Robinson, J. M. (2000)."Theropod Locomotion".American Zoologist.40(4): 640–663.doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.640.JSTOR3884284.
External links
Mediafrom Commons
Quotationsfrom Wikiquote
Textsfrom Wikisource
Textbooksfrom Wikibooks
Taxafrom Wikispecies
- The University of Edinburgh Lecture Dr Stephen Brusatte – Tyrannosaur Discoveries Feb 20, 2015
- 28 species in the tyrannosaur family tree, when and where they livedStephen BrusatteThomas Carr2016
- Australia's answer to T-Rex,State Library of Queensland
Exhibits
- Tyrannosaurus
- 1900s neologisms
- Apex predators
- Fossil taxa described in 1905
- Hell Creek fauna
- Lance fauna
- Laramie Formation
- Late Cretaceous dinosaurs of North America
- Maastrichtian genus extinctions
- Maastrichtian genus first appearances
- Maastrichtian life
- Paleontology in Colorado
- Paleontology in Montana
- Paleontology in South Dakota
- Paleontology in Wyoming
- Scollard fauna
- Taxa named by Henry Fairfield Osborn
- Paleontology in Alberta