United Nations Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

Abbreviation	CCPCJ
Formation	6 February 1992(1992-02-06)
Type	Functional commission
Legal status	Active
Headquarters	Vienna, Austria
Head	Chair Jose Antonio Marcondes De Carvalho
Parent organization	United Nations Economic and Social Council
Website	CCPCJ at unodc.org

TheCommission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice(CCPCJ) is a functional commission of theUnited Nations Economic and Social Council(ECOSOC) based in Vienna. The commission serves as the primary organ that guides the activities of the United Nations in the fields of crime prevention and criminal justice.

The commission meets annually for a regular session in Vienna in May. It also meets for a reconvened session towards the end of the year, mainly to discuss budgetary matters and matters concerning the operation of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme. Since 2011, the commission and theUN Commission on Narcotic Drugshave held joint meetings during the reconvened session.

History

The United Nation's participation in the field of criminal justice and crime prevention can be traced back to its predecessor, theLeague of Nations.However, this participation was limited to a Child Welfare Bureau that focused mainly on the issue ofjuvenile delinquency,and which worked closely with theInternational Penal and Penitentiary Commission (IPPC).This was because Member States saw crime prevention and criminal justice as internal matters and were hesitant to relinquish their sovereignty to an international body.

After World War II, and the creation of the UN, many interest groups tried to incorporate their work into the new UN system through the establishment ofspecialized agencies.The IPPC was among these interest groups and sought to pass off its work on criminal justice and crime prevention to a new UN agency. However, the UN was hesitant to get involved with the IPPC's work without having complete control and with no overlap with the IPPC itself, and Members States were hesitant as they still saw criminal justice as an internal matter. Eventually, it was agreed that the Social Affairs Division of theUN Secretariatwould work on the issues on juvenile delinquency, probation and parole, while avoiding law enforcement or law and order.

However, the Economic and Social Council foresaw that eventually the UN would have a bigger role in criminal justice and crime prevention and in 1948 requested that theSecretary-Generalconvene a seven-memberInternational Group of Experts on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offendersin order to advise the Secretary-General and theSocial Commissionon policies and programs relating to the problem of the prevention of crime and the treatment of offenders, as well as international action in these fields.

This Group met twice, in 1949 and 1950, before being replaced by a more permanentAd Hoc Advisory Committee of Experts on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenderswhich continued its functions. This Ad Hoc Committee was created by theGeneral Assemblywhen it approved a plan to transfer the functions of the IPPC to the UN. The Plan also included provisions for the transfer of the IPPC's library and archives to the UN Library in Geneva, the creation of consultative groups which met biennially to discuss the topics of the prevention of crime and the treatment of prisoners and the continuation of the quinquennialCrime Congress.After its functions were transferred, the IPPC ceased to exist was replaced by the International Penal and Penitentiary Foundation (IPPF).

In 1965 the UN assigned Thorsten Erikkson, the Chair of the 1963 meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee, to review the organization's work in the field of social defense. In his report, Erikkson made three suggestions: to create a Social Defence Trust Fund, to establish the UN Social Defence Research Institute (the predecessor to theUN Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute) and to reorganize the Ad Hoc Committee by making it a permanent Committee under ECOSOC and by expanding its membership to 10. The resolution that reorganized the Committee renamed it theAdvisory Committee of Experts on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offendersand also requested that the Secretary-General create a funds-in-trust account to strengthen the capacity of the UN to carry on its responsibilities in social defense.

In 1971 after the Fourth UN Crime Congress, ECOSOC reformed the Advisory Committee. Among the changes, it was renamed theCommittee on Crime Prevention and Controland its membership was increase to 15. The resolution that created the committee also requested that the Secretary-General involve theregional commissionsmore closely in the field of crime prevention. In 1979 the committee was further enlarged to 27 members, with its seats being distributed amongst theUN Regional Groupsto ensure geographic representation. Additionally, the committee was also entrusted with the following functions: preparing the UN Crime Congresses, preparing programs for international cooperation in crime prevention, assisting ECOSOC in coordinating the actives of UN bodies in regard to crime prevention, promoting the exchange of ideas in the field of crime prevention amongst Member States and discussing major issues in the field of crime prevention.

In 1992 the committee was once again reformed into the body that can be seen today, theCommission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice.It was re-created as a functional commission of ECOSOC at the recommendation of the General Assembly. Its membership was increased to 40 to be distributed on the basis of equitable geographic distribution, with members serving staggered three-year terms. In 2006, the commission's mandate was amended in order to allow it to act as the governing body of theUN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC),as well as to approve the budget of the UN Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Fund.

Mandate

The mandate of the commission was outlined by ECOSOC, at the request of the General Assembly, in 1992. In this resolution the commission was designated as the principal policymaking body of the U.N. in the field of crime prevention and criminal justice. Its other main functions include:

• Providing policy guidance to U.N. organizations and Member States in the fields of crime prevention and criminal justice,
• Developing, monitoring reviewing the implementation of the U.N.'s crime program
• Acting as the governing body of the UNODC
• Coordinating the activities of the U.N. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme Network (PNI)
• Mobilizing support amongst Members States for the U.N.'s program on crime prevention
• Acting as the preparatory and implementing body and of the quinquennial U.N. Congresses on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

Shift in the UN's crime program

The focus and work of the commission, and its predecessors, has changed much over time. The focus of early U.N. bodies dealing with crime and crime prevention was somewhat narrow, as Member States viewed these areas as falling under their jurisdiction. Thus, the work of these bodies was limited to studying juvenile delinquency, correctional treatment and criminal statistics.

However, as the U.N.'s membership began to grow in the 1950s and 60s, its new Member States began to advocate for a shift in the U.N.'s criminal justice program to include links betweenpost-colonialism,underdevelopmentand crime. Thus, the work of the U.N. in crime prevention and criminal justice shifted from asoft lawperspective of collecting and sharing data, research into crime and the development of international standards to a morehard lawperspective of international conventions and treaties. This shift was, in part, precipitated by the growth oftransnationalandorganized crime,terrorism,human traffickingandmoney laundering,which required a more action-driven U.N. crime program, which played a part in the adoption of theUnited Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crimeand theU.N. Convention against Corruption.

Another change in the U.N.'s crime program is the shift from expert-driven bodies to state-driven bodies. Early groups and committees were filed by experts in criminal justice who served in their own capacity. However, as the crime program grew and the issues it worked on became more complex, these experts were replaced by state-appointed agents who represented the interests of Member States and acted on their behalf. This led to a shift in seeing crime as a social issue, with a focus on prevention, juvenile delinquency, restorative justice and victim issues, to a national security issue, with an increased focus on criminalization, police powers and the operation of the criminal justice system.

Further change to the U.N.'s crime program came in 2015 when the General Assembly adopted the2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.The 2030 Agenda succeeded theMillennium Development Goalsand is composed of 17 interconnected targets to aim to measuresustainable developmentacross the U.N.'s Member States, as well as address the complex challenges that the global community faces. One of these goals,Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions,integrated the U.N.'s crime program with parts of other goals. In regard to criminal justice and crime prevention, the goal specifically calls for:

• The promotion of the rule of law at the national and international levels to ensure equal access to justice for all
• A significant reduction of illicit financial and arms flows, the strengthening of the recovery and return of stolen assets and the combat of all forms of organized crime
• A substantial reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms

Thus, the goal links the U.N.'s crime program to issues ranging from gender equality, the sustainability of communities, poverty reduction and health and well-being, to name a few. This linkage aims to demonstrate that sustainable development can lead to a reduction in crime, as well as how crime can negatively impact development. For example, Target 5.2 aims to eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls in order to achieve gender equality, Target 15.7 aims take action to end poaching and trafficking of protected species in order to protect life on land and Target 8.7 aims to eradicate forced labour, as well as put an end to modern slavery, human trafficking and child labor in order to promote economic growth.

Membership

The commission comprises 40 member states elected by the Economic and Social Council distributed amongst the various regional groups: 12 for African states, 9 for Asian states, 8 for Latin American and Caribbean states, 4 for Eastern European states and 7 for Western European and other states. Members are elected in overlapping three-year terms. The current members are as follows:

Term	African states(12)	Asia-Pacific states(9)	Eastern European states(4)	Latin American & Caribbean states(8)	Western European & Other states(7)
2019 – 21	Algeria Burkina Faso Eswatini Nigeria	India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Kuwait Thailand	Belarus Vacant	Brazil Cuba Ecuador Guatemala Mexico	Austria France United States of America Turkey
2018 – 20	Egypt Eritrea Kenya Mauritania Mauritius Morocco South Africa Togo	Afghanistan China Indonesia Japan	Bulgaria Russian Federation	Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Colombia Uruguay	Germany Italy United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Bureau

The commission elects a bureau for each of its sessions composed of a chairperson, three vice-chairpersons and one rapporteur. For the 30th Session the Bureau is as follows:

Name	Country	Regional Group	Position
Alessandro Cortese	Italy	WEOG	Chair
Takeshi Hikihara	Japan	Asia-Pacific	1st Vice-Chair
Teodolinda Rosa Rodrigues Coelho	Angola	Africa	2nd Vice-Chair
Armen Papikyan	Armenia	Eastern Europe	3rd Vice-Chair
Carlos Alberto Garcia Reyes	Guatemala	GRULAC	Rapporteur

Additionally the commission also has an Extended Bureau, which is composed of the Chairpersons of the five U.N. Regional Groups, the Chair of theGroup of 77 and China,and the representative of the State holding thePresidency of the European Council.

Crime Congress

Main article:United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

As a remnant of the 1950 agreement between the UN and the IPPC, the commission is responsible for organizing and convening an international congress every five years, the purpose of which is to enable the exchange of information and best practices in the field of crime prevention and control. These congresses aim to promote more effective crime prevention policies and criminal justice systems in Member States.

These congresses have played an important role in reforming criminal justice policies and systems throughout the world. Some of the more prominent actions they have taken include:

At the first congress in 1955, theStandard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisonerswere adopted and sent to ECOSOC, which would later approve them. These rules are considered the universally acknowledged minimum standards for the treatment of prisoners across the world to this day.

The 1980 congress passed a resolution calling for reform in the administration of juvenile justice, which would eventually lead to the UN creating theStandard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justicein 1985. The 1985 congress also recommended the adoption of theDeclaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power,which stated that victims of crime should be treated with compassion and respect for their dignity, as well as access to the mechanisms of justice and to prompt redress for the harm that they suffered. The General Assembly adopted the Declaration in November 1985.

The 1985 congress also resulted in the Milan Plan of Action, which stated that the problem of crime was an issue of global concern, hampering political, economic, social and cultural development across the world. It also stated that the UN should, as a universal public forum, play a larger role in multilateral cooperation to tackle the issues of terrorism, illicit drug trafficking and organized crime. This Plan of Action was one of the first of its kind calling for international action to combat crime.

External links

• Official website
• Records ofthe International Penal and Penitentiary Commission (1872-1955)at the United Nations Archives