I findenumeratedlists more suitable for human perception and memorizing, than so-called "prose"[1]enforced on wiki. Does this make me apoetor just anti-prozac(pun intended)?
I believe, that bothwiki-deletionists and wiki-inclusionistsare wrong, and the only right policy is wiki-improvementism: when you see a bad edit-do not delete it or leave it as it is. Instead- make it better. If you cannot make it better, mark the text for others to improve. If the article is getting too long, carve smaller articles out of it.[2]Also, if you have an impulse to delete - read this first:Chesterton fence.
I have access to several subscription databases, and I can help other wikipedians viaResource Exchange.Also, I want to draw your attention to this fantastic FREE databaseThe Lens,which has a larger coverage and a superior searchsyntax,thanScopusandWeb of Sciencecombined.
After years of being a wiki-hobbit[3]my editing style is metamorphosing into a wiki-dragon.[4]Yes, the previously unknown larval stage of wiki-dragons turned out to be a wiki-hobbit (perhaps along with other possibilities).
I've been with Wikipedia long enough to learn, that "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."[5]