User talk:フランベ

Your submission atArticles for creation:Black Milk (disambiguation)has been accepted

Black Milk (disambiguation),which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asDisambig-Class,which is recorded on itstalk page.You may like to take a look at thegrading schemeto see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creationif you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Annh07(talk)09:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi フランベ. Thank you for your work onEverything Squared.Another editor,Bastun,has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patroland left the following comment:

Nice work on your new article. It would benefit from being added to appropriate Wikiprojects, such as, e.g., Music.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Bastun}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curationtool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}15:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

The {{music ratings}} template

Hi フランベ. Nice work on the album articles you have created. You may have already noticed this, but it is now considered bad practice to put "favorable" ratings in themusic ratings template,though plenty of older album articles still have it. The template page says:

It cannot capture the general sense of a review that does not include any kind of scale, so do not include language like "Very favorable" or "(mixed)" in the template, as this would be original research.

Obviously reviewslike this oneofEnsembleare still good sources, they just shouldn't be in the ratings box.GanzKnusper(talk)09:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)