User talk:Aitias

This user may have left Wikipedia.Aitias has not edited Wikipediafor a considerable amount of time.As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Good luck with your future endeavors…:) --85.25.73.57(talk)14:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

XDBullzeye ^contribs 00:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see that it worked out the way it did. I hope you'll stay active on Wikipedia, but either way, the best of luck for the future. --MZMcBride(talk)01:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)(P.S. You may want to get your user page create-protected. Vandals can be vicious.)[reply]

Ya srsly. Best of luck. What an unfortunate end to a promising enWiki career. Stop by WR and say hello some time.:)Bullzeye ^contribs 04:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Best Wishes for the future.Feel really sorry for you after all the hours you spent particularly vandal fighting and more so as a Absolutist.Who are sadly a rare breed today.:)Pharaoh of the Wizards(talk)19:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I do hope we see you around again after a break. All the problems at RfAR were indeed unpleasant, but I hope you do still contribute. All the best whatever you decide. ~mazca^talk09:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

And we agree on Xeno! Who are you and what have you done with Aitias?--Wehwalt(talk)00:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like the exact same Aitias of just over a month ago...Majorlytalk 13:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Aitias, you have contributed enormously to ameliorate en.wikipedia. I hope you will stay, and work to ameliorate the encyclopedia. Have a nice day!AdjustShift(talk)14:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, actually I did...

You need to work on youredit summaries.I was giving friendly advice, hoping for a collegial conversation, but if you want we can move to warnings, up to you. Because you're on a bad path. ++Lar:t/c 18:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lar, read it: Iamnotinterested in what(ever) you say, and now pleasedostay away from my talk page. --Aitias(talk)19:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK then, have it your way, going forward, I'll only come by when I feel the need to warn you about something, or let you know you've been blocked. Try to manage your affairs so I never feel the need to come by. Best wishes. ++Lar:t/c 19:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, Lar, there will never be a need towarnme; also, be assured that someone like you does not, byanymeans, possess the authority towarnme. As for your second point: There will never be a need, let alone a reason, to block me — as such, you can be assured that this would be your last block.:) In conclusion: You can see that there will never be a need for you to edit this page and therefore I hope the above edit was your last one. I wish you all the very best,Aitias(talk)20:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello, Aitias. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidentsregarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topicWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editing_by_Off2riorob_after_multiple_extensions_of_good_faith.Thank you. --Cirt(talk)01:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA votes

Aitias, are you deliberately trying toantagonise peoplewith your RfA votes? It comes across that way: please rememberWP:BATTLEGROUND.Regards,Majorlytalk 20:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Majorly. No, I am not "deliberately trying to antagonise people".If it"comes across that way",you can be assured that this is a misinterpretation (on your part). Thanks for your message anyway, it is much appreciated. Best regards, --Aitias(talk)22:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a misinterpretation on Majorly's part at all: in both the votes Majorly listed above, I got the same impression he appears to have (I should also note that in both candidacies the oppose sections contained people who endorsed your RfC, and your vote on Sam Blacketer's RfA was criticized both here and on WR), and in one case you accused everyone in the oppose section of being hypocritical, which is hardly a good thing.Thiswas also concerning and even appears to contradict your response to Majorly. I'd like to point you tothis warning from Tznkai,and seriously encourage you to take his advice and Lar's above. Finally, don't consider this a warning (which it isn't): consider it an attempt to help you.Acalamari 23:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Power Pirate

I have revised the page forPower Pirate,which had some notability issues, to be in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines on that subject, and I would like to recreate that page. But, as the deleting administrator, I am contacting you first.Sabrebattletank(talk)20:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

German userpage

Hi, take a look atthis.Not sure whether you want that, considering that you don't seem to be best friends... --Tinz(talk)02:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring my talk page

I have came back to Wikipedia, and I would like my talk pages to be restored please.Mark t young(talk)15:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have restoredUser talk:Mark t young/Archive 2,User talk:Mark t young/Archive 1,User talk:Mark t young,andUser:Mark t youngon Aitias' behalf. There are some sandboxes in your userspace that I left alone, if you want them undeleted as well just say the word.
Welcome back!Amalthea 16:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards,Papa Lima Whiskey(talk)09:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement/Evidence/Blocks

In the course of an ongoing case, the Arbitration Committee has decided to collect all relevant information regardingMalleus Fatuorum's block log and, as such, has created a table of all blocks, which can be foundhere.Since you either blocked or unblocked Malleus Fatuorum, you are welcome to comment, if you wish.Salvio^{Let's talk about it!}13:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation for gadget authors

I saw you had done some work on heavily-used gadgets. We're trying to start alibrary for gadget authorsto use. Please check it out and post any questions or comments there. --☠MarkAHershberger☢(talk)☣01:16, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletionofTemplate:Unblock on hold-notification

Template:Unblock on hold-notificationhas been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.UpEpSilon(talk)08:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Aitias,

Just to let you know, the Featured PictureFile:Hong Kong Night Skyline.jpgis due to make an appearance asPicture of the Dayon May 13, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption atTemplate:POTD/2015-05-13.Thank you for all of your contributions! —Crisco 1492(talk)00:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AfDh

Template:AfDhhas beennominated for deletion.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Ten Pound Hammer•^{(What did I screw up now?)}04:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt(talk)06:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging ofTemplate:A note

Template:A notehas beennominated for mergingwithTemplate:Note2.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Thank you. –LaundryPizza03(d c̄)09:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AfDh

Template:AfDhhas beennominated for deletion.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Andy Mabbett(Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits19:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofNoli turbare circulos meos!for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleNoli turbare circulos meos!is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noli turbare circulos meos!until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Koopinator(talk)09:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletionofApage

The articleApagehas beenproposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:

Dictionary definition; not wikipedia-appropriate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}}notice, but please explain why in youredit summaryor onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}}will stop theproposed deletion process,but otherdeletion processesexist. In particular, thespeedy deletionprocess can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletionallows discussion to reachconsensusfor deletion. —Moriwen(talk)15:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger ofTemplate:Unblock on hold

Template:Unblock on holdhas beennominated for mergingwithTemplate:Unblock.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entryon the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Aasim-Herrscher of Wikis❄️19:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]