Jump to content

User talk:Axeman89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello! Couple days back you have deleted most of my additions on pageRakvere.Can you explain little bit that why those entries didn't fit?Majandus6(talk)10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tere, Majandus6! Thank you for asking. I felt that the information was too specific, and not the kinds of things that you usually find on pages for towns, including other Estonian towns, although maybe I should have changed the sentence on Rakvere having bus/train connections to say something about the bus and train stations, and the rail line Rakvere is on.--Axeman89(talk)14:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explanation! This was good notion. I will keep that in mind when I do next changes. I will look that bus and train station part.Majandus6(talk)15:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds great!--Axeman89(talk)15:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I descend from John Pool, senator from NC.

I don't think he was involved wit the Red Stringers and traveled through mountains of VA.

He had cousins in VA with the same name. He became a Union sympathiser, but he was involved with the NC government in Raleigh during the time period you mentioned.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by2600:1003:B465:253D:6E42:160A:1B7:8176(talk)14:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what I did wrong. I assure you it was an accident.Axeman8922:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if I mistakenly flagged you. Sometimes looking at the diffs it gets confusing who posted what. I'm battling the vandals too and it looks like I accidentally sent out some friendly fire. Mea Culpa.SnappingTurtle14:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I may have done it myself once (either that, or accidentally defended a vandal).Axeman8900:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Jack Thompson Biography

[edit]

This may not be the right place for this, but I am new to wikipedia - you recently scolded me for the "vandalism" of the Jack Thompson Biography - the only thing I edited in that article was a bit of bad grammar and strange sentence structure - I really don't understand how that constitutes vandalising someone elses work?Pentagram616:25, 14 October 2006

Sorry. As you can see above, I've had that happen to myself as well. I apologize. Check your old page.Axeman8907:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proofreading "Sea Tigers"

[edit]

Hi - thanks for your effort, seems quite a few errors when I looked up your corrections. Thanks again.Ulflarsen16:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problemAxeman8921:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice

[edit]

...but what did you mean specifically?:)//Big Adamsky01:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC) ??? Don't post info on clan members.Axeman8901:33, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Think there's a mixup here, Axeman99 probably meanthis,thus Big Adamsky had nothing to do with that entry.Scoo12:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. So sorry!Axeman8916:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hila class

[edit]

I replied to your query onTalk:Finnish Navy.--Laisak18:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Axeman8900:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New wiki

[edit]

Hello, I followed your depression userbox here, I'm looking for people who might be interested in a new wiki I'm working on. It's for and about people with depression. Hopefully it will be a good, comprehensive site one day, but right now it's a couple of articles and some help pages. If you are interested in having a look and maybe contributing, please come on over. It's at Wikicities,JimboandAngela's wiki-hosting project. The url ishttp://depression.wikicities.com.Hope to see you there --sannse(talk)14:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nadir and Zenith

[edit]

I reverted your reverts onBattleTech technology.If you compare the definitions of the two original words you'll notice that the meaning in the BattleTech Universe is something completely different. The sentence doesn't even parse; maybe the gravity above and below a star is lower than elsewhere in the BattleTech universe (which would be a silly idea in our universe), butNadirandZenith:

  • are not at a certain place relative to a body, only relative to a body and an observer and
  • are not limited to suns nor usually found on suns, since the observer must be on the surface of the body.

Please let's work on an alternative phrase if you don't like the current one. --Yooden

See alsothisand the next two edits. --Yooden

For future reference, lyrics are copyrighted material and they cannot be posted on Wikipedia. If you come across any more articles likeSpieluhr (song),tag it with{{db}}so an administrator can delete it. ~MDD469603:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, although I believe that that song was likely as public domain as "The Itsy Bitsy Spider." I didn't post the lyrics, did I?

You didn't post the lyrics, I just saw that you tagged the article with "cleanup". Spieluhr is a song byRammstein,released in 2001. Definately not PD. ~MDD469617:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I thought it was based on an old German nursery rhyme.Axeman8917:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PTSD, CSR, Railway Spine -> Combination

[edit]

There does not appear to be any discussion on combining these three articles, which you tagged on or about June 23, 2006. It appears that CSR is a subset of PTSD and should not be combined directly with PTSD. Railway Spine appears to just be another name (earlier incarnation) for PTSD and should be combined, although maybe just with a one line comment. This is just my opinion of course. Do we need a further consensus, or may this work be done with only one interested discusser? -Yendor22:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think the better parts of the railway spine article could be added to the PTSD article, but I don't have the time to do it myself, at least for the next week.Axeman8913:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's LGBT Community

[edit]

Hi, Axeman89!
You've indicated through various means (a userbox, membership in a category, etc) that you are part of the Wikipedia LGBT community, or are interested in Wikipedia's LGBT related pages. Welcome!

You may not know that Wikipedia has both anLGBT Notice BoardandanLGBT Studies WikiProject.If you haven't yet done so, take a look at both of them. They sorely need attention and participation!

Some things on the "To-Do List" that merit particular attention include:

  1. Identifying topics/pages that need attention
  2. Identifying problems that need addressing
  1. Adding theLGBT templateto appropriate pages
  2. Categorizing LGBT pages

Please feel free to participate in any or all of these activities! And if you feel like it, add yourself to either theNoticeboard Membersor theWikiProject Participants- or both!

Glad you're a part of Wikipedia - and Thanks! This invitation posted here bySatyrTN--talk
Please remove it if you so desire.

Thanks

[edit]

Hey thanks for appreciating:) --Lost(talk)17:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply, I would've smiled on you if I had known those existed.Axeman8917:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Axeman89 21:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)"

"What do you want to improve? For now I think there is enoght."Previous unsigned statement by76.16.183.57(talk·contribs),15:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You say that there is enough, so you delete what exists? Besides, do you honestly believe there was enough information already? Can you justify deleting the entire history of antisemitism?Axeman8923:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

That's the second time you've beat me to the punch when I was trying to revert a vandal (anti-semitism). You keep that up Mister, and I might just have to... nominate you for admin;)Jcam21:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!Axeman8923:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey what gives

[edit]

I think you flagged me for editing teh Gliese 581 c article.

When i visited the link it had "what the fuck" written in excess of 100 times and no real article. Becasue my wikipedia editing skills are basic i decide to put in "broken link" in stead of all the curse words untill an advanced user could correct the problem. It was not vandalism.Enstantkill22:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! For some reason, I didn't even bother to check what it looked like before you changed the article. There was an article before the person before you edited it. I see that you've made productive edits. Sorry about that.Axeman8901:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In the future, you can go back to the last good edit, and then save. It will replace the current version.Axeman8901:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NATO grades/EST national ranks

[edit]

Hi

Hopefully you can change NATO grades and EST military ranks matrix. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_Defence_Forces

Correct would be:

OR-1 No insignia OR-2 Kapral OR-3 Nooremseersant, seersant OR-4 Vanemseersant OR-5 Nooremveebel OR-6 Veebel OR-7 Vanemveebel OR-8 Staabiveebel OR-9:Ulembeebel

Also picture "Estonian Soldier" is out of date by uniform. Newer ones are available here:http://www.mil.ee/~fotek/gallery/albums.php

Cheers

D.

Why are you unable to change the NATO grades/EST national ranks, and why did you come to me to change them?Axeman8919:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clan Snow Raven

[edit]

Aproposed deletiontemplate has been added to the articleClan Snow Raven,suggesting that it be deleted according to theproposed deletionprocess. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia'scriteria for inclusion,and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not"andWikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}}notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or onits talk page.Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through theproposed deletion process,the article may still be deleted if it matches any of thespeedy deletion criteriaor it can be sent toArticles for Deletion,where it may be deleted ifconsensusto delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add{{db-author}}to the top ofClan Snow Raven.Judgesurreal777(talk)22:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ertugrul (Ottoman Frigate)

[edit]

Hi Axeman,

thanks for putting such nice information in the article about the Frigate Ertugrul. I am one of the team members working in the actual excavation project of the shipwreck and I wanted to ask you about the information you have gathered about the accident. I do not seem to have the original sources for the description in English and I would really appreciate if you let me know where to get them. I'll appreciate your help, [email protected]—Precedingunsignedcomment added byBertalledo(talkcontribs)10:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NVI F.K.31

[edit]

You added a contradict box to the NVI F.K.31 article. Could you point out what is contradictory there? --MoRsE(talk)06:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYer

[edit]

I've been a subscriber for years too and remember many controversial covers.... though the only one that jumped to mind was the gay sailors kissing. I know there have been others.

I don't know that any have ever beenthiscontroversial and time will tell how big of a cover this really is.--Utahredrock(talk)08:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your edit on Orissa violence

[edit]

I reverted [this edit] as you had wiped out the ref tag. I am sure it was accidental. Just wanted to mention that.:) Thanks.Recordfreenow(talk)03:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it was indeed accidental. Thanks for letting me know!Axeman89(talk)

Merry Christmas

[edit]

--A NobodyMy talk02:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last stand

[edit]

Please seeTalk:Last stand#Examplefarm--PBS(talk)16:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fast edits

[edit]

I use a program calledHuggleto remove vandalism quickly. When an account vandalizes after receiving a Level 4 warning, Huggle automatically reports the account toWP:AIV.You need rollback privileges to use it. It's really handy for blatant vandalism. --NellieBly(talk)08:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I assumed you were using a program, but that you were manually making the changes yourself.Axeman89(talk)08:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, but I do choose which edits to revert, and blatant vandalism is usually pretty obvious so it can be reverted immediately. --NellieBly(talk)08:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer"userright, allowing you toreview other users' editson certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing atwo-month trialscheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are notautoconfirmedto articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to onlya small number of articles,similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located atSpecial:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obviousvandalismorBLP violations,and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (seeWikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be foundhere.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.Courcelles(talk)04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vz. 58

[edit]

Hi. Please do not add content without citingverifiableandreliablesources,as you did toVz. 58.Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sourcesand take this opportunity to add references to the articles. Thank you.ROG5728(talk)22:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source added, right next to the picture of the Slovak soldier holding an Vz. 58 while standing beneath the Slovakian seal.Axeman89(talk)23:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you put a contradict flag on theNVI F.K.31article. I can't see any contradictions in it, so I have removed the tag. If I've missed the contradiction, please feel free to put the tag back, and leave a note on the talk page to expalin what the contradiction is. Cheers --WORMMЯOW12:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. I have no idea why I put in the contradiction tag, especially since I don't seem to have mentioned it on the talk page. Perhaps I found it peculiar that the tiny, poor Finnish Air Force of the 1920s would purchase and fly 12 planes for a mere 6 total hours?Axeman89(talk)21:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

I've noticed that you don't useedit summariesfor your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thanks.Dougweller(talk)05:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Petard

[edit]

Hi Axeman89
I see that on going through the edit history for thePetardarticle, on 13 March at 0639, in "the Far East part two" section, para 1, you changed 'machine' to 'airplane'.
I originally put 'machine' in as a neutral adjective (as per the MoS); it would also be in keeping with the period. 'Airplane' is, I believe, American English, but to have 'areoplane' (British English) in the same line as 'aircraft' is no better as it would not be very good writing, (and as it now is with 'airplane').
In addition, 'airplane' did not seem right in an article about a RN ship. If the article was about a USS, it would be a different matter.

Regards

RASAM(talk)13:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe thatthiswas a typo. I've reverted it, since it's not clear what your intent was. Regards,Orange Suede Sofa(talk)05:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's partially a typo. Referring to “the WWII conflicts” seemed a bit redundant, so I removed that part, but seem to have also accidentally removed the word “from.” If you agree with my change, you can make it, but with the word “from,” included this time, otherwise feel free to leave it alone. I'll leave the change to you.Axeman89(talk)15:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense. I've now made the adjustment. Regards,Orange Suede Sofa(talk)17:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSynagogues of Gibraltar,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLeghorn(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)10:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedRFB Fantrainer,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageF4(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)10:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedLudvig Puusepp,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageVentriculography(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)11:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'mBracketBot.I have automatically detected thatyour edittoCocos Islands Mutinymay have broken thesyntaxby modifying 1 "()" s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the pageagain to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and to signal the Japanese on [[Christmas Island]], which the Japanese had occupied on 3 March 1942).<ref>{{cite web|first=Klemen|last=L |url= http://www.dutcheastindies.webs.com/christmas.html |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions.Thanks,BracketBot(talk)21:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'mBracketBot.I have automatically detected thatyour edittoOutgassingmay have broken thesyntaxby modifying 1 "{}" s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the pageagain to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • temperature vulcanization|RTV]] sealants outgas the poison [[cyanide]] for weeks after application.{{Citation needed|reason=this is a strong claim which can't be included here without proper

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions.Thanks,BracketBot(talk)18:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedBarotrauma,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRockfish.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)08:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJoseph Bailey (general),you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWisconsin Dells.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)08:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHistory of Lisbon,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNorman.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)12:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment: Hyazinth Graf Strachwitz

[edit]

Hi, a communitygood article reassessmenthas been started for the article onHyazinth Graf Strachwitz,which you edited. The reassessment page can be foundhere,if you would like to comment on whether the article still meets the GA criteria, or to provide suggestions about how it could be improved so that it can retain its GA status.K.e.coffman(talk)04:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Knock, Ireland listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectKnock, Ireland.Since you had some involvement with theKnock, Irelandredirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussionif you have not already done so.SSTflyer15:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.Mdann52(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orsini affair

[edit]

You are an accomplished editor, so perhaps I am missing something related to your recent edit of this article. I found the texthere,which may suggest it came from a source now in public domain, but I don't see that you used quotes or a blockquote or identified the source.S Philbrick(Talk)12:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I was just copyingthis section,although I apparently didn't bother to seek out its source. It just seems strange that the one thing missing from the Orisini Affair article is the assassination at the center--the article simply goes from background to the arrest, with no description of the act itself.Axeman89(talk)12:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedReinickendorfer Straße (Berlin U-Bahn),you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBorsigwerke(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect,since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)12:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCanton of Schaffhausen,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCanton(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect,since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNikolai Vasilevich Novikov,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMolotov(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnotimply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest inArmenia,Azerbaijan,or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctionsis in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctionson editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies,or thepage-specific restrictions,when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctionsand theArbitration Committee'sdecisionhere.If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi(talk)15:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedEleonore Prochaska,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDannenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBattle of Bailén,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCabrera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)05:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBracteate,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGeorge Kennan (explorer),you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKoryak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics notification

[edit]

Information iconYou have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This messagedoesnotimply that there are any issues with your editing.Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please seeWikipedia:Contentious topics.For a summary of difference between the former and new system, seeWP:CTVSDS.—Red-tailed hawk(nest)19:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]