User talk:Hroðulf

Perhaps you're looking forHrodulf?(not Hroðulf aka Hrothulf) SeeUser:Hroðulf/disambiguation

Archives

2006—2009,2010—2013,2014—


Wikipedia ads	file info–show another– #95

Wikipedia:Babel

en

This user is anative speakerof theEnglish language.

fr-3

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveauavancédefrançais.

de-1

Dieser Benutzer hatgrundlegende Deutschkenntnisse.

sco-1

This brouker can contreibute wi alaichlevel oScots.

Search user languages

Kodaly

Thanks for finishing the AfC on his Te Deum.'DGG (at NYPL)'(talk)21:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing!

If you still visit the library or access periodicals, could you do me a favour? Most of the refs inTe Deum (Kodály)are to dead trees. Yet many of the refs were "ibids" that got scrambled up when the OP ran a ref correction tool. I am sure I made matters worse when I cleaned up the article for mainspace. (I guessed that all the ibids were to the Cecil Gray article, which is almost certainly not correct.) Could you have a go at correcting them, please? The OP may be in a better position to do this, but I don't think they are active on Wikipedia.

--Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)10:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request undeletion ofSophie (software)

Hello Stifle, Six years ago you closed the AfD on this article, which was deleted on notability grounds. Since 2008, several more papers appeared in the peer-reviewed literature.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sophie+multimedia+future+of+the+book&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

Per the deletion review rules, I am asking you before posting there. Please consider undeleting or userfyingSophie (software),so that it can be cleaned up and updated, or if necessary merged with another article.

--Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)13:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied toUser:Hroðulf/Sophie (software).Stifle(talk)19:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)19:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Responded to your suggestion

I've responded to your suggestion, atTalk:Bomis/GA1.

Thanks very much for your recommendation, the article is better for it.

Cheers,

—Cirt(talk)20:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I followed up at the above link. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)14:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITV vandal

Hi. Thanks for catching this one early. I'm very convinced this is the IP-hopper I've met several times before -- seehere.Nick Levine(talk)12:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is funny you say that: I didn't catch anything - I actually accepted the changes toCatchphrase (UK game show).I merely asked them to use edit summaries. That is a troublesome pattern you have been watching. How do you tell the fact from the hoax? --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)12:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Their editing pattern stands out. You saw something was odd even though you didn't know you were looking for it! I've been watching this for about a month but it goes back further - see my talk page for examples and also for discussion I've had with other editors about how/whether to revert. See alsohere.

The pattern is: BT Openzone IPs, edits every 5-10 minutes over several hours (today being an exception to this!), apparently random edits to ITV related pages, nonsense edit summaries (sometimes proveably so, eg when all the summaries sayUndid revision 583137604 by My name is not daveand all cite the same revision number). I half suspect the damge is automated, but can't think how to go about testing that out. And all this said, it's possible I got this one wrong. In which case the human concerned will do something different (talk to me, perhaps?)Nick Levine(talk)13:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peptide page

Hi and thank you for your message about my contribution to the peptide page. I don't really understand why you said it is adverstising as when i did my searches I often found the commercial name Matrixyl as from the pages listed below and I found it was discovered by a French company which has produced many others. So it is an interesting reference for readers. http://thedermblog.com/2008/06/23/do-peptides-in-skin-care-products-work/ http://www.antiwrinklereview.org/wrinkle-cream-ingredients/what-is-matrixyl-3000/ http://www.antiagingwrinklecreaminfo.com/blog/matrixyl-3000 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2288955/Anti-wrinkle-creams-really-work--magic-ingredient.html#ixzz2OBPizg8c http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/matrixyl-miracle-anti-wrinkle-ingredient-found-1747224 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/07/scientists-find-miracle-ingredient-anti-wrinkle-cream_n_2826946.htgards,

Please let me know your thoughts as I spent a long time wirting this contribution.

Regards,

Pcriton(talk)08:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)pcriton[reply]

Robert Lewandowski

He won't be playing for Bayern until July and has played for Borussia Dortmund since the contract was signed.Kingjeff(talk)18:55, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Incompetent editor who pushes fringe views" thread on ANI: looking for suggestions for way forward

Since you commented just once on the thread onWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidentsand seem pretty disinterested and concerned for the welfare of RetProf I'm coming to you for advice on what to do next - because that discussion is going nowhere and the problem isn't getting resolved.

As I see it, RetProf's problem has two dimensions. The first is that he's concerned over a revert onGospel of Matthewthat I made some time ago. Here's the diff:edit.In a nutshell, he'd put in material saying that there's an ancient mss of GM which includes a superscript to the effect that Matthew the Apostle wrote it. RetProf calls this an "attestation", which is a good-enough term.

RetProf says he wants a source - for the deletion, apparently. I've tried explaining that I can't source a deletion, and, more to the point, the class of attestations to which his example belongs is well known to scholars, but uniformly dismissed - they all derive from a single tradition, so have no independent vale, and the weight of other evidence is that the gospel can't be by Matthew, and was written in Greek. I believe I've pointed him to books saying this is the current consensus, but it seems to have no impact.

Anyway, that's what sparked this current row. The deeper problem is that RetProf keeps returning to this over months and years - he makes an edit inserting Hebrew Matthew, someone deletes, he goes away for a while, than months later he does it again. That's not a problem I'm worried about, but it's what the other editors are concerned about - they just want him to stop.

So what to do? I think the dispute processes have hardly been touched, to tell the truth, because he always backs off at any sign of resistance, only to come back months later. So what's the best step? An external mediator? If so, how is one found?PiCo(talk)01:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am disinterested, to a degree. I recall reading many years ago thatMatthewwas possibly written by a Jewish person or Aramaic speaker for a Jewish audience, though I don't know if or how it should be reflected in the article.

My concern isn't for the welfare of any of the editors involved, but for the quality of the article. An ArbCom hearing is likely to leave everyone that cares one way or the other banned from the article (or at least distracted for the duration of the hearing) and will only addressbehaviournotcontent.In my humble opinion, it is always a mistake to jump directly from an argument to a request for arbitration without exploring the alternatives.

In my opinion you are right: you can't source a deletion.

I get an impression, which might be mistaken, that misguided opinions of the Church Fathers are dismissed as fringe theories by some editors. I think some middle ground could be found on that aspect. After all, nobody believes in the religion of Ancient Egypt any more, yet it has Wikipedia articles. (Perhaps the same could be said for Pelagianism or Flat Earthers or any number of unusual or obsolete world views.)

Isn't there a register of volunteer mediators somewhere on Wikipedia?

I have notified RetProf about this conversation.

--Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)11:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I believe that if I write @RetProf the system automatically will alert him that he's been mentioned.I hope.

Anyway, the ANI discussion seems to have reached a pretty good conclusion - half a dozen or more people, including RetProf, have said they favour formal mediation. My own note has added that the mediator should be asked to provide a binding resolution, and that the parties agree to accept arbitration if they can't accept/keep the resolution.

On the matter ofGospel of Matthew,the lead of the article and the section on composition jointly say that the author was anonymous and Jewish and wrote for a Jewish Christian audience (meaning a community of Jews who accepted that Jesus was the messiah - something the majority of Jews did not do in the late 1st century and which led to the final split between Jews and Christians). All with reliable sources supplied.::RetProf's sources are reliable too - it's just that he keeps misreading and misrepresenting them, not deliberately, but because he's just not very good at critical reading, despite his claim to be a retired academic. Yet when I look at his user page it says he spent his career working in Africa, including with the anti-apartheid movement. I like him, and that's why this is personally painful.

I'll leave a message on his talk page suggesting he start approaching people on the mediator panel - best if he chooses his own mediator, as I'm pretty sure he's going to get the rough end of the pineapple and I don't want him feeling he's been framed.PiCo(talk)05:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

A proposal has been made to create a Live Feed to enhance the processing of Articles for Creation and Drafts. SeeWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to create a 'Special:NewDraftsFeed' system.Your comments are welcome.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง(talk)06:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

User:Smallbones/Questions on FTC rules-Smallbones_(smalltalk)15:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Temple

Hello, I'mAnup.No source confirms the date of death of Shirley Temple (If you do not mind to re-read the sources again). And You keep introducingoriginal research.Can you please explain? If you've some source that says, Feb 10 or Feb 11,citeit in the body of the article. Thanks,Anupmehra-Let's talk!11:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anupmehra:Trumplumpaddeda BBC article that saysShe died on Monday at home...bbc.Sorry I said 'warring' in my edit summary - your edit was in good faith. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)11:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. Happy editing! Regards,Anupmehra-Let's talk!11:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh and Telangana

Though Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have a joint capital as hyderabad for 10 years, The powers ruling the capital i.e. hyderabad goes to Telangana State only. So Technically, Hyderabad is just an acting capital for AP.— Precedingunsignedcomment added byMahesh13j(talk•contribs)09:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mahesh13j:Naturally. When the Act is implemented, why not put "acting capital"? It is easier to understand than 'no capital'. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)09:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi!We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:10, Friday, November 22, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure|Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Explanation for new user please

Please post a close explanation atWikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2014_January_14#File:New_Chippenham_Campus.jpg.

Cassie.reid(talk·contribs) is a new user and won't be able to understand that their upload was deleted even though I added a discussion of the image to the article the text. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)11:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - on both the discussion and the user's talk page. I read through the comments on the talk page and see a common problem. She works for them in a promotional role and like many only came here to fix errors in herecompany's article. The long learning period to get your head around Wikipedia is then absent and frustration ensues. -Peripitus (Talk)11:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your patient attention explaining the AfD and reading the talk page,Peripitus.

I agree about the learning period. I like to help newcomers understand us, because aaronsw's research said that most of the encyclopedia text is written by the long tail of hundreds of thousands of editors who are only interested in 1 or 2 articles, rather than the few thousand at the core who make the most edits. Patient, specific explanationfrom the horse's mouthhelps a lot. Even if she never comes back here, I bet she will tell others about her experience.

--Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)14:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedOlga Taussky-Todd,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAustrian(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodox Presbyterian Church

Greetings! I deleted the part that offended StAnselm. Would it be possible to reinsert the sentences now? Thank you for your consideration.— Precedingunsignedcomment added byAdamduker(talk•contribs)16:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments on my draft of the Project AGORA article and UC-HiPACC article

Possibly to clarify, I am a contractor for University of California, Santa Cruz, specifically, hired to be webmaster of theUniversity of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center( "UC-HiPACC" ). UC-HiPACC is a co-sponsor of Project AGORA.

As to the AGORA Project, I think it's notable thathttp://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2669shows that the technical paper describing the project has been accepted by the Astrophysical Journal Supplement, a prestigious scientific journal. As displayed at the arxiv link, the authors of the paper are Astrophysicists from 27 institutions around the world, and thus the project is vast in scope. The technical paper is footnoted in my draft Wikipedia article, as are references to two other outside publications, Universe Today and Science Daily. There is a website for the project,https://sites.google.com/site/santacruzcomparisonproject/,referenced by footnote, managed by an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology, which is not part of the University of California. The project is supported by the National Science Foundation, among others, according to this website. I would think that students of Astrophysics should be able to find out about this project so as to keep abreast of such a major developments in the field. I will happily leave it to the wisdom of the Wikipedia community to decide, based on its merits, the worthiness this article for inclusion in the Encyclopedia.

As to the UC-HiPACC article, I will follow the procedures you outline for suggested changes or updates to the article.

Thank you for taking the time to help me with my Wikipedia work!Sjzaslaw(talk)18:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sjzaslaw:Steve, it is good to hear from you. I downloaded the paper a few hours ago, and, though I didn't read it all, I appreciate the eminence and scope of the enterprise. Students of astronomy might learn about AGORA better in the journals and from your website. I would like it to be in Wikipedia, but I fear that without significant coverage outside the Universe Today piece, it is likely to quickly be the subject of anWikipedia:Articles for Deletiondiscussion. (I didn't mention Science Daily as it simply republished UCSC's press release.) As far as I can tell, lots of big ideas have one paper in a major journal, and their articles get deleted. It seems odd when we have articles on Pokemon characters. If you don't mind a wider debate and the risk of deletion, then by all means get the full copyright release, or rewrite, and see if an AFC reviewer will accept the article. Until then I'll move it from the AFC queue for you to work on (you should soon see an automated message about that.) --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)18:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of a text

I added a person's name "Oommen Chandy" in "List of Indian Christians" page. I gave government site as reference as he is presently Chief Minister of Kerala. Still it is removed. Please help me to understand why it was removed.— Precedingunsignedcomment added byRobin7013(talk•contribs)04:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Robin7013:The government website only tells us his job. You need to post areliable sourcefor his religion. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)18:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EastofEnglandlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:EastofEnglandlogo.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion.Thank you.Stefan2(talk)14:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Of Human Feelings

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for commentonTalk:Of Human Feelings.Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding.If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedInterSystems Caché,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageArray.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia talk:Five pillars

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for commentonWikipedia talk:Five pillars.Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding.If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTemplate talk:Events at the 2014 Asian Games

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for commentonTemplate talk:Events at the 2014 Asian Games.Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding.If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia talk:Administrators open to recall

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation toparticipate in the request for commentonWikipedia talk:Administrators open to recall.Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please seeWP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atWP:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello Hroðulf. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable toyouin particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ( "copyvios" ) making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even whenhallmarks of copyviosin the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copiedfrom the draft,rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio" ), theWayback Machineis very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, pleasedo notdecline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ( "we/our/us..." ), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ( "top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice withweasel words;including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit(talk)02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery(talk)02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation toparticipate in the request for commentonWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please seeWikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding.If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atWP:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pikey

Way back in 2008, you proposed thatPikeywas better off as a dictionary definition. I recently converted the page to soft redirect to a dictionary definition. That has now been reverted, if you are sill interested in the subject perhaps you would like to have another look attalk:Pikey.--PBS(talk)23:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Goryeo

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation toparticipate in the request for commentonTalk:Goryeo.Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please seeWikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding.If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atWP:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedWicked (musical album),you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageStephen Schwartz.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTemplate talk:Infobox officeholder

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate inthe request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox officeholder.Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please seeWikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding.If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atWP:Feedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We actually were discussing the sources you mentioned at RSN

And you gave the correct answer.[1]Atsme☯^Consult 23:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to take sides. There are understandable emotions, and understandable confusion about the sources. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)11:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a given. I never expected you to take sides. I simply felt the reply to you was incorrect, and didn't want you to be left wondering. I feel fortunate to have been the recipient of a great deal of input over the past few months regarding my journey toward a better understanding of RS. I have learned from highly experienced Wikipedians, some with over 100,000 edits, and an admin who collaborated writing some of the policies we adhere to today. I can say without reservation that what I've learned is simply that RS are and always will be subjective until a list is created with some form of classification. I don't see that happening anytime soon. Thx!Atsme☯^Consult 21:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad the conversation has progressed since the RS/N posting: I appreciated the update. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)10:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hroðulf. You have new messages atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants.
Message added 01:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC). You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please comment onTalk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate inthe request for comment onTalk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia.Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please seeWikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding.If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atfeedback request service.—Legobot(talk)00:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zero-energy universe

You may be interested in the discussion atWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Accelerating_universe--70.51.200.101(talk)05:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

old dog new tricks

a sincere thank you for the polite way you showed me i had the wrong template, i was doubling down on my error every-time someone commented, embarrassing. doesnt matter who long i edit here, always seems to be more to learn.Darkstar1st(talk)13:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for mis-edit

Hi Hroðulf

I went through the Schumacher Center AfD ensuring I had only voted once, as per discussion. But accidentally changed your vote, mistakenly thinking I had once voted 'merge' - when I thought the article could be merged with the NEC article. Sorry for my mistake.

Regards Jonpatterns(talk)15:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes we all make. No explanation was necessary, but I appreciate your comment all the same. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)15:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of political parties in the United Kingdom,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSomething New.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)08:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer.Legobot(talk)00:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could use your input

Your suggestions for issues that need to be raised, modified, or deleted at COIducks would be greatly appreciated. You can comment hereUser_talk:Atsme/sandboxCOIduckeryor at the essay's TP. Thank you in advance....Atsme☯^Consult 18:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofAndrew West (linguist)for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAndrew West (linguist)is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew West (linguist)until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –FayenaticLondon 15:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Loose hands

Well, now it's a moot point.Jjjjjjdddddd(talk)03:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJudge advocate,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJudge Advocate General.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)08:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia:Village pump (policy)

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (policy).Legobot(talk)00:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi Hroðulf, thanks for your assistance with gettingCommunity_First_Credit_Unionmerged. Its much appreciated on our end as we're only trying to do everything correctly. One question I have is that The Red pen of Doom keeps removing cited and referenced content (see change log) and hasn't given any explanation as to why he/she removed it. The information is consistant with other WP:Corp's who are similar. I would like to undo but would be appreciated if you could have a quick look? (obviously happy if they were removed within any guidelines, but would like to get feedback if they were)

Cheers MateBowey21(talk)21:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will answer atTalk:Community_First_Credit_Union.--Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)11:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hroðulf I have responded back to you onTalk:Community_First_Credit_Union Bowey21(talk)22:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:2015 Kumanovo shootings

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:2015 Kumanovo shootings.Legobot(talk)00:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Nasty Party

Other information about the not-so-nice party not allowed?— Precedingunsignedcomment added by2.96.102.202(talk)11:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Hroðulf!We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:10, Thursday, June 18, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure|Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Please comment onTalk:Mukti Bahini

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Mukti Bahini.Legobot(talk)00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for the welcome/introduction message on my page.:) Hope this is the right place to put this.AudreyTruong(talk)18:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AudreyTruong:Don't mention it. Yes, this is the right place. Welcome again. --Hroðulf(or Hrothulf) (Talk)13:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Fire Emblem Fates

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Fire Emblem Fates.Legobot(talk)00:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BP logo and updates

Hello Hroðulf, back in June you responded tomy requestto make some updates based on the new BP Annual Report. I am wondering if you would be able to return and help with the remaining requests, as these have as yet not been answered. Also, a few weeks ago, the BP logo was removed from Wikimedia Commons. I have uploaded a new logo to Wikipedia as a fair use file and am looking for help in adding that to the infobox. Are you able to help? Thanks.Arturo at BP(talk)20:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.Legobot(talk)00:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:University-ulster-belfast-exterior-closeup.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:University-ulster-belfast-exterior-closeup.jpg,has been listed atWikipedia:Possibly unfree filesbecause its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on thefile description page.You are welcome to add comments to its entry atthe discussionif you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.Kelly^hi!09:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Jesus

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Jesus.Legobot(talk)00:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletionnomination ofFile:Flag of the Ulster Nation.svg

A tag has been placed onFile:Flag of the Ulster Nation.svgrequesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion,because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nominationbyvisiting the pageand clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Stefan2(talk)22:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Gun laws in the United States by state

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Gun laws in the United States by state.Legobot(talk)00:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates:8 to 29 November 2015
Location:Worldwide/virtual/online event
Host/Facilitator:Women in Red(WiR) in collaboration withWomen scientists:Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
Sponsor:New York Academy of Sciences
Event details:This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a"physical" eventduring the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women inscienceto participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
RSVP and learn more:→here←

--Rosiestep(talk)03:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofJason De Carteretfor deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJason De Carteretis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason De Carteret (2nd nomination)until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Egghead06(talk)07:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Lists

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Lists.Legobot(talk)00:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination ofUser:Hroðulf/WABCO

User:Hroðulf/WABCO,a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion.Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hroðulf/WABCOand please be sure tosign your commentswith four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofUser:Hroðulf/WABCOduring the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Ricky81682(talk)23:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Post-coup unrest in Egypt (2013–2014)

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Post-coup unrest in Egypt (2013–2014).Legobot(talk)00:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTemplate talk:Infobox medical condition

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox medical condition.Legobot(talk)04:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science

Join us!

Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon-
aYear of Scienceinitiative

Hosts:Women in Red,Women Scientists

Sponsor:WikiEdu

April-December 2016
#wikiwomeninred#yearofscience#contentgap

(To subscribe,Women in Red/Invite list.Unsubscribe,Women in Red/Opt-out list)--Rosiestep(talk)01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)via MassMessage[reply]

Draft:Peptides in skin careconcern

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot.I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Peptides in skin care,a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserficationof the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot(talk)01:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:Peptides in skin care

Hello, Hroðulf. It has been over six months since you last edited yourArticles for Creationdraft article submission, "Peptides in skin care".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace,the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submissionand remove the{{db-afc}}or{{db-g13}}code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link.An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Peter Sam Fan19:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines.Legobot(talk)04:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onPortal talk:Right-wing populism

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onPortal talk:Right-wing populism.Legobot(talk)04:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!

Hello, Hroðulf. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment onTalk:Train Simulator (Dovetail Games)

Thefeedback request serviceis asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Train Simulator (Dovetail Games).Legobot(talk)04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Zoo mailing list

Hello! You are receiving this message because you have added yourself as a member of theWikiproject Zoo.This is the first such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from themailing list here,and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself frommember list here.ForWikiproject Zoogeneral discussions and suggestions, please usethe project talk page.(Delivered: 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC))

Vianovo updates

Hi Hroðulf. A couple years back, you helped me make updates to theVianovoarticle—would you be interested in helping again? I have a new set of minor updates on theTalk pagethat have been hanging out for about a month. As last time, I prepared these on behalf of the firm, so I won't make the changes myself. Thanks so much for your time!Heatherer(talk)18:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! Im currently rebuilding theWikiProject Investment.

Since your a member of the project/were one I wanted to ask if you were interested in helping me re-start the project.

I already am pretty much finished with updating the project page.Take a look at it. Ping me if you want to help! Thanks.WikiEditCrunch(talk)21:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join theInvestment WikiProject.There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hroðulf. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.2 -2017

Newsletter Nr 2, 2017-12-30, forWikiProject Zoo

Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2018

The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of thered linksblue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want!

Participation:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members inWikipedia:WikiProject Zoo,to everyone who added yourself as a member of theWikiproject Zoo.This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from themailing list here,and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself frommember list here.ForWikiproject Zoogeneral discussions and suggestions, please usethe project talk page.

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing listor alternatively to opt-out of allmassmessage mailings,you may addCategory:Opted-out of message deliveryto your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinatorDan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name fromour mailing list.
Newsletter delivered byMediaWiki message delivery

MfD nomination ofUser:Hroðulf/Sophie (software)

User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software),a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion.Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software)and please be sure tosign your commentswith four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofUser:Hroðulf/Sophie (software)during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.—Compassionate727^(T·C)20:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.3 -2018

Newsletter Nr 3, 2018-12-25, forWikiProject Zoo

Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2019

The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of thered linksblue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want!

Participation:

This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members inWikipedia:WikiProject Zoo,to everyone who added yourself as a member of theWikiproject Zoo.This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from themailing list here,and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself frommember list here.ForWikiproject Zoogeneral discussions and suggestions, please usethe project talk page.

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing listor alternatively to opt-out of allmassmessage mailings,you may addCategory:Opted-out of message deliveryto your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinatorDan Koehl.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Hroðulf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion.Spread theWikiLoveby wishing another user aMerry Christmasand aHappy New Year,whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery(talk)11:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name fromour mailing list.
Newsletter delivered byMediaWiki message delivery

Requested move: Chairman → Chair (officer)

Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019

Any input would be appreciated.Fyunck(click)(talk)03:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The People's Choice (political party)/meta/color

Template:The People's Choice (political party)/meta/colorhas beennominated for deletion.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.doktorb_words^deeds14:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. At some point in the ancient past you were either involved in the creation of the above template, or the successful AfD for the party's article's deletion. I've just put the template up on TfD so am letting editors involved at some point, even fleetingly in most cases, just in case you want to chip in the discussion. Cheers.doktorb_words^deeds14:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requestedatTalk:It's a Wonderful Lifeon a request for comment.Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Yapperbot(talk)09:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Hroðulf!You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to theFeedback Request Service,but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this- if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

Go to theFeedback Request Service page.
Decide which categories are of interest to you, under theRfCand/orGAheadings.
Paste{{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}}underneath the relevant heading(s), wherelimitis the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask onthe Feedback Request Service talk page,or onthe Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page.Thank you!MediaWiki message delivery(talk)21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retail Importance Assessment

Hi! Since you're a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks!Tfkalk(talk)23:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofUtterly Butterlyfor deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleUtterly Butterlyis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utterly Butterlyuntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sandstein15:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]