Jump to content

User talk:Hurricanehink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Please clickhereto leave me a new message.

TFL notification

[edit]

Hi, Hurricanehink. I'm just posting to let you know thatList of California tornadoes– a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page asToday's featured listfor August 12. The TFL blurb can be seenhere.If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or atTFL talk.Regards,Giants2008(Talk)21:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Storm Colour template

[edit]

When I was editingUser:OhHaiMark/1980 Pacific typhoon season,I noticed that when I subsituted the values of the template on the section for Typhoon Dom, it didn't mention the warning center. Normally, it does something like Typhoon (JMA), but it doesn't seem like that's the case.OhHaiMark(talk)16:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you rate my current work on this endeavor if you have time?OhHaiMark(talk)14:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination of1937 Hong Kong typhoon

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewingthe article1937 Hong Kong typhoonyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofDora the Axe-plorer--Dora the Axe-plorer(talk)00:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost:22 July 2024

[edit]
*Read this Signpost in full*Single-page*Unsubscribe*MediaWiki message delivery(talk)09:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion ofHurricane Hilary

[edit]
Congratulations, Hurricanehink! The article you nominated,Hurricane Hilary,has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussionhas been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate itto appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,FrB.TG(talk) viaFACBot(talk)19:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Climate of North America

[edit]

Information iconHello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Climate of North America,a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted,so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit itagain orrequestthat it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeletedso you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot(talk)01:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Climate of Oceania

[edit]

Information iconHello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Climate of Oceania,a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted,so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit itagain orrequestthat it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeletedso you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot(talk)22:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Illinois tornadoes

[edit]

Hey there Huricanehink (long time, no see!) I am currently working onDraft:List of Illinois tornadoes,and wanted to see if you wanted to help out (since you have experience in "List of ___ tornadoes" articles. It's quite a long list, and any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!:)Sir MemeGod._.(talk-contribs-created articles)05:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:List of Indonesia tornadoes

[edit]

Information iconHello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:List of Indonesia tornadoes,a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted,so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit itagain orrequestthat it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeletedso you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot(talk)12:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alert: PD-NWS Violations

[edit]

This is an alert being sent to all active editors on theWikiProject of Weatherand any editor who has recently editors weather-related articles.

Editors on the Commons have received communication from theNational Weather Servicethat theTemplate:PD-NWS,which is often used to upload weather-related images, is incorrect. There will be a discussion starting on the Commons Copyright Noticeboard within the next few days to determine how to manage this issue. Under the current PD-NWS copyright template, images on any NWS webpage was considered to be in the public domain unless it had a direct copyright symbol and/or copyright watermark.

One National Weather Service office has confirmed this is not the case.For the next few days, it may be best to not upload any image from an NWS webpage that was not made or taken directly by the National Weather Service themselves. Once the Commons determine how to move forward, editors will recent a new alert.TheWeather Event Writer(Talk Page)23:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to append this additional warning to @WeatherWriter‘s message: the National Weather Service emailed @Rlandmanntoday and clarified that the upload process doesNOTautomatically release a photo/video into the public domain. I strongly advise you not to upload anything under a PD-NWS tag unless it is specifically produced by the weather service.West Virginia WXeditor(talk)04:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Towns list

[edit]

I know I probably shouldn’t be putting this here. But I don’t have any way of contacting the oversight team; so I’m requesting that you @Hurricanehinkeitherrevision deleteor ask to suppress a couple versions of theGhost towntalk page. You’ll see which ones I’m referring to; but I don’t want to post which revisions on here publicly.West Virginia WXeditor(talk)20:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will also further add that the potentially oversightable content had been in place from late February until earlier this evening when I removed it and left the message here.West Virginia WXeditor(talk)04:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. ♫Hurricanehink(talk)20:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination of1937 Hong Kong typhoon

[edit]

The article1937 Hong Kong typhoonyou nominated as agood articlehas passed;seeTalk:1937 Hong Kong typhoonfor comments about the article, andTalk:1937 Hong Kong typhoon/GA1for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appearin the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate itwithin the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofDora the Axe-plorer--Dora the Axe-plorer(talk)12:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

Good article reassessment for1982 Pacific typhoon season

[edit]

1982 Pacific typhoon seasonhas been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page.If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720(talk)15:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost:14 August 2024

[edit]
*Read this Signpost in full*Single-page*Unsubscribe*MediaWiki message delivery(talk)22:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination of1937 Pacific typhoon season

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewingthe article1937 Pacific typhoon seasonyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofTheNuggeteer--TheNuggeteer(talk)01:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination of1937 Pacific typhoon season

[edit]

The article1937 Pacific typhoon seasonyou nominated as agood articlehas been placed on hold.The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria,but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:1937 Pacific typhoon seasonandTalk:1937 Pacific typhoon season/GA1for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofTheNuggeteer--TheNuggeteer(talk)05:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD-NWS Violations Update #1

[edit]

I am providing members of theWikiProject of Weatheralong with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an update to the discussions regardingthe PD-NWS image copyright template.

For starters, no "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred. All that means is the template is not formally deprecated and is still in use.However,Rlandmann,an administrator on English Wikipedia, has begun an undertaking of reviewing and assessing all images (~1,400) that use the PD-NWS copyright template.

What we know:

  • Following email communications, the National Weather Service of Sioux Falls hasremovedtheir disclaimer, which has been used for the PD-NWS template for decades. This means, as far as the National Weather Service is concerned, the following statementis no longer valid:By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others.Currently, the PD-NWS template links toan archived versionof the disclaimer. However,the live versionof the disclaimer no longer contains that phrase.
  • Seethis deletion discussionfor this point's information. NWS Paducah (1) failed to give attribution to a photographer of a tornado photograph, (2) placed the photo into the public domain without the photographer explicitly giving them permission to do so (i.e. the photo is not actually in the public domain), (3) and told users to acknowledge NWS as the source for information on the webpage. Oh, to note, this photographer is amagistrate(i.e.a judge). So, the idea of automatically trusting images without clear attribution on weather.gov are free-to-use is in question.
  • The Wikimedia Commons has a process known asprecautionary principle,where if their issignificant doubtthat an image is free-to-use, it will be deleted. Note, one PD-NWS filehas been deleted under the precautionary principle.The closing administrator remarks for the deletion discussion were: "Per theprecautionary principle,there is "significant doubt" about the public domain status of this file (4x keep + nominator, 5x delete), so I will delete it."
  • Several photographs/images using the PD-NWS are currently mid-deletion discussion, all for various reasonings.
  • As of this message, 250 PD-NWS images have been checked out of the ~1,400.
  • The photograph of the1974 Xenia tornado(File:Xenia tornado.jpg) was found tonotbe in the public domain. It is still free-to-use, but under a CC 2.0 license, which requires attribution. From April 2009 to August 2024, Wikipedia/Wikimedia was incorrectly (and by definition, illegally) using the photograph, as it was marked incorrectly as a public domain photograph.

Solutions:
As stated earlier, there is no "formal" rulings, so no "formal" changes have been made. However, there is a general consensus between editors on things which are safe to do:

  • Images made directly by NWS employees can be uploaded and used under the newPD-USGov-NWS-employee template(Usage: {{PD-USGov-NWS-employee}} ). This is what a large number of PD-NWS templated images are being switched to.
  • Images from theNOAA Damage Assessment Toolkit(DAT) can be uploaded and used under thePD-DAT template(Usage: {{PD-DAT}} ). A large number of images are also being switched to this template.

For now, you are still welcome to upload images under the PD-NWS template. However, if possible it is recommended using the two templates above. I will send out another update when new information is found or new "rulings" have been made.TheWeather Event Writer(Talk Page)03:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that there are a couple other safe templates such as PD-NEXRAD for radar images; and also the generic PD-USGov and PD-USGov-NOAA templates.West Virginia WXeditor(talk)05:40, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination of1937 Pacific typhoon season

[edit]

The article1937 Pacific typhoon seasonyou nominated as agood articlehas passed;seeTalk:1937 Pacific typhoon seasonfor comments about the article, andTalk:1937 Pacific typhoon season/GA1for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appearin the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate itwithin the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofTheNuggeteer--TheNuggeteer(talk)00:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

[edit]

If you see an unfamiliar username start commenting on future discussions. I am in the process of changing my username from WestVirginiaWX to Hurricane Clyde.West Virginia WXeditor(talk)04:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of West Virginia tornadoes

[edit]

I just published the list that I’ve been intermittently working on for the past couple months. I got the list back to 2000; still needs work on tornadoes prior to then and on recent tornadoes that have occurred since I started making the list.🌀 Hurricane Clyde 🌀(talk)22:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

[edit]

Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I was hoping that you would assist me in the preparation and processing of the FAC nomination. I wanted to nominatethis article.I'll be on the lookout for your responseThank you.dxneo(talk)17:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broken article history templates

[edit]

I'm not sure how, but your template changes onTalk:Hurricane Newton (1986)andTalk:Effects of Hurricane Isaac in Floridahave broken the article history templates. Any idea what the issue might be?CMD(talk)19:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. I tried to fix it by changing the date format and it didn't work for me, and look at thisoldid,MDY working there fine. Oh well, it's working now, big mystery box.CMD(talk)03:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:Climate of South America

[edit]

Hello, Hurricanehink. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creationsubmission ordraftpage you started, "Climate of South America".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion.An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!00:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:Climate of Oceania

[edit]

Hello, Hurricanehink. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creationsubmission ordraftpage you started, "Climate of Oceania".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion.An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!20:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from TheNuggeteer

[edit]

I just want to ask a question, how do you find the warning and info pages for typhoons? (Mostly the JTWC and JMA). Thanks,🍗TheNuggeteer🍗12:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

Hello Hurricanehink, I was wondering if you could help us with the discussion onJoseph Barbera talk page.I didn't want to take this issue straight to the administrators' noticeboard.Whatsupkarren(talk)20:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seenhere.So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93in the newscredits, and at least 333did you knowcredits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles tofeatured topicsandgood topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please seethis page.Further questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCupand the judges (Cwmhiraeth(talk·contribs),Epicgenius(talk·contribs), andFrostly(talk·contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost:4 September 2024

[edit]
*Read this Signpost in full*Single-page*Unsubscribe*MediaWiki message delivery(talk)13:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD-NWS Violations Update #2 (Key To Read Third Section)

[edit]

I am providing members of theWikiProject of Weatheralong with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an new update (2nd update) to the discussions regardingthe PD-NWS image copyright template.

On the Commons, an RFC discussion is taking place to figure out how to manage the template. No "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred, so nothing has changed. That is not a surprise as the RFC is still ongoing.

What is new?

  • The entireTemplate:PD-NWShas been placed inside a "License Review" template, which is viewable via the link aforementioned.
  • Most of the photographs which were uploaded to the Commons originally under the PD-NWS template (approximately 1,500) have been reviewed. Out of those ~1,500 images, only about 150 are requiring additional looks. Most images have been verified as free-to-use and switched to a respective, valid template.
  • As of this moment, approximately 50 photos have been nominated for deletion (results pending).
  • A handful of images have been deleted (either confirmed copyrighted or under the Commonsprecautionary principle.
  • One image has been kept following a deletion request under the PD-NWS template.

How to deal with new photos?

Given all of this, you might be wondering how the heck you use weather photos while creating articles? Well, here is what you can do!

What about third-party photos?

In the case of third-party photos...i.e. ones not taken by the National Weather Service themselves...there is an option which wasdiscussed and confirmedto be valid from an English Wikipedia Administrator.

  • KEY:Third party images of tornadoes & weather-related content can potentially be uploaded viaWikipedia's Non-Free Content Guidelines!
  • Experiments/testing has been done already! In fact, I bet you couldn't tell the difference, but the tornado photograph used at the top of the2011 Joplin tornadowas already switched to a Non-Free File (NFF)! Check it out:File:Photograph of the 2011 Joplin tornado.jpeg!That photo's description can also be used as a template for future third-party tornado photographs uploaded to Wikipedia...with their respective information replaced.
  • NFFs can be uploaded to multiple articles as well!
  • The absolute key aspect of NFFs is that they relate to the article and are not decoration. For example with the Joplin tornado, the photograph: (1) shows the size of the tornado, (2) shows the "wall of darkness", which was described by witnesses, (3) shows a historic, non-repeatable event of the deadliest tornado in modern U.S. history. The exact reasoning does not have to be extremely specific as Wikipedia's NFF guidelines "is one of the most generous in the world" (words ofRlandmann(not pinged),the administrator reviewing all the PD-NWS template images).
  • Tornado photographs will almost certainly qualify under the NFF guidelines, especially for tornadoes with standalone articles or standalone sections.
  • NFFs cannot be used when a free-photograph is available, no matter the quality, unless the section is about that specific photograph.For example, the photograph used at the top of the2013 Moore tornadoarticle is confirmed to be free-to-use, therefore, no NFFs of that tornado can be uploaded on Wikipedia. However, the "Dead Man Walking" photograph could almost certainly be uploaded as an NFF to the1997 Jarrell tornadoarticle as that photograph is the topic of a section in the article.
  • NFFs currently on Wikipedia can and should be placed in this category:Category:Non-free pictures of tornadoes.

Update Closing

Hopefully all of that information kept you informed on the Commons copyright discussion process and how you can still create the best articles possible! If you have a question about something mentioned above, reply back and I will do my best to answer it! Also, ping me in the process to ensure I see it! Have a good day!TheWeather Event Writer(Talk Page)00:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:List of South Atlantic tropical and subtropical cyclones

[edit]

Hello, Hurricanehink. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creationsubmission ordraftpage you started, "List of South Atlantic tropical and subtropical cyclones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion.An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!16:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination ofHurricane Dennis

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewingthe articleHurricane Dennisyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofJCMLuis--JCMLuis(talk)22:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Dennis GAN

[edit]

I saw that you weren't active on Wikipedia since 2 September, so I decided to complete most of the tasks in the nomination since I did not want it to fail due to inactivity. You're welcome!ZZZ'S00:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination ofHurricane Dennis

[edit]

The articleHurricane Dennisyou nominated as agood articlehas been placed on hold.The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria,but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Hurricane DennisandTalk:Hurricane Dennis/GA1for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofJCMLuis--JCMLuis(talk)14:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGAnomination ofHurricane Dennis

[edit]

The articleHurricane Dennisyou nominated as agood articlehas passed;seeTalk:Hurricane Dennisfor comments about the article, andTalk:Hurricane Dennis/GA1for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appearin the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate itwithin the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofJCMLuis--JCMLuis(talk)22:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for1943 Mazatlán hurricane

[edit]

1943 Mazatlán hurricanehas been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page.If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.OhHaiMark(talk)21:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Since we are proposing a lot of mergers, here are a few others that might be worth considering

12.74.53.67(talk)21:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add onto this comment. For Hurricane Georges, we can either merge Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Cuba into a new article called the Greater Antilles or all except Cuba back into the main article.ZZZ'S23:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How's this

[edit]

I'm currently working on adraftfor the1936 North Indian Ocean cyclone season.How does it look?OhHaiMark(talk)19:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I've made adraftforTyphoon Ruth (1991).How is it?Tavantius(talk)04:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA/FA tutorial

[edit]

I want to be able to improve articles and get them to GA/FA class without relying on others to do it for me. Now that you're not very active in getting the2005 Atlantic hurricane seasonto FT status, are you at least able to mentor me in getting Earth science-related articles to GA and/or FA status. If you're not able to, at least you responded. Thank you in advance.ZZZ'S02:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the{{You've got mail}}or{{ygm}}template.

The Signpost:26 September 2024

[edit]
*Read this Signpost in full*Single-page*Unsubscribe*MediaWiki message delivery(talk)20:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion ofHurricane Cindy (2005)

[edit]
Congratulations, Hurricanehink! The article you nominated,Hurricane Cindy (2005),has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussionhas been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate itto appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,Ian Rose(talk) viaFACBot(talk)00:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]

Hurricane Isaias tornado outbreakclosed with a consensus to merge.74.101.118.218(talk)21:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And so didEffects of Hurricane Isabel in New Jersey,Effects of Hurricane Isabel in PennsylvaniaandEffects of Hurricane Isabel in New York and New England.74.101.118.218(talk)21:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing newsletter

[edit]

I just want to ask; can I continue the newsletter? The newsletter seems like a good idea, and I don't want to let it go to waste.🍗TheNuggeteer🍗02:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Kirk

[edit]

I know that you believe that Kirk is not noteworthy, but I've been working on the draft and slowly improving it. I would really appreciate if you (or any other more experienced editors) didn't redirect it.

Thanks,96.236.149.251(talk)00:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, by the way, this is the other account of Shmego talking. Am I allowed to have two accounts if I make it known that they are the same person? I know you have a mobile account so I just want to check.Shmego2(talk)00:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1967 Pacific typhoon season

[edit]

I'm currently seeking to try to rewrite the1967 Pacific typhoon season,spin off all needed articles, and hopefully promote it to FA-status. However, there's one odd problem...The JMA did not include any intensity estimates in their BT, choosing to use pressure instead, and it seems like the JMA intensity are just original research. How should I rewrite this?Tavantius(talk)20:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sharpie

[edit]

Hello Hurricanehink! I have to admit I don't know exactly what I'm doing as I have only started adding to wikipedia. I have a weird love for sharpies and noticed that the page didn't talk about specific colors or where they come from (certain colors are discontinued or only come in certain packs). I don't want to be a bother but I added a bunch to this page and it was reverted by another user. At first glance they hadn't said anything, just simply reverted my input. I had to ask them why and they gave me attitude and really no explanation for the revert. So I added my information again....to have the same user revert my stuff again. I don't understand because I sourced my work. Once looking at this user's talk page I realized he does this to many people, on many different subjects. He thinks he's wikipedia king, the end all be all if you will. Many people on the page are asking for the information I provided, I truly don't get if this is my fault or the user who feels they would like to revert anything added by another person. I don't know if I should open a dispute resolution or ask for a protection for my items, as stated previously I don't completely understand how all of this works. Thank you in advance for all that you do.Thegoldengen(talk)04:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hurricanehink&oldid=1251057237"