User talk:LeoC12

Welcome!

Hello, LeoC12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions.I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a pageandHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember tosignyour messages ontalk pagesby typing fourtildes(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions,ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{Help me}}before the question. Again, welcome!BracketBot(talk)05:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Sustainable Australia Ideology

Dear Leo Crnogorcevic,

I have removed your edits once again. Sustainability is defined as: "The ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level."

This definition applies to both sustainable australia's position on population (not-just immigration), development, as well as several other areas in the policy page i found on their website. As this definition both adequate and overarching, there is no need for the additions you provided.

Furthermore most of the references you provided are out-dated, from biased organisations, are secondary sources with no citation of any primary source, or refer to a completely different organisation with the same name.

https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/rise-populationists-greenwashes-racism "Lower immigration from its record level (over 200,000 p.a.) back to the long term average of 70,000 p.a." https://meanjin.com.au/blog/the-elephant-in-the-chamber/ https://www.facebook.com/VoteSustainable/photos/fpp.114980098553874/1676052885779913/?type=3&theater https://www.sbs.com.au/news/dick-smith-joins-lower-immigration-party— Precedingunsignedcomment added byLinxthesontaran(talk•contribs)22:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'mBracketBot.I have automatically detected thatyour edittoInternational Monetary Fundmay have broken thesyntaxby modifying 1 "{}" s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the pageagain to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions.Thanks,BracketBot(talk)05:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello. Your edits seem to indicate a strongWP:POV,meaning that you edit based on what you think is the truth. Furthermore, you make changes in potentially controversial articles without bothering about consensus or using talk pages to gain support. If you continue to edit in the same way, you may be blocked. Use talk pages to suggest your ideas,ifyou get a consensus for them,theninsert them. Not before.Jeppiz(talk)13:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Please do not your ownpersonal analysisto Wikipedia articles, as you did toKosovo.Doing so violates Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy.When introducing and discussing controversial subjects and legal disputes, such as countries which have limited international recognition, we don't take sides, but rather describe the opposing viewpoints.Psychonaut(talk)06:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Pristina

If you continue to POV-push and edit war, I'll report you. Consider this to be your final warning. RegardsIJA(talk)21:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Greetings. At least one ofyour recent edits,such as the edit you made toKosovo,did not appear to be constructive and has been or will berevertedor removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome pagewhich also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please usethe sandboxfor that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.YourWP:POVedits against Kosovo on various articles like Kosovo, FIFA, etc are not appropriate. Please reverse the edit on Kosovo as you breached 1RR.Legacypac(talk)11:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warringregarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring.The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LeoC12 reported by User:Legacypac (Result: ).Thank you.Legacypac(talk)11:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring atKosovo

You have beenblockedfrom editing for a period of24 hoursforedit warring.Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this blockby first reading theguide to appealing blocks,then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changesand seekconsensus.If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution,and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.

The full report is atWP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LeoC12 reported by User:Legacypac (Result: Blocked).Dramatic changes to this article (such as making Kosovo not a country) can't escape notice since the page is watched by 927 people. Please work through channels to make whatever point you have in mind. I'm also alerting you under the arbitration case (below). Thank you,EdJohnston(talk)21:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

The topic of Kosovo is covered by discretionary sanctions underWP:ARBMAC

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnotimply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authoriseddiscretionary sanctionsto be used for pages regarding theBalkans,a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision ishere.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This meansuninvolvedadministrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia,ourstandards of behavior,or relevantpolicies.Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans,orblocks.This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston(talk)21:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Kosovo

On the subject of the edit war that has taken place, please read a new thread I started:Talk:Kosovo#December 2015 edit war on category (Countries in Europe).--OJ(talk)08:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedGovernor-General of Australia,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageConstitutional convention.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)10:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Srbijansko-hrvatski

Vjerovatno si jugonostalgičar, možda jesi iz BiH, ali ja sam u Sarajevu oduvijek. --Munja(talk)13:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Nossal

Thanks for thanking me for my addition to theCity of Greater Dandenongpage. I'm writing to you, because I saw that you've been editing theNossal High Schoolpage, and I was wondering if you go/went to school there. I graduated last year, so it's possible that we might know each other. Without revealing my name, I was in 9M/A04, had blonde hair, was good at maths and ran for school captain. If you aren't able to work out who I am, then give me your email address and I'll tell you there.Orthogonal1(talk)03:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm white.:P Good to know that there's another Nossalonian Wikipedian! I want to see the Nossal article improved too. If you have some spare time one day, would you be able to take some photos for the article?Orthogonal1(talk)08:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Football vs Soccer

Thanks for your edit today atFFA Cup,but I've had to revert it, because as per convention on hundreds of Wikipedia articles on football/soccer, the consensus has been that the Australian articles will be referred to as soccer rather than football. I personally disagree with this convention, but that's where those on the Football task force have landed - after much debate - for articles on this sport for countries like Australia, NZ and USA, where it is commonly referred to as soccer.Matilda Maniac(talk)10:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!

Hello, LeoC12. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Great work on the Nossal page!

Great job on the Nossal page - I didn't know that there was an outdoor IRC or an SRC meeting space. I'm curious to see what the outdoor IRC looks like; I'll have to see if I can find it. Also, interesting about Maria Sampey - she's actually someone for whom "Independent Labor" sounds like a good title. Also, the Casey Council countback is tomorrow. I haven't tried calculating who will take the place, but it is my sincere hope that it is *not* Rowe.:DOrthogonal1(talk)01:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSerbia national football team,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIreland national football team(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)11:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedGreen Left Weekly,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSocialist Alliance(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)10:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LeoC12. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Australian Affordable Housing Party/meta/color

Template:Australian Affordable Housing Party/meta/colorhas beennominated for deletion.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Frietjes(talk)17:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SNSD logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:SNSD logo.png.I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria,but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page,and edit it to include anon-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions"link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting" File "from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion.If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletionand ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.ShakespeareFan00(talk)18:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of political parties in Australia,you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesAnti-IslamandRegionalism(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect,since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)10:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Greens Vanderlism

Please find I have attached citations for the greens party there political ideology and there beliefsDr pragmatists(talk)07:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedWestern Australia Party,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRegionalism(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedVictorian Socialists,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEquality(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Football Victoria logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing.There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution,along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot ownerif you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content.RonBot(talk)17:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAustralian Liberty Alliance,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAnti-Islam(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LeoC12. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination ofThe Socialists (Victoria)for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleThe Socialists (Victoria)is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Socialists (Victoria)until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Drover's Wife(talk)00:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve United Srpska

Thanks for creatingUnited Srpska.

ANew Page PatrollerOnel5969just taggedthe pageas having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please take a look atWP:CITandWP:CITEon how to format footnotes and citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here andpingme.Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at theTeahouse.

Delivered via thePage Curationtool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969^{TT me}14:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Victorian election

Like the changes you've made to the 2018 article. But is there a specific reference for how you've calculated the two-party-preferred vote in the lower house and if so could you include or add a note explaining where the tpp comes from or how you've calculated it? Checking the VEC website there isn't a statewide TPP vote, just in most divisions. I've put the references back above the results tables as well.Global-Cityzen(talk)09:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks mate, I basically added up the TPP figures from each district. It's pretty annoying that the VEC doesn't post statewide TPP figures like the AEC does. I think the adding-up approach is the same one editors took for the 2014 article as well.--LeoC12(talk)10:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for clarifying.Global-Cityzen(talk)14:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Take part in a survey

Hi LeoC12

We're working tomeasure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms.We want to ask you some questions about howyouvalue being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from theWikipedia store(e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey:https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJcEhLKioNHuJv

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan(talk)05:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

See Rfc.

Howdy. Please see closed Rfc atWikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government,where consensus was tonothave Designate/Elect etc at the bottom. Also, we DON'T use numbering, until official has taken office.GoodDay(talk)16:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDepartment of Premier and Cabinet (Victoria),you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEquality(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Department of Justice and Community Safety(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toWorkplace safety

Sustainable Australia(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toDevelopment

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Recent Edits to Australian_Country_Party_(2004)

I originally put this reply to your edits to the Australian_Country_Party_(2004) on the page talk. I have now placed it here for your review.

All edits were cited and as noted below, we should have deleted both of the nationalism ideologies as the Party has made wholesale changes to itself

I am writing re the recent reversals to amendments to the Wiki page for the Party.

I note that all edits were cited and the change of Leadership was official with Party formal internal procedures. There is no ability to Cite the internal changes of Leadership of the party.

The party has completely changed its direction and political positioning to a grassroots democracy ideology and we should have also deleted the 2 nationalism ones as well.

We are no longer a rural-focused party and this change occurred in July 2017.

Our Position is definitely Broad-Centre, and again this was cited to our recent media release that clearly demonstrated this.

The opening paragraph, that has the first sentence utilised in the google search box had the two sentences just reversed so the current details of the party sho not the 15 year old history that also provides the impression of the old rural focus of the party.

I respectfully request that all the recent edits are reinstated, plus the deletion of the Australian Nationalism and Economic Nationalism as these are no longer reflected in the new direction of the party again cited to the media release that announced all the new details and direction of the party.

The way the Wiki page now reads, as it has been returned to the old content is related to the old Party under the old leadership and direction, Ideology and political positioning.

I look forward to your review of the recent media release and our website to see we have definitely changed who we are and where we are heading.

Media ReleaseWebsite

we have also removed all our policies as we develop new ones and will be updating our core values and position statements in conjunction with feedback from people around the country in our new FaceBook Policy Discussion Group.

I look forward to a quick return to the current and correct information for the Party as edited earlier this week.

--Glennstapo(talk)14:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Glennstapo(talk)12:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning,you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesEnvironmentandVictoria(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Fixes Required to Australian Country Party (2004) Page

Dear Leo,

Please find below the fixes required to bring our page up to date and reflect who and what we now are.

Thank You,

Glenn O'Rourke

Required updates to ensure Wiki Page Reflects the truth of who the Australian Country Party is from December 2018

Below are reverted edits that I believe should be reintroduced based on the factual information included and cited. I have provided the coded text, including cites to make the job easier for whoever takes on the fixing of our Page to bring it up to date and reflect who we are in 2019.

I note that I have a conflict of Interest as the New Federal Chairman of the Party and so I require someone to review and confirm the facts being presented, so they can be updated on the page.

Please note the additions to the Cate Speaks reference placed by one of your editors. There are notes there after I communicated directly with Cate.

1. Ideology - Grassroots Democracy, Australian Nationalism, Economic Nationalism

We do not believe that our patriotic positions are actually - Australian Nationalism and Economic Nationalism, but a broad patriotic position that is embraced by the majority of Australians of all nationality backgrounds and definitely not right wing.

We are definitely not social conservative.

| ideology =Grassroots democracy
Australian nationalism
Economic nationalism

2. Political Position - Broad-Center

| position =broad-center

3. Opening Paragraph

We are not a Victorian only Based Party and further, we are not "dedicated solely to the interests of regional communities", and was created to provide an alternative to the National Party in country Victoria. That Statement is historic and the Parties National Focus Commenced mid-2018.

The Suggested opening statements for the page are:

TheAustralian Country Party(ACP) is a Federaly Registered political party,headquartered and also registered in the Australian state ofVictoria.It has previously been named theCountry Allianceand theAustralian Country Alliance.

The party is focused on grassroots national issues, describing itself as a "Truly Democratic, Grass Roots Political Party for Australia", and provides an alternative to theAustralian Labor Party,Liberal Party of AustraliaandNational Party of Australiaas a voice for all Australians.

The Australian Country Party has commenced its national expansion with the application for registration in the Northern Territory.

In closing, I believe there should be some reflection to the complete change of Ideology, Positioning and direction the Party has embarked on in line with the Party Media Release widely distributed on January 15. A link to the media release is here -

Thank you to whoever fixes our Page.

Regards, Glenn O'Rourke

Glennstapo(talk)12:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCandidates of the 2019 Australian federal election,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageScience Party(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Reversion

Hi and sorry to revert your recent small change, but I'll be explaining why on the talk page of that article.Laterthanyouthink(talk)04:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Football Victoria logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing.There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution,along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot ownerif you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content.SeeUser:RonBotfor info on how to not get these messages.RonBot(talk)17:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Great Australian Party logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Great Australian Party logo.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNational Premier Leagues Victoria,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRound-robin(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect,since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)15:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NPL Victoria logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:NPL Victoria logo.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)02:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Re: FK Crvena zvezda

That's great, thanks LeoC12! –PeeJay18:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Football Victoria logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Football Victoria logo.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)02:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPublic holidays in Australia,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNational holiday(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of HP Boyz

Hello LeoC12,

I wanted to let you know that I just taggedHP Boyzfor deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion,but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note onmy talk pageif you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via thePage Curationtool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator(talk)13:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2020 Eden-Monaro by-election,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNimbin(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Infobox changes

I notice you have made a number of edits to the infoboxes of Australian MPs, replacing the constituency_MP and parliament fields with an office field containing "Member of Parliament for [Division]". Would you be able to explain and discuss the rationale for the change atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politicsso we can get a consensus on this alteration to a widely-used convention? Thanks, --Canley(talk)01:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Will do!LeoC12(talk)05:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2020 Bosnian municipal elections,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKljuč.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Croatian Parliament political groups

Hi,

on July 31, 2020 I made changes to theCroatian Parliamentwebsite, which you undid two times on August 1, 2020. After the 2nd revert, you claimed you'rehappy to go to the talk page to gain consensus.That same day, I explained my views as to why I've made the changes. Since then, you haven't replied to my section on thetalkpage, even when it was your idea after all to do this. You undid my changes again on September 1, 2020, still with no reply on the mentioned talk page, just with the short explanation in the changes summary that you havenot had more time to address this on talkand that youagree with the editor before. I am now encouraging you to explain (either here or on thetalkpage) why you think my changes areillogicalandnonsensical,which I will be very open to hear. Locky74(talk)11:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

List of High Court cases

Leo there is no claim being made that Chan is the most important High Court case. The table is navigable, with LawCite citations and dates able to be used to view the cases in an order for the reader. Please do not just randomly do a massive reversion to edits that took a high amount of effort; (including adding citation details, and citation statistics) without seeking consensus first.

The existing cases on the page were selected completely arbitrarily. There is no reason why the previous version of the page is better, other than conservatism and inertia. Please do not just randomly revert my bold edits. If you look at the page view statistics; you might also note that since my revision the page has seen a large uptick in viewership.Jack4576(talk)04:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

No one, including me would claim that Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs is the 'most important' Australian case ever. However, it is the most cited case. You might notice that before my bold edits, House v The King & Jones v Dunkel didn't even have entries. Those cases, especially house; ARE arguably the most important cases ever. I have reverted your reversion, and let us please continue this discussion on the article's talk pageJack4576(talk)04:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey – I want to reiterate once again that I know you've put in a lot of work in editing that article; I hate it when I do that too and somebody reverts it. This is why I'm suggesting that that table article of most cited articles is perhaps made into a separate article such as 'list of most cited HCA cases'. I just think that using LawCite is not a criterion that should feature in an article such as this one, especially since it is not a tool really used much by lawyers.

On the point of the uptick in viewership; I think that is a matter of causation vs correlation – I think this is attributable to media publicisation of proposed lawsuits to the HCA relating to the pandemic and emergency powers.

I think your point on seeking consensus equally applies to you too – you made these large edits on a longstanding article without really obtaining consensus either. Nevertheless, I'm willing to make a post on the article talk page/WikiProject Australian Law so that the issue is resolved.

In any case, I think an article likeList of United Kingdom Supreme Court casescould be a good compromise, since the table is broken up into distinct sections, and the citation information is absent.

No hard feelings man, I know we just both want the article to be the best there is.LeoC12(talk)09:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

I suspect that the increased viewership has come from interest in the page generated by this Reddit post; which was created by an internet stranger within a week of my actioning the consensus decision to put the whole page into a sortable table.LINK

I disagree with your objection to the use of LawCite statistics, they are just one of many variables that can be used to sort the table; as the wikipedia reader chooses. The reader is now able to sort the table by which court it was (as in the chief justice), the date decided, as well as LawCite statistics. In the previous page formatting; there is no ability for the reader to do any sorting at all.

I disagree with the need to create a new, almost totally redundant page just to include LawCite statistics. Why not just include it as one of the variables on the existing sortable list page?

My point on seeking consensus absolutely does not apply to me. My reformatting of the page into a sortable table, was in line with previous consensus being reached about the need to create a sortable table. The discussion on the page I was involved in with the user FindBruce; was at a stage where there existed two tables on the page. In an effort to accomodate the consensus that had been reached, I then consolidated it into ONE sortable table; which was the sortable table that you reverted. Note that consensus about making changes, is different to consensus for a bizzare, out of nowhere reversion; which is clearly outside of the wikipedia guidelines for reversion.

The List of UK Supreme court cases page absolutely is not a good compromise. How does that make any sense? The page is entirely the same as the High Court list; except it is split into year by year. The High Court has been operating for over 100 years, the UK Supreme Court has only been around for less than 20. So no, I am afraid I disagree with that page being a good compromise.

There are no hard feelings on my end, please refrain however from doing massive reverts in a way that exceeds the purpose of reversion under Wiki's guidelines.WP:STATUSQUO

Additionally, your reversion didn't only return the article to a prior formatting; it actually effectively deleted links that had been made to many of Australia's most important cases.Jack4576(talk)07:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hospo Voicemoved to draftspace

An article you recently created,Hospo Voice,is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?)Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiabilityis ofcentral importanceon Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace(with a prefix of "Draft:"before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guidelineand thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}17:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hospo Voice logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Hospo Voice logo.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)18:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRajko Tomović,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageYugoslav.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article,Draft:Hospo Voice

Hello, LeoC12. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creationsubmission orDraftpage you started, "Hospo Voice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace,the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion.An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!20:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:2020 Democratic Party primary results table

Template:2020 Democratic Party primary results tablehas beennominated for deletion.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.WikiCleanerMan(talk)15:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:Composition bar original

Template:Composition bar originalhas beennominated for deletion.You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.–Jonesey95(talk)16:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NPL Victoria logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:NPL Victoria logo.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Great Australian Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Great Australian Party.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)