User talk:Peregrine981
This page has archives. Sections older than31 daysmay be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot IIIwhen more than 4 sections are present. |
Early comments
[edit]Hello, Peregrine981. Welcome to Wikipedia.
A few tips for you to start going. (I'll send more if I see that I can help you:-)
- Just edit stuff off the cuff for a while. We like that!
- When you have time, check outWikipedia:Welcome, newcomers+ the links in there.
- You can sign your stuff on talk pages with ~~~~ It will convert to your username + the time. "anon" is fine too.
- If puzzled, put a question onWikipedia:Village pump,or feel free to ask me on my talk page if it's a very general question.
- Most of all, have fun but take our work seriously!
--Cimon Avaro on a pogo-stick23:08 26 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Article Licensing
[edit]Hi, I'vestarted a driveto get users tomulti-licenseall of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using theCreative CommonsAttribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0Licensesor into thepublic domainif they prefer. TheCC-by-salicense is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, theGFDL,but it allowsother projects,such asWikiTravel,to use our articles. Since you are among thetop 1000Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or atminimumthose on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ- Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}"template into their user page, but there are other options atTemplate messages/User namespace.The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}"with"{{MultiLicensePD}}".If you only prefer using theGFDL,I would like to know that too.Please let me knowwhat you think at mytalk page.It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. --Ram-Man(comment|talk)
Updated
[edit]I updated that aerial photo to include a link to its original site.. also, I added one of those template things to the Halifax page, and in the process I accidentally deleted the Argyle street pic. I'm assuming that was yours, so if you want to put it back on feel free to do so. -Alexk001
BLP PROD
[edit]Simon-Ehrlich wager
[edit]You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
PR review
[edit]You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Old links
[edit]You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.