Jump to content

User talk:RDWolfgang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, RDWolfgang!Welcome to Wikipedia!Thank you foryour contributions.You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}}on yourtalk pageand ask your question there. Please remember tosign your nameon talk pages by clickingor by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted"by a more experienced editor or joining aWikiProjectto collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Clickherefor a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in theedit summaryfield when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing!lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast17:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reply and the information it is going to help me a lot. Can Helpme with a draft it is almost completed but it got rejected. can you please check that for me and tell me how can I improve that draft so that it get accepted to be published. name of the draft: Draft: Bang Chan.
Thank YouRDWolfgang(talk)14:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your draft article.

[edit]

Hi @RDWolfgang,I see you created a draft,Draft:Bang Chan draftwhen there is already a draft of the same topic,Draft:Bang Chan.Please consider editing that one instead of making another. Thanks,Lordseriouspig09:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I had searched before creating one, but since I did not search using the exact draft name, I couldn't find it. Thank you so much for your message.Can you help me with the existing draft, 'Draft: Bang Chan,' as it got declined? Please tell me how I can improve it.RDWolfgang(talk)14:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The draft was declined as the sources didn’t show that the topic met ourWP:GNG,so I would say find more sources, especially reliable ones.Lordseriouspig15:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfCnotification:Draft:Bang Chanhas a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Bang Chan.Thanks!CNMall41(talk)19:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Bang Chanhas been accepted

[edit]
Bang Chan,which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class,which is recorded on itstalk page.This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading schemeto see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creationif you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Catalk to me!13:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work on resurrecting this article from deletion! It is very comprehensive and detailed article. There are some parts that is uncited, like his birth date (the cited source only mentions his birth city, not year), but you might want to try continuing to work on this article for it to become aWP:Good Article,where it will be reviewed by other editors to be formally designated as a "good article". Good luck!Catalk to me!13:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your kind words and for acknowledging my efforts in expanding the article! I appreciate your feedback regarding the uncited parts, and I will definitely work on adding reliable sources, especially for the birth date. I'm committed to improving the article further and aiming for it to become a Good Article. Thank you again for your support!RDWolfgang(talk)15:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section at RSN

[edit]

Hi RDWolfgang. Did you use an AI chat it to write your post atWP:RSN?If not you don't need to be so formal, it's just a place to ask for advice from fellow editors. --LCUActivelyDisinterested«@» °∆t°16:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I copied "The Honey POP is geared towards 15–25-year-olds and is run by a team of young creatives who are fans themselves. The website's content includes news and opinion pieces that share stories from the fans' own viewpoint." from the internet because it was the only information I could find about The Honey Pop.
and I can't talk informally that well, but yeah, sure! thanks for the advice!RDWolfgang(talk)17:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problems, just want to reach out. --LCUActivelyDisinterested«@» °∆t°17:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Yeji (singer)(October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creationhas been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Windborne Rider was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 kỵ viêm(𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔)12:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Hwang Hyun-jinhas been accepted

[edit]
Hwang Hyun-jin,which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class,which is recorded on itstalk page.Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelopover time. You may like to take a look at thegrading schemeto see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creationif you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 kỵ viêm(𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔)13:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RM

[edit]

Hey, heads up if you wanted to delete your your requested move of Hyunjin before anyone participates... given the article wasjustcreated and it's very obvious that the subject is only known as the mononym, it's probably safe to assume it's uncontroversial and process it as an undiscussedWP:BOLDMOVE.I can handle that process once the requested move is deleted if you wish (or you can do it yourself).RachelTensions(talk)15:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since another editor suggested "Hyunjin (Rapper)," I thought it best to discuss with others before moving it to "Hyunjin" or "Hyunjin (Rapper)." However, if we both agree on just using "Hyunjin," feel free to proceed with the move. I'll go ahead and delete the request.RDWolfgang(talk)16:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I submitted it atWP:RMTRachelTensions(talk)16:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:I.N (singer)has been accepted

[edit]
I.N (singer),which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creationif you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K-Pop contributor(✍️📚)02:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request: Range Block Issue

[edit]

This user is asking that theirblockbe reviewed:

RDWolfgang(block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser(log))


Request reason:

I am an extended confirmed user with over 500 edits and 3+ months of activity on Wikipedia. The IP address or range 103.175.62.0/24 block is affecting my IP address (103.175.62.236). I have not engaged in any disruptive behavior and believe this block is unintentional. I kindly request an IP block exemption to continue contributing constructively.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Pleasecheck the list of active blocks.If no block is listed, then you have beenautoblockedby the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow theseinstructionsinstead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read ourguide to appealing blocksto make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administratoruse only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator"with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator|2=I am an extended confirmed user with over 500 edits and 3+ months of activity on Wikipedia. The IP address or range 103.175.62.0/24 block is affecting my IP address (103.175.62.236). I have not engaged in any disruptive behavior and believe this block is unintentional. I kindly request an IP block exemption to continue contributing constructively.|3 = ~~~~}}

If youdeclinethe unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting{{subst:Decline reason here}}with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of adefault reason,explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am an extended confirmed user with over 500 edits and 3+ months of activity on Wikipedia. The IP address or range 103.175.62.0/24 block is affecting my IP address (103.175.62.236). I have not engaged in any disruptive behavior and believe this block is unintentional. I kindly request an IP block exemption to continue contributing constructively.|decline ={{subst:Decline reason here}}~~~~}}

If youacceptthe unblock request, replace this template with the following, substitutingAccept reason herewith your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am an extended confirmed user with over 500 edits and 3+ months of activity on Wikipedia. The IP address or range 103.175.62.0/24 block is affecting my IP address (103.175.62.236). I have not engaged in any disruptive behavior and believe this block is unintentional. I kindly request an IP block exemption to continue contributing constructively.|accept =accept reason here~~~~}}
@HJ Mitchell:can you take a look here?Elli(talk|contribs)05:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RD, you're definitely not a spammer. I was about to flip the switch for IP block exemption but I looked at the IP address and it's used by Oxylabs, which provides anonymising proxies. Do you know anything about that? Are you using a VPN or similar?HJ Mitchell|Penny for your thoughts?09:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not using any VPN, proxy, or anonymising services and I never used any of these. I primarily edit using Wi-Fi when on my laptop occasionally from my mobile phone using my regular mobile data connection. I’m not aware of any connection to Oxylabs or proxies.RDWolfgang(talk)10:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could this be possible that my ISP uses dynamic or shared IPs that might be flagged as proxies? I assure you that I have no intention of using any anonymizing services or circumventing Wikipedia's policies. Let me know if any additional details are needed.RDWolfgang(talk)10:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]