User talk:RoyBoy
What the heck is this gonna do?RoyBoy05:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Trust, but verify
[edit]Trust, but verifyis old (but still solid) advice. Just a light-hearted link to a quirky little article. -2/0(cont.)18:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again, wow that was messed up. Did we just post to each other's talk pages in the same minute about different things? Freaky. -RoyBoy18:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like it. Certainly I got your notice by saving this page and got a laugh when I saw who was pinging me. Happy editing. -2/0(cont.)19:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Abortion: "Art, literature and film"
[edit]Since going back in the history files I see that you were the one who created this section of the abortion article, I thought I'd make sure that you know (what you probably already know) that it was recently removed from the article. There was a discussion about it on the article's Talk page at "Anne Sexton/Don't be buffaloed."KatieHepPal(talk)19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleAbortionyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofAlanZhu314159265358979--AlanZhu314159265358979(talk)06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Saipan Colonial Period Names
[edit]Dear RoyBoy, please consider:
The period when Saipan was controlled by the Spanish is called the Spanish colonial period. The period when Saipan was controlled by the Germans is called the German colonial period. The period when Saipan was controlled by the Japanese is called the Japanese colonial period.
but...
The period when Saipan was controlled by the US is NOT called the US colonial period.
Is uniformity of descriptions not a goal of Wikipedia? Is Wikipedia aiming at truth, or simply a mouthpiece for the colonial masters?
Thanks!— Precedingunsignedcomment added by202.155.205.54(talk)05:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- You may have a point, but you made it very poorly by making a header in Saipan very long and argumentative. A heading in an encyclopedia shouldn't contain a question. Do you have any sources that call it "US colonialism", is there evidence that this was done against the will of the population? -RoyBoy00:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Roy, I do have a point, and it's blindingly obvious! I tried to just change it so it was in line with the convention for the previous three periods, simply saying "US Colonial Period" but it got changed back, as for some reason the naming conventions magically changed the moment the first US boots hit the shores of Saipan. I would say unless you have a document showing that the people of Saipan invited the US in, then it's a colony regardless.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by202.155.205.54(talk)08:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- As a US "commonwealth"it's defined as" self-governing under a constitution of its adoption and whose right of self-government will not be unilaterally withdrawn by Congress ". If it isn't a colony, then calling it colonialism sounds inaccurate and inflammatory. You need reliable sources to support a minority view, not aninformal fallacytrying to shift the burden of evidence. -RoyBoy01:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
The articleAbortionyou nominated as agood articlehas failed;seeTalk:Abortionfor reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofAlanZhu314159265358979--AlanZhu314159265358979(talk)02:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Self Decay
[edit]The articleSelf Decayhas beenproposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:
- Non-notable local band.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in youredit summaryor onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop theproposed deletion process,but otherdeletion processesexist. In particular, thespeedy deletionprocess can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletionallows discussion to reachconsensusfor deletion.QVVERTYVS(hm?)22:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Your contributed article,Marine Science
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizardto help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,Marine Science.First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page –Marine science.Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged forspeedy deletion.Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out atMarine science– you might like to discuss new information atthe article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you maycontest the nominationbyvisiting the pageand clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest thearticle creation processand using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.MrRD19:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ChemicalGalaxy Stewart 2004.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploadingFile:ChemicalGalaxy Stewart 2004.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)03:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ST-TNG The Inner Light.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploadingFile:ST-TNG The Inner Light.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)03:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
[edit]Hello, RoyBoy. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection(also known as "30/500 protection" ) is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned"extended confirmed" user rightwas created for this purpose. The protection level was created followingthis community discussionwith the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016,a request for commentestablished consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective.It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboardof each use.MusikBot currently does this by updatinga report,which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please reviewthe protection policycarefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'mass message list.To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GroceryGatewayLogo.GIF
[edit]Thanks for uploadingFile:GroceryGatewayLogo.GIF.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)18:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
[edit]Hello,
Please note thatTOTPbased two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on yourpreferences pagein the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see thedeveloping help pagefor additional information.Important:Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to thethread on the administrators' noticeboard.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
[edit]Hi RoyBoy.
A new user group,New Page Reviewer,has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin atPERM.It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are availableherebut very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us atWT:NPR.(Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery(talk)13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, RoyBoy. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.Mdann52(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, RoyBoy. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
[edit]News and updates for administratorsfrom the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it pleasesubscribe.Yourfeedbackis welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate•Schwede66•K6ka•Ealdgyth•Ferret•Cyberpower678•Mz7•Primefac•Dodger67
- Briangotts•JeremyA•BU Rob13
- Adiscussionto workshop proposals to amend theadministrator inactivity policyatWikipedia talk:Administratorshas been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016closed with no consensus for implementingPending changes level 2with new criteria for use.
- Followingan RfC,an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, anRfCclosed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation hasannounceda newcommunity health initiativeto combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee releaseda responseto the Wikimedia Foundation'sstatement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD(John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Blade Runnerhas been scheduled for the above date astoday's featured article.I'd appreciate it if you could check the article one more time to make sure it's up-to-date. You're welcome but not obligated to edit the text that will appear on the Main Page; I'll be trimming it to around 1100 characters. Thanks! - Dank (push to talk)19:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for heads up, brought blurb down to 1512. Will be hard to tighten without removing items, but without Rental and Remaster memes; gets it to 1327. -RoyBoy03:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Getting the wikibug back:), down to 1415. -RoyBoy03:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Careful, it's a hard bug to shake once you get it! - Dank (push to talk)03:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Heh, damnnn straight. Can I aim for 1200 chars or under? -RoyBoy21:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Down to 1257, removed Hollywood meme. -RoyBoy22:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- At first glanceBlade_Runnerstill looks sexy as hell, but if I engage my rusty Admin mode; would I be correct in thinking a good chunk ofBlade_Runner#Sequelcan be summarised, with existing content moved/merged toBlade_Runner_2049?-RoyBoy22:13, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Great plan. - Dank (push to talk)01:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]Blade Runner
Thank you for qulity articles such asBlade Runner,your favorite filmillustrated,forChinatownandIntelligent design( "helped" ), for "I hope my addiction can be put to some use around here", found on your marvel of a user page, - yes, Roy, you are anawesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt(talk)05:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks much! -RoyBoy14:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Two years ago, you were recipient no.1684of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt(talk)07:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Replied on "ABC hypothesis" TALK page
[edit]Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)specifically says:"Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content."That is a direct quotation which you can easily verify. Best wishes,HandsomeMrToad(talk)00:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RoyBoy. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletionnomination ofChemical Galaxy
[edit]A tag has been placed onChemical Galaxyrequesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Unremarkable book - author's article was just deleted for lack of notability.
Under thecriteria for speedy deletion,pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nominationbyvisiting the pageand clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator,or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Edward321(talk)01:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
The articleChemical Galaxyhas beenproposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:
Non-notable book. The article on the author has already been deleted due to lack of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in youredit summaryor onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop theproposed deletion process,but otherdeletion processesexist. In particular, thespeedy deletionprocess can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletionallows discussion to reachconsensusfor deletion.Edward321(talk)03:55, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chemical Galaxy II.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploadingFile:Chemical Galaxy II.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you.ShakespeareFan00(talk)13:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ChemicalGalaxy Longman 1951.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploadingFile:ChemicalGalaxy Longman 1951.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you.ShakespeareFan00(talk)13:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RoyBoy. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination ofSmartcar (company)for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSmartcar (company)is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartcar (company)until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Ymblanter(talk)07:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
RFC Request
[edit]Dear Fellow Wikipedian
I would like to invite you to my RFC request on the pageOne America News Networks.I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.
Kind Regards
Saad Ahmed2983(talk)11:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
[edit]Administratorsmustsecure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following arecent motion.Thank you for your attention. For theArbitration Committee,Cameron1159802:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
[edit]ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they arerequiredto "have strong passwords andfollow appropriate personal security practices."We haveupdatedour procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular,two-factor authenticationremains anoptionalmeans of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron1159821:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Precious anniversary
[edit]Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt(talk)08:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Establishedpolicyprovides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available atWikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators.If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request atthe bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89bot00:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt(talk)07:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Black Coffee (DVD).png
[edit]Thanks for uploadingFile:Black Coffee (DVD).png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer beautopatrolled
[edit]Arecently closedRequest for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to removeAutopatrolledfrom the administrator user group. You may, similarly as withEdit Filter Manager,choose toself-assignthis permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit theAdministrator's Noticeboard.20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
[edit]Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an adminwill still be able to access the IP.There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working onbetter toolsto help.
If you have not seen it before, you canread more on Meta.If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you cansubscribetothe weekly technical newsletter.
We havetwo suggested waysthis identity could work.We would appreciate your feedbackon which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You canlet us know on the talk page.You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The articleAnderson Water Systemshas beenproposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:
Article is written like the "about us" on a company website. I can findno significant coverage in reliable sources.An IP added a claim that the company is now SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions, but I can't findRSto back that up; SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions doesn't mention Andersonon its own site.I wouldBLARtoDegrémont,which I can verify it became part of; but it's not discussed in any depth there.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in youredit summaryor onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop theproposed deletion process,but otherdeletion processesexist. In particular, thespeedy deletionprocess can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletionallows discussion to reachconsensusfor deletion.--Tamzin[cetacean needed](she/they)01:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Establishedpolicyprovides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available atWikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators.If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request atthe bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89bot00:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
[edit]The administrator policy has been updated with newactivity requirementsfollowing a successfulRequest for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Establishedpolicyprovides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available atWikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators.If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request atthe bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89bot00:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Establishedpolicyprovides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request atWP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —xaosfluxTalk00:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thx for your ongoing work. Wow, 1 year & 1 month since my last edit... never thought that would happen when I first joined. Best of luck to u and the imperfect project. -RoyBoy17:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Monsanto
[edit]You made a redirect,Controlling our food,about 15 years ago, and it now points to a section that no longer exists. Do you want to take a look at it?WhatamIdoing(talk)20:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, updated to less specific destination. You sound familiar... wow its been awhile!Scanning user page; we match on Tobacco smoke and DST: my concern mental health. Windows, interesting stance, my guess more flexible, collaborative and distracting. Similar to why Android leads mobile, pricing is a factor but perhaps that dovetails into centralized vs decentralized control. I watch too much TV, while it would be more productive to redirect that time back to Wikipedia... alas the work fades into mediocrity.RoyBoy17:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- I find that it's still fun to add content, especially if I see some obscure detail in the news and wonder whether Wikipedia has an article on it yet.WhatamIdoing(talk)21:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
"Reearthing"listed atRedirects for discussion
[edit]The redirectReearthinghas been listed atredirects for discussionto determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines.Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 24 § Reearthinguntil a consensus is reached.Skarmory(talk •contribs)07:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta pageand view itsprivacy statement.
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,