User talk:Samsam22

Welcome

Hello, Samsam22!Welcometo Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributionsto this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check outGetting Helpbelow, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}}on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember tosign your nameon talk pages by clickingor using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in theedit summaryfield. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!Cheers,:) Dlohcierekim23:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial•The five pillars of Wikipedia•Getting mentored How to:edit a page•upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions•Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view•No original research Verifiability•Reliable sources•Citing sources What Wikipedia is not•Biographies of living persons Manual of Style•Three-revert rule•Sock puppetry Copyrights•Policy for non-free content•Image use policy External links•Spam•Vandalism Deletion policy•Conflict of interest•Notability The community Build consensus•Resolve disputes Assume good faith•Civility•Etiquette No personal attacks•No legal threats Community Portal•Village pump Signpost•IRC channels•Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing•Develop an article The perfect article•Manual of style Stubs•Categories•Disambiguation Pages needing attention•Peer review Miscellaneous User name•User pages•Talk pages Clean up:General-Spam-Vandalism Join a WikiProject•Translation Useful templates•Tools•User scripts

Epithets

Hi Samsam22, welcome to Wikipedia! I do appreciate your contributions to the articles regarding the Mamluks, namely adding epithets. But I think your last changes decreased the readability of the introductions of the related articles. Now I will make some changes on the articleQalawunin order to increase the readability of the introductory section. Please let me know what you think about it. If it suits you too, you can go on like that. Thank you. --Chapultepec20:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

reply epithets

Hi Chapultepec, thank you for your message. I think no problem as long as the royal epithets is quoted. Many people are confused from the names as many sultans had same epithets. quoting the orginal name then adding the royal names might help. In the case of Qalawun as I was not editing but only adding epithets, some things changed because orginal editor added lines for various ways to spell the name. I think the best is to quote the orginal name first then add the epithets so that it be clear and standared in all articles. Samsam2221:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

So let's decide here, I have given some specimens infra:

1. 1:

Epithet:al-Malik al-Mansour Saif al-Din Qalawun al-Alfi al-Salihi al-Najmi al-Ala'i(Arabic: الملك المنصور سيف الدين قلاوون الألفى الصالحى النجمى العلاءى)

Qalawun al-Alfi(alsoQala'unorKalavun) (Arabic:قلاوون الألفى) (c.1222–November 10,1290) was aMamluksultanofEgypt.He was in theBahriline and ruled Egypt from 1279 to 1290.

1. 2:

Qalawun al-Alfi(alsoQala'unorKalavun) (Arabic:قلاوون الألفى) (c.1222–November 10,1290) (Epithet:al-Malik al-Mansour Saif al-Din Qalawun al-Alfi al-Salihi al-Najmi al-Ala'i(Arabic: الملك المنصور سيف الدين قلاوون الألفى الصالحى النجمى العلاءى)) was aMamluksultanofEgypt.He was in theBahriline and ruled Egypt from 1279 to 1290.

1. 3:

Qalawun al-Alfi(alsoQala'unorKalavun) (Arabic:قلاوون الألفى) (c.1222–November 10,1290) was aMamluksultanofEgypt.He was in theBahriline and ruled Egypt from 1279 to 1290.

Epithet:al-Malik al-Mansour Saif al-Din Qalawun al-Alfi al-Salihi al-Najmi al-Ala'i(Arabic: الملك المنصور سيف الدين قلاوون الألفى الصالحى النجمى العلاءى)

Which one is approprate in your opinion?

Dear samsam,, i have no idea how to use wikipedia to connect with other users! but i really need to talk to you about one of the historical figures that you wrote an article about..i might be one of his descendants. my email is [email protected]— Precedingunsignedcomment added byTalkinshadow(talk•contribs)06:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

=

I think #2 looks good.

Ok then, let's go on with #2. Thank you. Happy edit. --Chapultepec22:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

=

ok fine. What do you think about article Shajarat al-Durr. her name was shajar al-Durr not shajarat al-Durr. is it possible to change the title? thanx Samsam2222:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Let me search for that. I'll be back again. --Chapultepec22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Not sure exactly, a brief search gave results from both names. I will make a detailed search, then I will be able to reply. Thanks. --Chapultepec22:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Even if I have found serious sources citing her Sahajarat al-Durr, the sources naming her Shajar al-Durr seemed more plentiful to me. Besides, in an article atBritannica Onlineher name is given as "Shajar al-Durr". And I think that's enough. --Chapultepec23:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

But I think "Shajar al-Durr" article already exists and redirects to the "Shajarat al-Durr" article. In this case, an administrator can realize the requested move. --Chapultepec23:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

- yes that is right. but I just was wondering whether title of page could be corrected not only redirecte. But thanx.

Ok, I'm gonna make a request for that. But seeing the results may require a couple of days. --Chapultepec23:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok Chapultepec, thank you. good job.

Shajar al-Durr

Hi again, there is an ongoing discussion in the talk page ofShajarat al-Durrarticle. The url isTalk:Shajarat al-Durr.So you can have your comments there. Thanks. --Chapultepec20:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

---

Hi Chapultepec, thank you. I added comment in discussion. regards Samsam2209:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

baibars

hello,did you add the scans from the book serat al-zahir beibars yet??pls let me know.thanxGrandia0116:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

== Hi Grandia01, no I did not yet. I havn't been on internet for a few days. I will scan soon. Thank you. Samsam2217:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ofAl-Said Barakah

A tag has been placed onAl-Said Barakahrequesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion,because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion,articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable,as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}}to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe article's talk pageexplaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedydeletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Jack?!22:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the note! Anyone can mark a page for deletion, however only an administrator can actually delete it. Because there is a constant stream of unencyclopedic material (often advertisements, autobiographies, or vandalism), there are a number of volunteers who monitorSpecial:Newpagesand tag any article which should not be in the encyclopedia. Because so many articles come in, however, the initial assessment is generally done quickly and without checking outside additional reference works). As a secondary measure, before the article is deleted, an administrator (me in this case) reviews the article to make sure we're not deleting something which should be saved. Your additions to the article, and the discussion on the talk page, indicated that the original request to delete the article was an error. Thanks for the great work, and let me know if there is anything I can do to help. --TeaDrinker(talk)00:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Barakah

I'm gonna add the dates too, thank you. --Chapultepec(talk)21:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi again, I merged a duplicate sentence regarding his marriage with Ghaziyah, and corrected his death category as per your changes. Now it's your turn in the article:) --Chapultepec(talk)22:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Of course, no problem, this can be mentioned later within the context of the article. --Chapultepec(talk)22:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I think a sub-section titled "rise to power" can be suitable for that paragraph, so we can divide the biography section into major sub-sections like "early life", "rise to power" etc. --Chapultepec(talk)23:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

It seems great, thank you! --Chapultepec(talk)22:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I made minor edits only. Good job in a short period of time. --Chapultepec(talk)09:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I've just seen the article. It seems a whole lot better now. We can do a small article for Salamish too, no problem. Shoukran ghazilan! --Chapultepec(talk)19:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

That's great, I'm gonna make some minor edits for Solamish article now, thank you. --Chapultepec(talk)11:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi again, I think you're right about the name of Solamish, I added my comments in the discussion page as well, and thanks a lot for the article. --Chapultepec(talk)22:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Solamish is ok, no need to change the name of the article, this way is better. Best regards. --Chapultepec(talk)23:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Early Muslim military history task force

Salam, I invite you to join us inEarly Muslim military history task force.--Seyyed(t-c)06:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

This task force covers the early military history of Islam and the various Muslim states, up to c. 1000 A.H. (c. 1600 AD). The primary focus is the Muslim conquests, the various Caliphates, and the early Islamic civil wars. You can add your name[1].and add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/User WPMILHIST Early Muslim military history task force}} on your user page. Then you become a member of the task force. In "|To-do] "some works has been suggested. In" [|Watchlist] "some articles have been gathered and you can see the recent changes of them. You can also add other articles.--Seyyed(t-c)17:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to theMilitary history WikiProject!As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Ournavigation boxpoints to most of the useful pages within the project.
• Theannouncement and open task boxis updated very frequently. You canwatchlist itif you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including{{WPMILHIST Announcements}}there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project'smain discussion page;it is highly recommended that youwatchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handlearticle quality assessment,detailed article and content review,article improvement contests,and other tasks.
• We have a number oftask forcesthat focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed astyle guidethat covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• The project has astress hotlineavailable for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of theproject coordinators,or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!Kirill22:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXIII (January 2008)

TheJanuary 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)01:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Arabic names

Hi again! I've been condensing Arabic names at the beginning of articles - rather than have, for example "Baibars al-Bunduqdari, known as al-Malik etc etc", I thought it would be easier to say "al-Malik etc...Baibars..." all at once. I know most of the words are not actually part of his name, but are rather his name and titles, but it seems more appropriate to put them all in the first sentence. Also, I've been changing English transliterations to something that appears more standard, at least to my eyes. So, instead of "Abu Alfitooh" I put "Abu al-Fituh", which looks more like transliterated Arabic to me and matches the actual Arabic better. I wanted to mention this because I assume you are a native Arabic speaker, so you would know better than me!Adam Bishop(talk)20:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The ultimate form inBaibarsarticle is also nice. We should keep it as short as possible to augment readability. But in fact, you're right at one point, royal names of Mamluk sultans start with al-Malik, so all the sultans will seem to bear the same name. I'm not sure of what to do about that. Best regards. --Chapultepec(talk)22:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, well, we could assume that the reader will be wise enough to figure out that "al-malik" is part of a title; for me, it was one of the first Arabic words I learned, but I suppose not everyone will be interested in learning Arabic words. Or, we could translate the whole title in each article, since it is interesting to know what all the honorific titles mean. I rememberUser:Striverused to create a separate section at the beginning of Arabic articles to include the entire name and a translation. I didn't like the idea of a separate section, but translating the whole thing is a good idea, I think.Adam Bishop(talk)02:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

In fact good idea, but it will grow the introduction section longer. This can also raise trouble for the user to get to essential information within the crowd of titles and translations. Current revision seems ok even if we can't find a better way. Best regards. --Chapultepec(talk)15:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinatorselection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, pleasesign up hereby February 14!Kirill16:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Assalamualaikum

I went through many sites to know details of El-Mansoura (Egypt).Unfortunately I was not avale to find nice informations.

If you can provide me some information including size of the city with maps of Mansoura,I will Be thankful.

Regard user:classicbanna(talk)17:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

• Hi Classicbanna

For maps see:

http://mansura.net/portal/default.asp?id=13&mnu=1

There are some pictures here:

http://www.ul10.com/Profile.aspx?id=16012&Page=2&bid=1490

Size: ca. 120km2

Distance from cairo: ca. 120 km

Population: including suburbs ca. 1,252,415

RegardsSamsam22(talk)00:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Lajin

Thank you for your contributions. I will have a look at the article for now. Best regards. --Chapultepec(talk)20:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Seems superb for the moment, thank you... --Chapultepec(talk)20:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008Military history WikiProject coordinatorelection has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Pleasevote hereby February 28. --ROGERDAVIES^talk21:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr

I have nominatedSaif ad-Din Abu-Bakr,an article you created, fordeletion.I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr.Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Gary King(talk)00:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• You had my answer. Thank you for your interest.Samsam22(talk)17:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr

Hi, to my mind, to be a Mamluk sultan is fair enough to be mentioned in a separate article. If the same thing happens again, we can express our thoughts in the related discussion page. Best regards. --Chapultepec(talk)22:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Kujuk

Thank you for your creating the article. I will try to edit for the moment. Best wishes. --Chapultepec(talk)07:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Shihab ad-Din Ahmad

Hi Samsam, I will have a look at the article. You're doing a good job, thanks a lot. --Chapultepec(talk)12:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

expanding Muslim military history task force

I have been reelected coordinator and brought up the old discussion about expanding Muslim military history to the present day. This has been an issue raised by Muslim editors when the task force was founded. It would be great if you could help expanding the articles that present what makes Islams treatment of war effect especially the Muslim warfare. I have been reading a bit on the topic and can help you with advice, but feel myself not confident enough with my limited knowledge.Wandalstouring(talk)12:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Hi Wandalstouring, I am glad you have been reelected coordinator. I wish you all success. As you notice I am busy at this moment with expanding the history of the Mamluk Sultans. But I will be glad to help. Please let me know what is needed. RegrardsSamsam22(talk)18:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Neferka

Do you know whoNeferkamight be?Valtoras(talk)20:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXIV (February 2008)

TheFebruary 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)08:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Images and maps

Hi, Samsam. I will have a look around to the articles. Thanks for your contributions. Meanwhile, the articleKhalilhas no references, it can raise some problems in the future. Would you add some references if you have? Happy editing. --Chapultepec(talk)01:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Tamam abi, yavash yavash... =) --Chapultepec(talk)02:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Khalil

Hi Samsam, yes, I wrote the original article, but that was many years ago and it probably was not a very good article. I see you have been improving it, along with many other Mamluk/crusade articles, which is very much appreciated!Adam Bishop(talk)06:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi all, yes I saw the sentences you mentioned in the article, but I could not find any supporting references either. Maybe we can make further research involving those, then take action accordingly. Thank you. --Chapultepec(talk)12:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Hi, ok I started to fix the article and found a nice image:) Please try to find about these 2 points + about Khalil was called new Alexander. so we can keep it if there is ref. Thank you.Samsam22(talk)20:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The info about the conflict with the Circassians comes from "The Age of the Crusades" by P.M. Holt (page 105-106). Ibn al-Salus is mentioned on page 105 as well. I can't find the reference about him being another Alexander, but I will keep looking.Adam Bishop(talk)05:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

About his being a new Alexander, I could only findthis source.I'm gonna attach it as a reference, but the sentence may be re-worded accordingly. Thanks. --Chapultepec(talk)13:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Tamam, the Alexander sentence is also ok, by the way you made a great job in the article. If you don't mind I will make some minor edits on it for two minutes. Thanks a lot. --Chapultepec(talk)23:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Mazbut, I've finished. You can continue. Again thanks a lot for bringing the article to such a condition. --Chapultepec(talk)23:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Samsam, I will have a look at the article for the moment. Thank you. --Chapultepec(talk)05:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, yes I finished editing the article. It was indeed a very good job. Thanks a lot for your contributions. Until then. --Chapultepec(talk)06:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I've edited the article as well. For now I just fixed spelling and grammar, and I removed all the italics around Arabic names, since we don't need to do that in English. I think there are still a few problems though. First of all, I don't think it is necessary to have so much detail about the Siege of Acre. There is aseparate articlewhere that information would be more useful. Also, I should note that the crusaders controlled Acre for over 80 years before 1191; it was held by Saladin for a few years, but it was a crusader city long before 1191. That is a minor complaint though! I think we will also have to work on the references. There are too many of them, and they are distracting. Some of the information included in the references should be incorporated into the text. Otherwise, they need to be more specific - it is good to quote al-Maqrizi or the Geste des Chiprois, but what page number is the quote from? Who edited the book? When was it published? We need to include that as well.Adam Bishop(talk)09:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem, you're welcome. We're all here to help each other. Best wishes. --Chapultepec(talk)20:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I understand and of course I agree - I like to write neutrally about the crusades as well. I do not think they were good or bad, I just think they were interesting. But it would still be helpful to include page numbers in the footnotes, so we can see where the information is coming from.Adam Bishop(talk)06:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Crusades task force

Hi Samsam, I've created aCrusades task forceas part of the Middle Ages WikiProject, so I thought you might be interested in helping out.Adam Bishop(talk)10:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXV (March 2008)

TheMarch 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)02:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Baibars

Hi, Samsam. Thank you, I'm ok. I hope everything is alright with you too. Yes, I know that guy. He sometimes visits the article for the last two years:) Anyhow, thanks for adding the references. I hope it will dissuade him from trying to add his point of view. --Chapultepec(talk)03:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Aybak

Hi, Samsam. Yes, I have seen the changes you made in the Aybak article. You made a great job again. Thank you. As for the Shajar al-Durr article, in the sources I have read so far, she was always mentioned as a Turkic origined ruler. If the other possibility (that she was of Armenian origin) is not so weighty, is it ok for you to change the word in the introduction fromprobablytomost probably?Again, thanks for your contributions, you're doing a good job. --Chapultepec(talk)16:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

That's also alright, thank you Samsam, mazbut. For the moment I will try to edit Aybak article, if you left something to do for me in there:) --Chapultepec(talk)17:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Samsam, I finished editing Aybak article. Those were minor edits. Please let me know when you finish editing the article of Shajar al-Durr. Thanks a lot. --Chapultepec(talk)18:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem abi, when you're ready, just e-mail me your address, I will send you baklavas at my earliest convenience:) --Chapultepec(talk)19:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The article is more than ready Samsam, I think it's half the weight of all Wikipedia:) Joke apart, thanks for your contributions. You did a good job as usual. I will try to edit at my earliest convenience. --Chapultepec(talk)20:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXVI (April 2008)

TheApril 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)02:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey there!

Greetings! I noticed that you are exerted much effort in articles pertaining to theMamluksandBahris.I too have begun exerted some work on articles concerningBaibarsand the Crusades. I believe that the articles relating to the Crusades are somewhat one sided and slanted toward the European version of events. In any event, I hope I can find the time to contribute more.Scythian1(talk)20:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I have often been guided to avoidthe passive voicegenerally, when writing, though your suggestion for theBaibarsarticle is fine as well.Scythian1(talk)15:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, sounds good brother.Scythian1(talk)18:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

That is true, I am glad that you are positing information that is either hardly conveyed or often overlooked.Scythian1(talk)18:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXVII (May 2008)

TheMay 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)02:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for adding mongol mamluk sultan Kithbuga. I like it.user:Enerelt—Precedingunsignedcomment added by202.131.1.12(talk)10:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Black africans of mamluk army

Hi my friend! Black africans had been served in the armies of dynasties in Egypt since ancinet times. So I have a question to ask you. I wonder whether native africans were among mamluk army and involved the battles against Mongols. I guess they were served for mamluks because Baybars invaded deep into Africa. I think you probably know that. --Enerelt(talk)09:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

TheJune 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)20:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXIX (July 2008)

TheJuly 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)02:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinatorselection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign uphereby 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)23:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXX (August 2008)

TheAugust 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)00:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008Military history WikiProject coordinatorelection has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Pleasevote hereby September 30!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)23:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XXXI (September 2008)

TheSeptember 2008 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)23:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Shihab ad-Din Ahmad

I was reading about the Manluk sultans and saw that you had deleted most of the article about Shihab ad-Din Ahmad because "I was told primary sources are not allowed." That doesn't seem right to me. What were you told? It seems to be that all you really need to do is preface the information by saying "The following is told by X____ about Shihab ad-Din Ahmad's journey to Cairo" or "As told by X____, Shihab ad-Din Ahmad..." The Background section at least looks fine and you found the information from various secondary sources like books on the history of Egypt. With some clean up (I can tell English isn't your first language) and direct citation (citing each fact with a reference instead of just having them at the bottom), the article could be fine and non-controversial. Good work adding all the sultans.Cheeselouise(talk)09:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: XLVIII (February 2010)

TheFebruary 2010 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)23:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for theMilitary history WikiProject coordinatorelections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)22:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: XLIX (March 2010)

TheMarch 2010 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)22:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: L (April 2010)

TheApril 2010 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)19:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: LI (May 2010)

TheMay 2010 issueof the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)21:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: LII (June 2010)

TheMilitary history WikiProjectNewsletter:Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members	Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.

This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)19:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: LIII (July 2010)

TheMilitary history WikiProjectNewsletter:Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.

This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot(talk)21:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: LIV (August 2010)

TheMilitary history WikiProjectNewsletter:Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)23:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinatorelection has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast yourvote hereno later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,Roger Davies^talk19:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: LV (September 2010)

TheMilitary history WikiProjectNewsletter:Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)20:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

An-Nasir Yusuf contradiction

This is the first time I have ever tried to report a problem with Wikipedia, but I noticed a contradiction in the An-Nasir Yusuf article. His birth year is listed as 1228, yet the section on "Relations with Crusaders" suggests he signed a treaty with them in 1224.—Precedingunsignedcomment added by96.35.255.44(talk)16:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News:Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)22:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)23:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions•The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients•bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.Past editions may be viewedhere.BrownBot(talk)21:39, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)16:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)22:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)04:40, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)23:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial:Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere.To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot(talk)23:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed:Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the projector sign uphere.If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot(talk)23:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed:WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the projector sign uphere.If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot(talk)23:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed:Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the projector sign uphere.If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.EdwardsBot(talk)18:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed:Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the projector sign uphere.If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.EdwardsBot(talk)02:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay:Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the projector sign uphere.If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.EdwardsBot(talk)08:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay:Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed:DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugleis published by theMilitary history WikiProject.To receive it on your talk page, pleasejoin the projector signhere.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.Ian Rose(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}21:07, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year"for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do sohere.Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of thecoordinators,Nick-D(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}00:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)You were sent this message because you are a listed as amemberof theMilitary history WikiProject.

The Bugle:Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay:Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed:Hchc's English Castles

The Bugleis published by theMilitary history WikiProject.To receive it on your talk page, pleasejoin the projector sign uphere.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.Your editors,Ian Rose(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}00:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed:Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugleis published by theMilitary history WikiProject.To receive it on your talk page, pleasejoin the projector sign uphere.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.Your editors,Ian Rose(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}10:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed:Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugleis published by theMilitary history WikiProject.To receive it on your talk page, pleasejoin the projector sign uphere.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.Your editors,Ian Rose(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}02:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXXIII, April 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed:The Land on commemorating World War I

The Bugleis published by theMilitary history WikiProject.To receive it on your talk page, pleasejoin the projector sign uphere.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.Your editors,Ian Rose(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}00:41, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle:Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview:Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed:Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugleis published by theMilitary history WikiProject.To receive it on your talk page, pleasejoin the projector sign uphere.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name fromthis page.Your editors,Ian Rose(talk) andEd^{[talk][majestic titan]}15:22, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Military historycoordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its2012 project coordinator election process,where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of thecurrent coordinatorson their talk page.This message was delivered here because you are amemberof the Military history WikiProject.–Military history coordinators(about the project•what coordinators do) 09:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history!As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinatorelection, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection pageby 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Kirill^[talk]18:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history!As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinatorelection, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection pageby 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Ed^{[talk][majestic titan]}22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for theMilitary historian of the yearandMilitary history newcomer of the year.Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for theMilitary historianandMilitary newcomerof the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history!As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinatorelection. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection pageby 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours,Ed^{[talk][majestic titan]}05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015Military historian of the yearandMilitary history newcomer of the yearawards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject!Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page.This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for theMilitary HistorianandNewcomer of the year!If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to allactive membersof the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running itsMarch Madness drive.This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be foundherefor those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards,AustralianRupert(talk) &MediaWiki message delivery(talk)07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject!Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page.This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators,AustralianRupert(talk)10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: theMilitary Historian of the Yearand theMilitary History Newcomer of the Year.Theco-ordinatorsinvite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage:hereandhere.Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions atTalk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery(talk)11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, theApril 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drivebegins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on theAutoCheck report,reviewing articles listed atWP:MILHIST/ASSESS,reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles atWP:GANorWP:FAC,and reviewing articles submitted atWP:MILHIST/ACR.Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up atWikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participantsand create a worklist atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists(examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at thedrive talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)