User talk:Stephenjamesx

Lady Gaga

Be careful, when you are removing a huge chunk of content likehere,please don't add a minor edit tag. Its not a minor edit when over 700K of code is removed. From next time, don't add such misleading edit summary. —Legolas^(talk2me)07:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Theseare some really good changes you are doing. Keep it up. Just one suggestion, change the new image to something, where Gaga is looking towards the text, as perMOS:IMAGES.—Legolas^(talk2me)04:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you have never replied to my messages, probably you don't like me. But oh well, that doesn't change the fact that you have done an awesome job on the prose of Lady Gaga. You should extend your contribution to other Gaga articles also. —Legolas^(talk2me)15:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shush you! Whenever I get a positive message from you it makes me feel like I've accomplished something! AS IF! I don't dislikeanybody- and I mean that so purely.:) Thanks for your nice words! I will continue on Gaga articles! xo -Stephenjamesx(talk)15:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really couldn't do that amount of prose corrections like you, its simply amazing. If you wanna start on any Gaga song, I would advice the prose ofBad Romance,the song is so close to being a FA. Thanks again for your contributions. —Legolas^(talk2me)16:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! *Blushses* I better get working then!;)Stephenjamesx(talk)16:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering, with such wonderful work, why the hell isKerry Ellisnot GA yet??

—Legolas^(talk2me)16:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wondered that too! Hahaha. Aaaaw! Thank you! You're so kind! xo -Stephenjamesx(talk)16:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? Back at the music articles people are really scared of me.:( I don't know why... I better let you work your magic on "Bad Romance".:) —Legolas^(talk2me)16:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(→)Wow, great job on the lead. Take your time with the body of the article. And forthis,you can refer to the Michale Jackson unreleased song which is a Featured list. I'm sure you will make this one also a featured list.:) —Legolas^(talk2me)03:44, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have stayed inNorthamptonfor almost a year. Superb place man!:) —Legolas^(talk2me)10:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your kind words.:) Haha. That's just a little project I started... might finish it... might not! And OMG! YoulikedNorthampton!? It's home, for me, but I just find it ludicrously boring! I want to travel! I want houses all across the world! Where do you live? xo -Stephenjamesx(talk)20:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At present I stay inBangalore,India.How can you say Northampton is boring, its such a cuddly-wuddly place!:) So where you wanna travel first? and hey is "Bad Romance" fine? —Legolas^(talk2me)05:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For all your work

		The Biography Barnstar
		You deserve this for all of your hard work on the Audrey Hepburn article recently. Thanks for your effortsMarnetteD\|Talk 19:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaaaaaaaw! Why thank you. I'm truly appreciative. Thank you very muchhhhhhhhh! (: xoxo -Stephenjamesx(talk)21:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How are you?

Stephen? You haven't spoken to me for a long time? —Legolas^(talk2me)15:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hellooooo! It's been a while! I'm doing quite well thank you, yourself?Stephenjamesx(talk)16:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Stephenjamesx/Lady Gaga Presents: The Monster Ball Tour at Madison Square Garden

I've deletedthe imagethat you're using in the infobox for this page: policy requires all nonfree images to be used in at least one article, but it's only used in your userspace. If you had moved the page to mainspace, there would have been no problems with the image; accordingly, if you move the page to mainspace, just leave a note at my talk page and I'll happily restore the image.Nyttend(talk)01:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pls take part in a conversation

Hey, I'm not sure how keen you are on Lady Gaga's concert tours, but we have an obvious problem with Billboard's reliability. (It says Monster Ball Tour is her first, but as you can see, we have an article on Fame Ball whose sources talk about it being the first tour.) I started aconversation here,pls take part if you are interested. --Frous(talk)03:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-freefiles in your user space

Hey there Stephenjamesx, thank you for your contributions. I am abot,alerting you thatnon-freefiles arenot allowed in user or talk space.Iremovedsome files I found onUser:Stephenjamesx/Lady Gaga as a gay icon.In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to youruser-space draftsor yourtalk page.

See a log of files removed todayhere.

Shut off the bothere.

Report errorshere.

Thank you, --DASHBot(talk)05:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gay icon

Stephen,thisis just some awesome work. However, one tiny suggestion, its just one huge prose, and you need to divide it into sections based on her career. TryJanet Jackson as gay icon,which is aGood Articleand you can include pointers from it. —Legolas^(talk2me)13:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm glad somebody's looked at it. I've been wanting some feedback!:') I've changed it around, although I admit I'm not terribly happy with it as it stands... but we'll get there! Tell me what you think?:)Stephenjamesx(talk)23:18, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree on her being one of the major LGBT icons of today, and the article draft looks solid, a very good start. She seems much more committed to her LGBT following and to their issues than Madonna ever was, committed to them aspeople,not as a pool of fanboys, dancers, record buyers or clubbers, and that bond sems to be reinforced from their side too.

For my own take, I'm not sure she's a great singer but she's undeniably an interesting visual/stage artist and performer and able to turn her talent to some genuinely subversive things. The way she twists around stereotypes of gender, fame and power is very intriguing too. She's both intelligent and gutsy, no question about it.Strausszek(talk)02:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Stephenjamesx. You have new messages atWikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_July_9#User:Stephenjamesx.2FLady_Gaga_as_gay_icon.
Message addedSPhilbrick T18:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC).You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I posted the following to the feedback page, just copying it here:

After posting, I realized you are actively involved with the Lady Gaga article. It doesn't mean that someone won't propose a merger, but it does mean it won't catch you unawares. As for the quotes, I'd simply suggest replacing most of them with {{Template:Quote}}. If you check out the doc, check out the see also section for some alternatives. Note in particular the note that Cquote is "not for use in articles". You might identify one of the best, and use {{Template:RQuote}}, but use it as apull quote,that is, make sure the quote is used within the article itself, then additionally as a left or right aligned pull-quote.

As an aside, I've been discouraged about how rarely someone responds when they get feedback, so thanks you very much for responding. It helps make it worthwhile.--SPhilbrick T02:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think it warrants its own article anyway. She's such a supporter of the LGBT community and it is key to her as a artist, unlike those who have pages under "as a gay icon" - Madonna who just sees them as a fan base (IMO) and Judy Garland who, because of the illiberal state of society she lived in, we don't really know where she stood in terms of appreciating the LGBT community. End of rant! Thanks for the feedback! I've changed the quotes into the formatting you recommend. I await a review from the LGBT portal and while the Gaga Wiki community think the article may be plagued with "recentism", have suggested maybe it should not be titled "Lady Gaga as a gay icon" but something more inclusive of the LGBT community - as she encompasses all areas of the community, not just the G. But I'd like to get this article out there.:)

And as for replying: I think it's important to appreciate everything any person does on this planet, especially if it aids another.:)Stephenjamesx(talk)14:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can appreciate the issues about the title, and have no brilliant solutions. I do hope it doesn't become a committee decision. Titles should be crisp. I'll citeClimatic Research Unit email controversyas an example of what not to do. I look forward to the article. I am utterly uninterested in most of the pop culture in music, but I find LG fascinating.--SPhilbrick T15:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga as a gay icon

Hi Stephenjames,

I'm a contributor on the French Wikipedia. I just read "Lady Gaga as a gay icon",you did an amazing job! It's very interesting and well written. Is it finish? I wondered if I could translate it in French. I want to ask you first because I don't know if you still want to improve it as it's a subpage. Anyway, congratulation for the wonderful work.--Raphael99(talk)00:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would be very happy for you to use it and develop it if you wish! It's a work in progress - by no means is it finished, but it's up to date. Bon chance!Stephenjamesx(talk)17:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gagadeletion

I see that you've expressed concerns over theFame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gagapage. There is now a discussion about its future atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga (2nd nomination).You may wish to contribute.SplashScreen(talk)09:26, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Will Young

Thanks! It's a long work-in-progess, and I'm happy for a helping hand. I'm pretty happy with everything up to theRecording careersection, although I probably will have to edit out some stuff. I haven't even touched at anything from that point, or researched it, so that's where I'm at right now.Matthewedwards:Chat17:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that; I wrote the first paragraph of that section. So jump in from the sentenceYoung's follow-up single was another song he had performed on Pop Idol, "Light My Fire", which also entered the singles chart at number 1.PS. My aim for this isWP:FA.Matthewedwards:Chat17:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me help out! I'll start my contributions onUser:Stephenjamesx/Will Youngvery shortly.;)Stephenjamesx(talk)21:43, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your major expansion of theLady Gagaartistry section. It looks like FA quality! —WP:PENGUIN·^[TALK]16:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Bow down bitches! This barnstar was tailor made for this little man called Stephenjames for the outstanding craftmanship onLady Gaga.—Legolas^(talk2me)17:13, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Respond please

Can you please take a look atthis?Please, pretty please?:) —Legolas^(talk2me)07:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen, I think its time to makethis piece of gold,live. I will just do minor copy-edits and then you make it live. And damn it, reply. I cannot discuss if you don't reply to my messages.:( —Legolas^(talk2me)17:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry I haven't replied! What were you planning on me to do with that info? I was thinking maybe another paragraph could go underMusical and performance stylethat would describe both her music videos, the choreography and could outline her relationship with Gibson, and recent change to Jackson? Thanks for your kind support! There's a bit of updating to do on that page but go ahead!:)Stephenjamesx(talk)17:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank god you are alive.:) Well the bio article is all yours so please do as you wish. I will do some copy edit on the LGBT article and then you move it. Also, nominate it for DYK and GAN. —Legolas^(talk2me)17:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adamlambertintencommandments.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Adamlambertintencommandments.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion.Thank you.Skier Dude(talk)07:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

	Happy new year!
	we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!Pass a Method talk 20:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Lambert - Please Respond

Thank you for your efforts in improving this page. Could you please correct your references, and in the future include title, dates and other details as appropriate perWiki References and citing sourcesYou have been using bare urls only. Again, your work onAdam Lambertis much appreciated! (Omgoodnessme(talk)01:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Again, please take more care when doing your citations. ie those with cite errors in red. Please correct these and in the future check all references after you make edits. Thanks. (Omgoodnessme(talk)05:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

You made such massive edits in only a couple entries that it is taking forever to try and make sense of some of it - what has been deleted, moved, added, where and why. Your good intentions and perhaps really great and certainly needed changes have been carried out in a manner that makes it difficult for other interested users to participate in this process. It would help the other users and aid in continuing efforts to make this article better if you would enter the edits as soon as possible that contain important items removed by you. Hopefully we can then move on from there and work together with better communication in the future. Also would you please keep in touch on thetalk pageso we can avoid any misunderstandings. There is no reason we can't all work together harmoniously, keeping in mind at all times the goal of making Lambert's article the very best it can be. Thanks, Stephen. (Omgoodnessme(talk) 23:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)) edited (Omgoodnessme(talk)06:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

If you don't plan on doing further edits onthis pageutilizing the deletions you made, as promised, then would you please advise so other users can start the unpleasant task of putting back one by one some of the important entries you highjacked and said you had plans for and would return. This is not helping improve Lambert's article which I thought was everyone's goal here. (Omgoodnessme(talk)20:18, 29 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

23rd GLAAD Media Awards

This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot.I have performed a web search with the contents of23rd GLAAD Media Awards,and it appears to include material copied directly fromhttp://www.glaad.org/mediaawards/nominees.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is notpublic domainor available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policyfor further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materialsfor the procedure.)CorenSearchBot(talk)10:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parody music

As far as I know, this is NOT an article you have ever edited, or have any particular interest in (although it does, naturally, mention musicals). Some one wants to hijack it for academic musical theory as opposed to general interest (at least that is my impression) and s/he and I have a dispute going. I would especially appreciate your opinion, as we have not, as far as I can remember, ever either clashed or agreed about anything in particular. Perhaps you will see in his argument something I am missing. --Soundofmusicals(talk)13:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review limits changed

This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review atWikipedia:Peer review.Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, thebacklogof PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review.

While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussionhere,the consensus was thatall users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request.

If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask atWikipedia talk:Peer review.If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed atWikipedia:Peer review/backlog/items.Thanks,Ruhrfisch_><>°^°00:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaga

Hey, Stephen! I think it's so cool that you want to get Gaga's article up to FA quality. I was wondering if you needed someone to co-nominate the article--I'd love to help out! I'll familiarize myself with it and copy-edit it as I read through soon.Auree ★21:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yesyesyesyesyes!:)Stephenjamesx(talk)21:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Hello Stephenjamesx,Status has smiled at you! Smiles promoteWikiLoveand hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread theWikiLoveby smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Statυs(talk)19:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hilary Duff/GA2

You seem to have lost steam atTalk:Hilary Duff/GA2.Please try to get back to the review soon.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)15:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination ofUser:Stephenjamesx/For Your Entertainment

User:Stephenjamesx/For Your Entertainment,a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion.Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stephenjamesx/For Your Entertainmentand please be sure tosign your commentswith four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofUser:Stephenjamesx/For Your Entertainmentduring the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Ten Pound Hammer•^{(What did I screw up now?)}01:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hey there -this diffmight interest you.;)Theo polisme11:04, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletionofTemplate:RuPaul songs

Template:RuPaul songshas been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Magioladitis(talk)22:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mflscrapbkpg02.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Mflscrapbkpg02.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion.Thank you.Stefan2(talk)21:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anthem Kerry Ellis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Anthem Kerry Ellis.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)18:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofI'm Not That Girlfor deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleI'm Not That Girlis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Not That Girluntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta(talk)23:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I'm Not that Girl.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:I'm Not that Girl.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]