Jump to content

User talk:Steven Walling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt(talk) 06:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt:Wow, time flies. Thanks for the reminder!Steven Wallingtalk19:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Criticeditor(talk) Steve, Could you kindly review the article M_A_Varughese—Precedingundatedcomment added 13:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Woohoo![edit]

Hey,Steven Walling.Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from theWikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Mjs1991(talk) 03:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October![edit]

Greetings!

After a successfulfirst iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year,we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Projectwelcomes you to October, thefirst out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving contentthat centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember tolist your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner(1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest pagehere.For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around:).--Jamie Tubers(talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest[edit]

US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties ofUnited States banknotes,yet only a fraction of these are represented onWikimedia Commonsin the form of 2D scans. Additionally,Colonial America,theConfederate States,theRepublic of Texas,multiplestates and territories,communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December,WikiProject Numismaticswill be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the2019 US Banknote Contest.The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators onall Wikimedia projects.Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receiveawards.Whether you want to claim theGold Wikior you just want to have fun, all are invited toparticipate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructionshere

Sent byZLEAat 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) viaMediaWiki message delivery(talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Updating sidebar[edit]

Hi Steven! I recently stumbled upon theRfC you spearheadedback in 2013 about updating the left sidebar. I've long thought that it could use some revamping, and I would've supported most of your proposed changes had I been around back then, but sadly it looks like it didn't get enough consensus to go anywhere. So I'm wondering (a) have there been any updates in this area since 2013 that I should be aware of, and (b) do you have any suggestions about what I might be able to do to have a higher chance of getting this done? Cheers,Sdkb(talk) 07:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User welcome A/B test templates[edit]

These templates which you created years ago are up for deletion. See the discussionhere.If the research was done they may be worth tagging{{Historical}},if not you may wish to{{G7}}them, or have some other opinion to express. All the best:RichFarmbrough16:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination ofTalk:Goat curryfor deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleTalk:Goat curryis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Goat curryuntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Ghinga7(talk) 02:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy...[edit]

Hey,Steven Walling.Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from theWikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
CommanderWaterford(talk) 08:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Nomination ofConnectipediafor deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleConnectipediais suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connectipediauntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Graywalls(talk) 20:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest![edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Projectinvites you to join us again this October and November,the two months which are dedicated to improving contentabout the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindlylist your username under the participants sectionto indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner- $100
  • Gender-gap fillers- $100
  • Language Winners- up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest pagehere.For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers(talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username fromthis list

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest![edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Projectinvites you to join us again this October and November,the two months which are dedicated to improving contentabout the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindlylist your username under the participants sectionto indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner- $100
  • Gender-gap fillers- $100
  • Language Winners- up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest pagehere.For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers(talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username fromthis list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November![edit]

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in theMonths of African Cinemaglobal contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page pleasedo so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in thearticle achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on theusers by articlespage. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner- $100
  • Gender-gap filler- $100
  • Language Winners- up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers(talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username fromthis list

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho[edit]

Fitbit article changes[edit]

Steve, I noticed that the Fitbit article you created had a pretty major edit (sections removed) without any prior discussion on the talk page. I was going to revert, but do not have the bandwidth to get in an edit war, not that it's ever fruitful anyway.

  • 21:55, 14 January 2021‎ Jawz101 talk contribs‎ 35,093 bytes −5,078‎ This was not a minor edit. I removed the accuracy and effectiveness sections and moved the recall further down in the article. It felt like filler to describe everything mentioned about a thing. Much of it could be for a discussion on activity trackers in general. The same could be said for running shorts.

I defer to your better judgment.Bobsd(talk) 15:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Connec+ipedia" listed atRedirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirectConnec+ipedia.The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Connec+ipediauntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰(𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofSlow Food Nationfor deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSlow Food Nationis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slow Food Nationuntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Platonk(talk) 19:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback Request[edit]

Hi there! I have recently made a request for an assessment of the articlePuppetry of the PenisonWikiProject Theatre.I have been editing this article for over a month, adding almost 3000 words, new sections, an infobox, media and more references for verifiability. I noticed you were a very active (and helpful) editor of WikiProject Theatre, and was wondering if you had the time if you could have a look at the article and provide me any feedback. Any general feedback would be much appreciated and possibly an assessment of the article for importance and quality. Thank you very much.Rubyredgirl(talk) 10:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rubyredgirl:I can take a look this weekend!Steven Wallingtalk15:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Steven Walling:Hello Steven Walling, thank you for taking the time to reply! The article has been assessed and some very helpful feedback was provided by other editors, but of course any suggestions for improvement from you would be greatly appreciated. No rush at all, I am grateful for your time. Have a lovely day!Rubyredgirl(talk) 02:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
You are a great Wikipedian. Keep up the good work!V. E.(talk) 21:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]


@CAPTAIN RAJU:Thank you! Very kind.Steven Wallingtalk19:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTimberline Trail,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRamona Falls.Such links areusually incorrect,since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk) 06:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest![edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Projectcore team is happy to inform you that theMonths of African CinemaContest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Pleaselist your username under the participants’ sectionof the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner- $100
  • Gender-gap fillers- $100
  • Language Winners- up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest pagehere.For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers(talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username fromthis list

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt(talk) 07:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Steven, good to see you around.Montanabw(talk)15:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Yeah this year I've been gnoming on some stubs again.Steven Wallingtalk17:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November![edit]

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about theMonths of African Contest 2021achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Pleaselist your username as a participanton the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on thearticle achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in theusers by articles.Please note that your articles must be present inboththe article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner- $100
  • Gender-gap filler- $100
  • Language Winners- up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers(talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username fromthis list

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer beautopatrolled[edit]

Arecently closedRequest for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to removeAutopatrolledfrom the administrator user group. You may, similarly as withEdit Filter Manager,choose toself-assignthis permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit theAdministrator's Noticeboard.20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination[edit]

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks

Hi Steven Walling! I'venominated you(along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers,{{u|Sdkb}}talk~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery(talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an adminwill still be able to access the IP.There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working onbetter toolsto help.

If you have not seen it before, you canread more on Meta.If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you cansubscribetothe weekly technical newsletter.

We havetwo suggested waysthis identity could work.We would appreciate your feedbackon which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You canlet us know on the talk page.You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement[edit]

The administrator policy has been updated with newactivity requirementsfollowing a successfulRequest for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday![edit]

WishingSteven Wallinga very happy birthday on behalf of theBirthday Committee!Chris Troutman(talk)15:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in[edit]

Hi, Steven - since you didn't respond to the ping fromWikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs#Confirmation request,I thought it best to follow up with a post to see if you are still active onWP:WikiProject Dogs.I'm updating our list of participants and removing those who are no longer active. Please ping if you respond here, or better yet, respond to the ping and let us know if you're still active. Happy editing!Atsme💬📧02:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Hello, I've noticed that your signature is using the html5 obsolete tags <font style>. Would you be willing to change it to <span style> for the same look, but without theLint errors?

This: <span style= "font-family:Georgia, serif;" >[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]] • [[User talk:Steven Walling|<span style= "color: #8080b0" >talk</span>]]</span> gives you the visually identical:Steven Wallingtalk

Thanks and have a great weekend,Zinnober9(talk) 17:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah definitely. Thanks for the note!Steven Wallingtalk18:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Zinnober9:Done! Let me know if there are any linter errors though.Steven Wallingtalk17:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No errors that I see. Thanks! I've adjusted your past signatures on this page to your current, so this page is now lint free.Zinnober9(talk) 23:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extension of Protection[edit]

Kindly, can the pageEgyptiansgets autoconfirmed access-only users like many big pages, since once the temporarily protection ends, IPs come and re-corrupt the page. Thank you.Fragrant Peony(talk) 17:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fragrant Peony:Just the one set of recent IP edits was a content disagreement, not vandalism, so unless volume of spam or vandalism picks up more the right move is to leave it open, since we don't apply protectionpreemptively.Steven Wallingtalk17:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. They actually took massive content from Britannica [while removing/changing original words], and kept corrupting the page even though the source accompanied says otherwise. The main issue here is plagiarism too, this isn't the first time, so if the page is kept edited by autoconfirmed and experienced users that would indeed help.Fragrant Peony(talk) 17:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:2022 Oregon ballot measuresindicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category,acategory redirect,afeatured topics category,under discussion atCategories for discussion,or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nominationbyvisiting the pageand clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!01:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz:Given that in my edit summary when creating this I specifically said I was about to create articles for this category and it’s obviously a type of common elections category, was this really necessary? It hasn’t even been one day. This kind of useless bureaucratic nonsense is what drives editors away from the project.Steven Wallingtalk01:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
Good JobMarah Gh 90(talk) 06:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FYI,User:Marah Gh 90has been blocked as a sock of apersistent, forum-shopping LTA.OhNoitsJamieTalk15:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie:Not surprised given that they sent me email spam asking me to create an article. Thanks for the heads up!Steven Wallingtalk15:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delosperma lehmannii[edit]

Hey, why did you remove the category "succulent plants" fromDelosperma lehmannii?It is a succulent, and the citation from Kew says so specifically. Am I misunderstanding the definition of "succulent"?User:Jonwilliamsl(talk|contribs) 16:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonwilliamsl:Thanks for pinging me. Including the individual species article isn't necessary / is duplicative, because the root genus (Delosperma) and the overall familyCategory:Aizoaceaeis already included. There are thousands of succulent plant species, so the category is much easier to browse if we tag the root genera and family in cases where 100% of them are succulents.Steven Wallingtalk16:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. Thanks:)User:Jonwilliamsl(talk|contribs) 16:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Thanks for asking.Steven Wallingtalk17:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Steven WallingI recently createdDraft:Darwin Del Fabro,about a queer Brazilian actor and was hoping that you or another member ofWP:Theatrewould be kind enough to take a look and let me know how it could be improved. Or, if it looks ok, to move it to the mainspace. Thank you in advance for your help and consideration Volcom95 (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Volcom95(talk) 19:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Volcom95:Hi! This article generally looks fine, but I don't have time to review it in detail right now.Steven Wallingtalk20:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. Could you move it to the mainspace? I'm not comfortable doing that myself.Volcom95(talk) 18:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, old friend[edit]

Glad to see you appear in my watchlist and even happier that you're still active here after all these years:) I hope you're well!Acalamari20:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Acalamari:Good to hear from you! Also great to see you're still editing as well. I definitely took a break for a few years but 2022 and hopefully 2023 to has had more time for article writing.Steven Wallingtalk04:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV WP:PA[edit]

This editor seems to be cherry picking facts based on personal bias and personal interpretations, cherry picking sources based on personal views. Newb here just learning wiki, trying to share facts. Editor has expressed disdain for “cyclists” and “Los Angeles” and the publication “Bicycling Magazine”.

Editor made false accusations as to my intent and personal identity. WP:PA

WP:NPOV All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.

WP:PA https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacksBaudrillard6969(talk) 23:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Baudrillard6969:You added a bunch of citations and references about a certain individual, watered down the language used by the sources, and then when I edited one of these items to make it more encylopedic, I immediately got a request on LinkedIn to connect to the person who is the subject of the references you added. How stupid do you think Wikipedia editors are? Please refrain from editing things about which you have aconflict of interest.This can and will result in being blocked from editing.Steven Wallingtalk23:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OUTING strange motivation, sounds like attempted outing. Why not just tell a wiki newb “hey don’t post so much about one topic it comes across as spammy” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?redirect=no&title=Wikipedia:OUTING

Baudrillard6969(talk) 00:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Information iconThere is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidentsregarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Valereee(talk) 12:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Please keep in mind that attemptingto continuean edit war, especially while avoiding the talk page after previous requests for editors to use the talk page and in violation ofWP:ONUSpolicy is extremely disruptive. That's doubly so for an admin to be doing it. The proper course of action then (or after a self-revert) would have been to read the previous edit summaries that made it clear it was time for you to come to the talk page. Instead, doubling down on the problem of editors refusing to get consensus for edits on the talk page and just continuing edit wars only hinders us regulars there trying to protect the page from it.

More concerning though isWP:INVOLVEDthough. When you take an admin action likeclosing a requestand immediately go to the article to continue an edit war and violate policies like ONUS, that is a sign of a more serious problem. That really showed when you closed that saying to use the talk page and you did the opposite of your own advice. That very problem is what editors have been trying to protect the article from and isn't something an admin should be encouraging.

If you had read the talk page or history, you would have seen that us regulars had been dealing with promotional issues with this fringe group and had to focus on activities that had independent sources forWP:DUEto filter out those issues. That dispute led to reverts that we finally got mostly under control. The reason for RFPP was because an IP that appeared to be a logged out account was the only one continuing edit warring without using the talk. Instead of deescalating with semi-protection, we're now in a position where full protection may be justified after your edit. I alluded to this at the above ANI about you, but please take more care about making situations worse and in this case creating extra work for us volunteers trying to keep persistent edit warring behavior at least somewhat contained.KoA(talk) 05:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You brought a good faith content dispute to RFPP which is most definitely not a candidate for protection. I saw that and jumped inafteryou posted the obviously wrong request for protection application. You need to rethink the level of lecturing you're doing here. Edit wars sometimes merit full protection, and in this case no admin would do so, given that there's an active and completely normal Talk page discussion already underway.Steven Wallingtalk05:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question fromDan Sevastopol(13:03, 21 August 2023)[edit]

Hi Steven,

Thanks for offering to be my mentor! I am very new to Wikipedia so I appreciate your taking the time out.

I've suggested an article for deletion because it's about a person who really isn't noteworthy. I don't really have a personal interest in the matter except that the article references people I do know.

Another user has said that deletion of the article ought to be discussed on the "Articles for Deletion" forum. I don't know how to do this. Can you help me move this forward?

Best,

Dan --Dan Sevastopol(talk) 13:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan Sevastopol:Yes, I can show you how to nominate something at Articles for Deletion. It's not super easy to understand, but there is aguide to nominating a page.Basically what you're doing is putting a tag on the article, which leads to a deletion discussion page. There will then be a week minimum for editors to discuss. If the template process is too daunting just let me know and we can screenshare.Steven Wallingtalk17:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider carefully whether it is appropriate to make accusations other editors over disagreements in adeletion discussion,as you did toUser:Scope creepatWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tines.Disagreement aboutindependenceandsecondarysources is quite reasonable and deserves discussion, but if you question thegood faithof their arguments, could you consider discussing it on the user's talk page before cluttering the deletion discussion? Is itWP:CIVILto make this sort of threat? I worry that it could promotebattleground behaviorand discourage participation atWP:AfD,and I think we need more editors involved in deletion, don't you?Jacona(talk) 17:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The argument made there is completely and totally ridiculous to the degree that it's either total ignorance of sourcing standards or made disingenuously. The nominator is not a new editor to say the least and should know the policies they are citing, which means pleading total ignorance of what constitutes a reliable source is not even remotely convincing.Steven Wallingtalk17:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was watching the Tines AfD, not really wanting to weigh in, but I clicked through to your profile after seeing you were taking such a beating.
There's a firmly held view, among the relatively small number of editors who make a habit of participating in corporation/organization deletions, that the "I" in SIRS means thatonly facts derived independently of any information from the article subject qualify for the purposes of notability.So a journalist can collect a hundred data points of information published by the company in press releases, interviews, earnings releases, etc. and synthesize it into a critique of the company, and it won't count for notability because the information itself isn't "independent content". Instead, so the logic goes, you have to first excise all of those tainted facts and then see if what's left of the article talks about the company in sufficient depth.
I have said, and I will continue to say (possibly to my peril), this is not a logical reading of NCORP/ORGIND but I am picking my battles. Some cats have claws.
When I looked at this AfD, I checked out some of the sources and it seemed to be more or less a lost cause for that reason. I don't think it should be deleted, becausecommon sensesays it's notable, but it's a close call.Oblivy(talk) 05:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, thanks for the note. That interpretation of SIRS makes no sense whatsoever to me. News organizations, book publishers, and journal peer reviews all have fact checking and editors whose function is to review work and challenge poor sourcing. Just because a news article or book direct quotes a source a few times doesn't mean the entire piece isn't reliable. If the New York Times quotes someone, it's still useful and verifiable material for referencingdependingon what facts you're trying to add a citation for. This is why verification is a policy and notability is just a guideline where common sense should be applied.Steven Wallingtalk14:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It comes from the part ofWP:ORGINDthat uses the term "independent content". I can see a valid concern that journalists may be uncritically shoveling information provided by an executive or PR rep into articles - it happens - but that puts a pretty low opinion on journalists, editors, and outlets like the NYT. There is a modest proposal brewing over at the talk page for NCORP to add language saying non-independent sources don't include "earned media" but I'm not sure if it will fly.Oblivy(talk) 00:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question fromAxhtonCole(19:30, 8 September 2023)[edit]

How do I create a brand new Wikipedia page using a mobile browser? --AxhtonCole(talk) 19:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question fromTux we do93on1953(02:11, 12 September 2023)[edit]

I have very much to post who are you? --Tux we do93(talk) 02:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious[edit]

Ten years ago,youwere found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt(talk) 08:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedExercise,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFitness.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk) 06:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.Happy Holidays to you and yours. Theeditor retention projectwas created back in July of 2012 and is still considered active. The lights are on and the rent is paid for the foreseeable future. Stop by for a chat. Start a thread. Nominate a fellow editor to be Editor of the Week. It was a good idea then and it's still a good idea. ―Buster7

Good article reassessment forDyer Lum[edit]

Dyer Lumhas been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page.If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Grnrchst(talk) 14:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crucible-logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Crucible-logo.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk) 18:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on thevoting page on Meta-wikito learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, pleasereview the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF)23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]