Jump to content

Utraquism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromUtraquist)

Luther and Hus servingcommunion under both kindstogether,an imaginative woodcut from16th-century Saxonyrepresenting the affinity ofLutheransand ModerateHussites

Utraquism(from theLatinsub utraque specie,meaning "under both kinds" ), also calledCalixtinism(fromchalice;Latin:calix,borrowed from Greekkalyx,shell, husk;Czech:kališníci), was a belief amongstHussites,a reformistChristianmovement, thatcommunion under both kinds(both bread and wine, as opposed to the bread alone) should be administered to thelaityduring the celebration of theEucharist.[1]It was a principal dogma of the Hussites and one of theFour Articles of Prague.[2]

After the Hussite movement split into various factions early in theHussite Wars,Hussites that emphasized the laity's right to communion under both kinds became known as Moderate Hussites, Utraquist Hussites, or simply Utraquists. The Utraquists were the largest Hussite faction.

History

[edit]
The Meeting atKřížky:Sub Utraque (1916), byAlphonse Mucha,The Slav Epic

Utraquism was aChristiandogma first proposed byJacob of Mies,professor of philosophy at theUniversity of Prague,in 1414.[2]It maintained that theEucharistshould be administered "under both kinds"[1]— as bothbreadandwine— to all the congregation, including thelaity.The practice amongRoman Catholicsat the time was for only the priests to partake of the consecrated wine, the Precious Blood.[2]

Jacob taught that communion should be provided and taken under both kinds, which as a precept of Christ could not be changed by the church. Only those who received the utraquist (both kinds) communion belong to the church of Christ.[3]: 51 There is disagreement in sources about whether he, or early Utraquists, taught this was necessary for salvation[4]: 180 (as claimed by Catholic detractors such as Andrew of Brod), or necessary to receive the salvific effect of the eucharist[4]: 174 or an obligation.[5]: 518 

The 15th century Utraquists were a moderate faction of theHussiteswith strong respect for the sacrament and, generally, endorsedtransubstantiationand Catholicity[6](in contrast to the more radicalTaborites,OrebitesandOrphanswho were closer to the beliefs ofJohn Wycliffe). They were also known as thePragueParty or the Calixtines — fromcalix,Latin for their emblem, thechalice.[2]

The Utraquists eventually allied themselves with the Catholic forces (following theCouncil of Basel) and defeated the more radical Taborites and Orphans at theBattle of Lipanyin 1434.[2]After that battle, nearly all forms of Hussite revival were Utraquist, as seen withGeorge of Poděbrady,who even managed to cause the town ofTábor,the famous Taborite stronghold, to convert to Utraquism.[citation needed]

An agreement of mutual accommodation was agreed in 1485 between Catholics and Utraquists: thereligious peace of Kutná Horaended the Hussite wars. Following the victory of allied Utraquist and Catholic forces in theHussite Wars,Utraquists constituted a majority of theBohemianlands.

Further development

[edit]

In the 16th century much of the population then adopted the pre-Lutheran ProtestantUnity of the BrethrenandLutheranism;the Utraquist Church remained strong in the cities.

TheBattle of White Mountain,in 1620, marked the end of theBohemian Revoltand, led to recatholization in theLands of the Bohemian Crown.In 1627, communion under both kinds was again not made available, until the eventualJosephinianPatent of Tolerationin 1781.

In modern Catholic practice since theSecond Vatican Council,it is determined by each local bishop whethercommunion is available in one or both kindsin their diocese.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abWood 1907.
  2. ^abcdeHughes 1915.
  3. ^Cermanová, Pavlína (2018)."Jakoubek of Stříbro's Czech Výklad Na Zjevenie and Its Latin Reception in Hussite Exegetical Texts".Listy filologické / Folia philologica.141(1/2): 45–73.ISSN0024-4457.
  4. ^abLevy, Ian Christopher (2017)."Interpreting the Intention of Christ: Roman Responses to Bohemian Utraquism from Constance to Basel".Europe After Wyclif.Fordham University Press: 173–195.
  5. ^Patapios, Hieromonk (2002)."Sub Utraque Specie: The Arguments of John Hus and Jacoubek of Stříbro in Defence of Giving Communion to the Laity Under Both Kinds".The Journal of Theological Studies.53(2): 503–522.ISSN0022-5185.
  6. ^"Utraquism’s faithfulness to the PragueUseof theRoman rite…(was) an intentional symbol of Utraquism’s self-understanding as a continuing part of the Western Catholic Church. "Holeton, David R.; Vlhová-Wörner, Hana; Bílková, Milena (2007)."The Trope Gregorius presul meritis in Bohemian Tradition: Its Origins, Development, Liturgical Function and Illustration"(PDF).Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice.6:215–246.Retrieved18 November2023.

Bibliography

[edit]