Jump to content

Ziran

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ziran
Sealofziran
Chinese name
ChineseTự nhiên
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyinzìrán
Wade–Gilestzu4-jan2
IPA[tsɹ̩̂ɻǎn]
Vietnamese name
Vietnamese alphabettự nhiên
Korean name
Hangul자연
Japanese name
KanjiTự nhiên
Kanaじねん, しぜん
Transcriptions
Romanizationjinen, shizen

Ziran(Chinese:Tự nhiên) is a key concept inDaoismthat literally means "of its own; by itself" and thus "naturally; natural; spontaneously; freely; in the course of events; of course; doubtlessly".[1][2]This Chinese word is a two-charactercompoundofzi(Tự) "nose; self; oneself; from; since" andran(Nhiên) "right; correct; so; yes", which is used as a-ransuffixmarkingadjectivesoradverbs(roughly corresponding to English-ly). In Chinese culture, the nose (orzi) is a common metaphor for a person's point of view.[3]

Origin

[edit]

The phraseziran's use in Daoism is rooted in theTao Te Ching(chapters 17, 23, 25, 51, 64), written around 400 BCE.[4]Ziranis a central concept of Daoism, closely tied to the practice ofwuwei,detached or effortless action.Ziranrefers to a state of "as-it-isness,"[5]the most important quality for anyone following Daoist beliefs. To become nearer to a state ofziran,one must become separate from unnatural influences and return to an entirely natural, spontaneous state.Ziranis related to developing an "altered sense of human nature and of nature per se".[6]When it comes to sensibility of Taoism, the moral import can be most found inziran.

Contemporary reinterpretation

[edit]

Ziran has been interpreted and reinterpreted in a numerous ways over time. Most commonly, it has been seen as the greatest spiritual concept that was followed by lesser concepts of the Dao, Heaven, Earth, and Man in turn, based on the traditional translation and interpretation of Chapter 25 of theTao Te Ching.[7]

Qingjie James Wang's more modern translation eliminates the logical flaw that arises when one considers that to model oneself after another entity may be to become less natural, to lose the 'as-it-isness' that ziran refers to. Wang reinterprets the words of Chapter 25 to be instructions to follow the model set by Earth's being Earth, by Heaven's being Heaven, and by the Dao being the Dao; each behaving perfectly in accordance with ziran. This interpretation reaffirms that the base nature of the Dao is one of complete naturalness.[7]

Wing-Chuek Chan provides another translation of 'ziran': "It is so by virtue of its own".[8]This brings up ziran's link to another Daoist belief, specifically that the myriad things exist because of the qualities that they possess, not because they were created by any being to fulfill a purpose or goal. The only thing that a being must be when it exists in accordance with ziran is ultimately natural, unaffected by artificial influences.

Ziran and Tianran are related concepts. Tianran refers to a thing created by heaven that is ultimately untouched by human influence, a thing fully characterized by ziran. The two terms are sometimes interchangeably used.[8]It can be said that by gaining ziran, a person grows nearer to a state of tianran.

Ziran can also be looked at from under Buddha's influence, "non-substantial". It is then believed to mean 'having no nature of its own'.[9]In this aspect it is seen as a synonym of real emptiness.

D. T. Suzuki,in a brief article penned in 1959, makes the suggestion ofziranas an aesthetic of action: "Living is an act of creativity demonstrating itself. Creativity is objectively seen as necessity, but from the inner point of view of Emptiness it is 'just-so-ness,' (ziran). It literally means 'byitself-so-ness,' implying more inner meaning than 'spontaneity' or 'naturalness'".[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Slingerland, Edward G. (2003).Effortless action: Wu-wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in early China.Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN0-19-513899-6,p. 97
  2. ^Lai, Karyn.Learning from Chinese Philosophies: Ethics of Interdependent And Contextualised Self.Ashgate World Philosophies Series.ISBN0-7546-3382-9.p. 96
  3. ^Callahan, W. A. (1989). "A Linguistic Interpretation of Discourse and Perspective in Daoism",Philosophy East and West39(2), 171-189.
  4. ^Stefon, Matt (2010-05-10)."ziran".Encyclopedia Britannica.Retrieved2023-04-23.
  5. ^Fu, C. W. (2000). "Lao Tzu's Conception of Tao", in B. Gupta & J. N. Mohanty (Eds.)Philosophical Questions East and West(pp. 46–62). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  6. ^Hall, David L. (1987). "On Seeking a Change of Environment: A Quasi-Taoist. Philosophy",Philosophy East and West37(2), 160-171
  7. ^abWang, Qingjie James (25 January 2003).""It-self-so-ing" and "Other-ing" in Lao Zi's Concept of Zi Ran ".Confuchina.Archived fromthe originalon 2021-06-20.
  8. ^abChan, Wing-Chuek (2005). "On Heidegger's Interpretation of Aristotle: A Chinese Perspective",Journal of Chinese Philosophy32(4), 539-557.
  9. ^Pregadio, Fabrizio. ed. (2008).The Encyclopedia of TaoismM-Z Vol 2. Routledge. pg. 1302
  10. ^Suzuki, D. T. (1959). "Basic Thoughts Underlying Eastern Ethical and Social Practice."Philosophy East and West9(1/2) Preliminary Report on the Third East-West Philosophers' Conference. (April–July, 1959)

Further reading

[edit]