User talk:Edwardx
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Edwardx. |
Daily pageviews of User:Edwardx
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Hello!
[edit]Hello Edward, thank you for your modification on the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suisse_Secrets I was searching on the Internet and in the following article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Ndrangheta. The name of that person is not mentioned in the referenced Wikipedia article. On the other hand, stating that someone is a "money launderer" when there is no final and effective sentence goes against the neutrality and objectivity of the Wikipedia encyclopedia. I wanted to know if, as a middle ground, we can at least establish an acronym or initials. I believe that the permanence of this information is not in line with Wikipedia's policies. Thank you! Sawyer19 (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Is this about Antonio Velardo? Wikipedia is based on what is published in reliable sources, and is not a court of law. Edwardx (talk) 22:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Matt Lintz
[edit]Somehow, I need improvements in the lead section and infobox, by using MOS:NICKNAME, MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE and MOS:INFOBOXREF. 154.66.159.34 (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Matt Lintz looks to be in decent shape. I do not see the problem? Edwardx (talk) 22:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Ruby Modine page you created
[edit]Hey there. I don’t know why but the wiki page you created in 2017 isn’t allowing my DOB edit to stick for more than 10 or 15 hrs.
The earlier version has her incorrectly listed as being born on June 20, 1991.
Her actual DOB is July 31, 1990
you can verify it here:
https://issuemagazine.com/ruby-modine/#/
can you help please? GrubletGrutKing (talk) 15:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also, she’s is currently 5,10”. Not 5,7” GrubletGrutKing (talk) 15:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Herbert William Allingham
[edit]Hi, hope all good with you. Have you ever seen an image of Herbert William Allingham please? Whispyhistory (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- You could try a fair use version of this. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Philafrenzy. Edwardx (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Philafrenzy. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Philafrenzy. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Philafrenzy. Edwardx (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MClay1 (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
MOS cleanup
[edit]I need for MOS cleanup for Ferdinand de Lesseps, as required per MOS:INFONAT and MOS:POSTNOM. As per MOS:POSTNOM, if a person's subject of an article has received honours or appointments issued either by the subject's state of citizenship or residence.
49.150.12.163 (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Edwardx (talk) 22:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Dirk Van de Put for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Van de Put until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Tule-hog (talk) 22:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template