Jump to content

Clifford analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clifford analysis,usingClifford algebrasnamed afterWilliam Kingdon Clifford,is the study ofDirac operators,and Dirac type operators in analysis and geometry, together with their applications. Examples of Dirac type operators include, but are not limited to, the Hodge–Dirac operator,on aRiemannian manifold,the Dirac operator in euclidean space and its inverse onand their conformal equivalents on the sphere, theLaplacianin euclideann-space and theAtiyah–Singer–Dirac operator on aspin manifold,Rarita–Schwinger/Stein–Weiss type operators, conformal Laplacians, spinorial Laplacians and Dirac operators onSpinCmanifolds, systems of Dirac operators, thePaneitz operator,Dirac operators onhyperbolic space,the hyperbolic Laplacian and Weinstein equations.

Euclidean space

[edit]

In Euclidean space the Dirac operator has the form

wheree1,...,enis an orthonormal basis forRn,andRnis considered to be embedded in a complexClifford algebra,Cln(C) so thatej2= −1.

This gives

where Δnis theLaplacianinn-euclidean space.

Thefundamental solutionto the euclidean Dirac operator is

where ωnis the surface area of the unit sphereSn−1.

Note that

where

is thefundamental solutiontoLaplace's equationforn≥ 3.

The most basic example of a Dirac operator is theCauchy–Riemann operator

in the complex plane. Indeed, many basic properties of one variablecomplex analysisfollow through for many first order Dirac type operators. In euclidean space this includes aCauchy Theorem,aCauchy integral formula,Morera's theorem,Taylor series,Laurent seriesandLiouville Theorem.In this case theCauchy kernelisG(xy). The proof of theCauchy integral formulais the same as in one complex variable and makes use of the fact that each non-zero vectorxin euclidean space has a multiplicative inverse in the Clifford algebra, namely

Up to a sign this inverse is theKelvin inverseofx.Solutions to the euclidean Dirac equationDf= 0 are called (left) monogenic functions. Monogenic functions are special cases ofharmonic spinorson aspin manifold.

In 3 and 4 dimensions Clifford analysis is sometimes referred to asquaternionicanalysis. Whenn= 4,the Dirac operator is sometimes referred to as the Cauchy–Riemann–Fueter operator. Further some aspects of Clifford analysis are referred to as hypercomplex analysis.

Clifford analysis has analogues ofCauchy transforms,Bergman kernels,Szegő kernels,Plemelj operators,Hardy spaces,aKerzman–Stein formulaand a Π, orBeurling–Ahlfors,transform. These have all found applications in solvingboundary value problems,including moving boundary value problems,singular integralsandclassic harmonic analysis.In particular Clifford analysis has been used to solve, in certainSobolev spaces,the full water wave problem in 3D. This method works in all dimensions greater than 2.

Much of Clifford analysis works if we replace the complexClifford algebraby a realClifford algebra,Cln.This is not the case though when we need to deal with the interaction between theDirac operatorand theFourier transform.

The Fourier transform

[edit]

When we consider upper half spaceRn,+with boundaryRn−1,the span ofe1,...,en−1,under theFourier transformthe symbol of the Dirac operator

iswhere

In this setting thePlemelj formulasare

and the symbols for these operators are, up to a sign,

These are projection operators, otherwise known as mutually annihilating idempotents, on the space of Cln(C) valued square integrable functions onRn−1.

Note that

whereRjis thej-th Riesz potential,

As the symbol ofis

it is easily determined from the Clifford multiplication that

So theconvolution operatoris a natural generalization to euclidean space of theHilbert transform.

SupposeU′ is a domain inRn−1andg(x) is a Cln(C) valuedreal analytic function.Thenghas aCauchy–Kovalevskaia extensionto theDirac equationon some neighborhood ofU′ inRn.The extension is explicitly given by

When this extension is applied to the variablexin

we get that

is the restriction toRn−1ofE++EwhereE+is a monogenic function in upper half space andEis a monogenic function in lower half space.

There is also aPaley–Wiener theoreminn-Euclidean space arising in Clifford analysis.

Conformal structure

[edit]

Many Dirac type operators have a covariance under conformal change in metric. This is true for the Dirac operator in euclidean space, and the Dirac operator on the sphere under Möbius transformations. Consequently, this holds true for Dirac operators onconformally flat manifoldsandconformal manifoldswhich are simultaneouslyspin manifolds.

Cayley transform (stereographic projection)

[edit]

TheCayley transformorstereographic projectionfromRnto the unit sphereSntransforms the euclidean Dirac operator to a spherical Dirac operatorDS.Explicitly

where Γnis the spherical Beltrami–Dirac operator

andxinSn.

TheCayley transformovern-space is

Its inverse is

For a functionf(x) defined on a domainUinn-euclidean space and a solution to theDirac equation,then

is annihilated byDS,onC(U) where

Further

the conformal Laplacian or Yamabe operator onSn.Explicitly

whereis theLaplace–Beltrami operatoronSn.The operatoris, via the Cayley transform, conformally equivalent to the euclidean Laplacian. Also

is the Paneitz operator,

on then-sphere. Via the Cayley transform this operator is conformally equivalent to the bi-Laplacian,.These are all examples of operators of Dirac type.

Möbius transform

[edit]

AMöbius transformovern-euclidean space can be expressed as

wherea,b,candd∈ Clnand satisfy certain constraints. The associated2 × 2matrix is called an Ahlfors–Vahlen matrix. If

andDf(y) = 0 thenis a solution to the Dirac equation where

and ~ is a basicantiautomorphismacting on theClifford algebra.The operatorsDk,or Δnk/2whenkis even, exhibit similar covariances underMöbius transformincluding theCayley transform.

Whenax+bandcx+dare non-zero they are both members of theClifford group.

As

then we have a choice in sign in definingJ(M,x). This means that for aconformally flat manifoldMwe need aspin structureonMin order to define aspinor bundleon whose sections we can allow a Dirac operator to act. Explicit simple examples include then-cylinder, theHopf manifoldobtained fromn-euclidean space minus the origin, and generalizations ofk-handled toruses obtained from upper half space by factoring it out by actions of generalized modular groups acting on upper half space totally discontinuously. ADirac operatorcan be introduced in these contexts. These Dirac operators are special examples of Atiyah–Singer–Dirac operators.

Atiyah–Singer–Dirac operator

[edit]

Given aspin manifoldMwith aspinor bundleSand a smooth sections(x) inSthen, in terms of a local orthonormal basise1(x),...,en(x) of the tangent bundle ofM,the Atiyah–Singer–Dirac operator acting onsis defined to be

whereis thespin connection,the lifting toSof theLevi-Civita connectiononM.WhenMisn-euclidean space we return to the euclideanDirac operator.

From an Atiyah–Singer–Dirac operatorDwe have theLichnerowicz formula

whereτis thescalar curvatureon themanifold,and Γis the adjoint of Γ. The operatorD2is known as the spinorial Laplacian.

IfMis compact andτ≥ 0andτ> 0somewhere then there are no non-trivialharmonic spinorson the manifold. This is Lichnerowicz' theorem. It is readily seen that Lichnerowicz' theorem is a generalization ofLiouville's theoremfrom one variable complex analysis. This allows us to note that over the space of smooth spinor sections the operatorDis invertible such a manifold.

In the cases where the Atiyah–Singer–Dirac operator is invertible on the space of smooth spinor sections with compact support one may introduce

whereδyis theDirac delta functionevaluated aty.This gives rise to aCauchy kernel,which is thefundamental solutionto this Dirac operator. From this one may obtain aCauchy integral formulaforharmonic spinors.With this kernel much of what is described in the first section of this entry carries through for invertible Atiyah–Singer–Dirac operators.

UsingStokes' theorem,or otherwise, one can further determine that under a conformal change of metric the Dirac operators associated to each metric are proportional to each other, and consequently so are their inverses, if they exist.

All of this provides potential links to Atiyah–Singer index theory and other aspects of geometric analysis involving Dirac type operators.

Hyperbolic Dirac type operators

[edit]

In Clifford analysis one also considers differential operators on upper half space, the disc, or hyperbola with respect to the hyperbolic, orPoincaré metric.

For upper half space one splits theClifford algebra,Clninto Cln−1+ Cln−1en.So forain Clnone may expressaasb+cenwitha,bin Cln−1.One then has projection operatorsPandQdefined as followsP(a) =bandQ(a) =c.The Hodge–Dirac operator acting on a functionfwith respect to the hyperbolic metric in upper half space is now defined to be

.

In this case

.

The operator

is theLaplacianwith respect to thePoincaré metricwhile the other operator is an example of a Weinstein operator.

Thehyperbolic Laplacianis invariant under actions of the conformal group, while the hyperbolic Dirac operator is covariant under such actions.

Rarita–Schwinger/Stein–Weiss operators

[edit]

Rarita–Schwinger operators,also known as Stein–Weiss operators, arise in representation theory for the Spin andPin groups.The operatorRkis aconformally covariantfirst order differential operator. Herek= 0, 1, 2,.... Whenk= 0, the Rarita–Schwinger operator is just the Dirac operator. In representation theory for theorthogonal group,O(n) it is common to consider functions taking values in spaces of homogeneousharmonic polynomials.When one refines thisrepresentation theoryto the double covering Pin(n) of O(n) one replaces spaces of homogeneous harmonic polynomials by spaces ofkhomogeneous polynomialsolutions to the Dirac equation, otherwise known askmonogenic polynomials. One considers a functionf(x,u) wherexinU,a domain inRn,anduvaries overRn.Furtherf(x,u) is ak-monogenic polynomial inu.Now apply the Dirac operatorDxinxtof(x,u). Now as the Clifford algebra is not commutativeDxf(x,u) then this function is no longerkmonogenic but is a homogeneous harmonic polynomial inu.Now for each harmonic polynomialhkhomogeneous of degreekthere is anAlmansi–Fischer decomposition

wherepkandpk−1are respectivelykandk−1monogenic polynomials.LetPbe the projection ofhktopkthen the Rarita–Schwinger operator is defined to bePDk,and it is denoted byRk.Using Euler's Lemma one may determine that

So

Conferences and Journals

[edit]

There is a vibrant and interdisciplinary community around Clifford and Geometric Algebras with a wide range of applications. The main conferences in this subject include theInternational Conference on Clifford Algebras and their Applications in Mathematical Physics (ICCA)andApplications of Geometric Algebra in Computer Science and Engineering (AGACSE)series. A main publication outlet is the Springer journalAdvances in Applied Clifford Algebras.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Ahlfors, L.V. (1981),Möbius Transformations in Several Dimensions,Ordway professorship lectures in mathematics, University of Minnesota,hdl:2027/mdp.39015015619276,OCLC681384835.
  • Ahlfors, L. (1986), "Mobius transformations inRnexpressed through 2 × 2 matrices of Clifford numbers ",Complex Variables,5(2–4): 215–224,doi:10.1080/17476938608814142.
  • Brackx, F.; Delanghe, R.; Sommen, F. (1982),Clifford Analysis,Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics,Longman,ISBN0-273-08535-2.
  • Bures, J.; Sommen, F.; Soucek, V.; VanLancker, P. (2001), "Rarita–Schwinger type operators in Clifford analysis",Journal of Functional Analysis,185(2): 425–455,doi:10.1006/jfan.2001.3781.
  • Colombo, F.;Sabadini, I.;Sommen, F.; Struppa, D. (2004),Analysis of Dirac Systems and Computational Algebra,Progress in Mathematical Physics, Birkhauser Verlag,ISBN0-8176-4255-2.
  • Eastwood, M.; Ryan, J. (2007), "Aspects of Dirac operators in analysis",Milan Journal of Mathematics,75(1): 91–116,doi:10.1007/s00032-007-0077-5,S2CID120593186.
  • Friedrich, T. (2000),Dirac Operators in Riemannian Geometry,Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 25,American Mathematical Society,ISBN9780821820551.
  • Jefferies, B. (2004),Spectral Properties of Noncommuting Operators,Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1843,Springer Verlag,ISBN3-540-21923-4.
  • Krausshar, R. S. (2004),Generalized Analytic Automorphic Forms in Hypercomplex Space,Frontiers in Mathematics, Birkhauser Verlag,ISBN3-7643-7059-9.
  • Lawson, H. B.; Michelsohn, M.-L. (1989),Spin Geometry,Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 38, Princeton University Press,ISBN0-691-08542-0.
  • McIntosh, A. (1996), "Clifford algebras, Fourier theory, singular integrals, and harmonic functions on Lipschitz domains", in Ryan, J. (ed.),Clifford Algebras in Analysis and Related Topics,Studies in Advanced Mathematics,CRC Press,pp. 33–87,ISBN0-8493-8481-8.
  • Mitrea, M. (1994),Singular Integrals, Hardy Spaces and Clifford Wavelets,Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1575,Springer Verlag,ISBN0-387-57884-6.
  • Roe, J. (1998),Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods,Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 395Longman(2nd ed.), Harlow,ISBN0-582-32502-1{{citation}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Ryan, J. (1996),Clifford Algebrasin Analysis and Related Topics,Studies in Advanced Mathematics,CRC Press,ISBN0-8493-8481-8.
  • Stein, E.; Weiss, G. (1968), "Generalizations of theCauchy Riemann equationsand representations of the rotation group ",American Journal of Mathematics,90(1): 163–196,doi:10.2307/2373431,JSTOR2373431.
  • Sudbery, A. (1979), "Quaternionicanalysis ",Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,85(2): 199–225,Bibcode:1979MPCPS..85..199S,doi:10.1017/S0305004100055638,S2CID7606387.
  • Tao, T. (1996), "Convolution operatorson Lipschitz graphs with harmonic kernels ",Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras,6:207–218,ISSN0188-7009.
  • Wu, S.(1999), "Well-posedness inSobolev spacesof the full water wave problem in 3-D ",Journal of the American Mathematical Society,12(2): 445–495,doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-99-00290-8.
[edit]